RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1239 €;
142 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/4
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.25x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   685 g
 Dimensions   83 x 125 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR, buy on Ebay


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 209000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on November 05, 2020

Pros: Weight but above all, for those who use filters, diameter from 77 (which saves a lot considering the prices of Nisi slabs)

Cons: not relevant

Opinion: I waited months before giving an opinion on this goal, and reading even before the purchase of the MTF tests. It is incomprehensible in my modest opinion how it is by many photographers (amateurs or professionals who are) underestimated. I had the pleasure of being able to compare it with 14/24 2.8, 24/70 2.8 and 24/120 f/4, and as fussy as it is, in view of the considerable difference in price to purchase (with the exception of 24/120 f/4) I would not give up at all 16/35 in favor of the others mentioned above. The mtf speak clearly, to very open diaphragms limps but from the f/6.3 the gap with the much "decanted" 14/24 f/2.8 (reference point of the Nikon wide-angle category) is narrowing. The vignette that many highlight is in my opinion completely irrelevant given the possibility with Ps to eliminate it (for what little it highlights) in a blink of an eye. The sharpness at the edges, on the open diaphragms, is certainly not that of 14/24 but moreover the price is not and, as it closes at f/7.1 the difference disappears. In my opinion, it is an excellent optics, due to the fact that, using it exclusively in the mountains for landscapes, my diaphragms always range from f/8 to f/13 thus eliminating that "limp" of his to open diaphragms. Moreover, I do not have the problem of holder and slabs, being able to use Nisi filters on all the wide angles I own, which is a nice saving of both weight and euro! I link with the test for those interested: https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-16-35mm-f4g-vr/2

avatarjunior
sent on August 25, 2020

Pros: Focal excursion, 77mm filters, stabilizer

Cons: non-relevant

Opinion: Good morning, you read several conflicting opinions on this optics, I report my photo-amateur from excursions and trips. The optics are perfect for my needs: optimal focal excursion, VR doing its job, acceptable weight and above all 77mm filters so I can do long exposures without bleeding out with slab filters. The sharpness at F 4 is ok in the center and enough at the edges, diaphragm at 5.6 and 8 becomes homogeneous throughout the frame. The distortion for me is acceptable, just be careful when shooting and avoid several problems, also if you want to eliminate distortions you have to use the decentralizables, otherwise there are always... New costs a lot (too much), I took it used at a reasonable cost.

avatarjunior
sent on January 08, 2020

Pros: focal excursion, VR, weight

Cons: disastrous angles at 16 mm, water infiltration

Opinion: after a year of use I can say that the defects outweigh the merits. The focal range is excellent the weight quite contained although not the stated one (720 gr with lampshade) combined with an exceptional VR for freehand photos that I regret very much. Unfortunately, the lens is only tropicalized on paper, following a trip to Iceland with frontal spray from a waterfall (not direct water on the target) and dried immediately were formed concentric rings inside the lenses, perhaps remnants of limestone/ dirt as a result of drying forcing me to sell it at a price to say the least ridiculous. Disastrous 16 mm angles, in some cases you are forced to cut them from how opaque and insharp they are.

avatarjunior
sent on August 24, 2019

Pros: Focus, sharpness, versatility.

Cons: Just the weight.

Opinion: This is an exceptional lens for me. Gifts colors and super sharpness and above all it is a wide-angle pushed, just as I like it. Among my best shots, many were made with this lens. The only downside is the weight and size that are remarkable (unfortunately), otherwise it is a lens that I love and that I recommend. I didn't find any defects in hallucirate lenses or anything like that. For me a 9.5 as a grade (the half point is only for weight/clutter, but I also understand that the project - to include VR - probably could not allow smaller dimensions).

avatarsenior
sent on June 11, 2019

Pros: Clarity across the field already from f4 (excluding 35mm), distortion noteworthy only at 16mm (corrects in the room), discreet resistance to flare, use of 77mm filters, VR, color yield, minimum focus distance, weight and quite modest size, versatility, zoom and AF INTERNI (it does not rotate anything, nothing comes out, no dust comes in), tropicalized.

Cons: At 35mm as sharpness drops a bit to f4 and you have to close to f5, 6-f8.

Opinion: Great beautiful lens, with a very versatile range of focals, fantastic the zoom and af interior mechanism. Ideal for landscapes and architecture (most obvious distortion at 16mm,solvable directly in the room). With a small minimum maf distance, it can also be used for close-up and creative shots. Coupled with 70-200 f4 is an exceptional combination. Personally I mount the 16-35 on the Nikon D850 (where thanks to the high number of Mpixels I can crop in the room or in pp to get the focal points between 35mm and 70mm) and the 70-200 on Nikon D600. If you do not want to complicate life with a 14-24 f2.8 (unmanageable by weight, clutter and impossibility of easy use of filters) and you can give up an f2.8, this is the right lens.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

Foto
O sun that lights are born poor 'land is
by Albieri Sergio
772 comments, 52187 views
Foto
Dear Cat .. Once upon a time ...
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
201 comments, 57169 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Ah! Livorno ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
296 comments, 28636 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Magical light ... magical art!
by Cosiminodegenerali
294 comments, 35876 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Wind painted
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
112 comments, 24228 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The hour draws to a desire
by Albieri Sergio
500 comments, 18741 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Chioggia (VE) - Vena Channel
by Albieri Sergio
372 comments, 14705 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 10.7 MP

Foto
In the valley of dreams
by Marcofer81
95 comments, 13408 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Bernina, red passion
by Marcofer81
84 comments, 11628 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 22.6 MP

Foto
Hamnoy, Moskenesoya
by Therion
69 comments, 22929 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Prayer
by Lara Zanarini
105 comments, 21045 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A difficult night
by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
97 comments, 17032 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.9 MP

Foto
700 Snowballs
by Afrikachiara
168 comments, 19005 views
Foto
Evergreen
by Arci
110 comments, 10511 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Before the storm
by Daniele Bisognin
84 comments, 7700 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Fight of colors
by Pao
92 comments, 19615 views
Foto
Marten
by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
76 comments, 4794 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
"Selfoss" How much risk?
by Riaz84
51 comments, 18110 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Still Life
by Cosiminodegenerali
117 comments, 14030 views  
HI RES 11.6 MP

Foto
From Arizona to the Po Delta
by Albieri Sergio
241 comments, 8469 views
Foto
The Scornata
by Wild Bergas Photo
55 comments, 5488 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Sanctuary
by Mario Vigo
64 comments, 7443 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 15.4 MP

Foto
Iceland - Kirkjufell the mirror
by Paolocotica2411
90 comments, 7954 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
The Easter egg
by Albieri Sergio
246 comments, 8968 views
Foto
Laguna gialloblu
by Albieri Sergio
260 comments, 5857 views
Foto
An almost blue now
by Albieri Sergio
223 comments, 7906 views
Foto
Scotland: night at the castle
by Claudio Santoro
343 comments, 16763 views
Foto
Luis the taxi Driver
by Andrea Ceroni
78 comments, 5807 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Rustic decadent
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
50 comments, 27763 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Not for a long time to risiterò
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
63 comments, 11767 views
Foto
Foggy Morning
by Meini Fausto
66 comments, 8496 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Lonely
by Dario Gazzi
113 comments, 7412 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 17.4 MP

Foto
Still Life!
by Cosiminodegenerali
69 comments, 11796 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Saudade of loneliness ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
83 comments, 9591 views
Foto
Ruthless
by Serpy
101 comments, 9131 views
Foto
A mystic and sensual kidnapping
by Albieri Sergio
244 comments, 6008 views
Foto
Walk in the lagoon
by Albieri Sergio
231 comments, 3668 views  
HI RES 8.2 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me