JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1299 €;

155 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-35 mm
Angle of view	107.1 - 63.5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	17 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	0.28 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.25x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	685 g
Dimensions	83 x 125 mm
Buy
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 244000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Giggi Topp

sent on June 26, 2024

Pros: Lightweight, beautiful colors, VR, AF so quiet it looks broken.

Cons: Price of the new, plasticky, bulky, sharpness that can be improved, problematic in night photos with cameras that are not particularly effective at high ISO, despite the presence of the stabilizer.

Opinion: Found at a price you couldn't say no to, it initially made a good impression on me. I took it to add it to a Sigma 17/50 f2.8, which I resold after its purchase, wrongly. Mounted on the D 7200, the millimeter difference on the wide-angle side proved to be significant, even if in the face of geometric distortions that I had never detected on the Sigma. In any case, I wanted to try a relatively modern Nikon lens, to see if it really made a difference compared to those of the competition, as many claim. On the colorimetry, the contrasts and the transitions between the shades in fact nothing to say, but otherwise it did not particularly convince me. Sharpness and definition seemed to me to be in line with the idea I had made in the use of other Nikon lenses, that is, good but not excellent and above all deceptive. In the sense that looking at the file in a not too in-depth way they seem valid, but if you look more carefully they show their limitations, in particular bringing the file to 100%. A series of shots taken at night, albeit with the presence of numerous artificial lights that lightened the scene, forced me to throw away almost all the photos, despite the use of the stabilizer. Maybe I won't be able or I won't have understood the needs of the lens, I know the camera quite well, since I've had it for several years. In that period, however, there was the opportunity of a Sigma ART 24-35 that I decided to take on the fly and, after repeating the night photo session in the same area and in very similar conditions, there was only a minimal amount of photos to be discarded, so to speak physiological. Of course, you basically have to give up the wide-angle side, but for this purpose I took a 10-20 for a laughable price, which also gave me great satisfaction, absolutely and not only depending on the price that was paid. On the 24-35 the stabilizer is not there, but the lack is not felt and above all the leap in photographic quality was simply abysmal. For 70 euros difference from what I then took from the 16-35 there was no need to think about it for a moment. I sold the 16-35 with great difficulty, despite the fact that it was immaculate in everything, including the box, and despite the fact that I offered it at a price well below average. Given the persistent lack of bidders, I tried RCE, which granted me a low amount, if you will, but still higher than what I had paid him. I always find it difficult to part with the photographic objects I own, but the 16-35 is the lens I sold and I regret it the least, that is, not at all. The price at which it was sold when new seems to me frankly out of this world and once again deceptive: such as to make me think of a first-rate lens which, however, corresponds to performance that apart from the colors, the really beautiful ones, I find largely inadequate. On the 7200 equipped with battery grip it made a great impression, but this was matched by a behavior that was too often disappointing. Maybe it doesn't go well with too dense sensors and the one on the 7200 is the densest ever in the entire SLR range. I write this after detecting the positive comments of those who have used it on 16mpx FF sensors. I probably chose the wrong model to test the qualities of Nikon lenses, but as far as I'm concerned Sigma for life, even if they are not Art series.

Francob

sent on April 27, 2024

Pros: Versatile, rugged, dynamic AF and VR

Cons: I don't know

Opinion: I think it's one of the best purchases I've made. Using it at f8 gives it its all, both in terms of distortion and colors. I use it with the D4S and they are a perfect pair. In addition to the one already described, I really appreciate the tropicalization and the internal zoom. Definitely a lens guessed by Nikon for those who don't like to break the bank like the 14-24

Max-Photo-Parker

sent on January 25, 2024

Pros: Versatile, robust, responsive and accurate af, beautiful colors

Cons: Easily damaged lens hood with coupling

Opinion: Reading the reviews that precede mine, you can laugh. As usual, the truth lies somewhere in between. This 16-35 may not be the best choice for those who only do landscapes and/or architecture but for a use of reportage, street and travel photography it is definitely a good choice. In the center it is sharp at any aperture, the colors are good, the autofocus and the stabilizer work well, the focal range is the best you can have for uses above citati.il problem of possible infiltration of moisture and dust is easily solved with a protective filter. The weight and size are in the norm of this category of lenses.distortions and not good angles at 16mm.... More fat laugh. We're talking about 16mm and we're not talking about a Zeiss or even the 14-24! In short, exaggerated comments aside, I consider it a very valid tool for street reportage and travel in general. Max

Daniele Giubilo

sent on November 21, 2021

Pros: Sharpness, colors, VR, tropicalization, portability

Cons: Slight distortion

Opinion: At full aperture it distorts, not excessively, obviously depends on the mode and place of shooting, then, apart from the sacred monsters, which wide angle does not suffer? In any case correctable in p.p. - Weight not excessive, balanced on the D4, filter from 77 (which does not hurt), the lens does not stretch zooming. I did not detect anything else, for my landscape and street photos I would buy it again.

