JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Lens photo unavailable

The Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1987 to 1992 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 350 €;

39 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	35-70 mm
Angle of view	63.5 - 34.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	15 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	0.60 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Zoom type	Push-pull, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	Yes
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	675 g
Dimensions	71 x 94 mm
Buy
Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8, buy on Ebay

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 226000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Pietro Bazzana

sent on March 01, 2022

Pros: Colors, construction, weight

Cons: suffers parasitic light, sharpness at the edges

Opinion: I highly recommend everyone to try this lens at least once given the charm of having to shoot again by manually managing the focus except when you have a camera body with af engine. It is recommended to always carry the hood with you as it suffers enough from parasitic lights. It loses sharpness at the edges. Low weight even if made of metal

Ernestospaziani

sent on February 01, 2022

Pros: SMALL AND COMPACT WITH 62 FILTERS THAT IT SHARES WITH 20 2.8 AND WITH THE 60 2.8 MICRO AND WITH THE 28-105 3.5-4 FRANK IN EXECUTION AND WITH THE RIGHT FOCAL COLOR AND BLURRED ILLUSTRATION

Cons: BACKLIGHT BUT RESOLVES FOR 80% WITH THE HOOD

Opinion: SOLID OPTICS BUILT VERY WELL PITY THAT THERE ARE MANY COPIES WITH THE CENTRAL DOUBLE OBFUSCATED WITH DETACHMENT OF THE BALM I HIGHLY RECOMMEND I HAD MANY COPIES EVEN THE FIRST I USED IT WITH BLOCKED APERTURE BUT ALREADY IT WAS VERY SATISFACTORY THEN WITH A WORK WORTHY OF THE FRANCHESTIN FROM TWO WE MADE A PERFECT ONE REPLACING THE CENTRAL DOUBLET THAT WAS BLURRED .... THEN SOLD AND BOUGHT BACK... I HOPE IT IS NOW FINAL....

Alle Power

sent on November 20, 2019

Pros: Colors, f2.8 to all focal points, robustness/solidity, possibility of transformation into lens "macro" to 35mm, flare.

Cons: Construction defects, sharpness at the edges especially at TA, flare, front lens that rotates in the maf.

Opinion: Slow that networkse images with the most pasty and less contrasted colors, tending to the heat (very pleasant in some cases). The use of circular polarizing filters is not prohibited, they simply need to be recalibrated when moving the maf, especially when the subject's distance from one maf and the next varies greatly. My specimen (non-D version) was prone to lens opacity, diaphragms > 4 the thing was not noticed, but at 2.8 it almost seemed to have a mattifying mask on the rest of the photo that also dampened the colors as well as clearly sharpness. Vulnerability to flare is indeed a problem in some cases but in others it makes the composition non-trivial and absolutely creative. In fact, the flare it generates (especially without a lampshade) is not incisive or said in a word "ugly" (like those lenses that make the sun all in pointed rays), but it leads to a loss of gradual and nuanced contrast. If your specimen does not have the original Hb-1 lampshade you can find it on e-bay, where the original is equal but plastic at 5 degrees, since the originals travel on 30 degrees.

Emanuel Sanguigni

sent on August 29, 2019

Pros: Price, professional lens, metal, sharp TA, etc...

Cons: Weight and not stabilized

Opinion: After a long time I managed to get one by switching with my D100 plus 50 th in my favor. Brought to clean the lenses because they were matte but with 40 euros I solved. Very satisfied, vintage optics and on D3 and D3s has its own because, also I paired it with the original lampshade and solves many problems in backlight.

Celemattia

sent on February 21, 2019

Pros: Compact, durable, crisp, bright, high quality/price ratio, fast AF (AF-D version)

Cons: Low flare resistance, limited focal range

Opinion: Bought at less than €200 used, in excellent condition (AF-D version). Old Pro Optics with a construction that communicates solidity and resistance. Zoom mechanism with particular pump and subject to "ingestion" of dust. Rotating front lens, so be careful to use circular polarizers. Between ƒ/2.8 and ƒ/4 detectable chromatic aberration, easily correctable in PP. Fast Autofocus, even if not the same as the current AF-S, and also quite noisy (watch out for videos). Macro functionality without AF, a bit complicated in focus, gives a very soft fuzzy. The tightness on the backlight is very bad, you have to pay attention to the parasitic light and often use a hood to avoid falls of contrast even with minimal lateral illumination. My specimen does not have opacification of the posterior doublet, but it is a common problem to be taken into account for this objective.

There are 18 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Break lines

by Commissario71
107 comments, 8854 views

Braies by boat

by Dylan
183 comments, 2345 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Fiumelatte Varenna LC

by 1niko
108 comments, 6971 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

5 snow

by Claudio Santoro
71 comments, 4422 views

VENICE: bow iron 3

by Claudio Santoro
164 comments, 2037 views

HI RES 10.8 MP

The snow ....

by Fulvio Lagana'
84 comments, 4784 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

Venice

by Ellebi
31 comments, 7593 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

7 norway

by Claudio Santoro
74 comments, 3410 views

Lights on the canal

by Lamberto
82 comments, 5790 views

HI RES 4.1 MP

Frost

by Ellebi
17 comments, 3275 views

Our Lady of Health

by Ellebi
30 comments, 4309 views

The Welcome Rest

by Dylan
136 comments, 1896 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

After the snowfall ...

by Fulvio Lagana'
55 comments, 2519 views

Serenity

by Dylan
120 comments, 1091 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

VENICE: bridge of sighs

by Claudio Santoro
210 comments, 2351 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Venezia14

by Ellebi
30 comments, 4251 views

Untitled Photo

by 1niko
67 comments, 4631 views

Untitled Photo

by Manrico Chiti
23 comments, 3295 views

Hi, I am Lulu ,.

by Anttesi
58 comments, 2241 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

The awakening

by 1niko
63 comments, 3771 views

McDonald's

by Ellebi
24 comments, 3108 views

A different day

by Dylan
103 comments, 1850 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

My bike of dreams ...

by 1niko
55 comments, 3979 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Confidences

by Commissario71
25 comments, 2574 views

The rime immobilizes the landscape

by Commissario71
58 comments, 4865 views

Venetian splendor

by Lamberto
98 comments, 6276 views

Details mountain

by Fulvio Lagana'
18 comments, 2594 views

HI RES 10.2 MP

Chioggia14

by Ellebi
21 comments, 4547 views

Autumn colors

by Wonderpig58
113 comments, 3427 views

Alone

by Redel
29 comments, 1170 views

HI RES 23.8 MP

A break in the clouds

by Commissario71
47 comments, 2730 views

Glimpse of Nyhavn

by Dylan
103 comments, 892 views

HI RES 22.1 MP

Red dawn

by Aringhe Blu
21 comments, 1407 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Morning

by Grega30
19 comments, 1438 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Struggling to survive,,,

by Anttesi
164 comments, 2689 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

The tip of Porticello

by Dylan
31 comments, 2286 views

Portrait 6

by Marco De Munari
14 comments, 4535 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8