JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 178000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Noise starts from 1600 ISO - AWB - AF that sometimes tempses (perhaps due more to optics) - size - live view
Opinion:A great machine with which I have a relationship of love and hate. Sometimes I wonder how I can do without it, others I would give it away because I feel more inspired and creative with smaller machines (like GR or Rx100 M3 that I own). Objectively speaking has so many pros: one of all the files that are easily workable and allow recoveries of shadows and high lights that make the difference between an acceptable photo and one that you have to trash. On the other, the noise begins to be visible already at 800 iso. Up to 1600-3200 you can still push as long as you intervene on the noise in pp. Besides it is advisable to go only in extreme cases (I set max iso 6400....more on is useless just that shots). Another thing, often sets an AWB that is incorrect. The burst mode with AF-C, struggles to focus the subject during movement (tried with all Nikon optics). The live view is.... Embarrassing.... I challenge anyone to use it except for some landscape on the tripod.
Opinion:Excellent Photographic Medium, has an excellent sensor, really strong retrieves, great detail and allows you to always have a balanced exposure pulling out all the colors of the scene. The AF is great for the camera type, very reliable and fast, it sins like burst, at the limit of the sufficiency with a limited buffer. The light meter in strong contrasts goes crazy, forcing you to use either the spot point or the LV, practically tends to always overexpose if you have an illuminated sky, burning it completely to safeguard the parts in the shade... That would still recover very well if totally subjected. I would have kept it but I had dirt problems at the sensor, I ordered a D7500.
Pros:Well-made Body, sturdy and ergonomic, idem autofocus
Cons:It Makes plastic photos, I don't know how to define them, then the JPEGS are mixed.
Opinion:I've already said it all in the cons. They Look beautiful files only if you have not seen anything else. Bought and sold after a week. Much better at equal price a D700, at least it's a FF. Too Bad because the body is done well, even the noise of the shutter is discreet. It'S like designing a beautiful car but then going astray.
Pros:Well-built body (semi-Pro), good combinations of programmable controls, high ISO yield optimal for the DX category
Cons:Live view to forget
Opinion:The price at which it is today is a bargain! The machine is well studied in the controls and in the body with a minimum of tropicalization (fortunately you can set the ISO key near the shutter, it took me a while to find it). Very good Autofocus, accurate with the right lenses. Double slots and the possibility of hooking the BG are features that make it truly a semi-pro (unlike the D7500). Excellent performance of the sensor, it is also very sharp. The high ISO yield is excellent for a DX format: together with the noise reduction settable from the menu, it produces excellent results even at 2000iso, besides it gets worse but up to 4000 still holds well. Anyway the recovery in post is incredible, the files are super workable. Negative vote for Live View, auto focus from shame and unprecise. In conclusion a very good reflex, will give more throat for a while to the new DX!
Pros:What about, coming from an Olympus e520, which, at the time while in 4/3 format was at the top of the entry level and that already had so many functions recently introduced by Nikon, the leap was remarkable. Fast Autofocus, yield up to 4000 ISO and good more up, heavy files and Treatabilissimi. Loving the pushed wide angles, with objectives of this type at full aperture, in my opinion, practically insuperable. Decidedly exhaustive and powerful manual (both manuals about 800 pages), which however allows you, explaining the best, to squeeze it to the fullest. Not using the live view do not express opinions about, but are follower of contortions. Very useful the battery pack that on the 7500 can not be mounted and that allows a autonomy to say the least monstrous. Very useful double slot for memories. As said use wide angle pushed, but also with the zoom 18/140 and absolutely superb, with the 50mm is the Queen of portraits. A nice 9.
Cons:Maybe the price even though it's out of production now.
Opinion:Super!!!!! Absolutely to recommend and those who find it used, of course in good condition, not if you let it escape in any way. The only way to overcome it is a ff of a good standard and anyway even in that case keep it spare if need be. If I were to buy it back immediately. I still have to try it with the flash, but if the assumptions are these, the result can only be super.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
