The Nikon AF 20mm f/2.8 D is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1989 to 2016 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 614 €;
52 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 193000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Optical yield with closed diaphragms. Microcontracting and chromatic rendering. Compactness and weight.
Cons:Detail to open diaphragms edges. AC evident at the edges. Beware of the flare.
Opinion:On D810 already sharp at f/2.8 centrally but to have acceptable edges you need to work at least f/5.6. However, to have the best you need to close at least f/8 - f/11. Until f/11 the dif-break is still under control, at f/16 (on D810) begins to soften the details. The color rendering compared to the new 20mm 1.8G I find it better as the colors are more muted and less contrasted (cursed G...). The general microcontract looks better as well as the tonal passages. It suffers a lot of AC compared to the nikon 14-24mm 2.8G not to mention the Zeiss 21mm 2.8 which is practically perfect (with the software however it resolves well). It's an optics that I used a lot on film and still today it can be used on digital as long as you know the limits especially to the edges to the most open diaphragms. Do I recommend it? Depends on usage. If your photograph focuses on the subject in the middle-central field the 20 AFD is fine. If you need sharpness at the edge level of the frame up to edges then better consider other optics.
Pros:Small size, low weight, 52mm filters, overall yield (colors, microcontrast, tonal steps), good resistance to flare.
Cons:Less sharp than the 20mm f1.8G between f2.8 and f5.6 (above virtually equal), not tropicalized.
Opinion:I carried out intensive testing within a day, so for long-term opinions I will update if I notice differences. Let's start against: less sharp than the 20mm f1.8G between f2.8 and f5.6. Not tropicalized. End. As a overall rendering I prefer it to my already loved 20mm f1.8G. Better tonal steps, best microcontrast with lower general contrast, best tonal steps (already said, I repeat to reiterate the concept), more open shadows. I mean, it's an old-fashioned view. Why did I take it despite already having 20mm f1.8G? Because I love the yield of the d series (currently I have 20mm, 35mm, 50mm and 85mm) and especially because you do not beat it for weight and small size. Working the photo in pp gets sharpness comparable to 20mm f1.8 G. If the most extreme edges are a problem, just cut them out (taking them into account when shooting). The coma at the corners on ff is scary, but again, I crop them into pp and farewell problem. A view that won me over. Update: After a few days of use, coupled with my D600, this lens gave me some of my most beautiful shots.
Pros:Dimensions, lightness, construction, general yield
Cons:To be used on FX, on DX it goes bad. Af noisy
Opinion:The vintage alternative, compact and better built to the current line of the G series. Sharpness still good already at f / 4 (on full frame) and excellent at intermediate diaphragms, on the contrary it is less resolving. Returns colors vaguely warmer than the latest generation lenses and is less contrasted, features that can be appreciated in the landscapes. Compactness remains its great advantage over current fixtures and zooms, while maintaining good image quality.
Opinion:I used this analogue for years mainly for DIA, excellent lens for both landscape and interior and street, I really liked the color rendering and the low distortion considered the focal, and optics with dimensions and weights liable compared to the same focal length nowadays.rnVenduto to change system and then bought back to use on Canon FF, then resold later to purchase 16/35 f4 IS, the only flaw that I found is in the shots against the light and mainly in digital, problem that in analogy I had not noticed or at least was much less marked.rn
Cons:Autofocus governed only by the camera body. Poor tightness in the backlighting
Opinion:Purchased this lens especially for its lightness and compactness, I was amazed by its performance even on a demanding camera such as the D810. The photos produced by this pair are sharp and with bright colors, especially on shades of blue. Like all the optics of the Afd series, I suffer a little backlighting and does not have a hyper reactive AF. In any case recommended if you love light and defined wide-angle lenses.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.