|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fascione www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fascione  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Ricoh GR III Pros: Size, Philosophy, File Cons: Internal lens system Opinion: Dust seems to be the biggest problem of this machine, everyone thinks of solutions to protect it but few use it for what it has been designed to do. Everyone puts the UV adhesive filter in front of the lens... Believing to save her from the dust. But by closing the air inlet like that, it only makes me think of the suction cup/air suction effect like a plunger every time it turns on? Now the dust is sucked out of the telescopic system and microphone holes! The real problem is the lens movement system that is too plastic and too delicate, in the face of a beautiful metal body. The battery can't be a con, to make it bigger they should increase the size of the camera in general, do as with the phone, if it runs out and you don't have batteries attach it to the powerbank! Guys enjoy this car, always carry it with you and enjoy it. sent on January 20, 2024 |
 | GoPro Hero11 Black Pros: size, excellent materials, robust, fast Cons: almost nothing but the linear RAW yes! Opinion: Great camera for its purpose (video shooting), I took it instead especially for photos (so I want to shoot in RAW) I often feel the need to use the shooting mode "linear" instead of "wide".... but the "linear" mode does not do RAW. I hope they implement this feature. sent on December 07, 2022 |
 | Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2.8 (C/Y) Pros: sample of compactness, robustness, quality, blurred Cons: nobody Opinion: Stratospheric lens, superlative quality, minimum size. It is one of the few lenses that totally covers even the MEDIUM FORMAT sensor so you can mount it with little expense on a GFX body and enjoy all its beauty. Fantastic construction, indestructible. If one does not care about focusing, which nowadays is still assisted with the new generation machines... go on this lens that is a real pleasure. sent on April 04, 2022 |
 | TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/1.4 Pros: construction, shape, detachment of the floors Cons: A bit of AC, edges at maximum aperture Opinion: I was surprised by this lens, the construction is excellent, the rings are very soft and perfectly frictioned, the diaphragm ring decliccabile. The optical scheme is simple and I like it, it gives character to the photos; I think it is this simplicity to give a beautiful detachment of the planes to the images ... maybe also because of some AC but I would say that all in all it is a good compromise. It is not a lens for those who want to shoot fast, excellent quality / price. sent on February 01, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-PRO1 Pros: Quality and CHARACTER of the images, physical keys in the right place, menu without too many functions (you photograph stop), style, robustness, beauty. Cons: are we talking about photos? then very few. It is not a camera for sports photos or where you should not think too much (maybe this is a PRO and not a con) Opinion: SHE REMAINS THE QUEEN. I've had all the mirrorless X series, all the versions and models... I have the GFX system, I think that by now I have been able to experience something, but what she transmits I have not yet found. There is feeling, there is style, there is the desire to photograph and enough with her. It makes you want to shoot, to feel that shutter that closes, it makes you want to compose to find new points of view. I am encouraged to shoot even with manual optics ... call them pippe but also the feeling counts in photography. It has its own character, precise, incomparable and unobtainable; coupled with dated lenses such as the 35m 1.4 or modern manual optics, the particularities of the lenses are combined to give life to images rich in "identity". I hope Fuji always remembers where it started. sent on January 31, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR Pros: f1.7 aperture, size, stratospheric sharpness, bokeh Cons: AF a bit noisy, movement ENGINE AF for image display (see below) Opinion: A lens that touches perfection thanks to its large aperture, its sharpness and its bokeh.... BUT... the lens is on / off (and this could also be fine) but also every time you go to "play" to view the images ... it makes a boring attack / detach of the AF engine, this can make those who may use it for video turn up their noses. I do not say anything about the AF speed because in the end even indoors, and with little light, you work well: I found them all in focus on a hundred photos .. Optics suited to the portrait for its opening and its crazy bokeh sent on January 21, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm GFX50S II Pros: file information, color rendering, size, ergonomics, beauty Cons: AF still uncertain but just enough for the type of photo that this machine should do, much improved compared to the 1 generation Opinion: I come from 50R that in its own way already satisfied me a lot, the only thing