|
| sent on 21 Novembre 2023
Pros: Ergonomics, Low ISO files still "current", Autofocus precision
Cons: Limited ISOs that can be felt today, depending on the areas of use
Opinion: When I decided to add the Canon to the Nikon kit, I invested in lenses, buying a 6D as a body, which has never satisfied me in terms of body, also because of the merciless comparison with the D700. By pure chance, right on RCE, I had the chance to find a semi-new one, only 7k shots, at a favorable price since it had been out of production for a while and just went beyond the 10 year warranty of availability of the components. I bought it even if with some initial doubts, but being lucky enough to have 24-35-50-85 in the kit, honestly after a while I realized which thoroughbred I had in my hands. Undoubtedly, after 800 iso the sensor begins to struggle but as many have remarked, the grain remains rather pleasant, but up to 800 it is a spectacular machine, it has a precise light meter, a detailed and excellent file in post, nice viewfinder, ergonomics spot on even for someone like me who used more Nikon, in short, I am satisfied with the purchase. In addition, despite being a studio camera, the 50 and 85 L have consistently increased the percentage of photos in focus compared to the use with the 6D. Carefully evaluate the purchase though, unless it is new / amateur, consider that this was a machine for more than 7k euros, if you break a component, the costs would be proportionate, always assuming that you find the materials But if you go back... I would buy it again |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
