JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

The Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2004 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 206 €;

79 users have given it an average vote of 7.4 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Pentax: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Pentax.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-300 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 8.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	13 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.95 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.5x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Manual Focus
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	435 g
Dimensions	76.6 x 116.5 mm
Buy
Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Timk2

sent on October 17, 2015

Pros: Cost, Performance up to 200mm

Cons: Lightness (yes, though that might be a plus to many), Performance at 300mm, fiddly and awkward 'macro' switch

Opinion: Tamron's evergreen budget FX telezoom and with the low price in mind, it is not as bad as you might think! Tamron have a long history of being able to produce pretty decent zooms of around this length, or shorter, such as the hugely popular Adaptall 80-210mm f3.8-4. I now have this lens' current sister SP version with VC, which is the best in class but for a few months, I owned this very light Di lens, which I understood even includes some plastic lenses inside. But, being used to a much heavier Nikkor 70-300mm VR (which I dropped and destroyed, hence the lack of a tele zoom) and without any form of stabilisation, this little Tamron is so skittish, it was almost impossible to get steady shots in all but the brightest conditions. One got used to these characteristics of course and I was able to get some very decent shots in London over several days, including a day out at London Zoo. The sunlit architectural shots, especially at shorter focal lengths were very sharp and undistinguishable from other lenses of this type but beyond 200mm or so and in less contrasty light, the performance suffered, though naturally stopping down helped. The close up feature, via the fiddly switch, which will not allow you to follow focus from close up to infinity, ie, tracking a flying away butterfly, as you have to stop, flick the switch and then reframe again - so not good, but consider this as a bonus and not a reason to buy this lens. So, as others have said, a good little budget lens that is good for normal 'snaps' and to start off with. You soon will find its faults and want to upgrade but don't dismiss as a complete waste of time. The competitors seem to be Sigma's cheap effort, but that is more expensive, or Nikon's DX 55-300mm, with VR, which is more expensive, has VR but is DX only but is probably better performing at longer lengths. There's also Nikon's basic 'G' lens at a similar price to this Tamron. I've not used or handled either the Sigma or either of the Nikons mentioned, so cannot speak with authority. 7/10

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Fabio Vaccaro

sent on December 15, 2022

Pros: once it was value for money

Cons: on many examples of this lens breaks the diaphragm

Opinion: I bought this lens in 2015 just to have my first telephoto lens at the very honest figure of € 110, in the following two years I used it from time to time also managing to get some decent photos despite the qualitative compromises imposed by the price in light of which it would now be unfair to complain about the lack of stabilization, slow autofocus, chromatic aberrations of the plasticy consistency and various and possible. The only thing that I could not digest and that leads me years later to write this review although I would have many other things to review is that just finished the warranty period and after only a few hundred shots one day I start reading on the displays of all my SLR cameras 600d 100d and 6d mk2 the words "err 01 communication problems camera - lens. clean the lens contacts." In essence, the contacts were clean and the diaphragm had stopped working, first only on the focal length that went from about 180/200mm up to 300 and then on the entire extension of the zummata. Given that in a lens already not very bright and that imposes in the absence stabilizer very fast shutter speeds especially on apsc 1.6x I rarely went to close the aperture above 7.1, but currently once I had this problem it works only at full aperture, then starting from f4 to 70mm up to f5.6 on 300mm. In my opinion, this leads to an accentuation of the above, obvious and understandable chromatic aberrations. Searching on the various sites for an economic solution to this problem (so as not to continue to preserve something partially broken but it seems bad to throw away) I note meanwhile, that many specimens of this lens have had the exact same problem, that it is not even convenient to try to send it to someone who can repair it. I also realized that the price on amazon of the latest pieces produced until 2021 have reached the absurd figure of € 249. DON'T BUY IT. Not for that amount, really it would not be convenient even in the luck of finding the specimen to which the diaphragm does not break. Buy more, even Tamron but higher models, even spending a little more or at most buy it used for no more than € 70.

Enrico_G

sent on February 11, 2022

Pros: Comparing everything to the price this lens is more than decent.

Cons: Slow Af, Chromatic Stabilization, Chromatic Aberration, Sharpness

Opinion: Starting from the assumption that I am not an expert, this lens is accompanying me on my path of photographic growth. Good enough to become familiar with focal lengths of this kind; the absent stabilizer is a not indifferent obstacle, but I think it is necessary to be able to train to eliminate tremors and movements as much as possible (if you learn with this with the stabilizer it will be a walk). A big shame is the af, slow and noisy that often misses shooting opportunities. Good brightness all in all, seen and considered that it keeps f/4 up to 120mm if I am not mistaken. Be that as it may, I read a lot of rather harsh and heavy criticisms that I consider exaggerated given the price. It will not be the best as optics, it is true but for less than 100 euros from used (less than 200 from new), for a canvas, what did you expect? So, reasoning on quality price, I would like to give an 8. Obviously, if a person is looking for high performance he will not find them from this lens and you can not expect who knows what given the price (you can not want a ferrari and pay it 10,000 euros). On the other hand, this lens is great for learning to stay still and shoot at low times without a stabilizer.

