Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 660 €; 59 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-85 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 28.6°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.5-4.5
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.38 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.22x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   72 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   465 g
 Dimensions   78 x 82 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR, buy on Ebay


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on March 01, 2019

Pros: Compact price and good sharpness

Cons: Zoom ring A little hard at least in my specimen.

Opinion: Got used intoned coming from kit d610 and paid really little. I mainly use fixed optics and I lacked a compact zoom to keep mounted on the body that I always have with me. I have to say it's not bad I thought worse I use it mostly at F 8 is sharp at all focal also the distortion and vignetting are well corrected. I prefer it to 24-120 F4 as performance is equivalent but the 24-85 is much lighter ex compact the 120 mm I do not need. The construction is a little plasticose but I think it's sturdy enough.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 28, 2016

Pros: Cost, compactness, versatility. Distance focusing. I think that makes the most beautiful skies. Filters "Standard" from 72. Paid € 200 from optical kit, immediately resold.

Cons: AF precise but not a lightning war, hood bulky and fragile-looking.

Opinion: Having had two versions of the 24-120 and cousin 24-85 / 2.8 to 4, that I have all sold for use only zoom kit that is 18-35 as a normal optical, I regained that focus in AF version S 3.5-4.5 to have at least one lens for all occasions in which to change the optics (in the rain, hovering over a cliff, in dusty places) it was a risk. Compared to all the other had and resold, it seems to me that returns the sky a little 'more beautiful than it is, as the 14 Sammy doing incredible skies. Also it is less distorted than the 24-120 at 24 and keeps sharpness even after the 70 / 80mm on the contrary that the other loses quickly after the 70mm diaphragm already +1 than the full aperture. A diaphragm 8, as almost all the goals from the best. The focus is almost perfectly and keeps the focus and sharpness. The lens hood attaches not well, maybe it's a bit 'too leggerino but is vistosissimo, not as that of the 18-35 but still remarkable. backlightfull fewer discs and colored flashes of brighter 24-85. In low light it is dark as all zoom and then pull out of the pocket of the backpack 50cc or the 135DC. But you can not have light and compact together, so it is not a defect. 7+ rating

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2016

Pros: Weight, backlight, price, VR

Cons: sharpness, color saturation.

Opinion: I have this goal by a year and is very comfortable to carry it around because of the low weight, it provides a good backlight and suffers little flare or refractions different, the price is good. The sharpness here is a sore point since the middle image is sharp from f / 6.3, while being fairly clear from corner to corner must diaphragm to f / 8. She begins to fall in refractive already at f / 11. All in all not a bad goal, I took it as a kit with the D610 to begin with and proved to be a good all-purpose focal range covering the most affected by my shots. The Vr in some situations can take up to 1/10, but tends to heat a part of the image in high ISO and or long exposures. The distortion there and it shows especially 24 mm. Not a career goal is clear but until 15/16 mp offers a good quality. For the price offered is recommended. 8 vote for the price not high.

avatarjunior
sent on October 21, 2015

Pros: The right heavy, compact, fairly clear, af normal.

Cons: Price of the new focal length.

Opinion: Honest performance, does not disappoint in the use amateur. If used on modern SLR at high ISO, it is not affected much of the reduced opening. You get files optimally sharp and contrasted and thanks to vr you can afford to take time with 1/20. By contrast, the low focal length, forcing frequent changes in objective and this can be a nuisance. Sold to make style opens the 24-120 f4 only for the reasons mentioned above. In comparison with the latter it does not lose at all ... but that's another story.

avatarjunior
sent on August 25, 2015

Pros: Compact and lightweight, value for money

Cons: vignetting, distortion at 24mm

Opinion: This was my first optic body fx, I decided to start from this point especially for the price, but after taking more than a year, I can only say that his modest work he does very well, that is all money spent. Put in good light conditions is quite nitido.rnil VR works quite well, and the autofocus on d600 is being veloce.rnBisogna say that very cartoon, and that the minimum focal suffers from perspective distortion, all solvable in Camera Raw




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR

Foto
The White Lady
by Roberto Lambertini
212 comments, 14433 views  
HI RES 23.6 MP

Foto
The colors of 'autumn
by Zucco55
64 comments, 8238 views  
HI RES 13.6 MP

Foto
Magical park 'Avic
by Zucco55
88 comments, 5319 views  
HI RES 13.0 MP

Foto
Steps tired
by Marchese75
100 comments, 6646 views  
HI RES 25.6 MP

Foto
Icy Mornings
by Marco Riccardi
120 comments, 1683 views  
HI RES 19.8 MP

Foto
Rain
by Paolo P
187 comments, 3455 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Hey presto
by P.a.t 62
58 comments, 3424 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
The colors of the smoke Valley
by Marco Riccardi
109 comments, 1620 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Spring..
by Marco Riccardi
98 comments, 2055 views  
HI RES 11.7 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Cischiopino
38 comments, 7081 views  
HI RES 20.3 MP

Foto
Pier
by Damicfra
62 comments, 7559 views
Foto
New World 1
by Marchese75
103 comments, 5346 views  
HI RES 18.4 MP

Foto
Spring Contrasts
by Marco Riccardi
109 comments, 2164 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Crazy Winter
by Marco Riccardi
99 comments, 1248 views  
HI RES 10.8 MP

Foto
Piazza San Marco Venice
by Brax
40 comments, 1498 views
Foto
Autumn
by Marco Riccardi
94 comments, 1448 views  
HI RES 17.1 MP

Foto
A young lady passed by and...
by Paolo P
125 comments, 1704 views  
HI RES 22.5 MP

Foto
Smoke Valley (TN)
by Marco Riccardi
90 comments, 1200 views  
HI RES 21.8 MP

Foto
Spring spear
by Marco Riccardi
105 comments, 1751 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Smoke Valley
by Marco Riccardi
92 comments, 1125 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Black Lake autumn version
by Zucco55
32 comments, 2674 views  
HI RES 13.0 MP

Foto
Sunset with the Aeolian Islands on the horizon
by Damicfra
25 comments, 5032 views
Foto
Curves ... with style
by Marchese75
54 comments, 5672 views  
HI RES 16.1 MP

Foto
Harmony
by Swagger
48 comments, 3272 views
Foto
Spring colors
by Marco Riccardi
75 comments, 833 views  
HI RES 22.6 MP

Foto
The arcades of Uncle Louis
by Paolo P
99 comments, 996 views  
HI RES 22.2 MP

Foto
Great Ocean Road, Gibsons Step
by Samuele87
25 comments, 482 views  
HI RES 22.2 MP

Foto
Bebi, ATM and I are up to you
by Roberto Lambertini
53 comments, 5277 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Final rest
by Paolo P
148 comments, 1923 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Salt fog ...
by Paolo P
116 comments, 1771 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Magic wood
by Rikimasut
25 comments, 942 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Ponte Vecchio
by Swagger
31 comments, 6591 views
Foto
The Butcher of the Suk (b / w)
by Marchese75
51 comments, 2327 views
Foto
Remote past
by Paolo P
155 comments, 2661 views  
HI RES 21.8 MP

Foto
Supernova
by Marchese75
41 comments, 2775 views  
HI RES 25.6 MP

Foto
Naviglio
by Paolo P
83 comments, 785 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
If you peach ..
by Marchese75
40 comments, 3005 views  
HI RES 20.2 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me