RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions




Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USMCanon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM



The Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1095 €;
212 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/4
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.23x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   615 g
 Dimensions   83 x 113 mm
Buy Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 184000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarjunior
sent on August 04, 2015

Pros: very sharp even wide open, solid constuction, helpfull IS low price for such a great Canon L lens!

Cons: none.... the small lens hood will not give much protection but that's typical for most wide angel zooms

Opinion: By far the sharpest of all Canon wide angel zooms! Solid construction and image stabilizer will make this gerat lens a real bargain! Visibly sharper in the image corners at 16mm than the 16-35 2.8 L II on full frame and way much better than the 17-40L that had mushy and soft corners form 17-20mm even at f11 (f4 or f5.6 was unusable soft from 17 to 20mm on two copies of the 17-40 I used some years ago)

avatarjunior
sent on June 21, 2015

Pros: There's an important notice in Opinion section! Incredible sharpness across a frame on every focal length and aperture. Low price that seems to be the lowest in connection with sharpness it delivers among all L lenses I've ever used. A weather sealed body with a gasket, a comparatively small and convenient lens hood (takes not so much space in my bag like 17-40 lens hood), popular and affordable 77mm filter thread, image stabilization that's quite handy, image quite compact for an ultra-wide zoom.

Cons: Can't make coffee & toasts.

Opinion: https://yadi.sk/d/JRe0ArOkhL6nr Here are some raw (*.CR2) test shots with 16-35/4 L IS lens on my 6D at apertures 4.0 and 8.0. These shots are more telltale than words. Simply download files (find and press a downward arrow) and open locally with smth like DPP or ACR. I must only add that having experience of using 5 L lenses and 2 ZE lenses I was shocked by sharpness of this gem from Canon when I took first shots. Natural color reproduction, high contrast, uniform sharpness across a frame with only slight degradation in outermost corners, not a trace of softness of any visible CA, low and easy correctable distortion and vignetting. Beware of minor field curvature esp. on the long end. For max acuity nail focus on a side-located object through LV. Speaking emotionally I think I'm lucky with the lens or Canon finally made an almost perfect and affordable ultra-wide zoom or both. P.S. check on my flickr page for shots taken with this lens (still pending). An important notice (for pixel peepers)! I've been shooting with the lens for a week and that's what I found. 1. IS may and does degrade IQ making sharpness across a frame non-uniform. I believe IS in a ultra-wide lens acts like a tilt-shift unit making unfavorable and uncontrolled shift movements at the moment of capturing a shot. OTOH IS on mode is fine for videographers. With disabled IS the lens still captures sharp images as usual. 2. The lens has got a mild field curvature on focal length between 24 and 35 mm maximizing at 35mm. Hyper focal focusing is not effectively applicable with this lens. Corner objects are sharper if they closer to the camera. Increasing aperture makes close objects more sharper than ones on distance. So keep this in mind and use LV focusing or focus bracketing techniques. It must be mentioned that it is common for wide and even normal lenses. N.B. I won't decrease the lens rating because I think that these aspects are not negative yet rather its peculiarities. Simply keep them in mind and produce great pictures with this great lens.

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on November 05, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, very limited aberrations, regular distortion and therefore easily correctable, stabilization

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: At the time of the purchase I was undecided between this and 2.8. Having little familiarity with the short focal points, I chose the least expensive solution, only to then make an upgrade. At the moment, however, I see no reason to change: it is a very clear lens, which lends itself to many uses, from architecture to set portrait (for which stabilization is a boon). I use it mainly on tripods for architectural photos and produces very sharp images, which sometimes do not even need sharpening. I have not had the opportunity to test the resistance to flare, which seems to be the weak point of this optics. A16mm distortion is noticeable but very regular, so any postproduction program is able to correct it easily. Limited chromatic aberrations but certainly present, also manageable in post-production. In short, a lens that I had purchased just to "cover" a range of focals, which is proving to be an ace up my sleeve in many situations.

avatarsenior
sent on August 17, 2019

Pros: an authentic blade, incredible surrender, coupled with Sony is addictive, I dare not imagine on an a7r3

