JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2013 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 860 €;
67 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 217000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I used it with extreme satisfaction with the D600, definitely my favorite lens for landscapes. Very sharp landscape diaphragms without ever particular defects such as chromatic aberrations or flare, light and therefore excellent to carry with you and with the diameter for 77mm screw filters that is always very comfortable. Super recommended optics especially in combination with a D600/610 or D750/780. Now that I no longer own either the D600 or the D750 I can say that it is the only lens that I really miss...
Pros:Excellent sharpness to all excursions and diaphragms, it returns saturated and natural colors. Precise and fast autofocus. Absence of flares even in "difficult" conditions. Robust but lightweight construction. Diameter of only 77 cm., economical.
Cons:My closed diaphragm specimen I find a little dark and prefer in post-production, open the diaphragm of 1.5 stop
Opinion:I bought it second-hand after much indecision, mainly because among the various defects, it was attributed a heavy distortion. I did not find any defect in this lens and the barrel distortion, detected at 18 mm but never excessive, is normal to these focal points and is easily solvable in post production. This lens is giving me a lot of satisfaction, I recommend to anyone.
Pros:Lightness, practicality, tropicalization, flare resistance, fast AF
Cons:Minimum focal "only" of 18mm
Opinion:Used nowhere to be found. Whoever has this goal, does not give it away easily. I took it to replace the Tokina 16-28 2.8 first series. Although I also rated the 16-35 Nikon house, in the end I preferred this because much lighter, more practical and cheaper. Compared to other brighter wide angles it gives the possibility to mount filters with standard measuring holders (which is no small feat). It is a lens that gives great satisfaction especially on the road or in the mountains where the weight in the backpack is an important factor to consider.
Pros:Sharpness, sharpness at the edges even at 18mm, accurate and fast af, contrast and colors, good resistance to the backlight, light, focal range, 77mm filters, cost
Cons:Barrel distortion marked at 18mm but can be corrected without problems in post
Opinion:Taken out of curiosity after trying the most emblazoned 20 and 24 f/1.8G (which I gave away both), if you do not need to shoot below f/3.5 I highly recommend this 18-35. I use it with satisfaction on D810 and I assure you that the least resolution (according to the tests) is not noticed in the slightest, otherwise it is fast, precise, light, it has the focal points that interest me the most and it is very sharp! For those who enjoy the landscapes is ideal but does its job a bit in all situations. It is very light and small in size, I personally also find it very comfortable ergonomically as it is held and handled in a very comfortable way. If you want to put it in difficulty try to photograph two parallel vertical lines, the only defect for me really obvious (but I repeat, solvable in post correcting the lens distortion with ACR or nikon software depending on how you work) : the barrel distortion, which is still noticeable only around 18mm and with lines in the frame that highlight it, for the rest you will not even notice. A hair of more chromatic aberrations than other lenses but they come out only when you put it under stress in scenes with very strong direct light and very high contrast, otherwise never noticed. The vignette is very light and uniform to the most open and never annoying diaphragms, I would say almost pleasant. In my profile you can find some photos taken with this lens to give you an idea. For the price to which it is used today in my opinion is a best buy and a lens absolutely to have without fear of using it with dense sensors like D810. It is worth far more than the average vote indicated! Score: 9.5/10
Pros:Lightness, sharpness (especially in the middle), cost
Cons:18mm distortion, renge of focals
Opinion:The Nikon 18-35 G is a lens that makes weight (less than 400g), size and cost its workhorses. I use it as a handyman on the Nikon d810 and I have to say that he does his job well, as at the end of the day I come home without suffering because of the weight of the machine-lens cover. From an optical point of view it is a good lens, closed to f8 is very sharp in the center and defends well even at the edges. It has good flare control and allows you to mount 77mm filters, which makes it a good landscape lens. The main limits are 2. First the fact that it starts at 18mm, vs 16/17 of the older brother F4 and the equivalents Tokina and Tamron. Secondly the distortion at 18mm, very noticeable. Personally I do not regret the choice, but having to buy an optics of this band, I would look forward to the Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4 which could be an interesting alternative.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
