JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Fujifilm X-PRO1 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 16.3 megapixels manufactured from 2012 to 2016 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 6 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 490 €;
59 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 193000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Very substantial body, fine lenses- I have the 35mm F1.4, and 18-55mm; you do need to read the manual thoroughly for best results.
Cons: There is a need to have every firmware upgrade; Fuji must be congratulated on providing the means to keep at the forefront of progress;
I do think that using a tripod suits the camera format for best results.
Opinion: I traded my M6 for the X Pro-1, and I have not regretted it at all; I sold images made with the camera within several hours of acquiring it- surely
proof of the pudding ! I found that due to having very large hands, it was necessary to get the grip, which transformed the camera for me, and i also got
the thumbs up to fit in the flash bracket; again, a superb piece of kit. Overall, I am pleased with the camera- I will eventually get the 14mm lens, and then I think that wiill be my walkaround outfit !
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Oscar aesthetics, jpg files ready from the first shot, great grip, crosshairs, Fuji colors
Cons:Battery, very slow, wifi absence, fixed display
Opinion:Does a Fujifilm X pro 1 make sense again in 2020? Absolutely yes, especially at the price at which it is located. Paid 250 euros with less than 4,000 shots, I think it is still a very good alternative for those who want excellent jpg and the legendary Fuji colors. If you add to this the vintage charm a beautiful aesthetic line, the choice is almost obligatory. Yes, it is true, it is not very fast but the photograph that I like to make with the Xpro1 is of concept, composition, relaxing and meditating. Recommended
Opinion:I wanted to specifically buy this machine in 2019. Obsolete? Undoubtedly if you look at modern machines with 20000 mp and hyper-performing autofocus. But I took it on purpose. I tried almost all the Fuji and then sold them because if you already have a full frame full set it makes no sense to recreate a new kit that, needless to hide, can not compete. Why did I choose to keep this? I am a convinced Canon user, the rendering of the canon ff sensor combined with the L-series optics can certainly not be in the least compared, useless to turn around. But there's a but. The Canon is the "safe harbor" when you need to do certain types of work, when you need a performance, a three-dimensionality and depth of level field and you have to take home the result. But photography is also emotion and feeling, and this machine takes you back in time and, for certain uses, takes you back to real pleasure. Your handbag (and not the heavy backpack), a little book note and the desire to have a fascinating medium, not flashy and invasive in your treks, trips or city visits... An absolutely exciting feeling Light, practical, aesthetically beautiful. A file that is sometimes imperfect but that brings you back a bit to the analogue and entices you to print, a fundamental aspect of photography. And speaking of analogue its "slowness" leads you to reason, to frame well and study the lights. It's no coincidence that she travels with my Nikon fm2. I use it with the 35 f 1.4 and the 16 f 1.4 and I don't need anything else.
Pros:Aesthetic beauty, viewfinder, generated files and body quality
Cons:To date, whoever buys it is because he knows what he's up against, on the contrary, he risks throwing money
Opinion:is fantastic ..... bought 2 times, resold one, I will never make this mistake again, I'll keep it to life.rnThe machine itself is beautiful to the eye, and robust to the touch ... the dials are at the right point, the layout of the keys a little less, but you make it a habit.rnEra (and is, now together with the pro2) famous for its hybrid viewfinder, which is great at the beginning to play with it a bit ', and have a little fun even with the lens inside that enlarges the focus but .... it lasts a little ..... has many many negative sides .... you end up early to use the evf, which is not magnificent, but you can understand given the age; remains however more than usable.rnI files: they are beautiful, at high iso you notice a little 'noise, but much less than you read around, and when present, if not very high iso, you have a nice grain, especially in black and white, where he produces excellent files even at higher sensitivities.rnThe speed of macchina is anything but high, but acceptable: it is not made for sports photos, but for street, landscapes ... nothing ultra fast, in short .... the autofocus is quite accurate, lent, but it goes a little in the ball in situations of low contrast or dark.rnNel complex, it is a machine in my opinion magnificent, from all points of view ... but you must know what you buy it for.
Opinion:Excellent old-style camera, effortless RAW files work well with Lightroom. Purchased used at the end of 2016 after reading several positive reviews on the web and specialized magazines at a great price (400). It's a pleasure to shoot with this jewel, having the ring for body time and that of the diaphragms on the lens has become, for me, indispensable: I went back to shooting as if I had a film camera, reasoning as much as possible before every shot. Autofocus is not suitable for sports photography, intended as subject tracking and burst shooting, but with static subjects it does not have problems even in low light conditions. On ISO sensitivity I consider it usable up to 2500, after losing, in my opinion, too much detail and the noise becomes invasive. It's better to always have a spare battery so you do not get dry during long outputs. RnThe X-Pro1 is the best with fixed fixtures for file rendering and portability; suitable for travel,hiking in the mountains and street. Recommended!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
