|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Makar79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Makar79  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D700 Pros: Robust, Reliable, Raw well processable, Reliable AF Cons: High ISO over ISO 1600, Resolution Opinion: Here is the old lady, vintage FF who... Photograph again! I recently replaced it with a D850, the purpose of this review of mine is to make it clear to those who perhaps have budget limits or want to look out at the FF world without fainting that this camera, even with all the distinctions that I have listed in the pros and cons, is still a camera that photographs and well, it can be an excellent "training ship" if purchased at reasonable prices for neophyte, Why not, for young people who want to learn, the body is "pro" and therefore has all those features that decreed its absolute success both in 2008 and in the 5/6 years to follow. To date it certainly loses the comparison with more recent cameras, but its 12 MP are still sufficient, its iso hold is still decent up to iso 1600 in my opinion, it has a very reliable autofocus module and enough to bring home the loaf in many situations, its files are still well workable on the computer, in my experience it has no problems with heat or cold, and after 60k shots I can say that I have never had a problem, At the right price I would buy it again to make the leap into the FF sent on November 28, 2023 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: Ergonomics, Low ISO files still "current", Autofocus precision Cons: Limited ISOs that can be felt today, depending on the areas of use Opinion: When I decided to add the Canon to the Nikon kit, I invested in lenses, buying a 6D as a body, which has never satisfied me in terms of body, also because of the merciless comparison with the D700. By pure chance, right on RCE, I had the chance to find a semi-new one, only 7k shots, at a favorable price since it had been out of production for a while and just went beyond the 10 year warranty of availability of the components. I bought it even if with some initial doubts, but being lucky enough to have 24-35-50-85 in the kit, honestly after a while I realized which thoroughbred I had in my hands. Undoubtedly, after 800 iso the sensor begins to struggle but as many have remarked, the grain remains rather pleasant, but up to 800 it is a spectacular machine, it has a precise light meter, a detailed and excellent file in post, nice viewfinder, ergonomics spot on even for someone like me who used more Nikon, in short, I am satisfied with the purchase. In addition, despite being a studio camera, the 50 and 85 L have consistently increased the percentage of photos in focus compared to the use with the 6D. Carefully evaluate the purchase though, unless it is new / amateur, consider that this was a machine for more than 7k euros, if you break a component, the costs would be proportionate, always assuming that you find the materials But if you go back... I would buy it again sent on November 21, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: Sharpness, Blur, Character Cons: Plastic lens hood, autofocus a bit cumbersome at times Opinion: An exciting lens in no uncertain terms, to which it is difficult to make negative judgments. It's sharp already at TA, decent AF on 6D, it becomes excellent on 1DsMKIII, accurate even in situations of pushed backlight even if sometimes a little slow, excellent construction, apart from the lens hood which is made of plastic but not well made, perhaps a little too thin the mold compared to the size. I don't find any flaws or contraindications to this lens which, although not my favorite lens, is still the one that gives the best results, practically always! Logically, the only application is for the portrait it is also a beautiful object to look at sent on November 21, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: Sharpness, Autofocus Cons: No tropicalization Opinion: A lens that is now beginning to have its years, but which still remains rather modern today, discreet construction but certainly not granite like the 24L for example, good sharpness and fully usable at TA, excellent if you close a little, fairly correct and good resistance to stray lights, Vignetta very at TA, but generally it is the field of use of the Street and can be a peculiarity of the lens, or at least I appreciate it for that too, it has a decent/good autofocus on the &D, but since I replaced that camera with the 1DsMKIII the lens has gained new life and hardly misses a beat. The lens is not a monster of correction and at the edge of the frame it is evident with an open aperture, especially for today's microscope standards, but this gives it the character for which it has always been known, still today it remains a valid, sharp lens and if you want to use it for the street, I can only recommend it, it will give emotions sent on November 20, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: Construction, sharpness, autofocus Cons: Vignette, Coma Opinion: A lens really well done, very clear in general and also be used to TA, it looks like a tank, has fast and precise autofocus and typical of the modern conception of pro lenses, I find it very "dry" and over-corrected. But unfortunately TA sticker in a