|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mimargu www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mimargu  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS Pros: Excellent construction biancone-churns out sharp images-well defined colors-Tropicallzzato-F4 constant-excellent AF-no flare and aberrations. Cons: Weight. Opinion: I bought it these days and use it on the Sony Alpha 7RIII binomial very successful, the balance is more than valid, the footprint a little less being a mirrorless but all in all compelling. The images are beautiful, the colors vivid and well defined, the focus accurate and fast. The fixing bracket to the practical stand and allows various positions. The stabilization is really fabulous, with slow times you do not notice blurred or wavy. The AF fast, precise and silent. Optics that I highly recommend. sent on November 01, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Pros: Everything make fantastic-solid construction-aesthetically beautiful-crisp-weather sealed-F2,8 constant-excellent bokeh-excellent for landscapes and portraits-precise, fast and quiet AF. Cons: Flare – Plasticky Lens hood – price even if justified.- Opinion: I bought it these days for my Sony Alpha 7riii fabulous binomial. I do not list all the positive things I checked, I would bore you, I do first to say that I did not find anything negative. The flare you OK is boring (the backlight must be really crash) but just open it 1 or 2 stops and everything is solved. A limit in post production with Lightroom resolves the whole thing quickly and easily. I come from Nikon and Nikon lenses, fabulous, this I think has nothing to envy. sent on November 01, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS Pros: Materials-sharpness-stabilizer-BOKEH-tropicalization-light and much more. Cons: At the moment nothing. Opinion: Lens that I use for a few days without stopping, excites me more and more. Fast and accurate AF, fantastic colors, BOKEH at f. 2.8 really nice. Very comfortable the focus ring in manual, even if not very easy to interpret in the reports. Very good optical stabilizer. Minimum CFUOCE at 25 cm. Unrivalled. Very good internal focus motor. Recommended sent on June 06, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Well done, handyman, sealed, light and not very bulky, fast AF. Cons: No one saw the placement of the lens. Opinion: The use recently paired with my Sony A7RIII, the yield is more than acceptable, the colors are excellent (they are Zeiss), the MAF is fast and accurate, at f/4 is a little soft, just open to f/5.6 and everything is solved. At 24mm. Distorts a bit nothing tragic, easily fixable in post.-Considering that the weight and encumbrance are more than acceptable I highly recommend it. sent on June 02, 2018 |
 | Sony A7r III Pros: Quality images, Touch, flexibility, ISO sensitivity, sensor, good video quality, precise and fast AF, excellent skin tone and eye focus, 10 fps. Cons: Price even if it's worth them. Opinion: I've been using it for a day and I have to say it's really nice, fast in focus, very real in colors and details (face, eyes, embodied). It is very good and it is not so cumbersome, the optics are beautiful both as yield and as construction, a real gem and as such a coastline. In due time I will also give my technical/operational opinion. Bravo Sony. sent on May 31, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D IF Pros: Good autofocus, brightness, focal excursion, small size, not excessive weight, close up.- Cons: f. 2.8 only at 24mm.- Opinion: I bought it used to use it with the F70. I use it almost permanently with the D750 and the yield is really excellent in all respects. The photos are well defined, the blur is pleasant and the colors are bright, do not envy anything to the most emblazoned 24-70mm. f.2,8.- Excellent also for street photography due to its reduced size and weight. The Macro function is more than acceptable, even if it gives me the idea of ??a close-up. I recommend the purchase, possibly used. sent on February 01, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Construction, focal length, lenses, minimal distortion, contrast, colors. Cons: Price, weight- Opinion: Bought just recently, it's a professional zoom in all respects. Excellent sharpness even at full aperture, the best from f. 5 a f. 11. The D750fx ??has a perfect balance. There are those who complain of the flare, all the extreme wounds suffer from it, the more or less the less. Non-existing vignetting, low distortion, gorgeous colors and blur. What to say is perfect, it is a definitive one. Sin costs a madness. rn sent on July 27, 2017 |
