JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon D700 is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 12.1 megapixels manufactured from 2008 to 2012 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 8 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1900 €;
262 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 205000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Robust and indestructible, bright optical viewfinder still excellent today
Cons:a little bit heavy a single scyth of memory.
Opinion:Now I have been using it for about a year, very strong body, I have side by side with my d300s that I have for many hanni and together I am a perfect kit, as long as I have a good back because they both weigh. it is indestructible a real tank with all the buttons in the right place and very ergonomic (especially for me who have large hands) works well with almost all nikon optics (even with older ones you have autofocus because it has an internal motor) tropicalized body and infinite autonomy (with original batter). The files are spectacularly sharp and . , lightweight (with a 32 gb CF you take about a thousand shots in raw and jpeg) held to iso excellent up to about 2000 ISOs good up to 3200 and workable with adequate software up to maximum ISO capacity. In short, I think it is one of the best FF without compromise even today, the song of the nikon home swan that after churning out only small updates but fundamentally the d700 remains the Full Frame par excellence. Today they are too pumped with useless electronics just to sell themselves better. I forgot: Very bright professional optical viewfinder.
Cons:If I really need to find one: in photo view, you use one command to scroll through them, but if the photo is zoomed in, you need to use another one to scroll through the photos. (nonsense anyway). Shooting noise (noisier than the D7100)
Opinion:I'm a simple fan, not a professional. For two months I moved to the D700 after 4 years of D7100, with which I took 37 thousand shots (in turn after 3 years of D3100). The difference can be seen. Definition, focus, image cleaning, color body. On the D7100 I had the Sigma 17-50 2.8, great, but with some front/back focus problems. Now, the D700 is paired with a spectacular, spectacular Sigma 24-105 F4 art, a sniper. D700 purchased at 450 euros, from a private in Germany, with 28 thousand shots, in excellent condition, including original battery grip and five original batteries! Space machine. Of the twelve megapixels you don't notice, especially when the zoom reaches 105mm. In light conditions, I also had to work at ISO 4000, working everything in posts with lightrooms, with spectacular results. Absolutely satisfied!
Opinion:I also find myself commenting on this milestone of photography. I've owned a lot of modern SLRs. Arriving at the Nikon d810 I stopped. I also went through Mirrorless I owned Sony (ff) and Fuji (apsc). It makes me smile that someone comments the video part of any Reflex. I've always thought of it as a honestly. No one makes videos with Reflex machines... so for me the function should be really inhibited (I have seen comparisons between iphone and Red to make pale.. red...). Y with this necessary premise, I, like some of you, found myself buying it for a second time. Taken sold and re-bought. I shoot mainly in analog (Pentax 67 and 645, Hasselblad 500cm) and this is the machine that comes closest to that concept. The sensor was very successful. The colors are mind-blowing. The iso... boh it will be that I reason as if I had a film... I keep them down as much as I can. If it is a static subject easel and I extend the exposure. Otherwise I try to illuminate if possible... It's a beautiful car aesthetically, really beautiful. Bright viewfinder, lightning autofocus, beautiful files. I currently have a 24-70 f2.8 Tamron attached to her. Perfect eh... but as soon as I can I take a 35mm so I also use it with the Fe2. Take it if you take pictures, if you have a concept of real photography. Whose only taste is to find a beautiful photo to do without having to exceed in the crop (better frame or look for a zoom if anything). It's a camera! You won't find (at least I haven't found it yet) a car that takes better photos than this... for concept, colors, sensor density etc... If you have to make videos, taking an iphone from the 11th onwards are unbeatable... If you make videos professionally you will hardly ever get a REFLEX... that's why I often smile at those who put it as a pro/con... Grade 10/10
Pros:Construction, files, materials, everything speaks of quality
Cons:Iso minimums at 200, it's not a feather and it's certainly not in a pocket
Opinion:A "forever" camera, handling it is a pleasure, the photos produced excellent, with a 12-megapixel sensor that look nice comfortable on the full frame format. It is used at low prices, to buy because it is a classic to keep even as a monument :-), I think in fact I will never give it up. Fun to use with any lens in the story Nikon F attack (from Ai onwards). It does almost nothing of modern things: no videos, no immediate sharing with the smartphone, the photographs do them, however, many and easily good. It weighs like a nice brick and stands out for the size and ta-clack of the shot, it's not good for the so-called "stolen" photos, when you look up and shoot it's like saying aloud "look I'm shooting" but if I were to be parachuted into the middle of a cataclysm it's the camera I'd choose
Pros:Gorgeous camera. Excellent file quality, high iso usable, very robust, good focus, excellent burst with grip. Very good is the duration of the stack.
Cons:Very few downsides. Remarkable weight with grip.
Opinion:It's a really good camera and you can buy used it at a definitely low price , in fact nowadays on the used there is a fabulous choice. The quality you get is remarkable, with the holder has a very consistent weight, but it becomes very fast. It certainly does not demonstrate age and can withstand comparison with any other reflex on the market. Of course, like all full frames there is no comparison with small-format machines.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