colossal, for me I use it mainly for street this however is part of his stamp and I appreciate it, while for landscape use this is not a problem, Since it is difficult to use so open it to me ... would have expected more correct in a coma level, I do not see it very well at RT for night photography with stars, but it is a more or less intrusive duty of superbright Recommended sent on February 05, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Three-dimensionality, blurry, magic Cons: Fast and precise autofocus, price Opinion: Almost convinced to buy the Nikkor AF-S 58mm1.4, this lens has been for me a dilemma for a long time, so that eventually I gave in and attached to the kit Nikon Canon kit just to be able to own ... and after that the first two months I spent in cursing them. When I accepted his faults, frustrating at times, speed and precision AF, especially flanked to my 6D whose evil is coupled from this point of view, love blossomed. It is not a monster of sharpness and TA is a bit 'soft considering its price, but the overall detail is good if the scope of use, then in my opinion the only one for him, is the picture set, otherwise there better at much lower costs. Beyond the blurred, always very pleasant but in some cases a little ' "confused" and "nervous" especially when there are objects "repetitive", such as leaves, grass, etc. not far from the fire floor, colore magnificent and I find it very "artistic" even pushed against the light, pulling out all his magic and personality are not limited as other lenses to a general loss of contrast and detail, as long as we know how to manage unwanted reflections of certain angles. If he had a metal barrel instead of plastic, it would be better, so I leave a reservation on the quality of construction, it is also generally pleasant, perhaps tones too hot hair that require more work in post in the correction when shooting indoors under artificial lights , but it is my personal impression and, above all, my fault having no desire to make the pre-snap white balance. A must for the environmental portrait, although too expensive sent on February 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon 35mm f/1.4 Ai-S Pros: build quality, Sharpness global focus ring precision fire Cons: Under certain conditions, unusable TA; the most obvious coma thrusts openings Opinion: impeccable build quality, pleasant to the touch, good at f 2, crisp even to modern standards to f4 / f5.6, so that often do not make out from my AF-S 24/70 2.8 ... The vignetting is there but it is lower than the most recent ultra blur and, while not a focal peculiarity is rather smooth and unobtrusive. rnPurtroppo to 1.4 instead you enter a surreal world, which in certain contexts can also be there and have her why, but generally not so much a loss of sharpness as contrast, and markedly, and an intrusive and annoying coma TA, losing much confrontation in this field with more lenses moderne.rnQuesta lens is new still, all in all it is an excellent lens, but pays 1.4 to the comparison with the modern optics, presents a bit 'of problems and needs a little 'more work in post.rnBenchè is one of my favorite lenses, recommended for those who like old-style made with respectcontrast and colorirn sent on February 04, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 135mm f/2 D DC Pros: Sharpness, blurred quality, Defocus Control, build quality Cons: Slow autofocus, the switch between auto and manual focus practicality Opinion: Already clear to f 2, top to f 4, the defocus control is a plus to "study" on which to reason well to enrich the composition of personality. Excellent build quality, is very "dense", solid in his hands. Blurry at best as portrait lenses, a feast for the eyes. The colors are as old scuola.rnPersonalmente lens that I love, but now the engine autofocus is older, so slow compared to most modern lenses of this price range, sometimes with little light is uncertain. A defect of the lens in my opinion is given by the difficulty in moving from autofocus to manual focus, frequent passage in the picture, because this is via ring and can make you lose the attimo.rnComunque is, if you can afford it, buy it! sent on February 04, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: NitidezzarnQualità costruttivarnPrecisionernQualità blurred Cons: Focus BreathingrnPeso? Opinion: Weight perfectly balanced on my D300s, lens already quite clear to 2.8 in exciting central aperture. I do not know whether my copy but I expected a bit more fast autofocus, whatever I find in my level of 24-70. Few times, but it happened to me, with the UV filter (B + W Top of the range), the autofocus sbagliasse.rnPer the rest, is of rugged design and impeccable, VR very efficient. For me it is not a big problem, not enough to make me prefer the old 70-200 VR, but I found the cut on the focal length equivalent to 135mm even at the minimum distance of focus when set to 200mm, a defect does not conform to a perspective of this level or at least would have to be aligned to the focal length of cutting all the competition, many ... Defocused pleasant to say the least, if it were not so heavy staccherei never out of the car ... Focus breathing aside, highly recommended who can invest in this lens. sent on November 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: AutofocusrnRobustezzarnEsposimetro Cons: High isornCalo 2.5 fps with 14-bit nef Opinion: Robust and reliable, with controls at the right place and with a good deal of customization using the buttons configurable, with an autofocus which when coupled to a lens level and used wisely, hardly tradisce.Ottimo also the exposure, personally, since I have this machine, use a more secure the aperture priority mode at the expense of manuale.rnLa machine churning file "clean" and well lavorabili.rnIl iso comparison with the latest SLR is decidedly uneven, but personally I feel good up At 800 ISO, discreet to 1600, "risky" to 3200.rnPersonalmente I never digested frame rates which, with nef 14-bit, drops drastically to 2.5, and the lack of firmware support even after a long time from the output of the machine, which Canon has done instead, despite not having, both houses, in fact yet replaced modelli.rnDa last, although not important to my way of photographing, for others pixels less than the competition can be pecca.rnrnAncora a lady a car. sent on June 05, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Good optical quality at f1.4, f2.8 rnOttima quality; rnAF very accurate; rnBokeh; Cons: AF slow, inaccurate rnGhiera; rnQualità constructive, very "plastic"; Opinion: For me, the build quality leaves much to be desired, even if you understand, having traded in favor of optical quality and price, but in his hands it seems really a "touch" of plastica.rnIo do not love him a lot, but optically it is a good lens, great for the price, autofocus while being very slow to 1.4 is very preciso.rnPersonalmente I find it a bit 'too contrasty, however, is right on I find excellent for portraits and ambientati.rnIl standard price, however, is good but not know if the advantage of light 1 .4 is enough to prefer the 50 1.8, which is spoken very well and it costs about half sent on March 18, 2013 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro II Pros: Good build quality, excellent in relation to the price; rnApertura constant rnGhiere fluid and precise; Cons: Soft 200mm f2.8; rnSul my copy autofocus slow; Opinion: Excellent value for money, although I was hoping to be better wide open, especially in tropical conditions will 2.8.Non but the build quality is very good, sturdy, the dials are quite accurate and the tripod socket is well fatto.Mi like made of contrasts and colors, but it is a lot soggettivo.Perde contrast against the light, but many lenses suffer from this problema.rnConsigliato those who want a constant brightness focus on walking and do not want svenarsi, but personally I would do at home nikon effort and buy at least 80-200 bighiera.rn sent on March 17, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D Pros: Excellent quality / price ratio for optical performance and construction, good sharpness at room temperature (subjective); Great blurred (subjective); Hood metallic screw; Cons: To be picky, it loses contrast backlit Opinion: The use of this format and DX are not able to find him flaws, but just using it lately, I do not want to separate! Worth all the money it costs, for f4/f5.6 the definition is excellent and, subjectively, I love its contrasts and its colors, to me different from the new AF-s.rnSi could improve anything in terms of construction materials, but they are still good and in line with the prezzo.rnLo focus is great, I can not recommend it. sent on March 17, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR II Pros: Focal length and thus the extreme versatility, wide side rnSul good definition; Cons: Cut to 200mm focal on min. distance of MAF; rnLato Tele a bit 'soft; rnDistorsione extreme wide-angle side; rnQualità constructive general, in relation to the price; Opinion: Objective "prince" to travel where it is difficult to change lenses all the time. All in all, honest and able to give good results, knowing the limiti.Non possess it more, but in the case of travel "serious" probably would regret, or whatever you would like at least a second corpo.rnL 'autofocus is not lightning and 18 / 20 the distortion is evidente.Inoltre is expensive, after all, but it's the price to pay for such a escursione.Visto closely together with the 18-300, the 18-200 seems to have done better, but compared to the list price, I would have expected something more sent on March 17, 2013 |
 | Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-IF ED Pros: Good optical quality and sharpness; rnOttima build quality; rnBuon attack tripods; rnParaluce an integral part of the body (subjective); Cons: Weight (however, for me, not so exaggerated); rnAberrazione color, often evident in TA; rnVelocità autofocus; Opinion: Borrowed from my uncle and never returned :-) rnPer those who do not often use this focal length and do not want to spend big money for the new AF-S, a good choice is used migliore.rnSostanzialmente is a lens very "constant" in performance and does not disappoint, apart from the speed performance of autofocus, in which the quality of the machine body affects molto.Nel my specific case the improvement from d90 to D300S was really enorme.rnGià at RT the definition is good, But by f5 .6 to f11 not disappoint prestazioni.rnUn dear old Nikkor sent on March 17, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
