|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Buenavida www.juzaphoto.com/p/Buenavida  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: quality from TA, AF, relatively compact, well balanced. Cons: Huge lens hood, replaced with HB-75 Opinion: Bought used at a very good price ( 400€ ) on the market, to have a std zoom for the Z fc. Not that the 16-50 is bad, on the contrary, but not very bright yes. The footprint between 16-80 + FTZ + lens hood although changed with HB-75 is remarkable but well balanced, suitable for all circumstances, from indoor portrait to outdoor events. The best performance at the widest apertures but up to f11 no diffraction. The AF is very good, responsive, area wide, it locks the eye or the face and does not let go. Excellent or very good up to the edges, a bit of thoughtful landscaping on a tripod can be done. Since it lacks native fixed Z dx is a valid alternative. sent on April 07, 2023 |
 | Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 Pros: Metal barrel of yesteryear, sharpness, blurred. On Z fc it is perfectly balanced. Excellent hood. Cons: It is not marked with a noble name. Opinion: What can I say, received in 36 hours "prime", worth every penny, accuracy of the graft, fast autofocus even with wide area. Neutral cold colors, not known dominant, perhaps, I say perhaps, overexposes by less than a third of diaphragm, just know it first. Used freehand in a slightly soft evening light, it does not close the shadows. Af quick but not instantaneous. Silent. Positive note, in addition to the soft fabric bag, a real semi-glossy black metal hood on the outside, knurled on the inside. I think I'll pass a coat of matte spray or matte black inside to avoid spurious reflections. Mechanics and construction 10 laude. I add, a month later, embarrassing sharpness at f1.4. Of course the depth of field is reduced. And the overexposure is there but only with the Matrix measurement which is the one I use for panoramas. I posted some photos. sent on November 21, 2021 |
 | Nikon Z fc Pros: All controls in front of the eyes with real rings, aperture display in use, light with good grip, 16-50 silver zoom in the nital base kit, excellent battery life. Round eyepiece in pro style. Complete but simple menu. Light meter calibrated on slight underexposure, but it can be adjusted. It works with Megadap. Cons: lack of flash (the Z50 has it); very fragile battery door; a single Fn button; in the dark it has no illuminated controls; some problems with FTZ for soft update problems. Opinion: In mountain outings I used for three years an Oly with 4 optics only for the very low weight. Undecided for a long time on the Z50, the first Aps-C version of Nikon in ml, I did well to wait for this version practically the same but with a nice aesthetic and some improvements in electronics, it supports focus-staking even if it loses the flash. I took the "hundred photos" of tests that I do with all the new cameras, almost all outdoors, a few indoors with tungsten light, various iso, various optics. The 14-30 becomes a super lens, from 21 mm to 45, the versatility is impressive. With the 16-50 instead I carried out the iso and focus tests. What can I say. The sensor seems different from that of the D500, at high iso (12800) has a "grain" less dry and more invasive but the detail is at the level, I think they are two settings of different soft, there are 5 years of progress between the two !! The menu reminds me of that of the D200, fast, intuitive, with a dozen more things invented in the meantime, but with the "i" button everything is very fast and above all clear. The various buttons behind are similar to those of the Z6 and D500 as an arrangement, so they are on the fly for those who are used to it. Compared to the Fx there are all the differences in the format, but compared to the D500 I find it more difficult to distinguish even 100%. Burst, I would say excellent, with the silent shutter there is much less "trembling" of the Vr compared to the Z6, but it could also mean that the Vr of the zoom in Kit is less efficient than that of the sensor with 50/1.8 S. Which is not a great defect, I reserve the right to try it with focal lengths over 200mm. Tested with Megadap and Canon 135/3.5 mount. Slow but precise autofocus, the lens is 50 years old, the edges are far behind what I am (viciously) used to. But it works. Then the battery. Arrived unloaded. Loaded 15 minutes. It's two days that we fiddle in addition to the hundred photos, I promise to upload it well tonight. Finally, the Vr side, already accustomed to the 10-20 without the physical button on the lens, seems that there is not, but then shoots at 1/8 and is not moved. Works. Compared to the D500 I think there is some addition in the soft electronics, because even if the sensor is not IBIS it seems to me that some electronic VR effect there is with the 14-30 that is not VR. I have to do two tests behind some birds with 300mm and then I will confirm or deny the feeling. I deny what was previously written. In the videos there is an electronic vr with 14-30 but with photos, nothing at all. So I wait for the 105MC that the Vr has. sent on August 27, 2021 |
 | Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Pros: Most beautiful silver version, sharpness from TA, focusing distance Cons: Collapsible, you lose time to open it, lack of hood. Opinion: But you remember the old 16-85.. sharp every now and then and never at TA.. this much reviled 16-50 , a little shorter as canvases but weighs a third, is sharper, VR works better, has half or almost half of lenses inside, that is, less absorption, less flare, so same brightness on the practical side. You can use it at TA.. nn will make the blurry of dreams but you should not close them to f8/11 like the old 16-85. That was not bad, mind you. But this outclasses him. Of course, f6.3 at only 50mm makes an impression but with the old one at 6.3 you found photos kneaded. At least these are sharp. And the 20 cm of minimum focus is a gem. Then if a 17-55 f2.8 with Z attack arrives, this one retires but I have the doubt that it will not arrive so soon and at less than 2000 €. sent on August 27, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS Pros: Compact, 12mm sharpness Cons: plastic attachment, lack of dial focus Opinion: Taken to replace the 14-42 kit that I wasn't thrilled with, on OM-10-II. The extra two millimeters are convenient, equates to a 24-60 about on Ff. It seems sharp from TA to 12mm, much higher than expected. At the longer focal points, he loses something. Pasty boken, unfired colors, very neutral. Recommended for those who want to put the camera in the pocket of the jacket to carry it always behind. sent on September 19, 2020 |
 | Nikon FTZ Pros: Compact, sturdy, no games whatsoever. Cons: Heavy, weighing 135g. halves the weight savings between the Z6 and the D610. Opinion: Similar to the workmanship to the adapter for AF-S optics on Nikon 1 bodies, it looks like the enlarged version, comfortable the plate below for the stand or the monopod, I save various ring frames. I do not know if it has a mechanical device to recognize the optics AF-S dx because if I mount one of these the Z6 automatically goes into clipping dx preventing me any choice that was possible on the D610. Obviously I can't do the test without FTZ and This thing I find a meaningless limitation, maybe there's an electrical contact in charge of this. I understand why it is recommended to buy a low-cost third-party "FTZ" so that you can mount different optics for creative effects without going through the limitations of soft Nikons. sent on December 11, 2019 |
 | Olympus 9mm f/8 Fish-Eye Body Cap Pros: Smaller than two screwed filters, stick closure, feather weight. Cons: As a habituation. Opinion: Last Sunday I was at a public event, for a customer, behind the inevitable fence, in front of me a wooden leudo at the Old Port and I mount this lens to take two photos together. At that point from the boat they nod me, go up that our official photographer did not show up. When I'm on the boat I notice that the bag with the optics is left to my wife, behind the fences. So I did all the service from this boat, right above, in the middle of flags, sails, elbows, rigging. 9. The photos were liked. yes, I did a little PP. but sharp, balanced, I had remained in the same condition with a fixed of other focal would have been much more problematic. What to say, I bought it as a joke, saved me from a situation that could end not well. In other situations, easel and well in bubble, obvious not at night, from interesting architectural perspectives as well as rural or marine landscapes. Pretty shot colors and medium high contrast as I like, shadows a little closed and unworkable. But for 92 coffees, thank you for existing!! sent on October 17, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Small, compact, light, sharp too. Cons: Difficult to fit a lens hood, or vignette or little serves, including that Nikon, the least worse is an old Cokin squared with Ring 52. Opinion: I bought it just came out and after 88 reviews and many years of use, what can be added? Meanwhile I used it on a heap of SLR, D40, D80, D3100, D7000 and now D500. On all the focus is accurate and quick, on the D80 perhaps the fastest, on the D500 the most accurate.. I also tried it duly cropped on FF, D610 and Df. It's better on D610, 10MP high-quality units. The main use was the portrait, the figure on the American plane (cut to the knee to be clear) and has never disfigured, fans of "Sfocus" will not be enthusiastic about the aperture 2.8 but the pastiness of the background is not bad at all. The second use were the panoramas, distorts a nothing and then you can "paste" more shots with interesting perspective and scenic effects. As "macro" I used it a