|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dinofer www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dinofer  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 55mm f/2.8 Micro AI-s Pros: Very simple, it's probably the best optics ever built. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: Optical of superlative quality even if dated and out of production for a long time. Manual focus may be an inconvenience for some, but it's worth owning in the kit. I used it for about 20 years with excellent results then, switching to digital, I abandoned it, always regretting it. Very manoeuvrable and light, it remains a milestone in its field. sent on December 27, 2023 |
 | Nikon 1 VR 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 Pros: Nothing Cons: All. Very mediocre quality and indecent construction. Opinion: I have 4 Nikon 1 series 10-30 lenses and, almost simultaneously, the inscription appears that the lens does not work and contact the manufacturer. This is for all 4 optics. I wonder if it is a separate thing of jokes or it is a diabolical combination. The fact is that I will repair only two, just because I use them so much. However, I do not think that products of this kind should be marketed. sent on March 15, 2023 |
 | Nikon 1 V3 Pros: I should think about it for a few years. Cons: Use of micro sd ridiculous however difficult, minimum battery life, but it will be the fault of the batteries, very small size. Opinion: Having already a J1 and a V1, I wanted to try a V3, found at an affordable price. Without the grip it would be almost impossible to handle it and without the viewfinder it would be really incomplete, so it is almost obligatory to have them. The yield is identical to that of the other mirrorless series j and V1 , with the difference that the V1 is more solid and has a really good battery. So............ A smart camera ? sent on October 16, 2022 |
 | Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: More than excellent quality, very handy and light. Cons: The focus sometimes goes jerky. Opinion: A lens that is at ridiculous prices but has a truly exceptional quality . Very light and handy does not make you regret at all the older brother 2.8 which has a weight comparable to that of a battleship. I also own the brightest one, but I almost always use this one at f 4 fixed. The yield is almost equal . Excellent sharpness and colors. sent on March 06, 2022 |
| Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: More than excellent quality, very handy and light. Cons: The focus sometimes goes jerky. Opinion: A lens that is at ridiculous prices but has a truly exceptional quality . Very light and handy does not make you regret at all the older brother 2.8 which has a weight comparable to that of a battleship. I also own the brightest one, but I almost always use this one at f 4 fixed. The yield is almost equal . Excellent sharpness and colors. sent on March 06, 2022 |
 | Nikon D1h Pros: It provides a beautiful and original file. Cons: Almost non-existent battery life, small monitor. Opinion: A camera that is worth trying your hand at. The file is really nice, but the shot must be perfect, because it would not be workable. It doesn't get to high ISO and the battery life is staggeringly low. Its monitor is small. All characteristics due to his age therefore understandable. However, it remains a fascinating camera, like the D1 and D1X. It's proof that megapixels basically don't matter much if there's a quality sensor. sent on January 29, 2022 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Very easy judgment: splendid goal. Excellent colors, super sharpness and remarkable robustness of construction. Cons: To say nothing, even if it is a dated perspective. Brightness is certainly not the strong point, but you have to overcome the inconvenience. Opinion: As with other discontinued lenses, this one also proves to be nothing short of exceptional. The price of the used is certainly affordable and it is worth having it at hand, because it is useful on many occasions. I use it with the Nikon D 300s, superlative camera and with the D 200, another truly inimitable example of the Nikon park and the yield is certainly excellent. sent on January 15, 2022 |
 | Nikon AF 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: Total and absolute quality. Sharpness, colors, focus, lightness. Cons: Nothing to report. Opinion: Simply an exceptional lens . Out of fashion, outdated? Not at all. With little money you can buy a high-level optics that has nothing to envy to the current ones. It is also light and easy to handle, which is now rare, unless you use horrendous and junk plastics. It is definitely worth having it in your kit. sent on October 06, 2021 |
| Nikon AF 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: Total and absolute quality. Sharpness, colors, focus, lightness. Cons: Nothing makes you report. Opinion: Simply an exceptional lens . Out of fashion, outdated? Not at all. With little money you can buy a high-level optics that has nothing to envy to the current ones. It is also light and easy to handle, which is now rare, unless you use horrendous and junk plastics. It is definitely worth having it in your kit. sent on October 06, 2021 |
 | Sony NEX 5T Pros: File quality certainly very good, sharpness and excellent grain. Excellent yield even at 3200 iso, which is not bad. Cons: The menu is quite complicated, and if you are not careful, you easily change the settings. The duration of the battery is definitely insufficient , as in many other cameras and it is better to have several spare. Obviously charged. No viewfinder. Opinion: A camera that provides a certainly excellent file and is not afraid of comparisons with other more famous. It is found in the used at really attractive prices. Practical and handy uses a wi fi that really works in spite of other brands where this remains a chimera. Given its small size, it is better to have one at hand. sent on August 19, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Robust, precise, economical. Cons: Maybe the brightness. Opinion: Lens that is used at very low prices and, combined with old but super cameras, such as the D 300, the D 300 S or the D 200 can offer