that pushed me to replace it with the 50SII was the IBIS, in my opinion almost fundamental in such large sensors. In fact, the world has changed a bit, now you shoot at different minimum speeds thanks to the AF a little less uncertain. It is a more mature machine, very beautiful among other things, the keys are positioned well, it grips very well. For the moment I am very very satisfied. sent on January 14, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm GF 100-200mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: compact, lightweight, stabilized, sharp, bokeh Cons: focal excursion not very wide but it's okay Opinion: one of the best lenses for the GFX system in my opinion, is a lightweight, compact and very sharp lens. Although it has a maximum aperture of 5.6 it has a beautiful bokeh so I also recommend it for portraits, without any problems at all. If you really had to ask for more... I would have liked a little more hiking, like 80-200 or 100-250 .... but it's already fine. It's a 10 lens for me sent on January 11, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 R Pros: Font, size, hood Cons: Noisy Maf Opinion: I tried literally all the lenses (and not just fuji)... in the end I found the final lens in the one I always snubbed and then bought last. I am very complicated about changing the lenses, this time I managed to take a vacation without ever taking off the lens. I was looking for small lenses without bringing zooms but at the same time I didn't want to change lenses too many times. This is beautiful with its vintage style, the hood is fantastic and makes effect in x-pro bodies Perfect focal length (subjective I know), af all in all fast on xpro3 even if a little noisy. Qualitatively it seems fantastic to me in the center, however a perfect lens for the street. Happy finally, maybe in the future they will make a quieter version (without increasing the size!!) sent on October 17, 2021 |
 | Mitakon Speedmaster 35mm f/0.95 II Pros: opening, construction, maf ring, bokeh Cons: diaphragms ring without click, weight Opinion: Purchased for its maximum aperture, 0.95 which equates a bokeh of about 1.4 on full frame (indicatively to the pdc). The construction is very solid, all metal... and you can feel it from the weight, the focus ring is very ergonomic and fluid, it focuses all in all well. If it were smaller it would not be easy to focus so the size is more than fine. With the new peacking systems it is not very difficult to focus in manual, even at 0.95 ... where I must say that the quality remains very high. The blurred is of character, not surgical, I personally like it very much. sent on September 19, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Lumix LX100 II Pros: Compact, sturdy, beautiful, picture format that really changes Cons: 24mm lens excursion, sometimes complicated menu Opinion: I wanted to try this compact because I needed something small, good quality and without changing goals. The choice was almost obligatory as in terms of sensor size/brightness of the optics does not have large competitors for now. The car is nice, pretty, sturdy... from off, too bad that when you turn it on you comes out a trumpet too long to be at 24mm, imagine when you go to 75mm... you could maybe reduce it in some way, really annoying, makes you lose the magic in a short time. The menu is unclear and even if you read the complete manual you can not understand what some function means because it is explained with 2 words (and I'm not really acerbic in cameras). Beautiful function there change image format that however keeps the field angle, in fact the sensor is the typical 20mpx 4/3 but that depending on the format you choose takes more pixels in width (for example for the 16:9 from 15megapixel goes to 5152x2904 pixels) or height (17 megapixels if you choose 4:3 in which it goes to 4736x3552)... so there is no full 4:3 cutout but the necessary megapixels are used. The image quality is normal for the sensor that has, a little too much noise even to iso 200 for my taste. For the moment I have found no alternative for what I was looking for... it's not perfect but almost. Rating 8.5 sent on January 21, 2020 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Small, robust, reliable, beautiful file Cons: lack of exposure point AF spot spot Opinion: After trying everything I am also approved to RF system, what to say, I like, the machine is sturdy (although built of plastic as well as RF lenses, but it is a beautiful plastic). It was the first machine that made me forget the joystic, in fact it has a really precise touch focus and easy to customize. The files are great, the megapixels are the right ones for me. The dimensions are small and hold well. As for a machine made well, fast and reliable, I do not care about the stabilizer or tropicalization for what I have to do, I am very satisfied. sent on January 06, 2020 |
 | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM Pros: Image quality, brightness, charm Cons: size (but you know), nothing more Opinion: It's the optics that I call DEFINITIVE, you mount it and you do everything to it. You have brightness, blurry, quality.... it's an exaggerated lens. The AF is fast even in critical condition. Size sometimes leads you to make choices, for example during a holiday I would bring the excellent 24-105 RF and not that.... but physics is physics. One-of-a-kind optics, my favorite... Rating 10 sent on November 29, 2019 |
 | Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Finally a 70-200 2.8 that you can always carry with you! Compact, well built although plastic, lightweight. Soft Blur! Cons: Paraluce that does not give at all, they could try one daisy although little indicated for the type of lens. Opinion: I'm not a pro and so I was waiting for a 70-200 2.8 to always carry with me, I prefer sincerely to scapita about the beauty of the lens..... But you know... the photos you make if you have the car with you! When it is closed you take it wherever you want, the weight is also very acceptable; from open is not beautiful (especially with the lampshade) but patience. The paint seemed a bit opaque and at first I was afraid that it was of the type "sigma" that after a while crumbled.... then looking good I saw that it is rigid white plastic, it seems unpainted so. The quality, even though I took it a few days seems great and one thing I immediately noticed is a very soft, beautiful blurry one. With the firmware of December 2019 the optics bought security in the AF, I made some portraits and did not miss a shot. We'll see later on for the rest. I gave a 9 for the lampshade sent on November 29, 2019 |
 | Leica M-P Pros: 2gb buffer, fast, discreet, robust Cons: For the leica system M ... Nobody. Opinion: It is a pity that here on juza the shots taken with this machine end up among those of the m240 normal, in fact it is recognized as such by the exif files... Dated machine you'll think... but the M-E with the same characteristics as the M-P... a machine instead that has so much to say. The 2gb buffer makes it fast, without large lag, the sensor that beats it with the m10 (which in my opinion has more chromatic noise). sent on July 21, 2019 |
 | Sony Distagon T* FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Pros: Light, well built, fuzzy soft, three-dimensionality, detachment of the subject Cons: Chromatic aberrations almost always present, flare sometimes Opinion: My favorite lens, an incredible optical quality, a blurry one and a deadlift of scary planes. Built well, all in all light, AF responsive and fast enough. You need to learn to live with the chromatic aberrations that are practically always present (just a touch to remove them). Maybe that's why the price is a little too high due to the competition. Rated 9 sent on March 03, 2019 |
 | Venus Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Zero-D Pros: Relatively compact, top construction, really minimal distortion Cons: Painful front cap, no communication with the camera Opinion: The lens is really fantastic, if one knows how to frame at 12mm (because it is often not distortion but PDR) is a really correct lens. The construction is at the highest level, the ring nuts well positioned and above all crummy as it should. At the bottom of the lens is not great if you consider its brightness and focal! One of the most beautiful and creative lenses I've ever tried! The lens hood... At first I thought it was a joke but unfortunately it was not! A "lid" pressure that after 5 times that extract it becomes slow and you lose it continuously. I would have expected better sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | 7artisans 12mm f/2.8 Pros: compactness, possibility of mounting filters (with a special accessory often not included in the package), economical Cons: Aperture ring without shots, a little flare Opinion: An economical lens, but built very very well, sturdy. It has some glitches in backlight and but for these focal can almost be normal. Bad the ring without snap to the change of aperture, but for the purpose of shooting does not change anything. If I look at the price to which it is sold I realize I can not expect more, a perspective to have because considering the size, construction and performance... is a good compromise. sent on November 06, 2018 |
 | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Extremely detailed file, fine detail detail, ergonomics, useful functions for file / size reduction Cons: Lack articulated display (if I just have to say) Opinion: Acquired with a bit of skepticism and fear after having owned a Sony A7R II, which turned out to be a big machine. It features at least 3 reflexes, a 50-megapixel reflex, and one from the "full frame" sensor and an APSC the maximum detail? Use 50 Mb RAW. Do you want to take a portrait session and are you afraid of the size of the photo series? Use mRAW and you have a 30 megapixel FF from the file anyway great. Want crop? Cut 1.3x or 1.6x and you are equal to a 7D mark II. For me this is very important and he avoided buying (as I often did) different bodies! It has a great function against the microregion during shooting, it is built as it should and the keys