|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Filippo Trevisan www.juzaphoto.com/p/FilippoTrevisan  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: Size, f / 4 constant, sharpness, color rendering, Cut of plans af / 4 Cons: Af cumbersome but precise, the front lens rotates Opinion: Truly staggering when you consider the price at which you buy a canvas "70-200" f / 4. I wanted to replace the Tamron 70-300 VC that I did not like as unfocused and was cumbersome. rnDecido to make the madness and sell a new economic tele-stabilized Ultrasonic af to take this nikon 70-210 .... you say I'm satisfied: increased sharpness, Cut plans af / 4 very nice, compact and with constant travel (what no small feat when compared Tamron pack size of 300 mm). I like a lot the yield of this series AF. Buy rnBest despite the rarity sent on February 16, 2017 |
 | Tokina RMC 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, Dimensions Cons: For the cost nothing Opinion: I tried a focal between 35 and 40 mm equivalent on APS-C Nikon (D7200) to use as a handyman. I came across the tokina almost by accident and, given the truly ridiculous price, I bought it to see if focal eq. really she did for me. Basically I bought it to test 28 mm and resell (even gaining a few tens of euro). I finally held and has won a place in my kit until you get to be my lens street. Crisp, very resolving (24 mpx on the right are not really comfortable ...) and with a nice resa.rnNe recommend buying if you have the luck to find it. sent on February 16, 2017 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Sharpness, screw filter, f / 2.8, construction Cons: Flare, limited zoom range Opinion: First-ever ultra wide-angle must say it is really a goal to have if you have an APS-C kit. Crisp even at TA already af / 5 is a blade. For me it is already irreplaceable for the way I take pictures (I use it for landscape and street) .rnL'f / 2.8 is a plus that pee those who want to try their hand at night photography is essential; not also overlook the fact of the possibility of mounting filters vite.rnCostruzione granite (on my D3200 feels, improves if you use your BG) .rnUnica thing you have to learn to deal with is the tendency to flare ... but nothing dramatic ... you will see that picture once tamed this lens. sent on November 03, 2016 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: focal length, 16 mm, stabilization, sharpness between f / 8 and f / 11, compactness Cons: Vignetting and distortion at 16mm, brightness, "PZ" requires habit Opinion: I use it in conjunction with a Sony NEX-5R taken as the body ultra compact to carry with me always and for this purpose the objective in question is ideal: the ML is ultra-compact and can be worn without feeling clutter. For these purposes the 16-50 kit makes to himself: they range from wide angle to medium telephoto, with all the limitations of the case, of course, but for street and landscape (where you can do without large openings) think it ottimo.rnE 'a honest goal to have it constantly bring home excellent file and on the NEX 5R sensor 16 MPX is really good in my opinion as risolvenza.rnPer against 16 mm with marked distortion (still recoverable PP) but can also be exploited almost like a simil.fish eye (take with tweezers this statement); the problem is that I do not love the strong vignetting in photos but then such a compact lens that ranges from 16 to 50 mm motorized and stabilized optical requires compromise so we can pass sopra.rnIl Power Zoom requires a custom poo but photographing with a ML no viewfinder comes in handy but the first time is difficult. rnConsiglio the purchase of used you saw the price and you have a tuttofre with the footprint of a fixed (with all the compromises necessary). sent on June 03, 2016 |
 | Sony NEX-5R Pros: Compactness, Construction, Quality RAW, Swivel Screen Cons: Honestly at the time no one .... Opinion: I purchased as a second camera body, in reality it is becoming an accessory that I always carry with me like a pair of sunglasses. The low weight and size (with sony 16-50) are compact and allows you to bring more excellent RAW home. rnProprio quality RAW surprised me: the 16-megapixel sensor is great: it generates sharp images with little noise and with bright and vivid colors. He was surprised by the recovery of lights and shadows that you can not get in PP.rnIl Achilles heel was to be the AF but honestly for my kind of picture, for the moment, he never missed a shot (thanks also to that this was the first ML Sony to mount the hybrid AF). RNLA construction in magnesium with a small rubber grip is great, it holds well and the orientation features you can really get creative and use it with a "viewfinder". rn sent on June 02, 2016 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Construction Brand, strength, size Cons: At the time nessuno..forse the jerky head Opinion: Purchased by the dearth of main tripod in some situations: resting on the ground or against a wall offers a good alternative when you leave "light" (perhaps during a visit to a city of art). Bears the weight of D3200 with BG and Tamron VC 70300 .... So for 20 euro I could not ask for more. I recommend it as a ubiquitous accessory in zainoborsa. sent on May 07, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, Brightness, Bokeh Cons: Construction Only DX (but not cost so little if it were otherwise) Opinion: Personally, it was my first hard and makes you really understand what you mean by "depth of field." Montanto of APSC become the most classic of goals: the fifty. The sharpness is excellent from F2.5 up but already at full aperture nn disappoint. Blurred that returns is pleasant and brings out the subject very well. Pleasing the bokeh effect. rnIo I think it's a must have in the kit of a photographer: it makes you discover and love the fixed .... and you create a dependency (pity that Nikon does not devote more fixed DX ... a 20 and a 85 would be perfect). rnAnche on a day with pale and flat light if you play with the details and the depth of field will always bring home good shots ... it teaches you to use your legs instead of zooming and, more importantly, it forces you to think and reflect on composizione.rnPer against the construction is not the best ... leggerino and nut MF dancer ... but the price game ........ rn sent on May 01, 2016 |
 | Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Pros: operating system, Camera, Receiving, Windows 10, Autonomy Cons: Screen HD resolution, Ergonomics, App Opinion: Good smartphone from value great price. Appreciable Windows 10: Simple, clean and allows you to communicate seamlessly with Windows PC 10.rnOttimi Microsoft services such as Weather, Maps (and during photographic output can make a difference) and the voice assistant Cortana.rnComprato mainly for optical Zeiss camera is great for the price range (especially with lots of light) and returns pleasing colors and natural ... it's not like the old Lumia PureView camera but in this price range is unmatched. rnSchermo 5.7 HD resolution (but a full HD would have been better) that offers beautiful colors, it is a quality panel: obviously suffers ergonomics. rnAutonomia monstrous when compared to smartphones hand livello.rnPersonalmente are satisfied sent on April 30, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Quality / price, VC system, pleasing Of Focus, Construction, Lens FF Cons: Brightness (but for the price ......) Opinion: Personally I find this a winning lens from the quality / price ratio: FX VC lens and top of the range. First of all I think is to highlight the fact that the lens is FX and thus of APSC sensor is used only the "heart" of the lens reducing distortion and chromatic aberration (in fact I have not found it). rnUn applaud Tamron for its VC image stabilization system, really good. rnForse a bit more brightness would be welcome ... but then the price would lievitato.rnHo noticed a great blur (bokeh "onion" typical Tamron) in portraiture. rnInsomma a lens that is bought and held in life because it's not extreme classic paintings that always makes comodo.rn sent on April 23, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Pros: zoom range "right", sharpness between f8 and f13, resistance to flare, construction, color rendering Cons: A bit 'dark, lack of window Opinion: I took this as the first goal instead of the classic 18 55 and 18 105. The quality is undoubtedly superior both in level of construction (bayonet metal) and image quality. I have noticed an excellent sharpness from f / 8, but also to defend more openings, the color rendering is good and does not distort the minimum excursion. rnApprezzabile in my view the range of focal lengths covered: in output "light" you can just bring this goal and bring home good images. rnDa a good yield on the latest 24-megapixel sensors from being able to exploit them to meglio.rnMaf through to precise ultrasonic motor, fast and quiet (a proven engine once there it bears more Ultrasonic). Vr effective for focal dell'obbiettivo.rnForse competence a little 'dark, but the aperture is about average for the membership-end objective. The most unsympathetic lack is the window to focus. sent on April 23, 2016 |
 | Nikon D3200 Pros: 24 megapixel sensor, sensor comparable to a medium-high a few years back-end machine, ease of use Cons: skinny commands, keeping more than 400 ISO, MAF Points Opinion: It 'was my first SLR and allowed me to approcciarmi already with a very high quality sensor that allows you to churn out quality files especially if coupled with quality goals. The noise is not excessive up to 800 ISO but it is recoverable, and for a entry level SLR with a sensor so handsome is not bad (about the EXPEED 3) processor. When "we grow" he feels the lack of physical controls (eg double wheel) and a MAF more sofisticata.Comunque is to keep as a second camera body. sent on January 25, 2016 |
 | AmazonBasics Treppiede con impugnatura a pistola 177cm Pros: Stability, Price / quality, interchangeable head Cons: Weight (but if you want stability is the price you pay) Opinion: Bought when he was promoted to almost 50 Euros out of curiosity. I was surprised by the quality of the product (in relation to the price). Stable and secure allows long exposures without fear gives shake, the "legs" opening to allow the spider to indulge themselves with the resume points. Interchangeable head with pistol grip quality: up even heavier camera body and lens does not move. sent on January 25, 2016 |
 | Panasonic Lumix FZ48 / FZ47 Pros: Portability, bright Leica optics, CCD Sensor, Zoom Not exasperated that maintains the quality of the picture. Cons: Do not shoot in RAW, Noise after 400 ISO Opinion: Using this machine for about a year and I'm very happy: it allows me to make good photos in every field of use: from landscape to macro in all light conditions. Excellent build quality of the camera body. The CCD sensor and Leica optics allow you to make sharp images and colors faithful to reality without noise. various shooting programs and well optimized, but I personally do not use as they prefer to give all the settings manually (and from this point of view is a very good car-gym for people like me who started a relatively short time). sent on November 07, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