performance to say the least excellent. It is not bright, but it is normal and it is better to always have it at hand. Surely you will not regret the purchase. I have two, precisely with D 300 S and D 200, which, apart from the limited sensitivity is a super excellent camera. sent on July 19, 2021 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Excellent file quality, robust, ergonomic, good ISO seal, very fast even without grip. Really useful double slot. Cons: Nothing to declare. Opinion: A great camera to say the least, definitely one of the best ever. It is located on the used at an affordable price and is worth having. I also have the D300, but that's another thing. It grips beautifully and always provides excellent performance. I often use it with the excellent 18-70 and the yield is super. The battery life, now proven, is good. sent on March 18, 2021 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: The quality of the file of absolute and unsurpassed value. Very handy and light, on display is perfection, it never goes wrong. Great yield even in high ISOs. Cons: Hard to find flaws. Opinion: A truly exceptional camera that confirms that there are no comparisons between the full frame and the smaller format. I've been using the D700s for years which are maybe even more robust, but the 810, as it shoots, already feels the difference. The use of the double card is also very valid and always comes in handy. Even the battery, although small, is already very tested and reliable. sent on February 12, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: Incredible image quality. Colors, sharpness, tonal gradation, everything is great. Cons: Automatically you have to be careful to set A or P. Opinion: I don't know if it's the car or the fantastic 16-55 3.5, however it's a stunning camera. I don't think there's any better quality among all the other machines. I used it for several years, now I have to throw it away because, after a few shots, it says to me " Protected memory" and it freezes for a few days. Amazing, but you can't do anything. If sending it to support, it's cheaper to get a golden one. I'm going to look for a used one. sent on November 21, 2020 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 Pros: Super quality compact. Very handy and quite intuitive as a menu, although it could improve. It also provides notable raw files. Cons: Battery life, lack of scope. Opinion: Camera certainly quality, in fact the price on the used is still remarkable despite the years. It's better to always have it with you, because it can often come in handy. The battery has a very limited charge. Like many other cameras the coating rubber tends to come off and this is an unbearable defect. sent on August 27, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-T1 Pros: High quality files for sharpness, colors and grits. Cons: On-off button to use continuously. Insufficient battery life. The Joy stick is extremely complicated in use, because it is very small Opinion: This camera confirms fuji's exceptional level in this area. Used with the 16-50 proves all its quality. The battery life is not remarkable, but with the grip, it increases the range and also the ergonomics. Like other x-series cameras, the ability to use the "film" type greatly increases the results. sent on August 03, 2020 |
 | Nikon D2x Pros: Professional camera of excellent quality, the file is good even if you have to use only low sensitivity, super battery life. Cons: Not very fast as fire and click, the file does not convince me at all. Limit in ISO, but it's normal. Opinion: I purchased this camera and a D2H and I prefer by far the second for weight, handling, absolute speed of focus and shooting and especially for the much more pleasant file type. They can be found at decidedly low prices, but on the other hand you will have authentic flagships in their field, able to cope with any other more modern and sophisticated camera. sent on August 02, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II Pros: Exceptional optics, plastic but very robust, precise and quiet. Cons: No cons, apart from the brightness, but it's a little detail. Opinion: This objective is located in the second-hand market at a very affordable price and provides respectable performance. Okay with the various cameras in the X series : I have XE1, XM1 and XT1 and I feel great with all of them. Quality is not afraid of comparisons with other cameras (not full frame of course). We must never forget to use the lampshade which is really indispensable. sent on July 19, 2020 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Gorgeous camera. Excellent file quality, high iso usable, very robust, good focus, excellent burst with grip. Very good is the duration of the stack. Cons: Very few downsides. Remarkable weight with grip. Opinion: It's a really good camera and you can buy used it at a definitely low price , in fact nowadays on the used there is a fabulous choice. The quality you get is remarkable, with the holder has a very consistent weight, but it becomes very fast. It certainly does not demonstrate age and can withstand comparison with any other reflex on the market. Of course, like all full frames there is no comparison with small-format machines. sent on July 07, 2020 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Pros: Poor lens goal. They are sold at an affordable price. Cons: Scary, indecent mechanics. slow and difficult focus, when it works and that is very rarely. Opinion: I bought two of these goals, completely the same , I paid them a discreet price, but they are completely useless. Despite a repair they are equally at the same level ie do not go into focus . I'm going to throw them in the trash can which is their ideal location. It seems absurd to me that they build things like that. sent on May 09, 2020 |
 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Pros: Exceptional file quality. Outdated camera, but hardly passable. Cons: Very small, typical Sony menu, that is, very complicated and difficult. Battery autonomy quite limited. Opinion: An out-of-production camera that you can find used at a good price. The Zeiss 2.8 optics are the highest as quality., plus focus and zoom are manual and very precise. The viewfinder and monitor are definitely too small, but it's worth a try. The battery has a slightly too limited lifespan as are the iso usable, at most 800.A 80 and 100 iso is unrivaled. sent on May 02, 2020 |
