|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Italystile www.juzaphoto.com/p/Italystile  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 2.0x III Pros: Build quality, optical output, and AC tropicalisation Cons: You can not mount it on all lenses as some compatible nor cascaded with another multiplier as did the series II Opinion: I replaced the Canon 2X II series with this series III. Tried to bottom along with the Canon 300 f / 2.8 IS, the new multiplier behaves considerably better than the chromatic precedente.rnL'aberrazione has decreased significantly, almost completely assente.rnLa practical use optical quality is very good and the average of focus shots it is greatly increased compared with the old optics multiplied serie.rnAnche the AF is more reactive than that preciso.rnL'unica thing I would like is to be able to also use other lenses that are currently exploitable only multipliers with third parti.rnAlberto sent on April 19, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Sharpness, contrast, color rendering, Stabilization and Tropicalization Cons: AF a little slow, but normal for a macro. Opinion: I bought this light to replace 60 Tamron f / 2 Macro and I fell in love for the yield, color, contrast and precision of form AF.rnTanto sniper that I preferred the Canon EF 85mm f / 1 8 also on portraits and thanks to the stabilization is also usable with shutter speeds with the EF 85 that are not possible because of the neo mosso.rnL'unico use in portraiture and still in dynamic situations is clearly a slower AF in focus "being a macro", also by entering the impersonator focale.rn sent on April 19, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, portability, integrated hood, AF accuracy and reduced weight. Cons: Maybe a little slow autofocus in very dynamic situation Opinion: A lens that has few rivals. Very clear already at room temperature and with a blurred piacevole.rnLa its uniqueness is due to the flexibility of use despite being a fixed and not zoom.rnOttima for close-up with his beautiful ingrandimento.rnMolto report on portraits, thanks to a soft blur .rne usable for sports and wildlife photos also thanks the opportunity to be moltiplicata.rnAdoro integrated hood, very comfortable and practical. sent on March 24, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Precision and speed AF Cons: chromatic aberrations Opinion: I used this in mind for a few years on both APS-C and on FF. The yield is always great, very beautiful colors and blurry. The maximum yield of I obtained the old Canon 5D, where thanks to the sparse sensor churning out spectacular also already TA.rnl'autofocus files is very fast and precisely, even in spite of the reduced PDC.rnL'unico flaw is excessive presence of AC especially on densi.rnrn sensors sent on March 24, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Cost, brightness, sharpness and AF. Cons: For the cost, None. Opinion: Compared to the previous version I noticed an improvement in the yield to TA and a blurred less nervous and more piacevole.rnIl AF module is much more silensioso compared to the previous version and also in low light engages meglio.rnLa construction is clearly economic but it is appreciated thanks the lightness and trasportabilità.rnVeramente a must, cheap and efficient. sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Yield on portraits, brightness and cost. Cons: inconsistent AF Opinion: I've always loved this point of surrender, with all its strengths and weaknesses, especially on ritratti.rnAcquistato to replace the Canon EF 50 f / 1.8 II I wanted to improve autofocus speed blur and a bit duro.rnPurtroppo the first copy purchased had consistency problems in focus, I do not speak of Front or back focus.rnSemplicemente Cannava shots in any condition of light, contrast, and aperture, while in the manual was perfetto.rnMi has been replaced with another exemplary which also had the same problem, we even tried another and was also inconsistent in the account AF.rnTenendo form at that time I used it with a Canon 60D free of micro, I had to give up and fall back on ' ottica.rnForse other existing pieces have been improved, and if I can not rule out in the future to try new specimens. sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: AF quickly and precisely, and Sharpness. Cons: Stabilizer of dubious effectiveness. Opinion: Taken to replace the old Canon EF 35 f / 2 that has accompanied me for a long time that I wanted to improve the speed and accuracy of the great AF.rnLa form difference with the old model is also in sharpness at full aperture that was far improved on the new versione.rnl'unico dark side of this lofty goal is that the stabilizer from tests carried out gave no appreciable results. (Maybe it's the fault of my copy?!). RnSu FF I find an exceptional and very functional focal while on APS-C is neither neither fish nor fowl, too long for street and too short to ritratti.rn sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: f / 2.8 and AF speed Cons: MF electronic, weight, not tropical conditions and lack of stabilization. Opinion: Optics definitely dated but still fully usable by and large very beautiful and usable nitidezza.rnColori with multipliers without large losses of unique risoluzione.rngli defects on my way to photograph are the lack of stabilization freehand and given the weight is felt and lack of tropicalizzazione.rnAttualmente Canon stopped producing spare parts and therefore given that even in manual focus the AF motor is used to focuse, if you were to break remains unusable. sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness throughout the frame, stabilization, tropical conditions and possibility of using