little.. It should be for a macro the main use, but I used it more in the range 40cm-a meter, it is perfect for many uses, not least the food industry. Although old man and with thousands of shots made, seems like new, but not because I was attentive and manic, but because it is very robust. sent on May 30, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/3.3-4.5 Pros: Compact, it looks like a 50mm, af precise, little vignetting, 52mm filters, all in metal. Very low price. Cons: Reduced focal excursion, not excellent sharpness, built by Cosina and Nikon license plate, discrete but not sublime boken at full aperture. Opinion: Purchased for very little out of curiosity, I wanted to have at least one of the ten worst Nikons of all time according to the personal ranking of Ken Rockwell. It does not deserve to end there, but the 43-86 that I used thirty years ago was infinitely worse, at least this is well built. Does not suffer from vignetting from f4.5 onwards, on Fx. RnMontato on the right becomes a portrait optics, a 50-105 that covers all normal focal lengths for portraits. With the D500 does not lose a focus, with the D610 every so often you "svaga" ie turn empty before finding the focus. In exchange it is fast enough, better than 35-105 but less than 28-200 which is more or less the same period. I will post a gallery of portraits dedicated to this view. The colors are not fired, the shadows do not close them, in full line with 28-105 and the 50 D is 1.8 and 1.4. It was no coincidence that they were considered optical save-errors, keep one in the pocket in the event of strong contrasts - internal, behind the theatrical scenes, the dressing rooms and the like - saves situations where you can not use flash for asoften and lighten. sent on January 17, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: compact, great VR, crisp as all the std zoom in this category. It hampers better than many other Nikon. Cons: missing metric manual focus, plastic bayonet attachment. Opinion: Taken in a bar with various optics, backed with a cormorant on the fly (3 photos published on juza). rnIt was all so the standard zooms .. Vr impeccable, perfect fire, better than the XX-XX I would just sell, I keep this, not so much for the 20mm more that make no difference but for the speed of focus, even silent, that will not disturb the video. rnBecause it does not have a "true" manual focus, there are no stops at the end so manually it focuses badly, that one hundred times it serves.rn the plastic bayonet. for what it costs new is a venial sin, games do not feel it, even though it is a 2 year old. rnMy i reserve to update the review between a couple of months of intense use in street and gite.rnVoto 8 + rn sent on November 13, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-P DX 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Pros: 10mm minimum focal length Cons: VR selector is missing Opinion: Inevitable a 10mm DX saw the "huge 2.25x" crop in 4K Nikon APS-C shooting. I was aiming to buy a fixed 10mm or zoom just to turn the 4K wide angle. RnArrived today and tried "from the window" to diaphragm 8. Haze light but well done, better than the 18-35 Af-S homologue. Too bad the vivid inscription made in thailand. It's aesthetically ugly. But there are details. The AF is silent and imperceptible. It will be a benefit in the videos. It should look good on the field. RnThe strange feeling of having it in his hands is really small and light, polycarbonate but different to "that polycarbonate" with which some optics are made. RnTurn On / Off VR button. The barrel goes up and down with the focal change, the elongation minimum around 16mm. The front lens is very small compared to the diameter of the filters but it is not very thick, the hood also serves, albeit with the shining sunlight at sunset I did not see any particular glow. If it were, it would be a great thing%2C over 100 degrees of angle the bright spots, reflections or the sun itself are often in the frame or just outside. The feeling is that it has designed the same computer that created the 40 / 2.8 ... little miracle between quality and weight. Up to 100% do not see busy colored bands between contrasted areas, but it was with low sharpness and low contrast, because my "neutral" adjustment is this. Nothing raw today. RnPrice testing .. better than I expected, it works very well close, clean colors, excellent sharpness, contrast typical of AF-S, published a photo and its central 100x100, with the data. It is curious that "property" looks at the brightest optics of the stated, both in the data on the D500 and on the pc. RnProvided on the D610. Without crop fills the full size without vignetting at 13mm, you just have to remove the hood. In practice I bought a 15-30 zoom on the Dx format and a 13-20 on Fx. Well over 110 degrees in diagonal although the focus does not work, the opticRemains in a kind of hyperfocal with a