 | Sony RX10 Pros: Really super file quality, great viewfinder, effective focus, good sequence. Menu better than other Sony store. Cons: The price still very high in the used. The impression that, using it a lot, deteriorates a lot. Opinion: In the bridge industry definitely an excellent camera, especially when compared to other type Nikon coolpix P 900. Unsurpassed Zeiss optical quality, remarkable 2.8 brightness and effective viewfinder, much more than many competitors. Unfortunately the price is still exaggerated. The video is of excellent quality. sent on March 03, 2020 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P1000 Pros: Long focal. End of the positives. Cons: Over 200-400 iso indecent quality. Big weight. It can only be used with a lot of light. Slow focus. Ridiculous battery life. Shamefully slow sequence. Opinion: I bought this camera, already having a P 900, because I would need an all-rounder, but I was wrong resoundingly . The file quality is acceptable only to 100 iso, as the P 900, onward, becomes increasingly poor. A camera whose price is very high and totally absurd, should cost much less than half, but no more. sent on July 21, 2019 |
 | Nikon D3400 Pros: Very little, only the high iso. Cons: Exaggerated price, invisible focus LEDs. Very amateur camera. Poor file quality. Opinion: A camera that is worth much less than its price, you do not see the focus LEDs (serious defect), poor construction material , especially the standard lens (I broke 2 obviously not repairable) Extremely small (not a value), durability unsatisfactory battery. It would make some sense if it cost the third part of the sale price. sent on July 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: Excellent camera in all respects. Cons: Only noise at high ISO Opinion: It does not fear the comparison with the other modern reflex, sharpness, colours, excellent files, solidity, manoeuvrability etc. It is at very low prices, then if you match a 18-70, old but super, you are really good. If you put a grip, it improves performance further. It is part of the stunning series with the D200, D 300 s and D500 which are unsurmountable. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Superb Cons: Terrible weight Opinion: Unsurmountable quality objective, one of the best ever built. Focus, image quality, color, etc. The only, but fastidious defect is the weight that tires very species in the shots freehand, as long as it has no sturdy physique and strength. Also the price is not cheap, well the used one has a pretty heavy cost, but still worth it to use a definitely exceptional lens. sent on April 26, 2019 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/2.8 UMC Fisheye II Pros: Excellent quality, very robust, total focus. Cons: Nothing Opinion: It is a great quality lens that continually surprises you. The material is great and the focus is no problem. It is bright though very small and a bit difficult to use. The price, although it is convenient, is still not low. It is almost unobvable as used. Excellent yield at all focal lengths, including 2.8. sent on December 18, 2018 |
 | Nikon D200 Pros: Exceptional sensor quality, especially with low ISO. Complete and ergonomic, acceptable burst, highly tested battery. Cons: Few flaws Opinion: Camera that is located at very low prices in the used, but does not fear the competition of any rival with the grip increases performance and handling. Practically indestructible. It certainly does not prove its age, except performance at high ISO. I have two bodies of this camera paired with the splendid 18-70 pure old, but of remarkable quality. sent on August 31, 2018 |
 | Nikon D2H Pros: Provides a beautiful and pleasant file, super-fast shooting speed. Excellent battery life Cons: Iso not very tall, given the age. Opinion: An excellent camera with remarkable performance, light and ergonomic. 4 megapixels in an excellent sensor, proof that megapixels are relative .. It is a real thunderbolt in practical use. The use of raw is recommended for optimal yield. Definitely worth having it, I have two bodies and I am fully satisfied. The prices of the company are more than good. sent on February 20, 2018 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P900 Pros: Few pro and a lot of shit in this camera. Positive is the very long focal excursion and the really good stabilization. Even in the video works well. Cons: The viewfinder is somewhat inoperable. Good, inaccurate, small, practically unusable. Focusing is decent only with plenty of light, but it gets lowered and less focuses, until it no longer works in darkness. The zoom It is slow. There is no raw file. The quality is good at 100 iso, but beyond it is significantly worse. With the arrival of the heat the rubber coatings are all detached. The battery life is too limited. Opinion: I was thinking of purchasing a great bridge bridge camera, but I'm really wrong. There are a lot of defects for a device that has a definitely high price and has very heavy sides like the totally inadequate viewfinder, poor batteries and more. It's a Camera that does not compare with other people of the same type. Also I had to replace, just bought, the sensor because it blurred. sent on July 14, 2017 |
 | Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n Pros: Exceptional qualità.Forse insuperabile.Alle low sensitivity has a yield super.Una compact flash and SD and the jpg file is excellent and complete as a raw. Cons: Slow and a lot of noise over 400 iso.Lo shutter is slow and there is practically a sequence veloce.Fotocamera studio or stand Opinion: Camera no longer in production, but the level altissimo.le images it provides are of high quality and as a color as nitidezza.Si can find at a low price and worth the pena.Deve be used in the studio or with a tripod. Batteries have little autonomy and they need different spare. Very balanced it provides a gradation of tones always remarkable sent on January 08, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
