JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Lens photo unavailable

The Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1987 to 1992 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 350 €;

41 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	35-70 mm
Angle of view	63.5 - 34.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	15 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	0.60 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Zoom type	Push-pull, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	Yes
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	675 g
Dimensions	71 x 94 mm
Buy
Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Pucci Mirti della Valle

sent on November 18, 2024

Pros: Sharpness already from F2.8, cost of used today really inviting, saturated but not "distorted" colors, light and excellently built, internal zoom

Cons: Many specimens lose treatment and create halos (you have to be very lucky in choosing the specimen"

Opinion: I got this NOS lens at a very low price a year ago, today I can spend a few words. I use it in every one of my outings, absolutely everything is done with it; From portraits to landscapes, from street to life style, for me it is the lens that absolutely must always be in the backpack, I use it with FX sensor. It has wonderful detail, always sharp even at TA and I have never encountered any aberrations under any circumstances. It is made of metal but curiously it weighs very little, having also the internal zoom it is a gem "THAT CAN BE DEFINED AS NO LAUGHING MATTER" (Cit. Dogui-Yuppies). It has a very mellow blur which makes it great in portraits as well. Very vivid and saturated colors but absolutely not distorted. You have to get used to the pump mechanism, for the younger or less practical it could be a hassle but after an hour you get used to it. For this characteristic this lens was also called "the vacuum cleaner", but I honestly leave the legend to the storytellers, never had any problem. Many specimens lose the coating to the lenses making the lens unusable (not in my case) so be careful when choosing. Prices are very low today and it is in my opinion a definitive lens, remember that it is 2.8 on the entire focal length, therefore a PRO. I highly recommend it, also because then that you try there it is absolutely impossible not to always have it behind. It doesn't suffer from spinning with its lens hood, without I don't know because I've never taken it off.

Pietro Bazzana

sent on March 01, 2022

Pros: Colors, construction, weight

Cons: suffers parasitic light, sharpness at the edges

Opinion: I highly recommend everyone to try this lens at least once given the charm of having to shoot again by manually managing the focus except when you have a camera body with af engine. It is recommended to always carry the hood with you as it suffers enough from parasitic lights. It loses sharpness at the edges. Low weight even if made of metal

Ernestospaziani

sent on February 01, 2022

Pros: SMALL AND COMPACT WITH 62 FILTERS THAT IT SHARES WITH 20 2.8 AND WITH THE 60 2.8 MICRO AND WITH THE 28-105 3.5-4 FRANK IN EXECUTION AND WITH THE RIGHT FOCAL COLOR AND BLURRED ILLUSTRATION

Cons: BACKLIGHT BUT RESOLVES FOR 80% WITH THE HOOD

Opinion: SOLID OPTICS BUILT VERY WELL PITY THAT THERE ARE MANY COPIES WITH THE CENTRAL DOUBLE OBFUSCATED WITH DETACHMENT OF THE BALM I HIGHLY RECOMMEND I HAD MANY COPIES EVEN THE FIRST I USED IT WITH BLOCKED APERTURE BUT ALREADY IT WAS VERY SATISFACTORY THEN WITH A WORK WORTHY OF THE FRANCHESTIN FROM TWO WE MADE A PERFECT ONE REPLACING THE CENTRAL DOUBLET THAT WAS BLURRED .... THEN SOLD AND BOUGHT BACK... I HOPE IT IS NOW FINAL....

Alle Power

sent on November 20, 2019

Pros: Colors, f2.8 to all focal points, robustness/solidity, possibility of transformation into lens "macro" to 35mm, flare.

Cons: Construction defects, sharpness at the edges especially at TA, flare, front lens that rotates in the maf.

Opinion: Slow that networkse images with the most pasty and less contrasted colors, tending to the heat (very pleasant in some cases). The use of circular polarizing filters is not prohibited, they simply need to be recalibrated when moving the maf, especially when the subject's distance from one maf and the next varies greatly. My specimen (non-D version) was prone to lens opacity, diaphragms > 4 the thing was not noticed, but at 2.8 it almost seemed to have a mattifying mask on the rest of the photo that also dampened the colors as well as clearly sharpness. Vulnerability to flare is indeed a problem in some cases but in others it makes the composition non-trivial and absolutely creative. In fact, the flare it generates (especially without a lampshade) is not incisive or said in a word "ugly" (like those lenses that make the sun all in pointed rays), but it leads to a loss of gradual and nuanced contrast. If your specimen does not have the original Hb-1 lampshade you can find it on e-bay, where the original is equal but plastic at 5 degrees, since the originals travel on 30 degrees.

Emanuel Sanguigni

sent on August 29, 2019

Pros: Price, professional lens, metal, sharp TA, etc...

Cons: Weight and not stabilized

Opinion: After a long time I managed to get one by switching with my D100 plus 50 th in my favor. Brought to clean the lenses because they were matte but with 40 euros I solved. Very satisfied, vintage optics and on D3 and D3s has its own because, also I paired it with the original lampshade and solves many problems in backlight.

There are 19 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Break lines

by Commissario71
108 comments, 11066 views

Braies by boat

by Dylan
208 comments, 4987 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Fiumelatte Varenna LC

by 1niko
112 comments, 8766 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

VENICE: bow iron 3

by Claudio Santoro
186 comments, 4140 views

HI RES 10.8 MP

The snow ....

by Fulvio Lagana'
90 comments, 6320 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

5 snow

by Claudio Santoro
73 comments, 5567 views

Venice

by Ellebi
31 comments, 8828 views

Glimpse of Braies

by Dylan
155 comments, 2808 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

7 norway

by Claudio Santoro
74 comments, 4320 views

Lights on the canal

by Lamberto
82 comments, 7172 views

HI RES 4.1 MP

Frost

by Ellebi
17 comments, 3826 views

Serenity

by Dylan
127 comments, 2507 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

Our Lady of Health

by Ellebi
30 comments, 5105 views

After the snowfall ...

by Fulvio Lagana'
55 comments, 3280 views

VENICE: bridge of sighs

by Claudio Santoro
230 comments, 4292 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

The Welcome Rest

by Dylan
136 comments, 3197 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by 1niko
69 comments, 5886 views

Venezia14

by Ellebi
30 comments, 5126 views

Untitled Photo

by Manrico Chiti
24 comments, 4346 views

Hi, I am Lulu ,.

by Anttesi
58 comments, 3109 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Alone

by Redel
33 comments, 2145 views

HI RES 23.8 MP

The awakening

by 1niko
63 comments, 4659 views

McDonald's

by Ellebi
24 comments, 3724 views

Snowshoeing in the light...

by Fulvio Lagana'
29 comments, 594 views

A different day

by Dylan
103 comments, 2806 views

HI RES 11.5 MP

My bike of dreams ...

by 1niko
57 comments, 4799 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Children at sunset

by Dylan
143 comments, 2726 views

HI RES 20.4 MP

Venetian splendor

by Lamberto
98 comments, 7536 views

The rime immobilizes the landscape

by Commissario71
60 comments, 6033 views

Confidences

by Commissario71
25 comments, 3030 views

Details mountain

by Fulvio Lagana'
18 comments, 3181 views

HI RES 10.2 MP

Chioggia14

by Ellebi
21 comments, 5338 views

Autumn colors

by Wonderpig58
113 comments, 4788 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

A break in the clouds

by Commissario71
47 comments, 3380 views

Red dawn

by Aringhe Blu
21 comments, 1876 views

The tip of Porticello

by Dylan
35 comments, 3075 views

Light in the beech forest...

by Fulvio Lagana'
27 comments, 490 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8