depth of field of 2 meters to infinity, with f5.0 diaphragm more open to 13mm. sent on June 16, 2017 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: Autofocus, handlebars and flashing with telephoto lenses, excellent burst. Cons: There is no flash, weight like D610. Opinion: Tested in good light with 300 / 4.0 PF and 16-300 Tamron, two very different optics. rnWith the 300 equilibrium and perfect shaking, the thumb on the iso command and the AF point selector seems to be "born learned" .rnOttima ergonomia.rnGabbiani flying in "infinite" sequences in jpg with SD633x, all the sharp, plastic volatile, better than with the D5300.rnCon the domestic cats and zoomed in to no micromassage I was almost used to treating half shots.rnI do not know if the handle is strong and the body / zoom balance or the 4megapizze less, but the scraps there are more.rnProved with old 28-105 AF-D in the street and set portrait .. excellent !! rn sent on May 02, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 E PF ED VR Pros: Featherweight, 1700gr with D500. Sharpness, VR sport and normal. Almost a macro at 1.4 m possilility to use it with the TC1, 4x III. Cons: Hood with "fragile" coupling. Opinion: Sharp already at F 4.0 from the maximum to F5, 6. Brought to the neck for an afternoon not tired, great update of the fire with birds in flight and ability to brandish without fatigue. Boken often very nice, almost pastellato, but sometimes a little hard in backlight maybe for the Fresnel lens. If you do not photograph in backlight or with cutting lights it is advisable to overthrow the lens hood and it is much better for the large cylindrical surface. Besides being light does not occupy much place in a suitcase for hand baggage on airplanes. Not by Shadows contrasty like other AF-S. With the TC 1, 4x maintains a very good AF speed, higher than many zooms. On FF does not show distortion or vignetting from 5.6 onwards, on DX is sharp and without vignetting even TA. A great tool for wandering photographic hunting but also for sports, from tennis to rowing. The polycarbonate with which it is built externally is more robust than many metals and I think that worked with the tolerances suitable to the optics of this invoice, is very expensive, therefore a choice weighted for the lightness and not for the saving. Defects I have yet to find, before I had the 80-400 and this is a better performance in everything and two spans as AF. If Nikon thought of an older brother 400/5.6 It would be a fable. Instead it made the 500/5.6.. That looks like price.. sent on May 01, 2017 |
 | Canon AT-1 Pros: Economic even at the time, first electronic rangefinder viewfinder and that worked, lightweight, battery life with two AAA. rnImpugnatura comfortable and safe. Cons: Metering is not too accurate in low light, less bright viewfinder due partly translucent mirror, only 1/60 "of sincroX. Opinion: According to the body for a lifetime, became the first in the theater or the canvas, the green LED of the focus was a must that facilitated the filming. rnCon two drains AAA had an almost eternal autonomy, over 25 rolls of 36 .. silent rnRelativamente, most of the AE-1 and A-1.rnLe inaccuracies of the exposure in low light is a venial sin, no exposure in 1982 was reliable in low light, no acaso you had in his pocket a Gossen that he weighed as much as a obiettico. sent on December 29, 2016 |
 | Nikon 1 AW 10mm f/2.8 Pros: Precise AF, compact, better sharpness than zoom, though it's just a little wider, so better underwater. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Though I used long dedicated AW zoom, I took this opt for that extra millimeter (about 3 equivalents) that could be useful. Instead of the zoom I already enjoyed, I found an excellent performance especially in the center. So much so that for "street" or photos in very crowded places where you can get a shot on the camera, I now hold the 10mm fixed on the AW body and zoom in the pocket. I'm less pleased with some of the choices for this AW in its 2 goals, such as the 40.5mm filter thread and the lack of a hood also in foldable rubber. The 10mm body is smooth except for a few millimeters in front and then slips with wet fingers, venial sin, if it falls on a tile floor it is possible that a tile is broken, not the lens. rnThe Nikon will do a 6mm fixed focus also f5.6 for sub use ?? sent on October 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 D Pros: accurate AF even if not lightning, sharpness and contrast of the past, compact. Cons: Loss of detail at the edges beyond 160mm, not exciting boken, lack of standard lens hood, focus from 2 to infinity, under two meters behaves so varifocal varies depending on the focal focus and the AF is better to exclude it and go to manual. Opinion: optical fourth "old" that purchase for the D610, then optical oldest of a modern sensor .. the best of the series remains the pump 35-105 but this