JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2002 to 2011 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 110 €;
114 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 190000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Better than him he can only do the big brother 50mm 1.8 G AF-S of which I did a review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IbAzj9u5P0 This is small, cheap, portable to the maximum, sharp. Many people talk about the external material but I think it's perfect so and you've never seen one broken! So the important thing is how the photos do it! Rating 10, better if bought used.
Cons:At its price nothing, but if we really have to, it struggles a little to focus from afar at full opening.
Opinion:At the price at which it is sold is the perfect goal, especially for newbies, the weight and clutter are embarrassing in a good way, it is quietly in your pocket, the files are very good, I used it years ago especially on DX and I have to say that it satisfied me fully. There are no big flaws, of course if we compare it with the 1.4g, the 50 Art or the 50 (equivalent) Fuji there are no comparisons in terms of focus and beauty of colors, but here we are talking about a lens sold for a hundred euros new on Amazon.
Cons:Perhaps compared to the new generations the speed and noiselessness of the focus
Opinion:Excellent lens of great sharpness, especially when compared to the ridiculous figure to which it is for sale, a fortiori if used. In many situations it has proved to be a very good goal. The metal construction then from that sense of quality, solidity and vintage at the same time that do not spoil for this kind of product. I would Definitely re-buy it!
Cons:Made of plastic, hard diaphragms, enough sharpness in the analogue field. In a decidedly poor digital environment
Opinion:It's a mediocre lens like all the 50mm built by Nikon. Unsuitable for digital use. Umpteenth version Paccottiglia. If a 50 mm is needed, go to other manufacturers, such as Sigma Art. The Lens shows games between the lenses, a noticeable leap back from the Ai and Ai-S, which at least were iron and the aperture was as precise as a clock. Here we find an excessive use of plastic and I would not wonder that even the lenses are. Focus does not specify and needs calibration with the machine. It Costs little but it is worth very little
Pros:Super Compact, sharpness, very light, aperture ring
Cons:Construction/materials, non-motorized
Opinion:After owning for almost a year the Yongnuo 50 today I have in the kit this optics and I could give you an idea of what the differences are. There are already many reviews on this lens that say everything and more, so I thought I would post more than anything else a comparison with the China version immediately with the prices (however low), the Yongnuo you could find it even at €70 New! The Nikon used becomes difficult to find it at less than €80. Construction: Externally so-so, I would say a dead heat if not even... Yong, for the quality of the lenses probably Nikon. AF: Yongnuo is motorized, Nikon No, they are still both fast Size: This type of lens is compact and light by nature.... There is little to add Blurry: The Nikon is really "important" and maybe even a little difficult to size exactly what you want, but maybe that is what you wish.. Bokeh Effect: Step up with the blur of course, so Nikon wins but Yongnuo is not at all to underestimate Brightness: excellent in Nikon, very good for Yongnuo, but depends very much on the situation, the decrease in brightness seems to me that Nikon is better Sharpness: Almost draw a good point in favor (for me) This model is the aperture ring that might be fine for some "alternative" photos like no-contact extensions, reversing rings and similar things. I hope this review can be helpful
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
