JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2004. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 486 €;
158 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 200000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:lightness, small size, sharpness, flare resistance, robust construction, 77 filters
Cons:lack of sharpness at 10mm edges, not stabilized (although for a wide it's not a big flaw)
Opinion:Wide-angle zoom lens with EF-S focal. That is, only suitable for APS-C sensors. Therefore, it cannot be used on FF. The autofocus is ultrasonic (USM) as the most emblazoned lenses in the L-series and ensures manual focus without detaching the AF. It has the distance window like all other USM. It's not stabilized. The opening of the 6-bladed diaphragm ranges from f 3.5 to f 4.5. The weight is in line with the non-exceptional size (385 g.). The filters can safely be mounted on this lens and must have a diameter of 77. It comes without a lampshade, to be bought separately, as in the best Canon tradition for "economic" goals. Its current price is around 500 euros. A lens that can certainly not be missing in the photographic set of those who own a reflex with the APS-C sensor and loves landscape photography. The excellent wide angle provides breathtaking views and even at the slightest focal point the distortion is incredibly contained. The baked files are great for sharpness, colors and exposure (high/low lights). It never overexposes frames even in the presence of very intense lights and with a few exceptions the flare (which persecutes several of its competitors) is absent. I read in previous comments that someone complains of poor flare resistance to this lens. Definitely not in my specimen. The autofocus is quick and precise. The brightness is not great (3.5 to TA) but not even a problem. The sharpness at the edges of the frame is also very good and only at the slightest focal point there is a slight drop. Holding the optics you can perceive an excellent build quality in the dials and metal attack. All very sturdy. This keeping a very low size and weight. Clearly, given the focus, it is also a very suitable optics in the interiors and cramped spaces (monuments, churches, museums, architecture in Jan.), considering also its reduced distortion. I personally work in all these contexts and especially in the landscapes where I judge it truly irreplaceable. For my personal experience and for the reviews read on the forums also about the rivals, I judge the 10-22 the best wide zoom installable on a Canon APS-C. The reason why I have not yet abandoned the smaller sensor is that I regret having to undo this lens that has nothing to envy, for e.g., at 17/40 L that I also own on the 6D.
Pros:Light, sturdy, good range of focals, quite luminiso, ability to mount filters
Cons:Sharpness at the edges at the low focals, fairly pronounced aberrations
Opinion:I've been using this lens before the 2000D for a while and now on the 7D mkII, in general I like it, it is versatile to be a wide-angle and at the same time practical, not being neither heavy nor very bulky though.... there's a though. That is, it has a slightly swinging yield, but generally from its worst to 10mm at the edges, they are very soft, not to mention the angles that really make so much pain they are soft that seem moved. But it's to say that you just go up a few mm of focal point and it's better. I recently purchased a 6D as a second body and will probably soon put it up for sale to replace it with the 17-40 to use on 6D. Frankly, I have heard many conflicting opinions about the rendering of this lens and I think that the build quality of this lens is not very constant, or that there is some criticism within it that comes out easily and creates the problems I report. In any case however I did not regret my purchase, because well or badly his work does, knowing the yield he has at 10mm just put a little attention and maybe add a little vignette in the corners so as to divert the look from those 4 points.
Opinion:Good wide angle, excellent view to the sales price, quality materials quite plasticky, sharpness that goes to fade at longer focal lengths. Great for beginners and for APS-c. Suffers enough flare and the hood is not sold in all products. Post production almost always a must to give a greater harmony to the colors, light and sharpness.
Opinion:Good wide angle, excellent view to the sales price, quality materials quite plasticky, sharpness that goes to fade at longer focal lengths. Great for beginners and for APS-c. Suffers enough flare and the hood is not sold in all products. Post production almost always a must to give a greater harmony to the colors, light and sharpness.
Pros:Weight, construction, color rendering and contrast, hiking, AF, very low distortion, exceptional flare resistance, sharp.
Cons:The edges are mainly 10 mm thick, bulky bulky (but very effective).
Opinion:For APSC Canon is still the best ultrawide that exists. The hike allows you to keep it full days without forcing you to use it for special shots. The AF is a missile and although it's ultrawide you appreciate it. It's very light and anyone who uses it in the mountains will appreciate it. The color rendering is excellent, very contrasting and gives shots ready. The flare resistance is exaggerated: I tried to snap with the sun in front of the center of the diaphragm and there was only a miserable dot. Distorce little (though something more than 10 mm, as is obvious) but has no strange folds. Probabimente is not the clearest lens in history, but overall sharpness does not lack, though not all over the frame. 10 mm actually loses a bit on the edges, but are secondary areas compared to the subject and I do not consider it a great problem. RnThank you very much because it's fun and useful for daytime landscapes or monuments / architecture photos. I spent months thinking about itSamyang, Tokina, but overall Canon is much more balanced. Who distorts those who do not have AF without giving great quality (and in 2017, in short ...), those who suffer from flare, those who suffer from F / B ... With this you will have fun.rnDefetto: new cost so much and the hood is cumbersome. But effectiveness is guaranteed.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
