JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1095 €;
212 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 184000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: very sharp even wide open, solid constuction, helpfull IS
low price for such a great Canon L lens!
Cons: none....
the small lens hood will not give much protection but that's typical for most wide angel zooms
Opinion: By far the sharpest of all Canon wide angel zooms!
Solid construction and image stabilizer will make this gerat lens a real bargain!
Visibly sharper in the image corners at 16mm than the 16-35 2.8 L II on full frame and way much better than the 17-40L that had mushy and soft corners form 17-20mm even at f11 (f4 or f5.6 was unusable soft from 17 to 20mm on two copies of the 17-40 I used some years ago)
Pros: There's an important notice in Opinion section! Incredible sharpness across a frame on every focal length and aperture. Low price that seems to be the lowest in connection with sharpness it delivers among all L lenses I've ever used. A weather sealed body with a gasket, a comparatively small and convenient lens hood (takes not so much space in my bag like 17-40 lens hood), popular and affordable 77mm filter thread, image stabilization that's quite handy, image quite compact for an ultra-wide zoom.
Cons: Can't make coffee & toasts.
Opinion: https://yadi.sk/d/JRe0ArOkhL6nr
Here are some raw (*.CR2) test shots with 16-35/4 L IS lens on my 6D at apertures 4.0 and 8.0. These shots are more telltale than words. Simply download files (find and press a downward arrow) and open locally with smth like DPP or ACR.
I must only add that having experience of using 5 L lenses and 2 ZE lenses I was shocked by sharpness of this gem from Canon when I took first shots. Natural color reproduction, high contrast, uniform sharpness across a frame with only slight degradation in outermost corners, not a trace of softness of any visible CA, low and easy correctable distortion and vignetting.
Beware of minor field curvature esp. on the long end. For max acuity nail focus on a side-located object through LV.
Speaking emotionally I think I'm lucky with the lens or Canon finally made an almost perfect and affordable ultra-wide zoom or both.
P.S. check on my flickr page for shots taken with this lens (still pending).
An important notice (for pixel peepers)!
I've been shooting with the lens for a week and that's what I found.
1. IS may and does degrade IQ making sharpness across a frame non-uniform. I believe IS in a ultra-wide lens acts like a tilt-shift unit making unfavorable and uncontrolled shift movements at the moment of capturing a shot. OTOH IS on mode is fine for videographers. With disabled IS the lens still captures sharp images as usual.
2. The lens has got a mild field curvature on focal length between 24 and 35 mm maximizing at 35mm. Hyper focal focusing is not effectively applicable with this lens. Corner objects are sharper if they closer to the camera. Increasing aperture makes close objects more sharper than ones on distance. So keep this in mind and use LV focusing or focus bracketing techniques. It must be mentioned that it is common for wide and even normal lenses.
N.B. I won't decrease the lens rating because I think that these aspects are not negative yet rather its peculiarities. Simply keep them in mind and produce great pictures with this great lens.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness, very limited aberrations, regular distortion and therefore easily correctable, stabilization
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:At the time of the purchase I was undecided between this and 2.8. Having little familiarity with the short focal points, I chose the least expensive solution, only to then make an upgrade. At the moment, however, I see no reason to change: it is a very clear lens, which lends itself to many uses, from architecture to set portrait (for which stabilization is a boon). I use it mainly on tripods for architectural photos and produces very sharp images, which sometimes do not even need sharpening. I have not had the opportunity to test the resistance to flare, which seems to be the weak point of this optics. A16mm distortion is noticeable but very regular, so any postproduction program is able to correct it easily. Limited chromatic aberrations but certainly present, also manageable in post-production. In short, a lens that I had purchased just to "cover" a range of focals, which is proving to be an ace up my sleeve in many situations.
Pros:an authentic blade, incredible surrender, coupled with Sony is addictive, I dare not imagine on an a7r3
Cons:it's a shame you can't mount it on Nikon, whose 16-35 has some to eat to look like this
Opinion:I was absolutely amazed when I saw the PC files: at 100% magnification you see incredible details and veins, thanks to an excellent contrast and microcontrast never screamed. Great color yield, neutral. Incredible starry. Suffers very little from flare (how he heck do you say he suffers from flare? you've never seen a Tokina or a sony 12-24 evidently), never falls of contrast. Only flaw, but that is not a flaw being physical: the minimum distance of maf, with such a beautiful lens would be the maximum to be able to upset the prospects by doing stacking, but everything can not be had. I was sorry to have to separate.
Opinion:It's a really remarkable landscape lens, with a great color yield and excellent sharpness. The stabilizer is a plus not a small plus, allowing shots with times otherwise unthinkable freehand. I'd say the geometric rendering is also great. The only annoying note is related to the flare, which in landscape photos can be annoying... it often happens to be with the framing near the solar disk, even if out of frame, and you generate annoying images, more than I happened with other canon lenses... nothing dramatic, but it's annoying.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
