JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1998 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1038 €;
61 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 207000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Bought on Juza Market by a certified user at a good price (strange but true) and... wonder. 6d mounted I think I'm going to disassemble it only if and when I pass to 6 d II. Perfect for portraits at 1.4-2 with a deadlift of planes and a blurred progressive dream. Shutting down it becomes a landscape blade where at 100% unimagined details emerge. Together with the 85 F 1.2 and the 135 F2 I consider them the magic triad of Canon House: the Magi. Now I do not know if the AF more Performand series II justifies the difference in price (3x), but I would say no to QI.
Opinion:I'm not a professional, but it's not hard to understand that this lens is fantastic. I tried the 35mm 2.0 is sharp too, but this one to my opinion churn out photos with sharpness colors and atmosphere that the other does not.... I'm not a fan of fixed I prefer zooms but this is an exception. I recommend it to everyone, if you can find it in good condition take it with your eyes closed.
Opinion:Excellent quality lens, especially given the age. I haven't tried the series II so I can't tell the improvements of the current model. The first series is one of those lenses that give a very creamy and deep background effect: great blur. Honestly with the time I preferred the 24-70 2.8 II for versatility, but this is my personal choice. Too bad you face now hard to find it around put well because off the market.
Opinion:For me together with the 85 1.2 II among the best fixed goals of the Canon House, I use almost always 1.4 and I almost never disappoint, apart from when I am wrong distance, a lens that I recommend to all those who want to do portrait but also landscapes and stars in short a Buo No handyman, certainly 85 1.2 II creates that magic in more that you have to try to believe, for me 9 full vote.
Opinion:Among the fixed, the only focal with which I have always found good is 35mm. I had for a while the Sigma Art. Bello, clear to be disgusting, but just the excessive sharpness and af "dancer" made me give up and I sold it to those who have more patience than me with focus charts and via saying (and now he uses it with satisfaction). I had three options in the canon house, and thanks to a well filled piggy bank, I was almost decided on the second series. But here too the problem of sharpness (for me in some cases the sharpness is a problem). In the end the only real choice (which was the first) was the 35 1.4 I series. rnA TA is obscenely mellow, clear only in the middle, it seems almost a mistake. And instead in that mistake, in that pastiness there is what I was looking for. Today with the various sw you look for the tiltshift effect, this lens has already incorporated it. A gradual loss of sharpness that almost seems like a brushstroke. rnE just close a little bit that becomes a blade. One nitsurgical ideology, which despite the years of difference has nothing to envy to the latest projects by Canon and Sigma. I waited a long time to decide, but in the end it was. rn
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.