Shirtxyz

sent on September 20, 2021

Pros: Focal range, versatility, colors, 77 filters

Cons: Cluttered?

Opinion: I would also like to contribute by exposing my opinions on this fairly denigrated lens that I have owned for over two years now, chosen after a long diatribe with his brother 17-35 f2.8. I needed a grandndolo not pushed, with a good focal excursion to be able to use it even in the street, of satisfactory quality and that was not a boulder. I must say that the 16-35 satisfied me in full in everything, also considering the possibility of mounting 77 screw filters (I use CPL a lot) and the stabilization that is an added value. I don't take much interest in charts, MTFs or brick wall photos, my impressions are purely like a Sunday amateur photographer. It is true that at 16mm it has more or less correctable distortion and vignetting (this easily correctable), but the general yield is more than satisfactory for my needs. I also didn't find it as disastrous at 35mm as others say. The only note I can make is related to the size: not so much the weight that is almost acceptable, but its length that for my taste is excessive and tends to unbalance the body (D750) during walking. In hindsight perhaps today I would evaluate the tamron 17-35 but only for a speech of weights / dimensions. I am finding myself very well so that from an initial sporadic use for specific situations, it has become one of the main objectives that I almost always carry with me.

There are 33 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

O sun that lights are born poor 'land is

by Albieri Sergio
811 comments, 69146 views

Dear Cat .. Once upon a time ...

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
209 comments, 66998 views [editors pick]

Ah! Livorno ...

by Cosiminodegenerali
300 comments, 35122 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Magical light ... magical art!

by Cosiminodegenerali
298 comments, 44122 views [editors pick]

Wind painted

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
115 comments, 28818 views [editors pick]

The hour draws to a desire

by Albieri Sergio
515 comments, 28411 views

Chioggia (VE) - Vena Channel

by Albieri Sergio
383 comments, 25114 views [editors pick]

HI RES 10.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

In the valley of dreams

by Marcofer81
96 comments, 16412 views [editors pick]

HI RES 24.2 MP

Hamnoy, Moskenesoya

by Therion
69 comments, 26880 views [editors pick]

Bernina, red passion

by Marcofer81
85 comments, 13994 views [editors pick]

HI RES 22.6 MP

A difficult night

by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
97 comments, 21593 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.9 MP

Prayer

by Lara Zanarini
107 comments, 23992 views [editors pick]

700 Snowballs

by Afrikachiara
169 comments, 22069 views

Evergreen

by Arci
111 comments, 14079 views [editors pick]

Fight of colors

by Pao
92 comments, 23365 views

Before the storm

by Daniele Bisognin
84 comments, 9854 views [editors pick]

Marten

by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
77 comments, 8669 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

"Selfoss" How much risk?

by Riaz84
53 comments, 19928 views [editors pick]

Still Life

by Cosiminodegenerali
117 comments, 16910 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

Round round

by Albieri Sergio
170 comments, 5973 views [editors pick]

HI RES 16.7 MP

The Scornata

by Wild Bergas Photo
55 comments, 8214 views [editors pick]

Iceland - Kirkjufell the mirror

by Paolocotica2411
93 comments, 10067 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The Sanctuary

by Mario Vigo
64 comments, 11155 views [editors pick]

HI RES 15.4 MP

From Arizona to the Po Delta

by Albieri Sergio
243 comments, 11755 views

The Easter egg

by Albieri Sergio
254 comments, 13175 views

Scotland: night at the castle

by Claudio Santoro
373 comments, 22522 views

Luis the taxi Driver

by Andrea Ceroni
81 comments, 8605 views [editors pick]

Walk in the lagoon

by Albieri Sergio
238 comments, 7031 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

Laguna gialloblu

by Albieri Sergio
260 comments, 7825 views

An almost blue now

by Albieri Sergio
225 comments, 10989 views

Not for a long time to risiterò

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
63 comments, 15055 views

Foggy Morning

by Meini Fausto
67 comments, 10725 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Ruthless

by Serpy
102 comments, 11588 views

Lonely

by Dario Gazzi
115 comments, 9907 views [editors pick]

HI RES 17.4 MP

Rustic decadent

by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
50 comments, 29305 views [editors pick]

Still Life!

by Cosiminodegenerali
69 comments, 13694 views

A mystic and sensual kidnapping

by Albieri Sergio
246 comments, 7737 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR