JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 660 €;
61 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 186000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Zoom ring A little hard at least in my specimen.
Opinion:Got used intoned coming from kit d610 and paid really little. I mainly use fixed optics and I lacked a compact zoom to keep mounted on the body that I always have with me. I have to say it's not bad I thought worse I use it mostly at F 8 is sharp at all focal also the distortion and vignetting are well corrected. I prefer it to 24-120 F4 as performance is equivalent but the 24-85 is much lighter ex compact the 120 mm I do not need. The construction is a little plasticose but I think it's sturdy enough.
Pros:Cost, compactness, versatility. Distance focusing. I think that makes the most beautiful skies. Filters "Standard" from 72. Paid € 200 from optical kit, immediately resold.
Cons:AF precise but not a lightning war, hood bulky and fragile-looking.
Opinion:Having had two versions of the 24-120 and cousin 24-85 / 2.8 to 4, that I have all sold for use only zoom kit that is 18-35 as a normal optical, I regained that focus in AF version S 3.5-4.5 to have at least one lens for all occasions in which to change the optics (in the rain, hovering over a cliff, in dusty places) it was a risk. Compared to all the other had and resold, it seems to me that returns the sky a little 'more beautiful than it is, as the 14 Sammy doing incredible skies. Also it is less distorted than the 24-120 at 24 and keeps sharpness even after the 70 / 80mm on the contrary that the other loses quickly after the 70mm diaphragm already +1 than the full aperture. A diaphragm 8, as almost all the goals from the best. The focus is almost perfectly and keeps the focus and sharpness. The lens hood attaches not well, maybe it's a bit 'too leggerino but is vistosissimo, not as that of the 18-35 but still remarkable. backlightfull fewer discs and colored flashes of brighter 24-85. In low light it is dark as all zoom and then pull out of the pocket of the backpack 50cc or the 135DC. But you can not have light and compact together, so it is not a defect. 7+ rating
Opinion:I have this goal by a year and is very comfortable to carry it around because of the low weight, it provides a good backlight and suffers little flare or refractions different, the price is good. The sharpness here is a sore point since the middle image is sharp from f / 6.3, while being fairly clear from corner to corner must diaphragm to f / 8. She begins to fall in refractive already at f / 11. All in all not a bad goal, I took it as a kit with the D610 to begin with and proved to be a good all-purpose focal range covering the most affected by my shots. The Vr in some situations can take up to 1/10, but tends to heat a part of the image in high ISO and or long exposures. The distortion there and it shows especially 24 mm. Not a career goal is clear but until 15/16 mp offers a good quality. For the price offered is recommended. 8 vote for the price not high.
Pros:The right heavy, compact, fairly clear, af normal.
Cons:Price of the new focal length.
Opinion:Honest performance, does not disappoint in the use amateur. If used on modern SLR at high ISO, it is not affected much of the reduced opening. You get files optimally sharp and contrasted and thanks to vr you can afford to take time with 1/20. By contrast, the low focal length, forcing frequent changes in objective and this can be a nuisance. Sold to make style opens the 24-120 f4 only for the reasons mentioned above. In comparison with the latter it does not lose at all ... but that's another story.
Opinion:This was my first optic body fx, I decided to start from this point especially for the price, but after taking more than a year, I can only say that his modest work he does very well, that is all money spent. Put in good light conditions is quite nitido.rnil VR works quite well, and the autofocus on d600 is being veloce.rnBisogna say that very cartoon, and that the minimum focal suffers from perspective distortion, all solvable in Camera Raw
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
