JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

The Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2004 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 206 €;

80 users have given it an average vote of 7.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Pentax: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Pentax.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-300 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 8.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	13 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.95 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.5x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Manual Focus
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	435 g
Dimensions	76.6 x 116.5 mm
Buy
Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 244000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Timk2

sent on October 17, 2015

Pros: Cost, Performance up to 200mm

Cons: Lightness (yes, though that might be a plus to many), Performance at 300mm, fiddly and awkward 'macro' switch

Opinion: Tamron's evergreen budget FX telezoom and with the low price in mind, it is not as bad as you might think! Tamron have a long history of being able to produce pretty decent zooms of around this length, or shorter, such as the hugely popular Adaptall 80-210mm f3.8-4. I now have this lens' current sister SP version with VC, which is the best in class but for a few months, I owned this very light Di lens, which I understood even includes some plastic lenses inside. But, being used to a much heavier Nikkor 70-300mm VR (which I dropped and destroyed, hence the lack of a tele zoom) and without any form of stabilisation, this little Tamron is so skittish, it was almost impossible to get steady shots in all but the brightest conditions. One got used to these characteristics of course and I was able to get some very decent shots in London over several days, including a day out at London Zoo. The sunlit architectural shots, especially at shorter focal lengths were very sharp and undistinguishable from other lenses of this type but beyond 200mm or so and in less contrasty light, the performance suffered, though naturally stopping down helped. The close up feature, via the fiddly switch, which will not allow you to follow focus from close up to infinity, ie, tracking a flying away butterfly, as you have to stop, flick the switch and then reframe again - so not good, but consider this as a bonus and not a reason to buy this lens. So, as others have said, a good little budget lens that is good for normal 'snaps' and to start off with. You soon will find its faults and want to upgrade but don't dismiss as a complete waste of time. The competitors seem to be Sigma's cheap effort, but that is more expensive, or Nikon's DX 55-300mm, with VR, which is more expensive, has VR but is DX only but is probably better performing at longer lengths. There's also Nikon's basic 'G' lens at a similar price to this Tamron. I've not used or handled either the Sigma or either of the Nikons mentioned, so cannot speak with authority. 7/10

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Giovanni Marchese

sent on July 23, 2024

Pros: Price, size, weight

Cons: Autofocus, chromatic aberrations, flare, reliability

Opinion: I took it used to adapt to my Sony a6000, so a very dense sensor, and I immediately noticed that the autofocus was unusable, so I always used it manually, also finding myself well, since the ring allows you to move the focus very quickly. The con is that sometimes it's hard to find the point, especially since it's not always as smooth; In addition, the barrel rotates, so polarizers are also difficult to use (they would be very useful given the optical defects). Image quality is only good from f/13 upwards. If you don't close enough, the aberrations are very intrusive and difficult to correct, so I would see it well on sensors that are not very dense, which suffer less from diffraction and that allow you to shoot at closed apertures even in non-optimal light conditions. Mine also broke down at some point: all the electronics died overnight. Thankfully it was still under warranty and I was provided with another one that at some point had the same problem. I decided it wasn't worth the €15 shipping fee and took it apart, only to find that a cable inside had been cut. Unfortunately, without a working diaphragm, this lens is unusable. In the end I closed the aperture manually (around f/11...I think), blocking it with XD glue, and this solution gave me the opportunity to use it occasionally.

Miopiartistica

sent on July 22, 2024

Pros: price

Cons: reliability

Opinion: Taken for 120€, at that price it is a fun lens, good for non-pushed macros, "for walking" and even as a telephoto it would not be bad. I don't even consider autofocus, but it has a nice focus ring and on ML you can use it quickly. It suffers a lot from flare but otherwise it's not bad, for what it costs. Unfortunately it happened to me too that at a certain point the transmission of the diaphragm at maximum focal length stopped working and turned into a nice paperweight, because given the value of this lens I would not even know if it is worth sending it to be repaired, probably with what you would spend between repair and shipping you could, if you want, take another copy... Wanting... but I don't think I want to: if I then take another one that ends up like the first?