is more versatile and can be used between 28 and 150mm with good performance, at around 200mm it is a bit 'weak at the edges. Use filters 72 that I consider std. Missing the lens hood in the scope, I'm trying to buy it on the bay. Contrary to the board of Juza, it weighs 520gr but it's all metal, a tank, however, much lighter than the "plasticone" 28-300 which replaced it. rnCome other optical "old" I've tried, the lines per millimeter of the most modern optical missing but are replaced by a surrender "crispy" in strong colors and at the same time in the most mellow soft, neutral tones. So a good yield even on photos studied, easel and control of lights or panels. A film made for represented and shades space. Beyond that which is already so, with wise PP video (which usuallyI leave it to those who do know how to do) makes a lot of video, along with the 50 / 1.8 AF (not D) of a tonal pleasantness, with soft passages that are impossible with optical spaccamillimetro last generation. Imho. sent on October 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon 35-105mm f/3.5-4.5 Macro Pros: Compact, filters 52, all metal, crisp on FF Cons: impractical macro function, not D, boken so-so Opinion: I found from my "drug dealer" habitual and paid 90 € with the original caps. It took more than anything to play with, and instead the first magnified files have impressed me. Even the AF - I thought inaccurate snail - is precise and quick. A bit 'dark, it is not a 2.8 but is little bigger than a fixed and you can not want everything. Perhaps it is the only zoom that I have that I can put into a jacket pocket or backpack, so I think the next trip you will see them in a dedicated gallery on the top arrived in casa.rnAnche backlit, despite losing a bit 'Contrast , it is not filled with stars and flashes. A beautiful sorpresa.rnIl "macro" instead works through uncomfortable button and only 35mm, focal almost useless for the macro. Even in the 24-85 / 2.8 to 4 there is a similmacro function and impractical. After these optical I am not aware that Nikon has more proposed this function only in a specific zoom, 70-180.rn sent on August 27, 2016 |
 | Mir-1b 37mm f/2.8 Pros: sharpen, blur, and cost. Cons: Screw short "attack" so a little 'uncertain adjustment on the Nikon bayonet. Opinion: The use of sensor 1 "then has an angle of view equivalent to a full-on 99,9mm formato.rnPerfetto for portrait and street freehand footprint and low weight, with the ring and the union seems to take pictures with a coffee pot Neapolitan from a cup, good boken and yummy pastel colors, very workable in pP. it is not a Trioplan but it comes close. you can adjust the iris continuously, such as optical cine, offering over / under exposure millimetriche.rnPagato € 16 including delivery the bay. sent on August 11, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 135mm f/2 D DC Pros: microcontrast and sharpness, massive construction, non-invasive lens hood, precise and fast AF with central point. Cons: You can not mount on TC 1.4x III, makes you want the 200 / 2.0. Opinion: A clear tank from f2,8 but very acceptable already at least at the center TA. I use it for "hunting" photographic backyard, rabbits, lapwings, ducks but if it hooks the central AF point on a bird in flight does not lose it in burst (I have the D610, 5 ftg x sec real) .rnVery good the integrated hood little intrusive, the set looks like a normal zoom std instead splits the hair and you can crop a lot in photo street on the fly, unexpected surprise. Not too difficult to work with the DC ring also I have to try for a long time the various combinations.rnAdd a year later: it is magnificent the defocus on R, both maintaining the same number of the diaphragm that, more simple, set R 4 and work with diaphragms between 2 , 8 and 5.6. You can already see in the car a "warm" pastiness and yet clear. Little describable in words. It is appreciated in print, less on the monitor. When I got it, I did not use the 85mm anymore. It costs but deserves. rnUsually used on a theater easel, fire at 25 meters, framed the whole stage. Diaphragms fra f2,2 and 4. Made 130 photos for a 40-minute show. 130 perfect photos. From great security. Body D500. sent on March 10, 2016 |
