JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1899 €;
169 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 224000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Sharpness, microcontrast, colour rendition, angle of view.
Cons: weight, too strange flare in some situations, coloured "blicks" even with no sun in the frame (sometimes), no possibility to attach filters, price too high.
Opinion: Much better choise than the 16-35/4 Nikkor. Completely different colours and contrast than this competitor. Including all PROS and CONS: the best very wide angle Nikkor lens! The most of little disadvantages of this lens could be easy removed in postproduction. With excellent microcontrast and colours (typical for Nikon lenses) the rest of job at computer screen is very nice - you simply get extraordinary picture. This item is "must have one" for all full frame "Nikonians". Of course one can buy a Zeiss 15/2,8, which is also very good piece of glass with overgrown price.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Optical quality in general, focal range up to 14 mm, construction and robustness with a single caveat regarding the front lens.
Cons:Weight and dimensions, protruding and unprotected front lens, flare-type aberrations lurking.
Opinion:It is a lens that I like very much and despite some flaws it will remain in my kit. To be a zoom the general optical quality is really high and in Nikon F-mount is also the only modern product that goes to 14 mm focal length, considering that there are fixed "exotic" natives that go to 14 mm but are dated optics and some of which are also difficult to find at fair prices in the used. It is an ultra wide angle, it distorts, it is its nature not a defect, and compared to others it distorts "better" in the sense that the "warping" effect it determines is less marked than in other lenses. It solves a lot even at full aperture and diaphragm is very very sharp throughout the frame. I really like the fact that with this lens you can give the images a very "immersive" look, which does not depend only on the wide-angle qualities but also on the peculiar character of this lens. It makes saturated /very saturated colors. As already mentioned by many others, the problems of this lens are two, both referring to the protruding front lens: the flare always lurking and the possibility of dirtying / ruining the lens even just by placing the lens in the bag - in my specimen the hood is rather loose and is easily removed, especially using aftermarket padded clutches that instead with every other lens protect against dust and scratches. Wanting to compare it with other Nikon material I would say that at 20 mm it is comparable with the AFS 20 1.8 that I had and I consider a really good lens, obviously the fixed wins for the f / 1.8, the weight and size, perhaps the minimum focusing distance, but overall the general yield is not very different. I didn't compare it to AFS 16-35 because I never had the latter.
Opinion:Used for almost 2 years on a D810, Lens Cara si but really Imposing, Very Sharp, Minimal distortion and well manageable during shooting, then in many scenes manages to give a three-dimensionality to the image that I had never seen in any other wide angle, solid metal construction, perhaps the only flaw is the quality of the front cap they could do better , but let's move on to the sore notes, the weight and the footprint compared to a classic 16-35 make themselves felt, in conditions of frontal light you have to know how to handle the flares because they are very pronounced and then lastly the inconvenience of not being able to mount screw filters, then in the mountains another 250-300g of weight to carry holders and slab filters , for the rest I think that in Nikon there is nothing more valid to make landscape, optical quality is comparable to fixed objectives.
Opinion:Great lens used for many months even on the go. Sharpness on par with a first, excellent image quality, distortion virtually absent. Only two flaws are the weight (1.1kg On Reflex tired after a while) and the combated front element that does not allow the assembly of threaded filters. Sold for a slightly less superb but lighter lens.
Opinion:Great lens, after years loved and sold waiting for the z-mount series. Sharpness distinguishes it, an optics loved by all fans. Bulky, front lens does not allow you to insert screw filters, and being protruding there is a danger that during the service you may run into involuntary shocks... Waiting for the 14-24 2.8 z-mount I use the 16-35 f4 optics more comfortable 77mm caps with excursion up to 35mm, but not comparable for sharpness and distortion to the king 14-24 f2.8 f-mount. good research
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