filters. Cons: No one but a lower resistance to flare compared to 10-22 Opinion: Purchased to replace Canon 10-22 that I used on APS-C and FF have about the same angle of campo.rnOtticamente excelled, colors and contrast better than the equivalent Canon 10-22 that I used on APS-C.rnL'unico step back I always noticed compared to the 10-22, is the resistance to flare and on 16-35 shows up much more frequently. sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Focal excursion, optical quality, stabilized and tropical conditions. Cons: For me no, but according to other users include variability among modern specimens and those older and in some cases a problem to flat cable. Opinion: I bought this objective several years ago to replace the 17-85 I had about aps-c, and for several years has been set at 10-22 my coupled perfetta.rnho changed several camera bodies both APS-C and FF that he is always been a faithful companion up to every situation and condition, and I think it will be for a long time despite the release of version II.rn sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Compatibility with goals not multipliable with the originals and optical performance. Cons: Lack of tropicalizzazone Opinion: I took this multiplier for use with the optical that would not multipliable with the original equivalents. The optical performance is quite good, I think it would be difficult to notice differences in the practical use with the originale.rnL'ho counterpart also used in combination with Canon EF2X series 2 with excellent results. rnConsigliato but conscious compatibility with new bodies Canon.rnrn machine sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 2.0x II Pros: tropical conditions Cons: B.C Opinion: Taken to multiply the 300 f / 2.8 turned out great, well-built and sturdy. You notice an increase in chromatic aberration with respect to the optical not multiplied, but all in all in an acceptable manner. The AF slows down and in dynamic situations you feel the difference, however, remains usable and reliable as accuracy and consistency of set fuocornAlberto. sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: zoom range, sharpness, acceptable weight and price. Cons: Limiter 15m Opinion: I took this goal in place of tamton 70-300, to join him in the canon 300 f4 is to have longer focal length without spending a capitale.rnLa yield is excellent across the range and up to 450mm is a blade as well as having a very AF performing, from 450mm up to 600 AF slows down a little and it becomes more difficult to maintain the subject in focus, especially if of small size and in very dynamic situation. (What, however, normal in these focal.) RnOttimo super zoom.rnAlberto. sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Sharpness and Cost in used. Cons: Soft wide open, rendering the edges, blurred a little hard Opinion: I had this lens that has always impressed me for his surrender with the 5D Old, on the contrary of aps-c I find it too soft to f / 2.8. While closing the diaphragm becomes a blade, especially in the center. rnSu FF has an interesting focal while on aps-c is too long for photos street and too short for ritratti.rnormai is really dated a goal, I replaced it with stabilized model that offers the highest performance at full aperture and an AF much better. But the buy back if being updated as the 5ontino STM.rnAlberto.rn sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: color quality, sharpness, flare resistance, ability to mount filters, lightness. Cons: No one but the lack of weather sealing. Opinion: I had this lens until I replaced it with the counterpart to FF. What can I say except that I have always been in love and still regret it for its light weight, its innate resistance to flare and color rendering true L.rnFosse series was also weather sealed would be the maximum of aps-c.rnLo advice to all those who want a super wide angle for ridotto.rnAlberto format. sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: Brightness, cost, overall yield Cons: AF slow, construction below average. Opinion: I had both the Canon EF35 f / 2 Original this Youngnuo YN35 f / 2.rnnel comparing the two I noticed an improvement in blur and sharpness at full aperture of this new clone.rnChiudendo the diaphragm recovers the canon and clarity that the youngnuo not equalized mai.rnNel AF module did not notice differences both speed precisione.rnPer as regards the construction, both are plasticky, but the canon is definitely built with migliori.rnAlberto.rnrnEDIT materials: (After a short period of use, the objective is mechanically broken confirming the low quality of materials). sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: AF module, output at high ISO, Tropicalization. Cons: Recovery Shadows, Banding improved, the auto white balance. Opinion: I joined my old 5D Old 5DMKIII this new and although there are aspects that could be improved as the yield in the shadows recovery and banding "even at low iso", (even to my worst aps-c 70D) is still a step giant leap. AF has a powerful and a good yield at high ISO.rnSolo the white balance in my opinion is incorrect in more often than if left in auto.rnPer the rest is definitely the best all-rounder until our new canon that the outclasses all (sensor side) .rnAlberto. sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Construction of series 5, yield on incarnarati file Cons: LCD little resolute, ISO car missing Opinion: An outdated car, but still is one of the best by the yield on incarnarati. It has a display that does not allow you to evaluate the shots and a slow AF, but good to step centrale.rnHa a grain that lets you shoot at high ISO, up to its maximum. rnNel Overall I