RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED

The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1682 €;
178 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-70 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 34.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   15 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.38 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.27x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   900 g
 Dimensions   83 x 133 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 205000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2020

Pros: Sharpness, colors, AF

Cons: Weight

Opinion: After years of using Fujifilm for total use, I took this aim from my father's kit since he was undoing it. I attached it to my D610 that I had not yet sold and I was impressed by the optical quality. I can't find a real flaw. Maybe the only thing I don't like is the intrusive flare in the backlight photos even without having the sun directly in the frame. The vividness of the colors is magnificent and very natural. You have to pay a little attention to 24mm if you have architectural components in the image I have the impression that it distorts a bit but clearly it is not a defect since it is not born for that. The moral is that now I can't help it in the exits and after years of light outings with Fuji I put the big backpack on my shoulders to carry this jewel, as long as my shoulders hold. Although The 16-55 Fuji is an accelerating lens, this nikon lens in my opinion on a full frame sensor does a little bit more that makes me prefer in general for travel photos or reportage. Going home and looking at the photos taken with this optics is really a pleasure. On the wide angular side I'll like the 20mm f1.8 (even he hadn't had the courage to sell it yet) to have more field and for all those cases where the photos need strictly straight lines

avatarjunior
sent on September 26, 2020

Pros: Versatility, brilliance, colors

Cons: Lack of VR

Opinion: My favorite goal, I always carry it with me in every photo release and never cheats. I do everything from landscapes (some distortion at 24mm, but nothing tragic) to portraits at 70mm (despite also possessing the 70-200 2.8 VRII), which give so much satisfaction with a nice incisiveness and an excellent blur. Mounted on an d810, in your hands it conveys an excellent feeling with a well-balanced weight. Only flaw, the lack of VR, but to be honest I have no intention of moving on to the next model!

avatarjunior
sent on March 09, 2020

Pros: Sharpness to all openings, af, general yield, blurry, colors (if they depend on the lens)

Cons: Weight and clutter (but are in line with the competition), dials that harden at the first bump.

Opinion: Possessed twice after years, exceptional optics, sharpness that I struggle to find in other zooms, I do not know who says that it is not sharp at the edges maybe should show it to a service center because my two owned at 2.8 had definitely edges and corners vouchers that closing became great (if anyone has any doubts I can safely send him some nef). I used it mainly to photograph people, and then a little bit of everything. For people (and children) I used it at f2.8 at all focal points, I never had anything to complain about, indeed, it had an exceptional yield and gave a three-dimensionality even if "only" 2.8 that I liked to die for. In the long exposures for some landscape at 24 was crisp all over the frame. Then I sold everything to have the eye af of the sony house but , lightness aside, I have to say that once I got to know it with d750 almost did not miss a shot and still guaranteed excellent results and when the a7iii struggles with the eye af for poor lighting , he (with d750) did not make a crease. Once you buy it in conditions ok without decentral dull or yield problems at the edges this is the ultimate all-rounder optics that you keep until fields, unless you buy bodies with many mpx then I do not know what to say but on the 24 of the d750 it simply made me delighted especially for the sharpness. The vignette is there but I'm never interested because in nikon you recover it without problems, even if you pushed the exposure, without ruining the image. If it weighs too much it is not his fault, a decently built 24 70 2.8 can't weigh 200 grams and in fact there are simply no 24 70 70 2.8 zooms built well for FF that weigh little. In conclusion, I say that like all cameras the lenses must be tested and used to make "real" photos and not mental pippe, only so you really appreciate every single component for its characteristics and quality, if you buy it in this perspective this zoom will not disappoint you as it has never disappointed any photographer who is not of Sunday, but who uses it to take photos, if instead you want to buy it for boredom leave it alone. If you want to buy it with the hope of being able to make spectacular photos then you will be disappointed like so many others because this zoom does not work wonders take photos for you, in this case better a nice photography course. I forgot, with 20 euros I replaced the tyres of the second model because they bought used and were a bit hardened, but it depends mainly on the sweating type of those who use it because every lens I bought new and held for 15 years has never had any problem tyres. I read that to many they loosen but even then, with 20 euros about the new original buys and change in a minute.

avatarjunior
sent on May 07, 2019

Pros: Excellent quality in the center, bright colors, excellent maneuverability.

Cons: Bad edges on 30 mega sensors up, weight and footprint.

