JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 320 €;
22 users have given it an average vote of 10.0 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Nikon Z.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Bought used for 200 euros, I have to say that it is money well spent. At the edges the sharpness decreases but for me it is not a defect for such an optics, on the contrary it emphasizes the central part creating a bokeh all in all pleasant. At the level of its brand correspondents at a very competitive price. I think I'll get another little brother in the family.
Opinion:For the price it costs it's a little gem. Equivalent focal length of 50mm so a true classic. Sharp, lightweight and constructed all metal. Well-made metal lens hood. Lightning-fast autofocus comparable to home lenses. I use it on X-T4 so with the ibis you make up for the lack of stabilization. For those who are used to hearing the clicks of the aperture ring, it may be a small annoyance not to have this feedback, but you get used to it. It can be found used at great prices and for the quality it offers, once purchased, it deserves to be kept. I use it mainly for portraiture.
Opinion:I used it for a while on the Xe2 because on the XPRO series it creates problems for me and I found it as excellent as the famous "magic" 35mm. It costs half but even less today and is worth the money spent. AF sometimes fails with low-light scenes, but so does Fuji. Usually I shoot in manual so I do not pose the problem if it does not find AF. Light more than expected and not as big as it may seem from the photos. It is not a focal length to my liking but it is not worth selling it for a few pennies since it has been too criticized to the point of collapsing the price of the new. Ring decliccata has its pros and cons and until now I have never happened to move it unintentionally.
Pros:AF like a Fuji, light although it looks metal, cost
Cons:Diaphragm ring decliccata
Opinion:I have been using it on Fuji xt3 and xe4 for about seven months. A 33mm 1.4 (a 50mm on FF). Objective well done in all its parts including the hood that still has a small yoke but nothing serious. It costs much much less than the respective Fuji which I think is overwhelmed, for what it costs it is a must have. Very good AF also in low light and AF-C. Other pros and cons in description.
Cons:The maf, at least on my z50, is not a lightning bolt even if all in all in good light conditions it copes rather well ... but when the light goes down they are pains (he made me lose several shots by completely reedding the maf)
Opinion:After the first uses I was enthusiastic about it but after squeezing the lens in more complex light conditions here is that the maf went to be blessed (my 16-50 Nikon is much, much faster and always very precise). I believe that the fact of not being a lens of the parent company is a problem because Nikon has not given the patents to any third party company and, despite the effort of Viltrox in doing reverse engineering, to date the results have not been up to par, maybe with a new update things will improve. I made the return to Amazon and now I will wait for the next releases of the new Nikon Z right lenses ... for the moment I ''will settle'' for my pancake 16-50 (great).
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
