JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2004. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 504 €;
156 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 181000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Good wide angle, excellent view to the sales price, quality materials quite plasticky, sharpness that goes to fade at longer focal lengths. Great for beginners and for APS-c. Suffers enough flare and the hood is not sold in all products. Post production almost always a must to give a greater harmony to the colors, light and sharpness.
Opinion:Good wide angle, excellent view to the sales price, quality materials quite plasticky, sharpness that goes to fade at longer focal lengths. Great for beginners and for APS-c. Suffers enough flare and the hood is not sold in all products. Post production almost always a must to give a greater harmony to the colors, light and sharpness.
Pros:Weight, construction, color rendering and contrast, hiking, AF, very low distortion, exceptional flare resistance, sharp.
Cons:The edges are mainly 10 mm thick, bulky bulky (but very effective).
Opinion:For APSC Canon is still the best ultrawide that exists. The hike allows you to keep it full days without forcing you to use it for special shots. The AF is a missile and although it's ultrawide you appreciate it. It's very light and anyone who uses it in the mountains will appreciate it. The color rendering is excellent, very contrasting and gives shots ready. The flare resistance is exaggerated: I tried to snap with the sun in front of the center of the diaphragm and there was only a miserable dot. Distorce little (though something more than 10 mm, as is obvious) but has no strange folds. Probabimente is not the clearest lens in history, but overall sharpness does not lack, though not all over the frame. 10 mm actually loses a bit on the edges, but are secondary areas compared to the subject and I do not consider it a great problem. RnThank you very much because it's fun and useful for daytime landscapes or monuments / architecture photos. I spent months thinking about itSamyang, Tokina, but overall Canon is much more balanced. Who distorts those who do not have AF without giving great quality (and in 2017, in short ...), those who suffer from flare, those who suffer from F / B ... With this you will have fun.rnDefetto: new cost so much and the hood is cumbersome. But effectiveness is guaranteed.
Cons:Suffering to the flare (quite pronounced), not really incisissimo
Opinion:I had for a couple of years this lens ke i enjoyed for construction, lightness but also for versatility 'focal offering. As written in the cons and 'a lens ke suffer much flare and lacks incisiveness' in the images while being acceptable not reach the top in terms of native sharpness. I consider it a great glass for those who want to dabble with extreme views (10mm pero 'distortion and' extremely pronounced) and wants something more 'robust and versatile little brother 10-18 STM.rnOra are in possession of 14 mm 2.8 L series II, I think, indeed I am sure, of having found my definitive wide angle.
Pros:color quality, sharpness, lightness, easy handling.
Cons:Hood sold separately.
Opinion:I expressed a vote of 10 votes since there are no means, but in fact I wanted to vote 9.5 because the edges, high openings (3.5-5.6) it does not seem as sharp as the center. From f.8,0 onwards there is no difference. Fast, AF (USM) quiet and reliable even if in a perspective like that serves relatively; often, in fact I put a hand flare for maximum depth of field.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