loved the old lady that I was never tradito.rnAdesso thanks to its affordable cost, I recommend it to those who want to try the pieno.rnAlberto format. rnrn sent on February 05, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 60mm f/2 Di II LD Macro Pros: Sharpness at all apertures, weight, f2, Cons: At slow and lack of last limiter, only for aps-c. Opinion: It is exceptional optics, the only macro 60mm f / 2. Sharpest already ta and with an excellent focus. Too bad it's only for aps-c. It is also lightweight, despite not having a ring-shaped ultrasonic motor, has the full manual fuocus. The only flaws are a slow af that without a limiter will affect some 'other uses to which I think would fit nicely, as ritrattistica.rn sent on April 12, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Quality between 70 and 200, stabilization, af accurate and price. Cons: A little 'soft 300 Opinion: It was my first tele and I am very satisfied. Between 70 and 200 has a quality comparable to optical band cost is much higher. It loses something in at least 300 and must be prepunched to f8, but it's still usable. He has a good degree of magnification that allows you to make closeup or macro when paired with the extension tubes. It was one of the first Tamron using an ultrasonic motor for af and has a stabilization eccezionale.rnstraconsigliato.rnAlberto. sent on April 12, 2014 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: AF very high performance, adjustable touch display, micro-adjustment for lenses, with a great detail File, 7 FPS burst of noise a bit more manageable, AF for video finally usable to 360 °. Cons: For now, I have not detected defects worth noting. Opinion: I bought this to replace my 60D SLR to have a camera body with a more powerful AF, for micro-adjustment of the goals that eventually Canon has decided to step down "as it should always be" the best tropicalizzazione.rnIl and for direct comparison with the 60D has highlighted a better sharpness and an improvement in the management of noise in equal ISO, thanks to a slightly finer grain and also thanks to the greater the detail of the file that churns which will allow a greater reduction of noise before losing the dettaglio.rn sent on October 10, 2013 |
 | Canon PowerShot A95 Pros: Swiveling display, a very sturdy construction, good image quality, fully manual mode Cons: for the type of camera would say no. Opinion: was one of my first digital compact cameras and I was very pleased with both the quality of the images for color rendition date dal'ormai old CCD sensor. It has a very robust metal body and swiveling display which for me is one thing that I could hardly give up. last value has become increasingly rare in compact mode is manual. sent on June 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon Coolpix L110 Pros: Great zoom range. Cons: Lack of viewfinder and lack of AV, TV and Manual, Opinion: Compact which is not very compact but its a great zoom range and a good quality of immagini.rnPurtroppo in my opinion blatantly missing the ability to set the shutter speed and aperture to shoot in manual and would have been helpful "given the size of" a classic viewfinder in addition to the LCD. RNE 'also present the image stabilizer, but I did not really understand what it's seen that activating it tends to make the picture even more mosse.rn sent on June 02, 2013 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: Swiveling display, excellent crowds at high ISO and management of the same car, sturdy and relatively light. Cons: Lack micro. Opinion: I am fully satisfied with the performance of this camera and the extreme comfort of the display orientabile.rnSforna very beautiful pictures and videos just as beautiful, but it requires high-quality optics to saturate the dense 18-megapixel sensor. rnL'unica sore point is the lack of micro-adjustment and I fail to see what is the reason for this choice "strategic" by Canon, since it just serves to adjust the same goals not perfetti.rn sent on June 02, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Sharpness, Brightness, Price. Cons: Focus manual uncomfortable, noisy autofocus when used to make videos, perhaps a tad too plasticky. Opinion: It 'was my first fixed target and I often used to experiment and gain experience, even in the macro thanks to a invertitore.rnne ring are really pleased both for the great clarity that for optimal luminosità.rnRegala decent pictures already TA, and the best of closed since F / 2.8rnLa building is perhaps a little too plastic, personally I would have preferred to spend a little more and have greater strength and especially a focus ring decente.rnper regarding the blurred is a hard little perhaps because of sun 5 aperture blades but it's a good sfocato.rnL'autofocus did not give me problems ever but if you turn the video is very noisy and can be a real problema.rn sent on June 01, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Excursion Focal, stabilizer, USM Cons: Low resistance to Flare Opinion: And 'un'obbiettivo that I took with the 60D kit. It has all in all a good zoom range and good image quality at maximum focal length that progressively decreases with decreasing of the same. The stabilizer works well and allows you to shoot with safety times in many situations and has a fast and accurate focusing. With very short focal distorts and has enough vignetting, things correctable in PP, but the thing that creates problems is the low resistance to flare that is not easily correggibile.rnHa still a good general construction when compared to the typical kit lens and economic light enough to carry around all day. sent on June 01, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