 | Sony RX100 III Pros: Compactness, detail richness, dynamic range, fast in MAF and good ISO resistance, retractable flash, electronic viewfinder. Cons: Low battery, no battery charge. Opinion: I wanted a camera to always carry with me and I found it, put it in my pocket and away. The baked files are great, well-defined and rich in information. They are not those of the FF reflexes but there is no abysmal distance. Technology of all respect, Sony does not joke. Up to 3000 big noise more than acceptable. Excellent optical brightness, all-in-one construction. It's a shame the lack of touch-screen even if I do not miss it. Low battery, easily overcome problem with one spare. Price not quite compact, taking into account what it offers. Great shopping I highly recommend. sent on July 20, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: sharpness, bokeh, dimensions, optical and constructive quality, price. Cons: missing, hood and ring passage by AF-S to M. Opinion: I recently purchased this lens and I'm delighted I did. Nice to see, light, crystal clear even at TA, beautiful colors and natural, making fast and accurate focusing. A great bokeh that it did not proceed very much inferior to the optical full-frame, obviously made the appropriate consideration between the two optics (David is a the other is Goliath). Highly recommended for 4/3. sent on April 21, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 Pros: Small, light, crisp, well-built metal, fast and precise AF. Not only beautiful to look also to use. Cons: Missing hood. Opinion: A very versatile lens, sharp, bright and wearable. Good for street and landscapes, defends in the portraits, the good focus. E 'optics that use of more on the PEN-F and also from time to time on the E-M1-II as godibilissima under all points of view. It deserves a nice 10 and praise. Negative note the lack of the lens hood. sent on April 05, 2017 |
 | Olympus PEN-F Pros: EXTREME CARE MATERIALS. VINTAGE DESIGN, PORTABILITY ', SIGHT VERY BRIGHT, LCD GOOD, FANTASTIC STABILIZATION, MANY CUSTOM, EXCELLENT AF ACCURATE AND FAST. VERY BUBBLE. Cons: EXPENSIVE, DELICATE LOWER BODY. Opinion: EXCELLENT PORTABILITY 'Lightweight and compact EVEN IF IN HAND FROM A GOOD IMPRESSION OF STRENGTH AND AN EXTREME CARE IN THE BUILDING. THE MATERIALS USED ARE FIRST CHOICE, LCD TILTING VERY PRACTICAL AND VERY BRIGHT. THE FOCUS SPEED AND PRECISION, baked FILES ARE EXCELLENT, EVEN IF THE ORF (RAW) NOT BE READ TO ALL SYSTEMS. GOOD SHARPNESS UP TO 3200. MORE THAN ACCEPTABLE BUT DIFFICULT THERE IS THE NEED 'TO OVERCOME THAT LIMIT, SINCE THE PERFECT REGULATOR ON 5 AXES ALLOWS TO WORK WITH TIME LOW SENA PROBLEMS MOVED. ALLOWS MANY CONFIGURATIONS PERSONAL. LITTLE FRIENDLY THE MENU. I HAVE ALSO OMD EM1 MARK II AND I HAVE TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE IS NOT 'SO THEN' abysmal. CERTAINLY NOT GOVERNING THE COMPARISON WITH THE NIKON D750 FX, BUT THIS IS 'ANOTHER WORLD. BEFORE YOU TAKE HER AT HOME, THE COUNCIL OF pick it up AND VERIFY THE FEELING, WITH FIXED OPTICS FOR 4: 3 THE IMPACT AND 'WONDERFUL, THE WHAT CHANGES WITH THE OPTICS PRO (ZOOM) BY A SENSE OF INSTABILITY'. JUST BUY THE HANDLE & euror;. 140,00- AND ALL BACK NORMAL. Consigliatissima FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO MOVE LIGHT. sent on March 18, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 II Pros: lightweight, excellent build quality, practical, stabilizer, image quality, AF speed, double slot, well-defined files. Cons: not fabulous battery. Opinion: The I own a couple of days and already I did about 300 shots in different lighting conditions (dim light, high sun, dark, etc.). I have not had any problems. Shoot at ISO 6000 and not notice the usual noise is pleasant, very good even at 64 ISO. Very fast and precise in AF. The burst and fast and exaggerated buffer. And 'beautiful, solid, compact with the function keys to the right place that limit the recourse to Menu, tropicalization and a stabilizer of 5 fabulous axes. What to say more. It was already fantastic first M1. We're talking about the top of Olympus home. Think I'm a Nikonist always. sent on March 03, 2017 |
 | Canon EOS M3 Pros: beautiful, light, compact, small, good quality files even at high ISO, making fuoco.- Cons: lack viewfinder standard, strap a little scarna.- Opinion: Just had a gift, the first very favorable impact, excellent in many respects: design, light weight, maneuverability, weight, construction, quite intuitive and light and well-defined files. Making quick, precise focusing, scarsettino built-in flash. Lacks series viewfinder, no small feat, even if LCD and also clearly visible in bright light. Considering the whole is no doubt on the subject beautiful and very interesting. She told by a Nikonist always. sent on October 17, 2016 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness, robustness, excellent color, absence of aberrations, stabilizer, distorsione.- Cons: Weight.- Opinion: L 'I bought used a few days ago, the impression is very good. Very easy to handle, stabilization super, almost no flare, making fast and accurate fire, f / 4 onwards made super well in the corners, the VC allows freehand night shots even with half of a second time. Delighted purchase, recommend to tutti.-rn sent on October 03, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: good construction, fast and precise M.AF, very true color, size and weight accettabili- Cons: Hood plasticky and cumbersome. Opinion: I got used yesterday morning, in perfect condition and little used. It 'a marvel, an object that once mounted in the car hardly want to change it. Maximum yield to TA even at the edges. Without the lens hood, it is not bulky. The weight is there but it is far from conditioning. The lack of stability is felt. Purchase strongly suggest that it is a well-paid monetary sacrifice by the results. sent on July 07, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 E PF ED VR Pros: Functionality, lightness, M / F, construction, versatile, beautiful to look at, a fairy tale. Cons: Hood anonymous. Opinion: I bought it yesterday and I've done a hundred shots. I will be a simpleton, but I found nothing wrong. Both in full light in the early evening shadows did not give me trouble, I also used with TC 14E III, the always beautiful images and precise. Great stabilizer. In the dark with the kickstand she has baked me very beautiful images and well defined. Excellent and fast M / F supported by the infinite function. Excellent VR Sport for moving subjects. Very nice all the focus. The price is not a joke, but considering the lightness and performance is everything. Beautiful custody. Lens recommended. rn sent on June 11, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: optics and build quality of the highest level, almost at the level of MAF Macro button (FN) on the body very useful, great multiplier combination 1.4, image quality, troplcalizzazione, excellent passage ring ATF / MF.- lens hood. Cons: heavy enough - with a multiplier respectable price. Opinion: I bought today, and I've done a hundred pictures, with fantastic results. The use is a bit 'problematic, because the weight is very different from the other 4/3 lenses. Certain that compared to others with the same characteristics is a lightweight. Good construction and excellent optical performance, no weaknesses. The focus is outstanding crisp and well-defined picture. The collar is provided. The lens hood remains optics without major problems. The price, though respectable, is justified by the content. I would say it is love at first sight. sent on March 08, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Clarity, compactness, lightness, weather sealing, excellent construction, focus mode; Cons: Hood not supplied; Opinion: I purchased the lens to use it with my OM-DE-M1, coupled truly apt. Excellent build quality, very interesting the AF limiter switch. optical essential for macros, it very well disengaged on other fronts (portraits, etc.). What's really bad, the failure envelope of the lens hood, the purchase is quite onerous. sent on February 22, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: lightweight, compact and very functional. Cons: the price Opinion: I took it today, so I cant say much. The pictures are very beautiful, the manual is great, very convenient to the ring switching from auto focus to manual. The auto focus is fast and very accurate, as well as manual. With f. 2.8 allows for great shots even in low light. Now I use it I know you can be more precise. sent on November 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Minimum distance of focus, light, space, clarity, stability, speed AF, construction. Cons: I struggle to find. Opinion: I bought it used to be a week, it was looking a bit 'of time. Just I picked up I felt in tune. I use both the D610 and D750 with that I do not find differences, the balance is more than excellent, the sharpness is fantastic, the focus fast and accurate, the blurred and very impressive, shooting quietly even at 1/10 of a second and the picture is stopped. Little cluttered and the weight is more than acceptable. It focuses closer than f2.8. I keep it constantly now mounted on a body now on the camera body, I do not find the way to put it to rest. Fantastic. rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn sent on June 25, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Compact, VR, sharpness, mounted filters, zoom range, light. Cons: distortion 16mm.- Opinion: They are about 6 months I use it and are more than happy - I mount that is on the D610 and D750 with both bodies yield and more than adequate. I thought at 14-24, but the inability to mount filters made me change my mind. I am not at all repentant. For the distortion (quite usual for wide angles) I try to pay attention during shooting, then there is always that PP does the rest. . The VR is very valid, it allows to take to 1/4 second to 16mm without having to resort to the easel. Surely perspective successful. sent on June 25, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