 | Canon FL 55mm f/1.2 Pros: Fuzzy and vintage tones, brightness .. Cons: Unbalanced weight, clear from f5.6, stop down. Opinion: Recycled Nikon 1 Series for the thrill of 1.2. I await a volunteer to try it as they should, in return becomes a nearly 150 macro .. The ring focus is pasty and exact, I had forgotten that feeling since I all optical AF. has no diaphragms means so 1.2 will immediately switch to 2.0, it would have been better to have 1.4 to have a more adjustable boken. sent on March 02, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: Cost, compactness, versatility. Distance focusing. I think that makes the most beautiful skies. Filters "Standard" from 72. Paid € 200 from optical kit, immediately resold. Cons: AF precise but not a lightning war, hood bulky and fragile-looking. Opinion: Having had two versions of the 24-120 and cousin 24-85 / 2.8 to 4, that I have all sold for use only zoom kit that is 18-35 as a normal optical, I regained that focus in AF version S 3.5-4.5 to have at least one lens for all occasions in which to change the optics (in the rain, hovering over a cliff, in dusty places) it was a risk. Compared to all the other had and resold, it seems to me that returns the sky a little 'more beautiful than it is, as the 14 Sammy doing incredible skies. Also it is less distorted than the 24-120 at 24 and keeps sharpness even after the 70 / 80mm on the contrary that the other loses quickly after the 70mm diaphragm already +1 than the full aperture. A diaphragm 8, as almost all the goals from the best. The focus is almost perfectly and keeps the focus and sharpness. The lens hood attaches not well, maybe it's a bit 'too leggerino but is vistosissimo, not as that of the 18-35 but still remarkable. backlightfull fewer discs and colored flashes of brighter 24-85. In low light it is dark as all zoom and then pull out of the pocket of the backpack 50cc or the 135DC. But you can not have light and compact together, so it is not a defect. 7+ rating sent on February 28, 2016 |
 | Nikon TC-14E III Pros: AF and super sharpness. Cons: Price Opinion: Tried today with the new 300/4.0 PF. The autofocus remains fast and accurate with 3m to infinity focus. He loses a few shots from very close, around the meter and a half. but it looks like a macro the final sharpness. From even an idea of extreme solidity and does not unbalance the total balance, it does not seem to have a 420/5.6 around the neck. Only thing the price. but the quality you pay for. In addition it can be mounted on a few optics. Too bad you can't mount it on 135/2.0 :-( I add, tried with Z6 and adapter with 300 PF. It behaves well but the Af - single or wide point - is sometimes uncertain, how it lost the subject. I tried it after dark in difficult conditions. I reserve another test at distances on 30 meters with more light. sent on December 24, 2015 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Magical. Cons: A lot. Opinion: Just look at a random page of photos posted on Juza .. every photo has decinaia of "like", more than any other optical, and this thing speaks for itself .. rnSperimentare with over 100 degree field is not easy but the results you see in the photos, so there risolvenza or mtf taking, starry skies and blue graphics and outweigh laboratory tests three to zero.rnrn sent on November 07, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Very light, focal excursion, quick and precise focus. Versatility. Excellent as a video optics. Cons: With the standard lampshade becomes flashy for street Opinion: In the same way as I was used to analogue, I have a 35 that widens to the wide angle in an important way. and gives the best up to 90 degrees, so great for landscapes, mountains and trips to the city of art. Sharp to be able to crop much, beautiful colors. There was a brother 35-100 AF-S would be a boon. Also good to replace the 18-55 on the APS-C, it becomes a bit flashy especially with the lampshade, but perfect as "sharp", another world. Update: On Z6 with FTZ is very well balanced, fantastic sharpness (better than the D610) af perfect, the distortion corrects in the car, grade 9. sent on September 17, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 D ED VR Pros: Weight below two pounds, 80 to 250 crisp even at TA Robust and compact enough, filters 77 that also use other lenses. AF precision. Cons: AF is not very fast, chasing a bird in flight is difficult. Plate of the attack to stand a little 'small. Opinion: I was struggling with another zoom that started even shorter, then I bought this used to make "portrait and fashion" because many of the larger zoom in excess of 300mm. But I have not found an opportunity to use it this way, I had fun in the Camargue and Provence. Great for boating and water sports like sailing and kite surfing, or maybe was thought to these uses. The VR does not earn God knows what but I have yet to see if with the monopod should be removed or not, as I use it on the stand off the Vr. rnHo tried for a day the new version, she does well but does a bang more, a bit 'too much for such a lens. This retains its value in used thanks to its inherent strength. sent on September 06, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Small, fits in your pocket, robust, precise AF, handyman on FF, great for portrait lens on DX. Cons: I have the older version to 1996, so it is not D. I lose the full reading Matrix and flash. A TA I have to use a strong vignetting correction of FF to the apertures. Opinion: What, found used at 60 € .. taken as a joke, I have a habit of 40mm on the right and 85 on the FF to do portrait and / or the like, plus the zoom so it was a duplicate. I use it far more than anticipated also in the landscape, in the evening for photos on the fly, always on FF. DX by perhaps the best, but do not use it often. The AF amazed me, very quick and quiet with D610, more than any zoom "normal". The colors are more pastel 85 / 1.8 AF-S thing that is often appreciated in the landscape cloudy. He had recently also its twinned 35/2 it would take forever to keep him company on the stock exchange. Last thing: Made in Japan. sent on September 06, 2015 |
