JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Don't own it. He suffers, perhaps, in the low lights but it is more than normal for the time of the project.
Opinion:Purchased in 2010, sold, replays for a long time and repurchased. Exceptional tool in the high and medium lights, a bit of suffering in the low. It produces exceptional Jpeg files and NEF workability. Exceptional robustness and unparalleled feeling of security. Setting the buttons more than intuitive. I think that more than 10 years of its marketing Nikon has not done better: some specimens have more than 300,000 shots to the credit without ever needing assistance!
Pros:Ergonomics, keys at the right point, built to last over time, built-in flash, built-in AF illuminator
Cons:No second slot, no silent shutter
Opinion:You want a perfect SLR here you are served! His Majesty D700, the Nikon SLR, with light and detailed files, colors and images "corpose". Compact body, massive and with the controls in the right place. Accurate and reliable AF. In the 2019 D700? If for you the videos are not so important, with a few hundred euros you will have a perfect reflex to blow up your creativity.
Pros:Everything, and even more, by the time he went out. The revolution at hand (albeit with bloody economies) since the D3 was unthinkable, for my wallet and many.
Cons:Nothing, by the time he stepped out (faults?!?). Just some too much artifact in the JPGs (but it's caprine wool).
Opinion:With me from the end 2008 to 2012, was then resolved to a friend who still uses it without problems now in January 2019, now towards the 150,000 shots. It was a milestone of digital photography, more than the D3, of which was the "stripped down" version, almost with the same image quality, and economically more realistic to afford (always around 2000 you had to hunt eh?). The machine that allowed the release, with almost total usability up to ISO 6400 and in some cases even further (with adequate attention, light and postproduction). Usable without major problems even glass "a little ' so" as the old Tamron 70-300 unstabilized (still do it...) and the Nikkor 28-200, not stabilized (which I had bought used, and such resolvated then). A bomb with 50 1.4 G and Col 28-300 VR, as well as a Sigma 24-70 2.8 that gave me great satisfaction. There is nothing more to say except: the JPG... generally excellent (are those who take Raw + jpg, and that you do not have trouble taking the second when it comes out well), had some artifacts probably due to a depth of color or a firmware not at the top : In particular, banding and posterization artifacts, sometimes seen in the Sky and shadows (alongside typical reddish and shelled "pixelloni" nuances). And it could also happen in the Raw, although it usually fixable in post. Nothing else. If you search for a second body to use as a "mule", if you find it as good used to two lire, and if you have enough its 12 mpx (at its time oh if they were!), you can proceed quietly. There were some A3 prints out of fear, never made of larger but I think he held them, with the necessary precautions. Rating: 9, that could be almost 10.
Pros:Ergonomics, solidity, burst with battery grip, lightweight and very workable files, fast and precise focusing
Cons:Lack of a second memory slot
Opinion:Use it as a second body, along with a d800E. Compared to newer FF bodies, the d700 shows the limits of a sensor of more than 10 years (dynamic range, high ISO tightness), but always guarantees to take home the shot. The autofocus is precise and fast, the ergonomics, especially with the battery grip, is very good. The resolution should be assessed to suit your needs, for most of my use was sufficient. In contrast, the lack of a second memory slot is felt, especially in situations where you cannot afford to lose your job. Overall I consider it a very successful machine, definitely one of the best of Nikon
Pros:Of the 2008 ISO seal, practicality and disposition keys, file quality, sturdy, heavy enough to give you safety when you hold it in your hand.
Cons:Nothing to be 2018 and she was born in 2008
Opinion:Arrived yesterday taken for a whim on the advice of a friend of mine photographer I went from d7100 to D700, immediately proved that to say in the field natural colors very realistic, lightmeter works by God I say this because my d7100 overexposed, this instead goes out of his. Proven at ISO 6400 indoors zero color loss compared to my ex dx, you can raise the ISO to the ball certainly degrades but never as a DX sensor, the file is nice CMQ does not lose that much and is very workable with a bit of pp... What about now I will spend my first FX. Highly recommended to those who find a nice used for the cost of the Irisorio compared to new Nikon there is no comparison.. AF is a sniper does not lose a stra fast shot, perhaps the WB known some in accuracy than the d7100 but cmq in PP restores everything. JPG file in neutral gorgeous already ready small levels correction and boom the file shines and is ready to print what say I'm sodisfactissimo for the moment. The Council is a blade...
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
