RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1240 €;
146 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/4
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.25x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   685 g
 Dimensions   83 x 125 mm

 Buy

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR, buy on Ebay Ebay



Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 221000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on November 21, 2021

Pros: Sharpness, colors, VR, tropicalization, portability

Cons: Slight distortion

Opinion: At full aperture it distorts, not excessively, obviously depends on the mode and place of shooting, then, apart from the sacred monsters, which wide angle does not suffer? In any case correctable in p.p. - Weight not excessive, balanced on the D4, filter from 77 (which does not hurt), the lens does not stretch zooming. I did not detect anything else, for my landscape and street photos I would buy it again.

avatarjunior
sent on September 20, 2021

Pros: Focal range, versatility, colors, 77 filters

Cons: Cluttered?

Opinion: I would also like to contribute by exposing my opinions on this fairly denigrated lens that I have owned for over two years now, chosen after a long diatribe with his brother 17-35 f2.8. I needed a grandndolo not pushed, with a good focal excursion to be able to use it even in the street, of satisfactory quality and that was not a boulder. I must say that the 16-35 satisfied me in full in everything, also considering the possibility of mounting 77 screw filters (I use CPL a lot) and the stabilization that is an added value. I don't take much interest in charts, MTFs or brick wall photos, my impressions are purely like a Sunday amateur photographer. It is true that at 16mm it has more or less correctable distortion and vignetting (this easily correctable), but the general yield is more than satisfactory for my needs. I also didn't find it as disastrous at 35mm as others say. The only note I can make is related to the size: not so much the weight that is almost acceptable, but its length that for my taste is excessive and tends to unbalance the body (D750) during walking. In hindsight perhaps today I would evaluate the tamron 17-35 but only for a speech of weights / dimensions. I am finding myself very well so that from an initial sporadic use for specific situations, it has become one of the main objectives that I almost always carry with me.

avatarsenior
sent on November 05, 2020

Pros: Weight but above all, for those who use filters, diameter from 77 (which saves a lot considering the prices of Nisi slabs)

Cons: not relevant

Opinion: I waited months before giving an opinion on this goal, and reading even before the purchase of the MTF tests. It is incomprehensible in my modest opinion how it is by many photographers (amateurs or professionals who are) underestimated. I had the pleasure of being able to compare it with 14/24 2.8, 24/70 2.8 and 24/120 f/4, and as fussy as it is, in view of the considerable difference in price to purchase (with the exception of 24/120 f/4) I would not give up at all 16/35 in favor of the others mentioned above. The mtf speak clearly, to very open diaphragms limps but from the f/6.3 the gap with the much "decanted" 14/24 f/2.8 (reference point of the Nikon wide-angle category) is narrowing. The vignette that many highlight is in my opinion completely irrelevant given the possibility with Ps to eliminate it (for what little it highlights) in a blink of an eye. The sharpness at the edges, on the open diaphragms, is certainly not that of 14/24 but moreover the price is not and, as it closes at f/7.1 the difference disappears. In my opinion, it is an excellent optics, due to the fact that, using it exclusively in the mountains for landscapes, my diaphragms always range from f/8 to f/13 thus eliminating that "limp" of his to open diaphragms. Moreover, I do not have the problem of holder and slabs, being able to use Nisi filters on all the wide angles I own, which is a nice saving of both weight and euro! I link with the test for those interested: https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-16-35mm-f4g-vr/2

avatarjunior
sent on August 25, 2020

Pros: Focal excursion, 77mm filters, stabilizer

Cons: non-relevant

Opinion: Good morning, you read several conflicting opinions on this optics, I report my photo-amateur from excursions and trips. The optics are perfect for my needs: optimal focal excursion, VR doing its job, acceptable weight and above all 77mm filters so I can do long exposures without bleeding out with slab filters. The sharpness at F 4 is ok in the center and enough at the edges, diaphragm at 5.6 and 8 becomes homogeneous throughout the frame. The distortion for me is acceptable, just be careful when shooting and avoid several problems, also if you want to eliminate distortions you have to use the decentralizables, otherwise there are always... New costs a lot (too much), I took it used at a reasonable cost.

avatarjunior
sent on January 08, 2020

Pros: focal excursion, VR, weight

Cons: disastrous angles at 16 mm, water infiltration

Opinion: after a year of use I can say that the defects outweigh the merits. The focal range is excellent the weight quite contained although not the stated one (720 gr with lampshade) combined with an exceptional VR for freehand photos that I regret very much. Unfortunately, the lens is only tropicalized on paper, following a trip to Iceland with frontal spray from a waterfall (not direct water on the target) and dried immediately were formed concentric rings inside the lenses, perhaps remnants of limestone/ dirt as a result of drying forcing me to sell it at a price to say the least ridiculous. Disastrous 16 mm angles, in some cases you are forced to cut them from how opaque and insharp they are.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

Foto
O sun that lights are born poor 'land is
by Albieri Sergio
797 comments, 57207 views
Foto
Dear Cat .. Once upon a time ...
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
204 comments, 60111 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Ah! Livorno ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
300 comments, 30766 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Magical light ... magical art!
by Cosiminodegenerali
296 comments, 38733 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Wind painted
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
113 comments, 25671 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The hour draws to a desire
by Albieri Sergio
504 comments, 21854 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Chioggia (VE) - Vena Channel
by Albieri Sergio
380 comments, 18227 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 10.7 MP

Foto
In the valley of dreams
by Marcofer81
95 comments, 14397 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Hamnoy, Moskenesoya
by Therion
69 comments, 24291 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Bernina, red passion
by Marcofer81
84 comments, 12369 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 22.6 MP

Foto
Prayer
by Lara Zanarini
105 comments, 22189 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A difficult night
by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
97 comments, 18649 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.9 MP

Foto
700 Snowballs
by Afrikachiara
168 comments, 20024 views
Foto
Evergreen
by Arci
110 comments, 11888 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Before the storm
by Daniele Bisognin
84 comments, 8631 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Fight of colors
by Pao
92 comments, 21004 views
Foto
Marten
by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
76 comments, 6491 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
"Selfoss" How much risk?
by Riaz84
51 comments, 18728 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Still Life
by Cosiminodegenerali
116 comments, 15120 views  
HI RES 11.6 MP

Foto
The Scornata
by Wild Bergas Photo
55 comments, 6578 views  [editors pick]
Foto
From Arizona to the Po Delta
by Albieri Sergio
241 comments, 9544 views
Foto
Iceland - Kirkjufell the mirror
by Paolocotica2411
92 comments, 8702 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
The Sanctuary
by Mario Vigo
64 comments, 8941 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 15.4 MP

Foto
The Easter egg
by Albieri Sergio
248 comments, 10279 views
Foto
Laguna gialloblu
by Albieri Sergio
260 comments, 6654 views
Foto
Scotland: night at the castle
by Claudio Santoro
359 comments, 18750 views
Foto
An almost blue now
by Albieri Sergio
223 comments, 8873 views
Foto
Walk in the lagoon
by Albieri Sergio
233 comments, 4730 views  
HI RES 8.2 MP

Foto
Not for a long time to risiterò
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
63 comments, 13035 views
Foto
Luis the taxi Driver
by Andrea Ceroni
78 comments, 6738 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Foggy Morning
by Meini Fausto
66 comments, 9443 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Ruthless
by Serpy
101 comments, 10062 views
Foto
Rustic decadent
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
50 comments, 28288 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Lonely
by Dario Gazzi
113 comments, 8156 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 17.4 MP

Foto
Still Life!
by Cosiminodegenerali
69 comments, 12500 views
Foto
Saudade of loneliness ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
83 comments, 10261 views
Foto
A mystic and sensual kidnapping
by Albieri Sergio
244 comments, 6551 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me