Fabio Vaccaro

sent on December 15, 2022

Pros: once it was value for money

Cons: on many examples of this lens breaks the diaphragm

Opinion: I bought this lens in 2015 just to have my first telephoto lens at the very honest figure of € 110, in the following two years I used it from time to time also managing to get some decent photos despite the qualitative compromises imposed by the price in light of which it would now be unfair to complain about the lack of stabilization, slow autofocus, chromatic aberrations of the plasticy consistency and various and possible. The only thing that I could not digest and that leads me years later to write this review although I would have many other things to review is that just finished the warranty period and after only a few hundred shots one day I start reading on the displays of all my SLR cameras 600d 100d and 6d mk2 the words "err 01 communication problems camera - lens. clean the lens contacts." In essence, the contacts were clean and the diaphragm had stopped working, first only on the focal length that went from about 180/200mm up to 300 and then on the entire extension of the zummata. Given that in a lens already not very bright and that imposes in the absence stabilizer very fast shutter speeds especially on apsc 1.6x I rarely went to close the aperture above 7.1, but currently once I had this problem it works only at full aperture, then starting from f4 to 70mm up to f5.6 on 300mm. In my opinion, this leads to an accentuation of the above, obvious and understandable chromatic aberrations. Searching on the various sites for an economic solution to this problem (so as not to continue to preserve something partially broken but it seems bad to throw away) I note meanwhile, that many specimens of this lens have had the exact same problem, that it is not even convenient to try to send it to someone who can repair it. I also realized that the price on amazon of the latest pieces produced until 2021 have reached the absurd figure of € 249. DON'T BUY IT. Not for that amount, really it would not be convenient even in the luck of finding the specimen to which the diaphragm does not break. Buy more, even Tamron but higher models, even spending a little more or at most buy it used for no more than € 70.

Enrico_G

sent on February 11, 2022

Pros: Comparing everything to the price this lens is more than decent.

Cons: Slow Af, Chromatic Stabilization, Chromatic Aberration, Sharpness

Opinion: Starting from the assumption that I am not an expert, this lens is accompanying me on my path of photographic growth. Good enough to become familiar with focal lengths of this kind; the absent stabilizer is a not indifferent obstacle, but I think it is necessary to be able to train to eliminate tremors and movements as much as possible (if you learn with this with the stabilizer it will be a walk). A big shame is the af, slow and noisy that often misses shooting opportunities. Good brightness all in all, seen and considered that it keeps f/4 up to 120mm if I am not mistaken. Be that as it may, I read a lot of rather harsh and heavy criticisms that I consider exaggerated given the price. It will not be the best as optics, it is true but for less than 100 euros from used (less than 200 from new), for a canvas, what did you expect? So, reasoning on quality price, I would like to give an 8. Obviously, if a person is looking for high performance he will not find them from this lens and you can not expect who knows what given the price (you can not want a ferrari and pay it 10,000 euros). On the other hand, this lens is great for learning to stay still and shoot at low times without a stabilizer.

There are 34 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

The Moon

by Gianluca Belgrado
58 comments, 29130 views

The boat

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
106 comments, 6067 views

Magic in the Val di Fiemme.

by Seriola
57 comments, 14156 views

The deer is mirrored

by Valeriano84
105 comments, 4353 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
114 comments, 3445 views

HI RES 6.7 MP

Reflections of Venice 2

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
172 comments, 7319 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Everything in a drop

by Maurog74
145 comments, 14103 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

The Moon in Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
89 comments, 3540 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Serena leather on the Vertical pallet

by Maxbottax
82 comments, 8647 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

Fantasy

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
115 comments, 4121 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

Antibiotic

by Simoneperi1967
96 comments, 2211 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

My Avatar

by Boland
59 comments, 11075 views

Night dream

by Alesynth
54 comments, 4908 views

The Tree

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
68 comments, 2499 views

Mineral Moon

by Gianluca Belgrado
32 comments, 9513 views

HI RES 6.6 MP

Yards

by Simoneperi1967
80 comments, 1394 views

HI RES 19.8 MP

Boats on the lake

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
80 comments, 1951 views

Linen of Resurrection

by Simoneperi1967
72 comments, 1179 views

HI RES 20.7 MP

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
93 comments, 2778 views

Ship in Porto Marghera (Venice)

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
55 comments, 3213 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Tricolor

by Addo
44 comments, 5230 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

More than 2000 years and holds up well

by Mario Nardinocchi
75 comments, 3057 views

Farruggio StudioFocus

by Maxbottax
41 comments, 5499 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
91 comments, 3285 views

La Boat 2

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
54 comments, 2341 views

The boat

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
72 comments, 1849 views

HI RES 4.4 MP

Surprised in the woods

by Valeriano84
35 comments, 3110 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Assisi

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
49 comments, 2032 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
41 comments, 2335 views

Desire

by Fiorenzo Fiorenza
25 comments, 10008 views

Untitled Photo

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
96 comments, 3650 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The advance of the rain

by NaCapaTanta
67 comments, 3418 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

Dragonfly

by Fiorenzo Fiorenza
43 comments, 7221 views

Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
51 comments, 1503 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Backlighting in Venice

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
55 comments, 2154 views

Portrait of My Wife

by Antonio Dell'Aquila
74 comments, 2282 views

Dancing Queen

by Nolimits80
28 comments, 2476 views

HI RES 13.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro