JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R APD is a tele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1279 €;
20 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Progressive and soft bokeh without hard lines like the wr or the old 1.2 , color rendering , weight , cost used today
Cons:Af better than 60 macro , but far from the wr version , does not involve a real disturbance if you work in single af with bodies from xt3 onwards
Opinion:This lens is close to the brenizer effect because of the focal length not excessively long and for the blurred not brutal, pleasant and contextualizing, the color rendering is very similar to the medium format GFX, as colors I feel fully satisfied by the jpg, obviously I was fought between viltrox 75 1.2 and the adp, I preferred the latter because of the yield very close to what can be called a film mood, sharp but in the same soft, different from the yield of modern lenses such as the Art or precisely the Viltrox Pro .. 14/09/2023 , I confirm that the adp spreads the bokeh and makes it more buttery without losing sharpness on the selective maf where it is resolving more than the smooth 56 R , the af seemed usable on xs10 with afs and spot point , lightness to scare that improves the possibility of shooting without stress , definitive kit to be combined with ff dslr 1dx and the second series of the biancone version is f2.8
Cons:Addiction that creates, impossible to use for what moves
Opinion:The 50mm and derivatives I tried them all for Fuji but this is a glass that has its own unique style, inimitable and ... Unreachable! The blur is incredible, it is just different from everything you know, the light points are soft and defined at the same time, there is not a single aberration and the dose of microcontrast on the subject makes it emerge strongly. But the yield is silky, smooth, which does not split the features, the sharpness is there, the contrast as well but does not scream. Those that should be the cons such as lower T-stop and AF only contrast are forgotten immediately, you will not catch the evolving dancer but ... ! The normal 56 in comparison is a scrap, I say it almost with regret because until I sold the APD and bought the smooth I did not understand it, of course I had to buy the APD again. The other 50 and 56 new WR still do not have a fife in common in the overall image rendering.
Opinion:Excellent optics , the quality of the images it creates is staggering . Together with the 35 1.4 is a lens for weight size and price of superlative quality . I would say that it is a professional optics that for the price it is now a to buy with your eyes closed. I can carry it around even in a pocket and in the photographic backpack almost disappears, I mount it on a xpro3 and its size and weight are perfect, which I can no longer do with the new optics 33 and 56 that for weight and dimensions unbalance the camera a little. I also tried the 56 1.2 classic first version and for me there is no story the APD wins hands down . The filter mounted on the lens is of very high quality. Try it and you will not regret the choice made
user26730
sent on October 06, 2016
Pros:Sharpness, focus, portability.
Cons:AF noisy and no lightning. Price
Opinion:I took this lens being hesitant and a bit skeptical. Not for the optical qualities, but for the auto focus. Speaking of optical qualities we are at very high levels. The sharpness that produces f / 1.2 is staggering and shames 50 and 85 L. The focus however, in my opinion, is not like the two Canon cited above. The focus of the APD 56 is delicate and clean. A little 'edges with little character but pleasant. Far from the fuzzy dream of 50 and 85L.rnL'auto focus has different behaviors depending on the body with which you are using. In general it is not lightning and it is a bit 'noisy. Mounted on the XT1 (with all updates made) it remains unresponsive and not optimal light conditions hard to keep up. Used instead of XT2 and Xpro2 its performance increased significantly. It does not become super fast but not speed over the use of previous bodies. In addition, the new machines, running as fast as you reduce the noise that produces solito.rnPer the quality of imthe image I give him a vote of 9,5rnPer the auto focus on first-generation bodies 8 and on those of last generation 8,5.rnIl seems very high price although higher the quality of this lens. I advise.
Pros:Fire rings and diaphragms firm, best of 56 normal, as well as slightly better color contrast and detail.
Cons:Slow to focus when focus in low light, to TA has exposure times from F2.0 around and it is a very specific lens.
Opinion:Hard to tell the quality of this lnte, they are many, but there are also difetti.Il filter apodized radically changes the lens, which is almost the only choice for a portrait Fuji, a little bit less for those who need a lens tuttofare.Dopo He has supported and tested together with a standard 56 I collected my impressions in an article: rnhttp: //instantart.it/? p = 3703
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
