Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 670 €; 56 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-85 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 28.6°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.5-4.5
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.38 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.22x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   72 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   465 g
 Dimensions   78 x 82 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 164000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsupporter
sent on February 28, 2016

Pros: Cost, compactness, versatility. Distance focusing. I think that makes the most beautiful skies. Filters "Standard" from 72. Paid € 200 from optical kit, immediately resold.

Cons: AF precise but not a lightning war, hood bulky and fragile-looking.

Opinion: Having had two versions of the 24-120 and cousin 24-85 / 2.8 to 4, that I have all sold for use only zoom kit that is 18-35 as a normal optical, I regained that focus in AF version S 3.5-4.5 to have at least one lens for all occasions in which to change the optics (in the rain, hovering over a cliff, in dusty places) it was a risk. Compared to all the other had and resold, it seems to me that returns the sky a little 'more beautiful than it is, as the 14 Sammy doing incredible skies. Also it is less distorted than the 24-120 at 24 and keeps sharpness even after the 70 / 80mm on the contrary that the other loses quickly after the 70mm diaphragm already +1 than the full aperture. A diaphragm 8, as almost all the goals from the best. The focus is almost perfectly and keeps the focus and sharpness. The lens hood attaches not well, maybe it's a bit 'too leggerino but is vistosissimo, not as that of the 18-35 but still remarkable. backlightfull fewer discs and colored flashes of brighter 24-85. In low light it is dark as all zoom and then pull out of the pocket of the backpack 50cc or the 135DC. But you can not have light and compact together, so it is not a defect. 7+ rating

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2016

Pros: Weight, backlight, price, VR

Cons: sharpness, color saturation.

Opinion: I have this goal by a year and is very comfortable to carry it around because of the low weight, it provides a good backlight and suffers little flare or refractions different, the price is good. The sharpness here is a sore point since the middle image is sharp from f / 6.3, while being fairly clear from corner to corner must diaphragm to f / 8. She begins to fall in refractive already at f / 11. All in all not a bad goal, I took it as a kit with the D610 to begin with and proved to be a good all-purpose focal range covering the most affected by my shots. The Vr in some situations can take up to 1/10, but tends to heat a part of the image in high ISO and or long exposures. The distortion there and it shows especially 24 mm. Not a career goal is clear but until 15/16 mp offers a good quality. For the price offered is recommended. 8 vote for the price not high.

avatarjunior
sent on October 21, 2015

Pros: The right heavy, compact, fairly clear, af normal.

Cons: Price of the new focal length.

Opinion: Honest performance, does not disappoint in the use amateur. If used on modern SLR at high ISO, it is not affected much of the reduced opening. You get files optimally sharp and contrasted and thanks to vr you can afford to take time with 1/20. By contrast, the low focal length, forcing frequent changes in objective and this can be a nuisance. Sold to make style opens the 24-120 f4 only for the reasons mentioned above. In comparison with the latter it does not lose at all ... but that's another story.

avatarjunior
sent on August 25, 2015

Pros: Compact and lightweight, value for money

Cons: vignetting, distortion at 24mm

Opinion: This was my first optic body fx, I decided to start from this point especially for the price, but after taking more than a year, I can only say that his modest work he does very well, that is all money spent. Put in good light conditions is quite nitido.rnil VR works quite well, and the autofocus on d600 is being veloce.rnBisogna say that very cartoon, and that the minimum focal suffers from perspective distortion, all solvable in Camera Raw

avatarjunior
sent on December 03, 2014

Pros: homogeneity of yield, price

Cons: sprained minimum focal maximum aperture

Opinion: Objective underestimated? I think so, as I am about to explain. Placed in the category of seminfamante "zoomini kit", Nikon offers it in conjunction with some full-frame digital SLR, fate it shares with the most expensive 24 120 f4 aperture constant. Compared to the latter, I have no hesitation: subject to greater build quality and greater openness in maximum configuration canvas, 24 85 has the rare advantage - that can not boast even emblazoned 24 70 f2.8 - not to accuse cali yield at maximum focal length, where the 24 120 gives miserably, resulting usable little closer to 100mm. If we opt for the non-stabilized version, the value for money is even more interesting. Renouncing constitutionally plasticity of a lens from the focal generous opening, the landscape you will benefit of pleasant surprises around f8. Defects? The distortion at 24mm: Photozone has measured a value of 3.78%. Nevertheless, competitors are not much better in this respect.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR

Foto
The White Lady
by Roberto Lambertini
208 comments, 13721 views  [retina]
Foto
The colors of 'autumn
by Zucco55
64 comments, 7540 views  [retina]
Foto
Steps tired
by Marchese75
100 comments, 6228 views  [retina]
Foto
Magical park 'Avic
by Zucco55
80 comments, 4699 views  [retina]
Foto
Carmen 4
by Maucat69
37 comments, 16170 views
Foto
Hey presto
by P.a.t 62
58 comments, 3126 views  [retina]
Foto
The colors of the smoke Valley
by Marco Riccardi
109 comments, 1281 views  [retina]
Foto
Rain
by Paolo P
187 comments, 3009 views  [retina]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Icy Mornings
by Marco Riccardi
84 comments, 857 views  [retina]
Foto
Pier
by Damicfra
62 comments, 7263 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Cischiopino
38 comments, 6792 views  [retina]
Foto
Spring..
by Marco Riccardi
93 comments, 1525 views  [retina]
Foto
New World 1
by Marchese75
103 comments, 5081 views  [retina]
Foto
Spring Contrasts
by Marco Riccardi
102 comments, 1800 views  [retina]
Foto
Piazza San Marco Venice
by Brax
38 comments, 939 views
Foto
Smoke Valley (TN)
by Marco Riccardi
90 comments, 911 views  [retina]
Foto
Autumn
by Marco Riccardi
85 comments, 964 views  [retina]
Foto
A young lady passed by and...
by Paolo P
117 comments, 1239 views  [retina]
Foto
Carmen 6
by Maucat69
22 comments, 13010 views
Foto
Spring spear
by Marco Riccardi
103 comments, 1490 views  [retina]
Foto
Smoke Valley
by Marco Riccardi
86 comments, 876 views  [retina]
Foto
Sunset with the Aeolian Islands on the horizon
by Damicfra
25 comments, 4840 views
Foto
Black Lake autumn version
by Zucco55
32 comments, 2416 views  [retina]
Foto
Curves ... with style
by Marchese75
54 comments, 5419 views  [retina]
Foto
Harmony
by Swagger
48 comments, 3125 views
Foto
Bebi, ATM and I are up to you
by Roberto Lambertini
53 comments, 4967 views  [retina]
Foto
Final rest
by Paolo P
144 comments, 1622 views  [retina]
Foto
Ponte Vecchio
by Swagger
31 comments, 6316 views
Foto
Salt fog ...
by Paolo P
116 comments, 1491 views  [retina]
Foto
The Butcher of the Suk (b / w)
by Marchese75
51 comments, 2194 views
Foto
Supernova
by Marchese75
41 comments, 2596 views  [retina]
Foto
If you peach ..
by Marchese75
40 comments, 2870 views  [retina]
Foto
Fidia (The Singer)
by Francesco.Santullo
158 comments, 8436 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Game in the blue
by Mirkoark
24 comments, 2350 views
Foto
Remote past
by Paolo P
155 comments, 2263 views  [retina]
Foto
Magic wood
by Rikimasut
19 comments, 672 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Cischiopino
17 comments, 5221 views  [retina]

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me