are all in the right place. The fine detail of the files is greater than any "big megapixel" sensor I've ever tried, maybe on the recovery wins the Sony sensor ... but if they play it. VERY HAPPY! sent on November 09, 2017 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Lightweight, well built, small, acceptable quality Cons: For me nobody saw the price and location of the lens. Maybe a bit more sharpness to the edges at times Opinion: Maybe the most distorted lens in history ... I bought it because it's light and very small compared to 2.8 and I have to say that the size is perfect for the mirrorless system (i find the sony 2.8 optics too big and they lose the philosophy of portability). For the cost that he has, especially used, I think he's doing his job quietly ... Very well, I really like the aluminum he's produced with. It's really like so many say, sometimes it's not sharp on the edges ... but I think he can forgive me. sent on October 26, 2017 |
 | Pentax K-1 Pros: image quality, pixel shift, peacking focus, internal stabilization, strength in general. Cons: upper display a little bit (but there is all that is needed) Opinion: I was looking for an SLR with a stunning optical quality without having to manage billions of megapixels but not too few, for measuring density is perfetta.rnIn more when you want the most just activate the pixel shift and have the files of 150 MB but with detail from Middle formato.rnVolevo an SLR but I did not abandon the peacking focus that I used with satisfaction in my mirrorless..ed here goes ... we have it! rnAvendo also had the d810 I can say that the quality of image and color management is even better, totally abandons K1 much better manages the greens and noise in general (recovery 4 stops on shadows with a minimum of chroma noise) .rnPer me is a spectacular car, certainly does not have a lightning-fast AF, it does not have many AF points ... but everything works well. is not made for sports or birds even if you can practice! rnBatteria that never ends, spectacular swiveling display, very compact for a camera ... I could say rnPoi Wifi ... gps .... ecc..eccc .. but these things do not use ... but there are! sent on March 06, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R Pros: Openness, size, optical quality, bokeh Cons: autofocus Opinion: A lens that can not miss the portrait but with which you can do so much more. Once the mountains makes you want to take to see the blurred or the detachment of the plans that you da.rnÈ also very compact and if you agree to use it without a hood becomes wearable! RnUnica sore point for me is the autofocus of the old generation establishment at times and in low light situations in peripheral points just will not hang up and makes you nervous! Compared with 90 (I) is a duffer at af level. For the rest it is a lens 9 sent on October 21, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: Robust, construction, AF, quality Cons: Nobody! Opinion: What else can you ask from a 'very well built optical, razor sharp, fast by AF and the blurred beautiful? NOTHING! For me one of the best fuji optical although very specialized, born for the pure portrait but willingly use benches for more details ... I'm in love with his optical quality and its saturated and soft blurry! sent on September 14, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X100T Pros: discreet, light, strong, immediate feeling Cons: AF sometimes uncertain Opinion: I wanted to buy this compact more to "monkey" than anything else because I already had two fuji bodies and a whole range of optics but this little car I was stunned! RnImpressionante, incredible as you can you open your mind to a totally different approach to photography from what you're used to, you feel free from the thought of the focal length, the lens and finally .... MOVE! RNE when you move discover! rnIl feeling was immediate, the fact is the AF sensor ottimo.rnL'unico that still does not fit in my complete reliability parameters ... but the margin for error is really just around errori.rnInsomma a car that makes you forget everything else ... because in the end with you will not miss anything! sent on June 28, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: build quality, file quality, speed. Cons: Price maybe .... Opinion: A machine for a particular type of photography, of course you can do it but it is not a machine especially designed for sport or birds. I know understand the type of viewfinder that mounts, an optical viewfinder that the doors open you to a different approach to street photography. The files are very good, more detail (given by the denser sensor), a stop on the iso more grip than the old xtrans from 16mpixel, more vivid, more rofondi, more pieni.rnL'AF improved but I can not say what we saw I do not use this machine in situations where it puts to test his machine reattività.rnUna not for every use so ... but a great machine to use for which it was born. sent on April 25, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: Focal range, compact enough for the class, affordable price Cons: Not very precise zoom range in my opinion. Opinion: I noticed that just bought from 130 to 135mm zoom abbastazna was hard, I tried with other specimens and those who more or less had the same caratteristica.rnIl Pipe Making zoom range is made of plastic and not really perfect for the thousandth where you see that in some parts of the sponge touches dust and other remains slower (d nothing worrying anyway) .rnPoi I look at the bottom ... and it says MADE IN CHINA .... and you can have capisco.rnNon the same quality of lenses made in Japan, I do not think that the controls are tight as those made in japan .... and vede.rnper the rest, however, gave a qualitatively very valido.rnHo 9 sent on September 18, 2015 |
 | Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro Pros: Great optical quality, well costrutia, intenal focus Cons: Overcharge Opinion: I BOUGHT ONE MOUNT FUJI X.rnL'ho purchased because Fuji does not have a macro lens, the 60mm I did not take this bene.rnHo Samyang FUJI because he had the attack and did not have to make do with adapters go (although I would have saved quite a bit) .rnLa manual focus is perfect, the ring at the right point. For the pure macro is what I wanted! Rnih However optical quality of the lens is very high, we are on a par with the most renowned optics (maybe more), the building is made of plastic and metal and looks very robusta.rnLa focus manual is perfect, the ring to the point giusto.rnInfondo is not too great not having FIRE INSIDE stretches during MF.rnSono happy purchase, the advice to those with mirriorless while those who have a reflex recommend taking other optics with selective afuoco automatic (which can always serve). sent on September 10, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R APD Pros: Tough, bright, optically a show. Cons: Loss of focus phase detection in large apertures, but you know before you buy it so ... Opinion: A lens that is not for everyone, the purchase goes valutato.rnSe looking for a lens from portrait this is the best in my opinion, a lens that has a crazy blur, soft and never "nervous" (like that of his brother 56mm non APD) .rnC'è to know that the filter APD inside of the lens also acts as a filter for the light, enters a little less light than a lens without treatment, for example if I open to 1.2 there will be a passage of light as if it were 1.7..eccc the diaphragm. The diaphragm is still 1.2 but spends a little less light (a bit like making a normal filter) .rnATTENZIONE, this is NOT for me because a defect in a lens devoted to this portrait It involves a greater contrast and the "removal of the subject" .rnQuesto treatment APD also lose speed AF with apertures ranging from 1.2 to 5.6 (In addition to the back even) then the MAF will be slower than the 56mm NOT APD ... ( we will in fact only the maf sensingContrast). This thing could lead to prefer the 56mm not apd for indoor shots or where necessary maf faster .... for me and just avanza.rnOttima choosing fuji in the package insert a filter ND8, filter essential when shooting at ' aperto.rnGRANDE LENS sent on July 06, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: Sharpness, optical quality and physical size Cons: ring diaphragms a little soft, lens hood economic Opinion: Stratospheric lens, rugged, small, optically fantastica.Credo that the equivalent focal length of 21mm is often useful for those who make street and who does not want to bring too much stuff with you, but it can go very well as wide angle and even for night shots through the roof ... is a lens that you always carry with you, always. my choice was the 14mm and 35mm ... and when I'm out walking I do not need another. Lens really recommended sent on June 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: crisp, well-built, fast, good stabilizer, size Cons: high price, maybe a little heavy but we know Opinion: Lens for excellent light output, excellent image quality when used smooth, still good when used with TC14, TC14 better with III, which is sometimes miracles (I would like to see given the cost). The AF is fast and maintains a certain usability even with TC. In short, does his dirty work in many situations. I think the only downside is the price, exaggerated by the type of lens which is (even if it looks like its other brands) .rnMi am still recommend it because the alternatives at par there are not second me.rn sent on May 05, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Sensor quality, good construction, dimensions, good sealing ISO Cons: If we want the BUFFER ... the single biggest impediment if we are used to "strafe" display mode in play Unclear. Opinion: We found a good opportunity used, about 7000 shots. I do not miss nothing compared to d810 but I still keep that for other types of shots. This machine has the advantages of the APS-C for macro and nature while maintaining a very good image quality. A sensor very dense but maintains a high quality, davvero.rnPer many the only problem will be the buffer, 6 continuous shots and then slows down a lot, but for those like me who are small bursts of max 3 to 4 shots at a time the problem does not occur rarely. If you enable the reduction of noise and distortion reduction on room and you also get to a buffer of 3 shots max ... really pochi.rnUn'altra special features that I noticed is that the lack of clarity of the display shots, because when I go to review click the image appears blurry, but just minimally enlarge the image changes completely, perhaps this is due to the "neutral" in the picture control.rnSono however satisfied and I feel quietly to advise! sent on May 05, 2015 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Size from compact, extended park optical stabilizer on-camera, speed, robustness Cons: Exposure spot AF point missing, noise visible over 1000 ISO Opinion: An excellent machine, dynamic, robusta.rnUn lot of features (some of which are useless for the professional) .rnAvrei acceptable exposure SPOT below the AF point ... but what about ... rnSono soddisfatto.rnAl very moment I think it is the only alternative to reflex when it comes to compactness and number of lenses disponibili.rnLa recommend sent on January 05, 2015 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: 36 megapixels, dynamic range, quiet Cons: It does not seem too strong, a lot of plastic. Live view in low light conditions unsatisfactory Opinion: I state that I come from machines and optical per canon, my change was made because I was fascinated by the sensor 36mpx and its dynamic range. Nothing to complain about it with regard to image quality, the menu and the many useful features. Compared with the bodies of pro canon I was used to see and hear a little too much plasticosità enough to get an impression of not strength. The live view is 20 years back .... if it is used in low light seems to use a cell phone at night, graininess and flicker a go go, unacceptable to me on a pro body. For the rest great macchina.rn sent on November 08, 2014 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: Robusta, which is essential, safe, reliable. Actual colors, file malleable grain fascinating Cons: Perhaps the lack of work AUTO ISO (but avoidable with the "rectification") Opinion: Machine that must be seen with the knowledge of his age for some things ... but if you are unable to accept this is still a top of the range car that "new" hardly know how to overcome. I had practically all SLR cameras canon (including 1d 4 and 1DX) but I went back after seeing the fidelity of color and texture that makes this sensor .... really exciting. I do not want to say that the 1DX is a ciofeca, for charity, but in my opinion the files of modern sensors are sometimes too hard ... rnUna car that is approaching the threshold of € 1200 for a used one .... truly take. sent on September 28, 2014 |
 | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: Strong, fast, safe, reliable, a real tank. Cons: Lack AUTO ISO function (to circumvent the problem with the "rectification" but is not equal). Display with low resolution but I do not watch it almost never. The 10 mpx not think it is a great "against" because I think enough. Opinion: Purchased exclusively for wildlife shots, I think this is his vocation, for other types of photos I have other bodies. A machine designed for the professional who cares about megapixels but who loves the natural colors and beauty of RAW. A machine with which he was now feeling, produces files with a sharpness "perceived" truly impressive. The colors are beautiful and faithful, the file is very malleable! I tried all the machine into service I think ... I stopped (in fact I went back) to the DIGIC III processor and the old sensors because even with the age of the files give me Exciting and not too technical as the ones of today's machines. Just because I love this type of machine (talking about the construction method), I decided to also buy a 1DS Mark III. I am very happy! sent on September 24, 2014 |
 | Sony RX1 Pros: Image quality, portability, robustness. Lens of high quality, full-frame sensor. Cons: It is not the lack of viewfinder as many think as a screen swivel (I speak for what you did this compact, the photo of the street) Opinion: I had the opportunity to buy both the RX1 that RX1r ... seeing some samples and comparative tests I chose the RX1. In my opinion, in fact, the minimum difference in sharpness compared to RX1r is compensated by an image without artifacts, lights / shadows fuller and (again in my opinion) greater dynamic range. A camera that you can not ask or lightning AF Tracking AF infallible because it IS NOT 'BORN TO ONE but a camera for street photography (and also for the black and white I might add!) the quality of the sensor and the lens are terrific, I do not think there is any better at the time when it comes to compact fullframe.rnPer the photo of the street is the best point, you can not find fault with a camera at the top in all ... rnMi like to point out that I never had big problems with focus, is much faster than many professional DSLR in liveview! rnSono super stoked for my purchase !! sent on September 09, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
