JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/1.4 is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2020. The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 91 €;
8 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Nikon Z.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.
L-Mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C L-Mount.
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:It seems to me that the focus ring for manual focus, is with too short travel. Embarrassing image quality at open apertures
Opinion:For Fuji it is not the most desirable. Better to spend more to have something usable more easily. After all, the quality leaves much to be desired if diaphragms below 5.6 are used. If you then consider that at closed apertures the image quality tends to deteriorate, you can connote this lens as a toy, but nothing more
Opinion:Surprising lens with negligible cost. Let's start with the price: it costs like an original battery. Very small size, smaller than fuji 23mm f / 2 but the mechanical construction is very good, feels good in the hand, very fluid fire ring and clicked diaphragm ring. The only aspect that could be improved, given the need for manual focusing, would be the stroke of the same, too short especially from 3m to infinity. Cmq with the peaking and the generous viewfinder of the xt I have no major problems to focus and even at full aperture, in portraits, I can have the precise focus on the eye. What satisfied me most is the optical yield as a whole, color rendering, sharpness, bokeh are very good even not considering the ridiculous price at which it is sold. If we then consider the cost, then the judgment can only be excellent. Taken for fun, I find myself using it very often and not just for "play". The minimum focusing distance is also good. A lens absolutely to own if you want to try your hand at manual focus.
Opinion:a lens from which I had no expectation. I had bought a Fujifilm, and I needed something to put in front of it to see how it was going. In order not to spend 3-400 euros unnecessarily for on native goal, I opted for this: 60 euros new. Never choice was more guessed. I found myself with a small, light lens, with excellent mechanics, pleasant to the touch and that returns an optical quality that you would NEVER expect from 60 euros invested. Clearly at full aperture it is soft and vignette, and it is also right that it is so, otherwise you can not even give a minimum of effect to your shots. Low contrast, but with the right light a three-dimensional effect that once again, I would never have expected. At F2 it is already great, the edges are no longer so soft and the blur remains good, three-dimensionality still good, contrast greatly improved. F4 personally goes a bomb. And in all this it is also coated, I do not know if multi, but coated it is. For 60 euros. Crazy. Value for money among the best ever observed, indeed as far as I'm concerned never seen before. Vote? Well, give me the heretic, but even if it is not as emblazoned as Zeiss or Leica, I give my 9.5 to him all, because of the price, which is a factor that we can not ignore when thinking about buying a new photographic tool.
Cons:Maybe the flare at the maximum opening but, at the end of the day, I like it.
Opinion:Goal purchased for about 80 euros, worth at least double. Excellent build quality, all metal, perfect rings, mini size. Image quality above expectations. The center of the frame is, in my opinion, very sharp. A bit of leakage on the edges and ac to the most open apertures but it is obvious for a lens of this price. There seems to be a more "net" drop in quality between f1.8 and f1.4 then from 1.8 upwards the general quality of the image improves homogeneously up to f8 where perhaps it gives the best of itself. A great buy rating 9
Pros:construction, shape, detachment of the floors
Cons:A bit of AC, edges at maximum aperture
Opinion:I was surprised by this lens, the construction is excellent, the rings are very soft and perfectly frictioned, the diaphragm ring decliccabile. The optical scheme is simple and I like it, it gives character to the photos; I think it is this simplicity to give a beautiful detachment of the planes to the images ... maybe also because of some AC but I would say that all in all it is a good compromise. It is not a lens for those who want to shoot fast, excellent quality / price.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.