JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 179000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Sharpness, microcontrast, colour rendition, angle of view.
Cons: weight, too strange flare in some situations, coloured "blicks" even with no sun in the frame (sometimes), no possibility to attach filters, price too high.
Opinion: Much better choise than the 16-35/4 Nikkor. Completely different colours and contrast than this competitor. Including all PROS and CONS: the best very wide angle Nikkor lens! The most of little disadvantages of this lens could be easy removed in postproduction. With excellent microcontrast and colours (typical for Nikon lenses) the rest of job at computer screen is very nice - you simply get extraordinary picture. This item is "must have one" for all full frame "Nikonians". Of course one can buy a Zeiss 15/2,8, which is also very good piece of glass with overgrown price.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness and chromatic rendering, focal aperture construction and versatility. In the backlight after "taming" it also gives a lot of satisfaction.
Cons:Maybe the delicacy of the front lens and not be able to mount screw filters.
Opinion:I have had this lens for about 10 months, I have used it in many scenarios (even for some improvised portraits) I can say that it is relatively versatile. This does not mean, however, that it is an easy lens to use, in fact you have to learn to "tame" it once you understand it you can even take advantage of the effects it does in the backlight to take particular photos. I don't go into the rendering of colors because they are just spectacular... blue and shades of the yellow greens etc are always well balanced is never excessive. The only flaw is not to be able to mount screw filters and have to be very careful to handle it because of the protruding front lens, but alas and thanks to the one that is so phenomenal.
Pros:Versatility, chromatic rendering and detail at all apertual and constructive solidity.
Cons:At the time no one found.
Opinion:In this focal range I think it's the top in circulation. Magnificently completes the Holy Triad F/2.8 (14-24/24-70/70-200). I honestly do not understand who complains about the weight and for the price. The versatility and quality you pay... With respect to fixed (and costly) targets, it is normal that quality is not the same. But if I choose a zoom, I have to accept a compromise. Otherwise it would be a bit like buying a Ferrari and then complaining that it consumes too much...
Cons:Front lens delicate and exposed... bad resistance to backlight... lack of incisiveness (available with post-production)... weight and cost!!!
Opinion:I have owned this lens for a few months... but I sold it almost immediately to replace it with fixed wide angles of the Zeiss milvus ZF series. 2 (15 and 21 mm). There is no comparison as a global surrender, as a micro-contrast, as a resistance to backlight, as fidelity colors and tonal transitions: win the Zeiss a man low!!! Basically this is the black sheep of the Nikon f/2.8 zoom triad. It's an outdated lens: it would serve a sound redesign to make it contemporary. But now Nikon will allocate resources and development to the 14-24 f/2.8 Attack for mirrorless use, because that's the future.
Pros:Sharpness and chromatic yield, magnificent contrast and crazy incisiveness. Construction at the top and AF very fast and precise.
Cons:Cost of a plate filter kit,
Opinion:Crazy Optics, it's the second I buy. I had sold it to try out the new Sigma and Tamron proposals, but regained it without thinking about it. I use it mainly in Cape Landscape and for astrophotography and it is a pleasure to use it, AF fast and very precise manual MAF. Compared to the aforementioned Tamron and Sigma offers a microcontrast and fairytale colors from my point of view. I read many reviews of crazy flare, but if used to not known these problems, sure if used directed against sun is inevitable seen the lens. Sharpness already at 2.8 then if you diaphragm a little is not equal. For me I vote 10!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