Opinion: I don't know how to say it's a vision without flaws. The edges at almost all focal lengths are very scarce. You have to diaphragm at least 8 to have decent results, but then, as you ask for the review of Chausseur D'images (the only honest), why buy a 2.8? A 24 for landscape is almost unusable. Just print already at 30x40 to notice the difference in quality between center and edges. It's a reportage perspective, where you don't have to be too careful with the edges. It still makes it better in medium and long distances rather than at minimum. After 10 years, bought the D850, and saw how it went I replaced it with fixed. If you have to use a handyman zoom at closed diaphragms on 24/85, it behaves very well and costs 350 euros used (see Tom Hogan). From 5.6 onwards it goes slightly worse than 24/70, but only slightly.

avatarjunior
sent on May 07, 2019

Pros: sharpness, colors, brightness, ideal focal range.

Cons: External tires, they say "the price"

Opinion: I bought one to replace a 28-70 AFS 2.8, an exceptional optics but which lacked the step at the bottom towards 24 mm. I used it for 4 years on D700 but then sold it to try other brands. After a fairly intense use, the external coating tires were dull, I think they are very sensitive to hand sweat and natural heat. Today after 5 years that I have remade a kit Nikon, because the first love never forget, I bought it again. My copy still has 4 months to live so I don't know if in the meantime mum Nikon has changed the quality of the rubber coatings, only time will tell me. For the rest I preferred this version not stabilized either because I knew her for a long time and in fact of reliability gave me security and because of the stabilized version in many argue is not really sharper than this version.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED

Foto
Apocalyptic picture in Praia a Mare
by Giusepperussofoto
352 comments, 36432 views  [editors pick]
Foto
My Galaxy
by Caio56
302 comments, 113409 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Back to the lake
by Deanbauer79
126 comments, 90358 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Lost in the woods
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
164 comments, 32666 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Utah - Lower Antelope Canyon
by Afrikachiara
346 comments, 44034 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 12.2 MP

Foto
This land is my land
by Lucio Agnifili
159 comments, 52249 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Steam train
by Marcophotographer
210 comments, 21421 views  
HI RES 11.9 MP

Foto
Marrakech - Jemaa el-Fnaa - Famous place
by F.Naef
146 comments, 34075 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
The One
by MarcoEquitani
124 comments, 16158 views
Foto
Mefjordvr Orcinus
by Walter Dall
122 comments, 14548 views  [editors pick]
Foto
On the Lake
by Deanbauer79
70 comments, 49328 views
Foto
Ice kingdom
by Crocca95
90 comments, 5811 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 17.6 MP

Foto
Rozes
by Gio8710
87 comments, 37744 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Spirit Island on Maligne Lake
by Franco Bergamini
119 comments, 16556 views
Foto
The house with the broken fence
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
80 comments, 11028 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Gold and Diamond
by Mario Vigo
143 comments, 25478 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 16.7 MP

Foto
Thunderstorm over Waterfall of the Gods
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
111 comments, 22542 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Pelmo in the clouds
by Crazyforlights
98 comments, 5088 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Canopo70
82 comments, 26545 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Homage to magritte
by Roberto Marini
95 comments, 25083 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Out of darkness
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
80 comments, 19029 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A flower for two
by Alchie
113 comments, 20677 views  [editors pick]
Foto
"Birds"
by Spartacus
146 comments, 11667 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Davide__m
89 comments, 22755 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Touareg
by Maria Rosaria Iazzetta
164 comments, 7305 views  
HI RES 5.2 MP

Foto
Last sun on Predarossa
by Maxspin73
101 comments, 13805 views
Foto
Ties
by Canopo70
106 comments, 3859 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Also I love the Tuscan sunsets
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
67 comments, 15444 views
Foto
Heaven in a Room
by Roberto Marini
85 comments, 16033 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Maria Giovanna ... 18 years!
by Afrikachiara
175 comments, 23361 views
Foto
Dawn balloon
by Maria Rosaria Iazzetta
136 comments, 8039 views
Foto
Relax at Puritama Spa - Chile
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
44 comments, 19458 views
Foto
Jain nun
by Massimo-lanteri
71 comments, 9793 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 15.1 MP

Foto
Misty day
by Mario Vigo
72 comments, 5428 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 14.3 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Venetian corners
by Maxspin73
80 comments, 5761 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Dolomites
by Afrikachiara
160 comments, 18376 views
Foto
Une touche de soleil
by Maxspin73
86 comments, 10638 views  [editors pick]

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me