JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD : Specifications and Opinions

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

The Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 324 €;

462 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-300 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 8.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	17 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	1.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.25x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	765 g
Dimensions	82 x 143 mm
Buy
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 231000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Timk2

sent on December 25, 2015

Pros: Usability, as a telephoto zoom package; image quality; effective vibration control; Price; Build/cost ratio; decent lenshood

Cons: Focus isn't the quickest;

Opinion: Update: I've replaced the old model with a brand new exact same one (apparently, the buyer of the old lens had it repaired and a loose wire inside was responsible for the hit and miss VC fault, so not necessarily a fault with the design) and upgraded the D7000 to the 24mp no alias filter D7100 and the images are now even sharper! Review: My 5 year old model has produced over 25,000 images and it still is THE zoom I use for most telephoto applications. The VC function has now become hit and miss, now, the only sign of wear it shows and if I were to replace it (not worth cost of repair), it would be with the exact same model. Being a Nikon user, I cannot use the Canon L, which I understand is the only lens of the same spec that competes with this Tamron. And why not the Nikkor 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR, that would surely be my target? Well, I had one of those and it broke quite quickly. The Nikon did display excellent contrast and sharpness at lower focal lengths and in the centre of the frame and its VR is quicker to activate and quieter in operation. This makes the Nikon better than this Tamron for action and wildlife, where central image is more important. The Tamron SP however, is the better all round lens for travel, architecture and landscapes. The VC, once activated (takes a short time) literally holds its subject like glue. The distortion is much less than the Nikon (the Nikon had such pincushion at 300mm, you could see it in the viewfinder!) and the plentiful sharpness is more even and across the frame. Even the so difficult 300mm at f5.6 produces a very acceptable image - I'd be happy to shoot at this to isolate my subject - and often do. It won't be as sharp as a fixed focal, of course, the contrast a little less too, I find f9 to be the sweet aperture here, f8 at lower focal lengths. but in the everyday practicality, the Tamron is good to use and one can have confidence in it. Of good solid weight, it can be handheld with confidence, though if I have a criticism, the rather front weighted bulk on camera means it can be difficult to use on a tripod, especially in the vertical position. It's not especially easy to use in manual focus but SO much easier than the Nikon, which had an awfully thin and awkwardly placed focus ring. And if you think that such lenses are only used with AF, the true landscaper will often find very low light and low contrast subjects, such as after sunset. With the D7000, AF can find and lock onto subjects to a surprising degree but when it loses it, it annoyingly goes through the entire focus path and you have to interrupt the shot, and reset the focus manually and your subject is gone. But then, that can happen with almost all lenses, after all. Lastly, I was pleasantly surprised to find that I could use my Sigma EX 1.4x APO teleconverter with it! And with pretty fair results, giving a 560mm equivalent foccal length on DX, even if I do choose to use f9 or smaller and best of all, the VC works then too, reigning in all that huge potential for severe camera shake. Has to be as near to 10/10 in practical terms, especially when the modest price is concerned. If nothing else, this lens has been the 5th most used optic by Juza users for as long as I've been on the site myself - we can't all be wrong!

Stevenchadg

sent on January 16, 2015

Pros: just the right wight and fill of the lens ....the VC is great but tricky i will explain later the glass used in this lens is great. and a 6 year warranty

Cons: variable aperture F/4--5.6 so it is dim but you get use to it. i wish tamron would just made it a F/4 only .... shooting at high iso sometimes in order to keep your shutter speeds up because its tack sharp at F/8 thru F/11

Opinion: I think for the price its a steal!!!! i know it came out in 2010 but it is still a great lens to have in 2015 do a internet search you hear a lot of great reviews for it now with that being said here is my issue with this lens now it might be just me with these issue . i have a nikon D7000 i use back button focus but when i use this lens the VC does not work sometimes i have to ease down the shutter button then let it kick in then fully press it down to snap a photo.i was getting so frustrated so i decide to switch back to normal use where you half way press down the shutter button to bring it in to focus then full pressed to snap a photo... when it was like this the lens work great no issue no problems with the VC it work normal and great the only other issue i have is shooting high iso i am use to shooting with fast zooms and prime and not having to use high iso this is my first time shooting over 1000 iso. so that was something i had to get use to so you have to know just how high you can go before noise sets in and set your auto iso that is how i use this lens i set my auto iso at 1/100 sec and auto iso at 100 to 2000 iso and so far my normal iso has been between 100 to 1600 iso it depends on if you are shooting in the shade or in the sun. i also use spot metering or center metering so if you just got this lens take some time and learn what works best for your camera and you.its a great lens but i had to learn how to use it in order to get the best out of it. i guess thats what i get from using primes so much lol

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Paolowsky84

sent on December 12, 2022

Pros: Image quality for what it costs, just know how to use it and churns out excellent images even in theater and night concerts. Lightweight and with a stabilizer still very good. I repeat, everything for its price is great!

Cons: At 300mm you notice the loss of detail but it is completely normal, both for the physics of that lens and for the price. I must say that it loses little anyway, I thought worse.

Opinion: It is a lens that has accompanied me since 2012, very happy that everything works (including autofocus) with the FTZ II I will continue to use it profitably! It has a nice quality and I repeat for the price you spend on this lens is really a monstrous value for money! The only flaw is the loss of detail at 300mm, not huge but still noticeable, you have to be good at shooting in that focal length when you have a perfect light!

Riccardo Arena Trazzi

sent on October 21, 2022

Pros: Great first telephoto lens, crazy stabilization

Cons: AF not lightning, loses a little over 200mm but it is there.

Opinion: This is the telephoto lens that comes to mind when they ask me "which first telephoto lens do you recommend?" Here, this is the easiest to use. Not in a negative sense. It has a scary stabilization for the price it has. I took it many years ago at 300 euros but today it is also used at 150 euros, what do you want to say? Autofocus is honest. It is a fairly fast and accurate ultrasonic USD on stationary subjects, on moving subjects it is not a Canon L-series lens USM. And what did you expect? It costs a tenth! Of course, but it is good to reiterate it. Let's say that qualitatively up to 200mm it holds a very good blow, comparable to the 70-200 f / 4 L IS I Canon, from 200 to 250mm it becomes sufficient, beyond it becomes mediocre. For those who love the 70-300 range its competitor is the 70-300 L which has better performance but weighs more and used is 500 euros.

Man-Trip29

sent on February 08, 2022

Pros: Stabilized, focal range, price

Cons: Sharpness at 300mm not excellent

Opinion: Taken used to replace an earlier Tamron 70-300 (not stabilized). They are two completely different worlds since with the previous lens to pull out a decent photo you had to be lucky. With the stabilized version the opinion is positive, the color rendering and the overall quality is satisfactory even if from 250 mm you lose the detail (but there can be and in any case nothing dramatic). The construction of the lens is good, as is the petal hood as well. Being a pushed canvas obviously it is bulky, although not excessively heavy, but after all finding similar lenses with reduced dimensions and dimensions is impossible. Very responsive autofocus (detail not obvious). Recommended for the excellent quality-price as well as for the availability in the world of second-hand.

There are 189 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

After a dip ... shake ...

by Stef54
197 comments, 47084 views [editors pick]

HI RES 20.0 MP

Walking the Dog

by Timk2
338 comments, 38045 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Look

by Peter Pipistrello
205 comments, 44091 views

HI RES 12.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Nick1979
160 comments, 11325 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.6 MP

The dance

by Italystile
171 comments, 49322 views

Frost

by Bruno Pisani
69 comments, 12954 views [editors pick]

Crimson sky

by Ulysseita
76 comments, 21035 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The Fisherman of Dreams

by Fabiodistefano72
85 comments, 5187 views [editors pick]

HI RES 14.1 MP

Dogs pedestrian

by Damicfra
141 comments, 12514 views

Walk the line

by Cristina Giani
108 comments, 13717 views

On ray of light

by Fulvio Gioria
174 comments, 16219 views

Valentine-Falzes and Rieserferner

by Lucapucci
107 comments, 20638 views

HI RES 15.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by Nick1979
137 comments, 6443 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Closer

by Ulysseita
53 comments, 26808 views

Not just flowers

by Fabio.Whitebread
130 comments, 7769 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Kissed by the sun.

by Carlo Bassi
182 comments, 8191 views

HI RES 4.9 MP

Freestyle

by Carlo Bassi
135 comments, 4909 views

HI RES 4.6 MP

Narrow streets

by Nick1979
126 comments, 7837 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Eyes

by Ulysseita
30 comments, 17925 views

Waiting for the night

by Cristina Giani
75 comments, 19465 views

The fog of early morning

by MadEmilio
71 comments, 7832 views

The tree

by Carlo Bassi
177 comments, 10709 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The mirror of the soul (tough version)

by Massimiliano Montemagno
127 comments, 14862 views

I do not fassar so '...

by Alby67
83 comments, 12263 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

Kensington High Street

by Ulysseita
27 comments, 16869 views

Val d'Orcia

by Carlo Bassi
123 comments, 3730 views

Il pioppeto

by Lupo Manulo
106 comments, 7374 views

HI RES 23.5 MP

Squatting

by Ricaro
51 comments, 9663 views

As if by magic

by Massimiliano Montemagno
85 comments, 22248 views

Alba Marina

by Fabio.Whitebread
111 comments, 5611 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Sunset at the bag of Scardovari

by Carlo Bassi
173 comments, 11584 views

Magic Val d'Orcia 2

by Carlo Bassi
136 comments, 12065 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

FreeStyle

by Carlo Bassi
162 comments, 13008 views

Fallen Angel

by Evanescentangel
65 comments, 21307 views [editors pick]

Untitled Photo

by Nick1979
109 comments, 4564 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Reflections

by Italystile
70 comments, 20104 views

The light at the end of the tunnel

by Flavio Paganelli
124 comments, 7061 views

HI RES 22.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD