JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 177000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:File Clarity - Ergonomics and Command Predisposition - Autofocus - Tropicalization - Double Memories Slots - High Light Recoveries
Cons:ISO Estate Over 1600 - Shadow Recoveries - Dynamic Range - Autonomy - Slow in Post-Shooting - Sensitive to Diffraction
Opinion:Bought and sold after about 2 months after owning 1000D > 60D > 6D, Grand Machine on the construction side and predisposition of controls, basically it is a 5D Mark III with a 50mpx sensor, in fact it is just nice to hold, the autofocus if set properly does not disappoint never, but the real effect "Wow" is the sharpness of the Files that churns out as long as you mount lenses worthy of the Sensor, even the recoveries of the High lights are very good, but let's move on to the sore notes: if you do landscape and often use the live view you need at least 2/3 batteries , while if you use almost only the mirror the autonomy is not bad, you get about 500-600 shots with the original batteries LP-E6N, but this in the end is a subjective problem, above f5.6 you already perceive diffraction, but the drop that made the vase overflow are the recovering shadows and dynamic range, nothing better than the respective 6D and 5DIII released 3 years before, a real disappointment given the price of the body, in fact before buying the 5DsR I had the 6D and in the recoveries of 2-3 stop the background noise is almost identical , and the 6D with the same ISO was slightly cleaner, for those who say it is a "study" machine I agree only partly for the dynamic range, in fact it was enough to spend a weekend with a D800E to go to the other side and buy a D810, which despite being out 1 year or before in cleaning files are light years away.... Really a shame for Canon, and this confirms the difficulty in reselling it, in fact I had to change it...
Pros:Image Quality at 360 °... Good even at 1600/2000 ISO, but up to 1200 the rendering of the images is unbeatable in every point of view... machinability files... Sturdy body and "for me" ergonomic to perfection.
Cons:If You use the monitor very little battery autonomy. For me no but maybe for some the burst limited to 5 fps. Heavy Files, it takes a good PC.
Opinion:I waited quite a while before reviewing the Canon 5DSR, I wanted to be certain of what I thought and wrote... I do not review the video part because I do not care, I never do. I have been holding and using it for over a year, I took it on the advice of a friend who still owns it, I admit that after a few tests, at first glance I thought I had made a "cavolata"... At the beginning (about a month) there was some difficulty in managing it, but when I went into tune, and after doing (personally) all the settings on the camera combined with the optics I had the pleasure of enjoying all the merits. Reflex particular but rich in content, especially those related to the potential/quality of the image rendered.... Obviously the files are "Pesantucci", it takes a good processor in the PC. Who thinks is a reflex only for a few photographic uses as landscape or studio wrong, it is not so... I do mostly naturalistic, and I can say that it is the best SLR I have owned for that purpose,.. It takes away so many chestnuts from the fire, es: I can crop to 100/150x100 without loss of quality, also have a perfectly sharp subject, which covers a good surface of the finished photo and in case to be presented. Obviously with many Megapixels (RAW 50ml) you have to be careful of the blur, but once understood/managed to handle the results are surprising and unreachable with other cameras. Noise management is good/excellent even at 1600/2000 ISO, and in M-RAW (30ml pix) in the fact of noise the results are identical to the 5DMK3 (which I own).... In RAW at 50ml of pixel up to 1200 ISO image rendering is unbeatable in every point of view, sharpness, color and effect three-dimensionality... The workability in post is very good and in the recovery lights/shadows are absent the artifacts... Zero Bandig, which is sometimes present in the 5d3. Some might say that in naturalistic would serve the burst over 5 Mbps, personally I do not find limiting, of course it is my way of photographing, rarely (almost never) use continuous shots of The autofocus if set well is fast and precise, of course the The lens must be adjusted to the performance request. Even the ergonomics (for me that I have big hands) is perfect, as the feeling of robustness... I'm not going to list all the custom settable functions, one of those (for me) very useful, set the over/under exposure in a click with main wheel. The thing that must be said is that the micro fine adjustment must be done at a point, and that wants lenses/optics performing/solving, with these attentions the result is of sure effect.... A real pleasure to see the results obtained..! A tip to those who wanted to buy or bought it recently, patience and commitment, use it frequently, it takes some time to understand and discover all its potential. I gave a 10 vote in view of the difference in all round performance with other cameras owned, even different serie1.
Pros:Exceptional file quality, sharpness and detail at the top, possibility of making incredible crop, "clicking" Many photos from a single. The best for those who do panoramas, fashion, and studio photos.
Cons:Weight, autofocus, excessive noise at very high ISO.
Opinion:I have for two years the 5DSR and I am very satisfied, it is an exceptional machine for a specific use, that is, you can hate or love depending on what type of photography you intend to do. It is certainly not a machine for all, of the type frames and snaps, it requires a considerable experience to be able to exploit to the fullest all the potentialities. For panoramas and photos from studio or fashion is not rivals, as long as it is combined with high-level optics (L-series) to make the most of the detail. Except of course with full light, it is preferable to always use it with a support to avoid the micro blur that you perceive, but only at maximum magnification. Personally I used it freehand for photos in church or night up to Iso 2000 without problems, also succeeding in making cuttings. It also has a discreet burst that allows, within certain limits to take sports photos, even if it was not born for this kind of use. Autofocus should be improved with multiple points and phase autofocus. The video is certainly not at high levels, but who buys this machine does not seek this. Ultimately this is a machine to use for "quiet" photos and meditate and will give exceptional results, significantly higher than the competition.
Pros:Files with extraordinary detail; Ergonomic machine body, solid and beautiful to the touch; Super Autofocus
Cons:None relevant; Maybe an excessive number of useless functions for me.
Opinion:I have been using Canon's 5 Series for many years. I had the 5d old, the MkII, used several times the MKIII. The 5DSR constitutes in my opinion a further step forward than the previous versions, at least for my way of photographing amateur. I only do landscapes, I will have tripped 3 times in my life over 600 ISO, camera almost always on tripod. I don't need ultra reactive autofocus and a machine gun gust. 3 \ \ 4 of the 5DSR on-camera functions I do not consider necessary, including videos. I obviously seek the best image quality possible so this sensor attracted me a lot and did not disappoint expectations. Never had such detailed and well-contrasted files. Combined with good quality lenses and shrewdness in the shutter settings, it produces exciting results. I have posted one or two test photos for those who want to get an idea of the files that churns.
Pros:Very detailed and not difficult to process files, ergonomics and "series 5" controls.
Cons:If you know what you buy, no one.
Opinion:I agree almost entirely with the previous reviews. I add to have taken with me "on track", Car/motorbike (from the stands). The machine proved to be good even in a genre that should not be the one for which it was born. The AF is, when adjusted, very similar to that of the 5D4 used as a comparison during a 3-hour race (the lens used the 100-400 L IS II "fixed" at 400), then with the possibility of an extended field test. Burst and buffer the only notes. Especially the buffer (I shoot in RAW on both tabs) that does not allow guit if the cars/motorcycles are close together. I tried the crop in the car, both at 1.3 and at 1.6. Crop relative shooting in RAW since then with DPP I can recover the part of the frame "Croppato" possibly cut at the time of shooting. The files are slightly less workable than those of the 5D4, but the thing is irrelevant because in the genre that I do are already good, and because in PP I am not a great...;-). Ultimately I was pleased, as I am happy with the machine when I use it for the genres that compete them.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
