JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2009 to 2016 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2719 €;
146 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Excellent quality, sharpness, precision and autofocus speed
Cons:the important weight, but if you want this quality there are not many alternatives, cost of the new
Opinion:I have owned this lens for some years and it has been widely tested in numerous sports, wedding and fashion photo shoots, in any situation it has a crazy sharpness on the whole frame and a cleanliness in the shot, without vignetting and chromatic aberrations that has nothing to do with other lenses. I use it on D750 and Z6, replaced the old 80-200 f 2.8 for slow autofocus for sports. The only disadvantage if you can say so is bulk and weight, over time it is an important pear tree that "makes itself felt", moreover the cost of the new was really high, already more acceptable a good used guaranteed. Highly recommended
Pros:Sharpness, blurry, colors. A bomb on the F system!
Cons:The weight. It feels like spending hours in the gym... Maybe a bit slow with the af when used on the Z system with the Ftz adapter.
Opinion:Essential optics! To fully appreciate its qualities you must first desire it, save money and then ... Buy! Beautiful colors, sharpness, blurry, everything at the top! I still have to try it at night, but already in the interior it is more than fine. Surely it is heavy and feels. You need the backrests where to hook the car to be able to relax your arms every now and then (if held around the neck it hurts!).
Pros:A great lens throughout and with unique sharpness
Cons:For now none
Opinion:A very interesting lens, despite a bit "old" But not rivals even in 2022. I tried the Tamron 70-200 G2 sincerely not apple I feel to make a comparison the colors that returns the G2 are absolutely too cold and difficult to fix in post, even with a nikon D780. In my opinion By now we are getting used to the colors of tamron and we do not realize that the photos shared around no longer have color but seem too artificial, this is because more and more third-party optics are used and the post is no longer the same because unable to obtain a certain color that the nikon or Canon etc instead have well outlined. When I read that the Tamron G2 is better I am really amazed. Then another thing the Tamron G2 uses an innovative system si Beautiful but very delicate that can be ruined over time and consequently the sharpness maybe is no longer the same and with the passage of time can be affected, the nikon on this are reliable and durable obviously also canon etc. Then if you are looking for something more, then the NIKON FL is for you, but unfortunately I find it excessive, especially for the price too high. Returning to vr2 I do not consider it heavy, let's remember that a 2.8 and the quality usually weighs, then if considered that I also use the Nikon 200-500mm F5.6 for work that much heavier so it is all subjective. Really good stabilization works wonders. Obviously my vote is 10/10. Good Light to all!
Opinion:Objective with superlative optical quality. Sharpness, blurry, af,stabilizer,three-dimensionality,everything in this objective is at the highest level. Built very well it does not present problems with regard to reliability. Many complain about the weight problem but it is in the norm for a 70-200 f2.8 designed for the reflex system. Vote 10
Opinion:Excellent goal, very heavy but qualitatively monstrous. Sharpness at the top, blurred by fairy tale, full colors and lightning AF. Unsurpassed in portraits (I also have the 85mm 1.8G), beautiful even in the landscapes. Dream-paired with D810. As you know, it weighs (and costs) a lot: if you can shoot with the tripod it's all spared effort.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
