JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon D700 is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 12.1 megapixels manufactured from 2008 to 2012 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 8 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1900 €;
246 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 188000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Body Pro - intuitive - solid - excellent management for the era of low luc i- clean and light files in both Jpg and Nef and also in Tiff
Cons:Video sector that does not use dilutive Live view poor - few MPX in case of crop pushed. in the same era Canon with the 5D Mk II had a nearly double resolution.
Opinion:I've owned this body for about 3 years. Entered my possession in perfect condition with 84,000 shots by accident. the Canon 5D MK II I had purchased with a defect. Changed on par with the D700. Since then it has been total feeling. I own several newer Nikon bodies, but needless to say, this body is my favorite. It falls into the hand, intuitive solid, a reassuring shutter sound. It suffers a bit from the low lights, but it still shoots at 3200 iso with few interventions in pp. Light Files both Jpg and Nef also snaps in Tiff. All very workable. Few MPX is true but also for this large photodiodes with a very pleasant result reminiscent of analog in some cases. Very recommended. I met a photographer from Florence who never had a problem reached 900,000 shutter shots and it was still working. It has the pop-up flash (great in some cases). The pushed crops obviously do not make for her given the resolution not high, but very valid images even today. In 2019 I recommend to try it and in case you get excited as you did with me... good purchase. really cheap.
Pros:Weight, solidity, controls, "few mp", good hold high ISO
Cons:Weight, "few mp", 95% coverage viewfinder, a single memory slot
Opinion:Purchased for two days to join my D7100. From the few tests done I can only consider myself more than satisfied. Construction of the past and the weight suffers but a lot of solidity and an excellent ergonomics with all the keys in the right place that allow you to never take your eyes off the viewfinder (fantastic with coverage only 95% to get used to). I put the few mpins in both the pros and cons. From one high they allow you to work with the old afd optics getting really good results and the "light" files do not stress the pc in pp. On the other hand you have little chance of crop without letting the quality expire. It holds up to 3200 ISOs and beyond. No micromove problem (in my d7100 is always lurking). For those who, like me, do not have great economic possibilities, I do not think there is anything more convenient for the switch to FF.... over-recommended!
Cons:Don't own it. He suffers, perhaps, in the low lights but it is more than normal for the time of the project.
Opinion:Purchased in 2010, sold, replays for a long time and repurchased. Exceptional tool in the high and medium lights, a bit of suffering in the low. It produces exceptional Jpeg files and NEF workability. Exceptional robustness and unparalleled feeling of security. Setting the buttons more than intuitive. I think that more than 10 years of its marketing Nikon has not done better: some specimens have more than 300,000 shots to the credit without ever needing assistance!
Pros:Ergonomics, keys at the right point, built to last over time, built-in flash, built-in AF illuminator
Cons:No second slot, no silent shutter
Opinion:You want a perfect SLR here you are served! His Majesty D700, the Nikon SLR, with light and detailed files, colors and images "corpose". Compact body, massive and with the controls in the right place. Accurate and reliable AF. In the 2019 D700? If for you the videos are not so important, with a few hundred euros you will have a perfect reflex to blow up your creativity.
Pros:Everything, and even more, by the time he went out. The revolution at hand (albeit with bloody economies) since the D3 was unthinkable, for my wallet and many.
Cons:Nothing, by the time he stepped out (faults?!?). Just some too much artifact in the JPGs (but it's caprine wool).
Opinion:With me from the end 2008 to 2012, was then resolved to a friend who still uses it without problems now in January 2019, now towards the 150,000 shots. It was a milestone of digital photography, more than the D3, of which was the "stripped down" version, almost with the same image quality, and economically more realistic to afford (always around 2000 you had to hunt eh?). The machine that allowed the release, with almost total usability up to ISO 6400 and in some cases even further (with adequate attention, light and postproduction). Usable without major problems even glass "a little ' so" as the old Tamron 70-300 unstabilized (still do it...) and the Nikkor 28-200, not stabilized (which I had bought used, and such resolvated then). A bomb with 50 1.4 G and Col 28-300 VR, as well as a Sigma 24-70 2.8 that gave me great satisfaction. There is nothing more to say except: the JPG... generally excellent (are those who take Raw + jpg, and that you do not have trouble taking the second when it comes out well), had some artifacts probably due to a depth of color or a firmware not at the top : In particular, banding and posterization artifacts, sometimes seen in the Sky and shadows (alongside typical reddish and shelled "pixelloni" nuances). And it could also happen in the Raw, although it usually fixable in post. Nothing else. If you search for a second body to use as a "mule", if you find it as good used to two lire, and if you have enough its 12 mpx (at its time oh if they were!), you can proceed quietly. There were some A3 prints out of fear, never made of larger but I think he held them, with the necessary precautions. Rating: 9, that could be almost 10.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