Cons: it's a shame you can't mount it on Nikon, whose 16-35 has some to eat to look like this

Opinion: I was absolutely amazed when I saw the PC files: at 100% magnification you see incredible details and veins, thanks to an excellent contrast and microcontrast never screamed. Great color yield, neutral. Incredible starry. Suffers very little from flare (how he heck do you say he suffers from flare? you've never seen a Tokina or a sony 12-24 evidently), never falls of contrast. Only flaw, but that is not a flaw being physical: the minimum distance of maf, with such a beautiful lens would be the maximum to be able to upset the prospects by doing stacking, but everything can not be had. I was sorry to have to separate.

avatarjunior
sent on August 01, 2019

Pros: Very solid construction, image quality, chromatic rendering.

Cons: Flare

Opinion: It's a really remarkable landscape lens, with a great color yield and excellent sharpness. The stabilizer is a plus not a small plus, allowing shots with times otherwise unthinkable freehand. I'd say the geometric rendering is also great. The only annoying note is related to the flare, which in landscape photos can be annoying... it often happens to be with the framing near the solar disk, even if out of frame, and you generate annoying images, more than I happened with other canon lenses... nothing dramatic, but it's annoying.




Photos taken with Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Foto
Light Explosion
by GSfotografia
138 comments, 13750 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Vestrahorn
by Gmer7534
125 comments, 24123 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Castelluccio
by Beppeverge
175 comments, 17535 views
Foto
Milky Way three tops of Lavaredo
by GSfotografia
98 comments, 14569 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Golden Hour-Passo Giau
by GSfotografia
118 comments, 11474 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Great Gallery
by Dantes
268 comments, 21103 views  
HI RES 7.3 MP

Foto
Three Peaks by Cave
by Cimosg
130 comments, 21162 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
New York Red Skyline
by Paolozac84
107 comments, 17341 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Dynamicscape
by Beckerwins
100 comments, 9187 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The spell
by Andrea Pozzi
96 comments, 9487 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Haifoss
by Bob70
96 comments, 11508 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Source
by Gorlan01
101 comments, 9135 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Ice Maze
by Andrea Pozzi
89 comments, 5012 views  [editors pick]
Foto
On the beach of dreams
by Vincenzo Mazza
101 comments, 10406 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Stillness in Portovenere
by Caterina Bruzzone
200 comments, 15857 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Sunset in the Val d'Orcia
by Giovanni Antonini
105 comments, 12840 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Alcantara
by Antonio Guarrera
104 comments, 13108 views
Foto
Wind Polignano
by Caterina Bruzzone
240 comments, 18715 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Carrier
by Caterina Bruzzone
219 comments, 14634 views
Foto
As a brazier burning
by Raffaele1978
139 comments, 8518 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Kirkjufell!
by Vincenzo Mazza
81 comments, 8810 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A New Day in Almstron Point
by Nicola.mazz.86
91 comments, 6160 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The light of Polignano
by Caterina Bruzzone
205 comments, 11642 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Back to Basics
by Beckerwins
65 comments, 4809 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Rio awaits ..
by Caterina Bruzzone
203 comments, 18375 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Sdrart
69 comments, 11981 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Cave11
76 comments, 12133 views
Foto
Ra
by Caterina Bruzzone
181 comments, 15887 views
Foto
Seville 2017 Parasol
by Caterina Bruzzone
206 comments, 5939 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Riding the cuban streets
by Marco Tagliarino
95 comments, 6450 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Face to face
by Caterina Bruzzone
207 comments, 7984 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Dubai from 124mo floor: unique emotion!
by Raffaele1978
110 comments, 9973 views
Foto
To limit the boundaries
by Caterina Bruzzone
151 comments, 10225 views
Foto
Salina Comacchio
by Tiber
112 comments, 8986 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 17.1 MP

Foto
Temporal surprise
by Caterina Bruzzone
139 comments, 13433 views
Foto
The fisherman's net
by Marco Tagliarino
72 comments, 9654 views  [editors pick]
Foto
On the edge of the ocean, winter version
by Vincenzo Mazza
73 comments, 7194 views  [editors pick]

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me