JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1682 €;
191 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Velocidad de AF, definición desde f/2,8, colores,construción, rango focal......
Cons: Precio nuevo
Opinion: Comprado nuevo en 2007, sigue funcionando como el primer día, bodas, deportes, paisaje......
Hay gente que se queja de falta de nitidez en las esquinas,yo no tengo ninguna queja, para mi rinde perfectamente en cámaras como la Nikon D3s, D800...., después de 14 años trabajando con el, sigue funcionando perfectamente,al precio que esta hoy de segunda mano es una autentica ganga.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:It may be that I was "loser", my specimen, taken new from Nital, soon showed a whole series of problems, the autofocus failed after a few months of moderate use, repaired under warranty, after about a year began to have problems with the rings, then the autofocus broke again, repaired, always under warranty, as soon as I returned I put it on sale and took the Sigma counterpart. I give him 7, although I think he doesn't deserve it.
Opinion:After much hesitation, I took it as a replacement for the Nikkor 24-120/4. Overall, this 24-70 satisfies me more, even if it is less manageable than the 24-120 and those 40mm of focal length less make it less versatile on the go. The advantages of this lens are not so much in the extra diaphragm, as in the plasticity of the images and in the color rendering, which bring it closer to the best fixed objectives of the house. The absence of VR for me is not a problem, indeed (the version with VR weighs, clutters and costs more).
Opinion:Really very sharp lens even at 2.8 I made some fantastic close-ups. I bought the 24-70 Without VR because I think that such a sharp lens already at 2.8 so bright does not need stabilization, because the shutter speeds will always remain relatively high, in fact I did not regret the purchase. The zoom chiera is very delicate, you have to treat it with care, but nothing serious. The only thing that in my opinion can be a problem on certain occasions and the weight, in fact I do not consider it a travel lens. But in portraiture, landscaping, even in night photos I consider it excellent. absolutely recommended!
Opinion:Very sharp lens with beautiful colors. Good blurry. Vignetting and distortion in the norm for the lens type, easily corrected in post production anyway. Flares and ghosts very well controlled. One thing I don't like is zoom motion, maximum extension to 24 mm and minimum to 50 mm.Unfortunately as others have said before it suffers from construction problems. I bought one used in the store and had to return it the next day as the focus ring that at the time did not seem to present any particular problems once we got home and took about twenty test shots began to become hard and almost unusable. Returned with another specimen equal to the new one. Too bad about this construction problem because the lens is of exceptional optical quality.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
