JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon D2H : Specifications and Opinions

Nikon D2H

The Nikon D2H is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 4.0 megapixels manufactured from 2003 to 2005 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 200 - 6400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 8 FPS x 22 RAW / 40 JPEG. The list price, when it was announced (2003) was 4500 €;

9 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10

Sensor
Format	APS-C, 23.5 x 15.7 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.5x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	4.0 megapixel (pixel pitch 9.53 μm)
ISO sensitivities	200 - 6400
File formats	RAW, JPEG
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/8000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/2 steps
Exp. modes	P, S, A, M
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Nikon F (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	No
Autofocus (AF areas)	11
Continuos shooting	8 FPS x 22 RAW / 40 JPEG
Pre-Burst	No
Live View	No
MLU/SS	No
Video mode	No
WiFi	No
GPS	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	No
LCD	2.5", 320 x 240 pixels, fixed
Viewfinder	Optical, coverage 100%, 0.86x
Flash	No
Storage	CF
Storage, Slot 2	not available
Battery	Nikon EN-EL4, 20.90 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1200 g
Dimensions	158 x 150 x 86 mm
Buy
Nikon D2H, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Simone Rota

sent on January 18, 2023

Pros: Ergonomics, stability, viewfinder, burst. It is part of the Nikon series that had as its progenitor the F5 film and that ends with the D6

Cons: Weight and size, as for the entire line of the aforementioned flagships, make it "challenging" for amateur use

Opinion: This year this SLR turns 20 and, despite the value of time and product, I am going (unfairly) to an attempt to evaluate with today's parameters, for those who want to buy it, not for passion of vintage or yet another camera to add to the collection, but to use it as the main body. The robustness, the quality of the mirror-shutter mechanism, the ergonomics, the viewfinder, the attention to detail, the communication with the flash, the bursts, ... They are also today (2023) at the highest levels. The camera "goes out at distance" in prolonged use. If 8 fps burst were not considered sufficient, I think perhaps it would be good to dedicate yourself to videos rather than photographs. Autofocus is difficult to evaluate objectively, however it has been surpassed in sensitivity, speed and precision by technological evolution. In good light sports the camera can still have its say, while in photographic hunting the low resolution is an Achilles' heel. It is true that, for most situations, you can have photos that have little to envy to those obtained from today's cameras, but it is also true that this would require a much greater expenditure of time, stalking, approach to the subjects, optics of adequate focal length, etc ... In ordinary photography today can also be used a much more discreet object such as the smartphone, but apart from this, the d2h does not present particular contraindications. The colors I find them very beautiful, while the conversion to b / w lays bare the little refinement of the shades, especially if you go to enlarge the image too much (no problem for prints up to 20x30). There is a lot of talk about dynamic range and in this sense this camera is placed 20 years ago, with a dynamic range much lower than that of cameras of 10-15 years ago, which instead is not so far from that of the current ones. It should be compared to a slide scan, with a good amateur scanner, but nothing more. Certainly not the one obtainable through a drum scanner, and not even remotely close to that of a projected dia. So much so that the magnificent 3D color matrix light meter, inherited directly from the F5, is not in itself a guarantee to take home the shot: conditions with excessive light waste should be avoided. In fact, being within the range covered by the sensor, the exposure is returned in a natural and faithful way. Moreover, the reference, when this camera had been developed (LBCAST sensor) was still the film, which x the courses and historical appeals, back in fashion...

Emanuel Sanguigni

sent on June 18, 2018

Pros: Like all the Admirals.... Gust like the D3 (I love the sound)

Cons: Noise low ISO but they're adorable

Opinion: Just taken on Ebay for €152 and already it is love... I currently use a D3s but I am curious about the result of the JFET lbcast sensor I will use it purely for sports and baptisms.... it is for my children. 4MP are enough and advance for a photo book 40x30 and I can not wait for it to come to try. For the Iso I do not think is a problem... in the daytime is quiet and in the evening I will use a flash. Proven Sunday 24.06.2018... burst like the D3, even low ISO files (400/640) with grain but recoverable and adorable (I like it), light files and anyway it's a flagship... Divine. I created a group to have opinions on how to best use it. October 2018... I fall in love more and more and now with the firmware update 2.02 I read that it is similar to the D2HS.

Fadipa68

sent on February 20, 2018

Pros: PROFESSIONAL BODY, PROFESSIONAL HANDLE, PROFESSIONAL AND ESSENTIAL SOFTWARE FOR PROFESSIONAL USE, PROFESSIONAL RAW FILE.

Cons: AND TOO BEAUTIFUL AND DO NOT REPEAT TO TRADIRLA.

Opinion: I bought this digital used a few years (2014) with only 20,000 actual shots. From that day after a bit of foreplay it became my favorite digital body. I've had other digital bodies but its sturdiness its grip its speed is unmatched. The iso is comparable to the film so who, like me, comes from the film knows that at high is high grain. The concept of non-grain at high is the result of digitization of the image and modern software but here we talk about a body of 2003. For this, however, I solved with the use of flash when needed or with a small intervention in the room raw that solves the majority of my cases. rnrnI had other bodies pro and not, but nobody gave me its detail and its lightness.rnrnSi lightness of the 4 megapixel files that download are a flash. I have experimented interpolating, according to the studies carried out, the RAW file arriving to print landscapes and more up to the 40x60 cm format and the image was perfect. No one saw it believed that it was native to a file of the BEAST. rnrnThe test has satisfied themy hunger for megapixels considering that then to the question of how much I should have printed to those dimensions, the answer was: little. So live the wonderful 4 MEGAPIXEL.rnrnNon I'm here to emphasize the shutter speed. I only tell you that I have called it MITRAJA.rnrnFENOMENALE.rnrnrn

Dinofer

sent on February 20, 2018

Pros: Provides a beautiful and pleasant file, super-fast shooting speed. Excellent battery life

Cons: Iso not very tall, given the age.

Opinion: An excellent camera with remarkable performance, light and ergonomic. 4 megapixels in an excellent sensor, proof that megapixels are relative .. It is a real thunderbolt in practical use. The use of raw is recommended for optimal yield. Definitely worth having it, I have two bodies and I am fully satisfied. The prices of the company are more than good.

Gilles52

sent on October 28, 2017

Pros: Four great megapixels. Professional body, but above all with almost perfect ergonomics.

Cons: Well, at the end of 2017 I do not think it appropriate to talk about ... against.

Opinion: I agree with my friend who preceded me, that at a time when running as many megapixels as possible does not know any limits, talk of just four megapixels may seem anachronistic. But I think if some friend or friend try this jewel, surely now surpassed, it would be astonished at the performance of this sensor. If combined with quality optics, the validity of the shots leaves little or no disorientation (in a positive sense). It is certainly not a machine to provide breathtaking images in detail Still Life, but for amateur and not only use, the rendering is extremely pleasing and in any case definite if you do not require unobtrusive magnifications from the megapixels of the sensor. It only could support the 14 bits instead of 12 bits .... You can not have everything from life, and then the good thing is to be able to get the best out of your own, not just in photography, but in all fields to which we are dedicated in life. I'm sorry? RnUn greetings to everyone and sincere congratulations%2C because I see in galleries fantastic shots. rn

There are 1 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon D2H

Ermine

by Barito.mario
17 comments, 1467 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Saltiness

by Davide1976
11 comments, 2420 views

Fox den on

by Barito.mario
12 comments, 2032 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Roads of Ireland

by Davide1976
4 comments, 1853 views

Untitled Photo

by Tiburonblanco
6 comments, 3428 views

Miss

by Maurizio Gargiulli
0 comments, 2717 views

Untitled Photo

by Tiburonblanco
3 comments, 2822 views

Grandma & Grandpa

by Tiburonblanco
2 comments, 3209 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Here you are fine...

by Davide1976
2 comments, 1471 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Michael Imola2005

by Stefano Muccini
1 comments, 626 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Simone Rota
2 comments, 1407 views

Michael Imola2005

by Stefano Muccini
5 comments, 1044 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Rome, from the roof of the Palazzo Giustiniani

by Silvio Valente
1 comments, 1258 views

Sunset @ brice canyon Inspiration Point

by Tragniact
1 comments, 1260 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Shadow game

by Simone Rota
4 comments, 855 views

HI RES 5.4 MP

Flirtatious ...

by 10mar.co
0 comments, 1390 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Keeper of the park

by Tragniact
0 comments, 1229 views

Hoodoos

by Tragniact
2 comments, 1110 views

I didn't make it... BUT I'M :)

by Alberto_Conti
6 comments, 758 views

HI RES 25.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Dario Rapino
1 comments, 860 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Tiburonblanco
4 comments, 2662 views

Inspiration sunset point

by Tragniact
1 comments, 1075 views

Zion & mustang

by Tragniact
0 comments, 1143 views

Caesar palace

by Tragniact
0 comments, 1207 views

Winter in Saint Petersburg

by Fabargello
0 comments, 542 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Winter in Saint Petersburg

by Fabargello
0 comments, 345 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Michael Imola2005

by Stefano Muccini
0 comments, 456 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Silvio Valente
0 comments, 1073 views

...narcissus...

by 10mar.co
0 comments, 1096 views

Eagle eye

by 10mar.co
0 comments, 800 views

Untitled Photo

by Silvio Valente
2 comments, 834 views

HI RES 4.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Dario Rapino
0 comments, 729 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Crawl in the middle of nature

by Gigiluciecu
0 comments, 376 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Rome Carabinieri in Piazza Montecitorio

by Silvio Valente
0 comments, 1123 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Maxim Van Gils

by Simone Rota
0 comments, 538 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Fold

by Giacon Nicola
0 comments, 785 views

Winter in Saint Petersburg

by Fabargello
0 comments, 416 views

HI RES 7.2 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Nikon » Nikon D2H

Nikon D2H : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Nikon D2H