RCE Foto

Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR : Specifications and Opinions

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

The Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1240 €;
134 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos

 Focal lenght   16-35 mm
 Angle of view   107.1 - 63.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/4
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.28 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.25x

 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   685 g
 Dimensions   83 x 125 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR, buy on Ebay


What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 180000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

sent on August 24, 2019

Pros: Focus, sharpness, versatility.

Cons: Just the weight.

Opinion: This is an exceptional lens for me. Gifts colors and super sharpness and above all it is a wide-angle pushed, just as I like it. Among my best shots, many were made with this lens. The only downside is the weight and size that are remarkable (unfortunately), otherwise it is a lens that I love and that I recommend. I didn't find any defects in hallucirate lenses or anything like that. For me a 9.5 as a grade (the half point is only for weight/clutter, but I also understand that the project - to include VR - probably could not allow smaller dimensions).

sent on June 11, 2019

Pros: Clarity across the field already from f4 (excluding 35mm), distortion noteworthy only at 16mm (corrects in the room), discreet resistance to flare, use of 77mm filters, VR, color yield, minimum focus distance, weight and quite modest size, versatility, zoom and AF INTERNI (it does not rotate anything, nothing comes out, no dust comes in), tropicalized.

Cons: At 35mm as sharpness drops a bit to f4 and you have to close to f5, 6-f8.

Opinion: Great beautiful lens, with a very versatile range of focals, fantastic the zoom and af interior mechanism. Ideal for landscapes and architecture (most obvious distortion at 16mm,solvable directly in the room). With a small minimum maf distance, it can also be used for close-up and creative shots. Coupled with 70-200 f4 is an exceptional combination. Personally I mount the 16-35 on the Nikon D850 (where thanks to the high number of Mpixels I can crop in the room or in pp to get the focal points between 35mm and 70mm) and the 70-200 on Nikon D600. If you do not want to complicate life with a 14-24 f2.8 (unmanageable by weight, clutter and impossibility of easy use of filters) and you can give up an f2.8, this is the right lens.

sent on November 22, 2018

Pros: Sharpness across the field, rugged, VR, front diameter for filters

Cons: 16 correctable Distortion, if you do architecture

Opinion: Taken to mount it on DF and D810, and immediately I noticed that it was a great zoom, for landscapes and street is the best that you can have, at all Apermi I find the optics in question excellent, has no particular sagging, I found to TA the extreme edges read more morbid I, but not in an egregious manner. In weddings, I noticed that I use in a very high percentage of the 16 -35, both for excellent quality and because it encloses the focal range most important for photography, the last VR where for me it really makes sense, so you can shoot with lower times , and keep the lower ISO, this Nikon works great. Beautiful lens also in the construction and especially in the various fields of employment, which are many, in the landscape is essential.

sent on November 14, 2018

Pros: Versatility, sharpness, counterlight sealing, construction.

Cons: Slight loss at the extreme edges, 16mm distortion easily correctable in post.

Opinion: There are various thoughts and experiences on this lens, I noticed the negative comments of the last 4 users, while the previous reviews are exciting, this makes me think maybe an inconstancy of quality of the specimens, I say this because mine is extraordinary, Excellent sharpness on the center and median parts of the frame already at F4 which closes further improves, a slight drop in the extreme edges but I think is justified by the amplitude of the zoom. I confirm the distortion to 16mm, but it corrects fine in post, easily on Lightroom that I use. At 35mm It is true that it loses a little bit, but not so dramatic the result then I noticed that it also depends on the origin of the light. In conclusion I can say that the lens is great as long as you find the specimen without defects, so I recommend it quietly but try it before you buy it.

sent on October 12, 2018

Pros: Great lens...

Cons: To use as Paperweights

Opinion: There is unfortunately the slip of a brand, and if for Canon was the 16-35 (which have always been far from being a decent lens), for Nikon is this lens. Now let's bypass the construction considerations directly. Already said on my review of 24-70: Nikon wanted to lower the bar. Maybe to try to sell more spare parts and more manpower once the guarantee is over, I have no idea. I only know that if you compare it to a 17-35 or 20-35, the construction will be enormously different. I can't get my head off the toy sensation once I've picked up the new Nikon Lenses. It's going to be me, but it's okay. About the optical quality I do not understand how you can praise a similar lens. It costs a roar, it is an f4, the sharpness at F4 makes laugh from half frame to the edges and becomes homogeneous by dropping on average at f11. Nikon has put the VR in a wide angle because so you can shoot at F11 in broad daylight without raising the ISO (ahahah). I don't really tell you not to buy it, I just tell you to look at the graphs MTF or lw\\ph online, and to see this lens actually as it is. But then it costs new as a sigma art 14-24...

Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR

O sun that lights are born poor 'land is
by Albieri Sergio
747 comments, 43334 views
Dear Cat .. Once upon a time ...
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
193 comments, 52012 views  [editors pick]
Ah! Livorno ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
283 comments, 24540 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Magical light ... magical art!
by Cosiminodegenerali
285 comments, 31519 views  [editors pick]
Wind painted
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
112 comments, 21071 views  [editors pick]
The hour draws to a desire
by Albieri Sergio
488 comments, 14329 views
In the valley of dreams
by Marcofer81
91 comments, 11127 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Bernina, red passion
by Marcofer81
82 comments, 9841 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 22.6 MP


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Hamnoy, Moskenesoya
by Therion
67 comments, 19957 views  [editors pick]
by Lara Zanarini
104 comments, 19159 views  [editors pick]
700 Snowballs
by Afrikachiara
164 comments, 17109 views
A difficult night
by Sergio Luzzini e Luigi Meroni
98 comments, 12661 views  [editors pick]  

by Arci
105 comments, 7887 views  [editors pick]
Before the storm
by Daniele Bisognin
83 comments, 6160 views  [editors pick]
Fight of colors
by Pao
92 comments, 17023 views
"Selfoss" How much risk?
by Riaz84
51 comments, 17019 views  [editors pick]
Still Life
by Cosiminodegenerali
113 comments, 12340 views  
HI RES 11.6 MP

From Arizona to the Po Delta
by Albieri Sergio
236 comments, 6522 views
The Easter egg
by Albieri Sergio
240 comments, 7197 views
An almost blue now
by Albieri Sergio
224 comments, 6155 views
Laguna gialloblu
by Albieri Sergio
258 comments, 4602 views
Iceland - Kirkjufell the mirror
by Paolocotica2411
87 comments, 6482 views  

Rustic decadent
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
49 comments, 26681 views  [editors pick]
Not for a long time to risiterò
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
63 comments, 9949 views
Scotland: night at the castle
by Claudio Santoro
311 comments, 14065 views
Luis the taxi Driver
by Andrea Ceroni
73 comments, 4102 views  [editors pick]
Still Life!
by Cosiminodegenerali
69 comments, 10412 views
Saudade of loneliness ...
by Cosiminodegenerali
79 comments, 8532 views
Foggy Morning
by Meini Fausto
63 comments, 6625 views  

A mystic and sensual kidnapping
by Albieri Sergio
244 comments, 4526 views
by Dario Gazzi
113 comments, 5844 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 17.4 MP


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Work ends at the end
by Albieri Sergio
245 comments, 3426 views
by Serpy
99 comments, 7107 views
The priest and his church
by Albieri Sergio
198 comments, 13613 views
Merry Christmas and Serene 2018
by Albieri Sergio
234 comments, 4379 views
The shadow and reflection
by Albieri Sergio
210 comments, 7100 views
La Gonzaghese-color version
by Albieri Sergio
189 comments, 2326 views

Next Page »

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.


Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me