JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 177000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sensor, EXPEED3 processor already very good, noiselessness shutter, dynamic range, ISO tightness more than good.
Cons:Maybe (but really maybe) the concentration of 39 points autofocus and burst not very fast, but only for those who do naturalistic photos. But that kind of photography unless you talk about camera bodies from 51 points and 10 fps burst, the rest is too little anyway unless you talk about a D4s or a D5.
Opinion:I bought it two years ago, coming from the D700, then already a fantastic reflex. The difference in dynamic range and acquired details is very relevant, as is the ISO seal. The controls are comfortable and even the ISO setting, with the ISO compensation feature, becomes easy to handle with the camera's rear wheel, avoiding the automatic ISO mode, not always adequate. Sorry that you miss the rear AF-ON button. The discussions on Pro body, semi Pro or FF entry level are academic, because everything always depends on what the camera body we want and what kind of photography we do. I do landscapes and street predominantly and for this kind is widely satisfactory even in low light conditions.. But with a good lens you compensate. The weight is not impossible and always better than the 950 g of the D700. The D750 that I possess has something more certainly, starting with the sensor Expeed 4, but the D610 is really good. The true flaw more than the concentration of autofocus points is the number of autofocus points (39) and the focus speed, but it always depends on what kind of photography we make. For a passionate landscape photo goes excellently and also in the macro is very good. I'm satisfied.
Opinion:I have this car for a few months now and I have to say that it was a surprise right away. It will be the huge leap from my old D80, it will be that of against this machine has very few, but I can not find obvious flaws except the limitedness of the AF points. The dynamic range is extraordinary, the ISO seal is very convincing (I find the images produced with 6400 very usable). It has the double SD slot (huge comfort) and the socket I find it, personally, very comfortable. Of course it weighs a bit, but it's a fullframe! Would I recommend it? Yes, at today's used prices. To pick it up new, with the market in fibrillation post entry in the scene of Nikon Mirrorless FX, I would think twice: with a relatively small effort plus you manage to bring home the d750 which has a better AF system.
Pros:Full frame sensor, dynamic range, noise Iso high Medil
Cons:Weight, slow af low brightness (good to high light)
Opinion:I own this d610 for a year, coupled with the mythic "Tamron 2.8 VC first series and the immense 50ino 1.8 g Nikon! Mind-blowing sensor, phenomenal image recovery, ISO hold up to 4000 very good ISO, at 6400 grain present, but correctable in post! The dolelent note is the weight. Also used during the trips is felt on the shoulders and neck, but it gives you images of a bill so high, that makes you forget the bad ones taken because of him. Great price in the used, I highly recommend to switch to FF. Odious the key to the ISO that forces you to remove your hand from the lens to modify them!
Opinion:Perfect machine to enter the full frame, and except professional needs of niche, also excellent for working. Sensor, autofocus, dual SD slot, ergonomics. I don't understand what you want more from a car. Sony offers a car similar to 3 times the price of this (A7III), and sincerely except sports Photography The difference is not there. In fact, with this you can stop having the anxiety for the batteries. Maybe now for 200 \ \ 300 € should go directly to D750, but they are calculations that everyone must make themselves. About the ergonomics then in my opinion Nikon is coming years ahead at all. Gripping a Nikon seems to have an extension of its arm. Maybe less resistant in time than a Canon 5d, but as a feeling of use are unparalleled. I now use Sony and I wouldn't go back, but I still miss grabbing a Nikon and feel how ergonomic the grip is... For those who do not know the Nikon sensors The dynamic range is exaggerated, you will recover the impossible. Also excellent for amateurs who want a car to enjoy photography in serenity without many technological bells of dubious usefulness
Pros:sharpness, color range, ISO seal, weight, price. Double SD slot.
Cons:ISO key inconvenient, slow AF. Not very ergonomic handle.
Opinion:Excellent reflex. a clarification. If you set the Flash to 1/200 * and you have a high speed flash you can shoot up to 1/4000. I took a bat in flight at 1/1250 with Flash godox 860ii. I own the d7500. The d610 is slower in AF, but recovers in sharpness or crop. I find it fabulous for macro (even freehand) color range and sharpness higher than the d7500 that I remember mounts sensor and processor of the d500. I highly recommend it.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
