Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro : Specifications and Opinions


Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

The Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro is a superzoom lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 549 €; 44 users have given it an average vote of 8.3 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Sony A-mount.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-300 mm
 Angle of view   84 - 5.5°  (equivalent to a 24-450mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
 Format   APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.5-6.3
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.39 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.34x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   No

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   67 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   540 g
 Dimensions   75 x 100 mm
Buy Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 179000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on March 23, 2018

Pros: Versatility, lightness, price, fair general quality.

Cons: 16 mm distortion, chromatic aberrations.

Opinion: I compared this target with the Nikon 18-140 and the 70-300 Tamron vr. I used 5 target usaf 1951 (those that were once used for the objective tests) a central one and 4 at the edges. At full aperture (ta) at 16 mm the Tamron is surprising. While in the center the Tam and the Nik are equivalent to the edges the Tam is definitely better. A f8 both improve. At 50mm a ta in the center no winner while at the edges the Nik gets even worse. At f8 both improve. At 70mm the Tamron 70-300 comes into play. The super zoom 16-300 holds up well the comparison, both in ta and f8. Parity. At 140 mm at ta the Nik is better than the Tam 16-300 because of the AC of the latter. But you notice at a 100% magnification, minimal difference. At f8 the Tam 16-300 recovers a lot with the ac managing to be almost in a draw. At 140 mm the Tamron 70-300 is better than both. Now the challenge is only between 16-300 and 70-300. 70-300 is better at all focal lengths and diaphragms. But anyway the 16-300 comes out with his head held high. The most "macro" of all is 16-300, but the 70-300 being of superior quality even enlarging the image remains better. The af seems to me fast and accurate while the stabilizer is 90% reliable, but in that 90% does its duty really well. My conclusion. Is it worth replacing the Nikon 18-140 with the 16-300? Yes definitely. Taking into account that in focal lengths between 18-140 it is sometimes clear that 16-300 is even better and between 140-300 it is all gold cast. Is it worth replacing the Tamron 70-300 with the 16-300? No, the first one is better. Is it worth replacing the 18-140 and the 70-300 together with the 16-300? NI! If you are not looking for the super quality between the 70-300 focal lengths, the 16-300 is definitely worth it. Keep in mind that in addition to the overall dimensions between 18-140 and 70-300, together with the weight, a total of 1255 g against 540 g. Then the versatility of 16-300 is enormous. I use it especially if I go on a motorbike or long trips in the mountains. For the sheds or a short road I have the 150-600 Sigma sport. Otherwise I bring both, the 150-600 in the backpack and pull it out in case it's worth it.

avatarjunior
sent on January 07, 2018

Pros: focal excursion, price, sharpness at short focal length, AF.

Cons: strong chromatic aberrations above 200mm, not very bright.

Opinion: I state that this is my first goal after 18-55 from kit canon, so the review that I will be compared to the latter.rnavevo fear of buying it having read conflicting reviews on this goal, but at the end for an offer found I bought it shortly with the premise that if I had not satisfied I would give it back.rnallora in sharpness up to 150 mm is great, I pulled out beautiful shots especially at 16mm, unfortunately the more you go up more shows its limits, above the 200mm above all I realized strong chromatic aberrations, which in any case are corrected quickly in post.rnl'AF I found it better than that of 18-55, where I had problems.rnè a goal not to be used at closed, where it is very affected by the fact that it is so dark, but outside there are no problems, and excellent results.rnconclusion: to learn is a great goal, gives you the opportunity with not too much money to understand which focal lengths they are for you and sfruttthe more (I for example I am realizing that 80% of the photos between 16 and 60mm shots) is also valid as a goal and you can make great photos.rn I regretted having bought it, obviously it is a goal only to learn or for the light trips, for those looking for the real quality I discourage.rnrnps. not having the stm have the opportunity to correct the autofocus while shooting was a turn.rn

avatarjunior
sent on October 28, 2017

Pros: Lightweight, focal length, footprint, weight and price

Cons: For my amateur uses for now I do not see it

Opinion: I am a holder of nikon 7200 and travel a lot. I was a handyman who would allow me to travel lightly. I had some doubt, but I have to say that I have taken some good shots even in low light conditions. Good autofocus and vr system. So if one is a lover of perfection buy three four fixed goals it spends five times what I have spent and traveling with eight pounds on the backpack. And if you see pictures on a monitor you do not always notice it ..

avatarsenior
sent on August 20, 2017

Pros: Versatile, light, crisp, "almost macro", pleasing bokeh, minimum distance of MAF, tropicalization.

Cons: If you want to be fussy, it's not really a 300mm, the new price though for what it offers them all.

Opinion: I had this lens a few years ago, coupled with a Canon 700D, and when I realized how to use it, I liked it a lot. Moving to FF, reluctantly, I sold it but I always went looking for a "handyman" that would allow me to go home with a go-go or on the go. Having an Aps-c body, I took advantage of an Amazon opportunity and resumed it. I use it with a 7D2 for the "read" outputs and honestly do not know what one might ask for more than one optic that maintains good sharpness - at least 200mm - already in TA (beyond just close 1, max 2 stop And sharpness returns to more than appreciable values), always considering the price range but above all the use it makes of such an optic. I find it particularly convenient to go in an instant and above all without having to change optics, from "macro" to "pushed" telescopes, especially in the countryside"I go to butterflies" or insects. Obviously it's not the 100-400 IS II, but weighs well over 1kg less and anyway, working a little in pp, the results you get do not regret having left home for a walk without a slut, the big brother .rnPacific blurry and natural colors, fast enough for MAF and great stabilizer, although I noticed that taking longer than 1/250 "and keeping it off, will be my impression, but the photos are crisper ... RnFollowing not being able to use it with 6D, but you can not have it all and anyway, the fact that it is tropicalized, I would prefer to pair with 7D2.rnIn conclusion, I am very pleased to have taken it back between "whites" and " Whites "that I have and I appreciate, this" little "Tamron does not matter at all!

avatarjunior
sent on April 24, 2017

Pros: Lightweight, rugged, weather sealed, bulky at the right point, Sharpness Good, as expected.

Cons: yield Calo at maximum focal if it can be a defect.

Opinion: I bought to match the Canon 100D, so I replaced my Sony 10RX Bridge, I have gained in versatility and a little acting. The need was to have a versatile solution, not cluttered and decent quality to keep in your backpack. I'm using for several months even in combination with a Canon 7D Mark II, with this body is a bit slow in making fuoco.rnComunque happy with the purchase.




Photos taken with Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Foto
Papa, you do also work in August?
by Claudio Cozzani
116 comments, 5939 views  
HI RES 8.9 MP

Foto
Lire Diecimila
by AnnH
70 comments, 1276 views
Foto
All Arms and Legs
by AnnH
51 comments, 1521 views
Foto
Asya a little Naughty
by Loredana Schena
87 comments, 1113 views  
HI RES 11.4 MP

Foto
With the sun on our side
by Photofla
44 comments, 2687 views  
HI RES 9.7 MP

Foto
PortoVenere between Sky and sea
by Magù
108 comments, 1743 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Morpho Peleides
by AnnH
58 comments, 748 views
Foto
Colored embroidery thread
by Loredana Schena
141 comments, 2387 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuseppe777
25 comments, 4194 views  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Likeness
by AnnH
36 comments, 1354 views
Foto
The colors of the sea
by Claudio Cozzani
116 comments, 4653 views
Foto
Look look that kittens
by Claudio Cozzani
81 comments, 3908 views
Foto
Papa as you are funny
by Claudio Cozzani
107 comments, 3062 views
Foto
Milan c.le
by Loredana Schena
130 comments, 1767 views  
HI RES 6.9 MP

Foto
Samia ricini
by AnnH
49 comments, 740 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Elena_og
9 comments, 5072 views  
HI RES 6.0 MP

Foto
Reflections from Castel Toblino
by Photofla
27 comments, 2948 views  
HI RES 14.0 MP

Foto
Arrives?
by Simet7610
69 comments, 3312 views  
HI RES 6.5 MP

Foto
Escapism
by AnnH
33 comments, 524 views
Foto
The sails and the Apuan
by Claudio Cozzani
94 comments, 1518 views  
HI RES 3.6 MP

Foto
Sunshine And Sunshades
by AnnH
42 comments, 711 views
Foto
The snowfall yesterday
by Loredana Schena
88 comments, 1519 views  
HI RES 5.2 MP

Foto
Colors of summer
by Loredana Schena
55 comments, 472 views  
HI RES 5.9 MP

Foto
Marine reflections
by Claudio Cozzani
81 comments, 1146 views
Foto
Here, the waves don't pass, quiet
by Claudio Cozzani
71 comments, 860 views  
HI RES 4.3 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by AnnH
35 comments, 597 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by AnnH
38 comments, 650 views
Foto
Happy Holidays
by Loredana Schena
71 comments, 1101 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
The low wall on the sea
by Claudio Cozzani
81 comments, 807 views
Foto
I almost go back inside ....
by Claudio Cozzani
89 comments, 6528 views
Foto
What remains of the past
by Loredana Schena
66 comments, 1149 views  
HI RES 15.3 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Palazzo Marino and the statue of Leonardo
by Loredana Schena
69 comments, 1194 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
Lake Tovel
by Photofla
26 comments, 3438 views  
HI RES 15.8 MP

Foto
Good 2018 to everyone
by Claudio Cozzani
90 comments, 1192 views
Foto
Color in the streets
by Photofla
39 comments, 1875 views  
HI RES 5.3 MP

Foto
Dawn Walker
by AnnH
30 comments, 385 views
Foto
The gold of the sea
by Claudio Cozzani
98 comments, 1151 views  
HI RES 3.6 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me