 | Nikon D5300 Pros: Compact, pivoting display, 24MP, Wi-Fi, GPS, dynamic range and quality jpg. does not have the sensor of the D7100 or D5500 .. it is a unique model and NOT Sony, held at high iso commendable. Cons: There are no unnecessary functions, other curious (video thumbnails, for instance). Had the internal engine to use non AF S, you could use a lot more lenses. Opinion: As the body rides also has "too much quality", lightweight and ergonomic as the second body in the ceremonies (with the handyman Tamron 16-300) it is highly reliable. I find it curious videos in thumbnails and absolutely useless the "night vision" available only with AF in live view. The use with a 800mm catadriottico to photograph the Moon or with 14 Samyang for the milky way with some success. So a versatile body, simple to use. Missing some things, control depth of field, for example, and the engine for optical S Af not but after all if these functions are essential there is the Nikon D7x00. The goal with which works best is the 40micro. New evidence from a distance 5-15 meters with 300 / 4.0 PF and excellent yield, almost prefer the files that bakes in this pairing than those of the D610 - Soon I'll put pictures .. sent on August 30, 2015 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Pros: value for money ; fairly sharp from f 5.6 Cons: af complicated by the barrel that moves to pump to choose the inclusion or not, I thought it was neat to 2.8 - 4.0, f sometimes uncertain Opinion: I got it used in a barter, I'm not a big fan of macro 1: 1, was looking for a small canvas for short distances, the portrait, the cerimonia.rnNelle ceremonies or in the events I prefer the much more powerful AF-S 85 / 1.8 while in portrait appreciate tones "creamy" that churns out without excessive PP.rnLo hold because the optics never sell (at most barter), however, are still looking for a performance drape around 100 / 150mm.rn sent on August 18, 2015 |
 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 AF Pros: compact, crisp, light Cons: lack hood, soft up to f2.8 Opinion: Couples with 18-35 and 85 covers 90% of my needs with FX and does not regret the zoom std I find too expensive in choosing Nikon (I mean the 24-70) or some 'dark (24-85 I and had tried in the two versions and I find soft up to f5.6) .rnQuindi better some change of optics more. rnSe is used D or D, I recommend it. rnOttimo in low light outdoors, the environmental portrait, makes well with LED lights making them less icy. sent on August 17, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Compact, strong, sharp 18 to 55mm Cons: Poor to 70mm. Opinion: Purchased through barter, basically it costs me just a little. Under "C", he must have seen the sorts of raw, but no whistles and noises. Very valuable to replace 18-55 std. rnMessa focus from good to very good, I used it a lot, then I found the first one 16-85 and then I bought the Tamron 16-300 so in recent months remains to casa.rnProvato on the D610, the focus has become instant fairly accurate. Among the zoom it remains the favorite for environmental portrait, though the beats with 50 / 1.8. sent on August 16, 2015 |
 | Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro Pros: Compact, versatile. 16mm block. Vr. Cons: Progressively slim after 220mm to any diaphragm. Opinion: Taken as a stockbroker for ceremonies and the like besides the Sunday non-engagement trips. I was impressed by the quality at the focal court, between 16 and 24 is good at all opening and great at 5.6-8. And f8 is the default diaphragm, which is fine up to 200mm. Rn I usually use it on the Nikon D5300 but I've tried it on the D610 and it looks like it's better at least up to 250mm, then it's out of sight. RnIt is decent, focusing if the camera is fine, with the single point of Focus, it's good, if you're chasing a gull hook it up pretty well. At my photo galleries I have one dedicated to the 16-300 in which I put the lucky shots. RnrnI do not understand why Tamron wanted to "infiltrate" the focal beyond 200mm, proposed it as 16-240 would sell it more: -) rn The D500 is incredibly better, especially at longer focal lengths thanks to the best fire focus. RnProtected the D5300 micromouse even with critical times, 1/125 to 200mm for essaysMpio, it can always be used. sent on August 16, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