Kisso75

sent on January 05, 2022

Pros: Price

Cons: Slow AF - Chromatic Aberrations - Dark - Sharpness - Flare

Opinion: Purchased to practice with those focal lengths. Although it costs little, I would not buy it again, turning to better objectives. So much, because the same is practically unusable. It is very dark and difficult to use even in conditions of abundant light at the most extreme focal lengths, given the absence of stabilizer. It is not particularly sharp and chromatic aberration is almost always present. He suffers a lot from flares. The AF is slow and inaccurate, but given the age and the price of the lens I did not expect better. Not recommended.

Kenzo_jo

sent on September 14, 2021

Pros: Right focal width. Almost complete macro. Hood always available. Lightweight for focal length. Extraordinary price.

Cons: Qauasi chromatic aberrations always present (but simple to remove in PP). Not easy to use.

Opinion: I had this lens because I bought a Canon 5D Mark II with some lenses, including this one (in excellent condition). I think I've experimented with it embossing to try to understand it. At first I did not love it, on the contrary, then ... Let's start with the cons. You have to get used to AF. If you understand how it works (not being recent is not comparable to modern ones) you can handle it well in most situations. Sometimes it goes into trouble and here the manual is "smooth" enough to allow you an easy fire. Other serious defects I do not see. The brightness is in line with those of its cluster, the weight is light. While not excelling in photographic quality, most of the shots I've taken are decent/good/excellent by definition and colors. It has the Plus of turning into a macro with a max magnification ratio of 1:3.9. Of course, the CAs are always present or almost, but they are removed in a couple of clicks in PP. And we come to the strong point indeed very strong: the price. On the bay you pull it down between 50 and 100 euros. I find that at that price you will not find anything that allows you to have a zoom certainly not easy, agree, but that covers the average distances decently. Well of course you can buy another 70-300 f/4-5.6 like this but Canon L IS USM the performance is much better, but instead of 50 euros you have to pay it a thousand....

There are 32 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

The Moon

by Gianluca Belgrado
58 comments, 28765 views

The boat

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
106 comments, 5861 views

Magic in the Val di Fiemme.

by Seriola
57 comments, 13935 views

The deer is mirrored

by Valeriano84
105 comments, 4123 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
114 comments, 3217 views

HI RES 6.7 MP

Reflections of Venice 2

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
172 comments, 7092 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Everything in a drop

by Maurog74
145 comments, 13829 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

The Moon in Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
89 comments, 3371 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Serena leather on the Vertical pallet

by Maxbottax
82 comments, 8389 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

Fantasy

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
115 comments, 3932 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

Antibiotic

by Simoneperi1967
92 comments, 1880 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

My Avatar

by Boland
52 comments, 10865 views

The Tree

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
68 comments, 2385 views

Night dream

by Alesynth
54 comments, 4821 views

Boats on the lake

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
80 comments, 1796 views

Mineral Moon

by Gianluca Belgrado
32 comments, 9341 views

HI RES 6.6 MP

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
93 comments, 2647 views

Ship in Porto Marghera (Venice)

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
55 comments, 3134 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Yards

by Simoneperi1967
74 comments, 1013 views

HI RES 19.8 MP

Linen of Resurrection

by Simoneperi1967
69 comments, 767 views

HI RES 20.7 MP

Tricolor

by Addo
44 comments, 5156 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

More than 2000 years and holds up well

by Mario Nardinocchi
75 comments, 2903 views

Farruggio StudioFocus

by Maxbottax
41 comments, 5334 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
91 comments, 3172 views

La Boat 2

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
54 comments, 2217 views

The boat

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
72 comments, 1723 views

HI RES 4.4 MP

Surprised in the woods

by Valeriano84
35 comments, 3014 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Assisi

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
49 comments, 1931 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
41 comments, 2237 views

Desire

by Fiorenzo Fiorenza
25 comments, 9882 views

Untitled Photo

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
96 comments, 3514 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

The advance of the rain

by NaCapaTanta
67 comments, 3324 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

Dragonfly

by Fiorenzo Fiorenza
43 comments, 7094 views

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
51 comments, 1429 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Backlighting in Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
55 comments, 2051 views

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
74 comments, 2194 views

Dancing Queen

by Nolimits80
28 comments, 2388 views

HI RES 13.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro