JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.
The Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1870 €;
165 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 212000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Sharpness, microcontrast, colour rendition, angle of view.
Cons: weight, too strange flare in some situations, coloured "blicks" even with no sun in the frame (sometimes), no possibility to attach filters, price too high.
Opinion: Much better choise than the 16-35/4 Nikkor. Completely different colours and contrast than this competitor. Including all PROS and CONS: the best very wide angle Nikkor lens! The most of little disadvantages of this lens could be easy removed in postproduction. With excellent microcontrast and colours (typical for Nikon lenses) the rest of job at computer screen is very nice - you simply get extraordinary picture. This item is "must have one" for all full frame "Nikonians". Of course one can buy a Zeiss 15/2,8, which is also very good piece of glass with overgrown price.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Used for almost 2 years on a D810, Lens Cara si but really Imposing, Very Sharp, Minimal distortion and well manageable during shooting, then in many scenes manages to give a three-dimensionality to the image that I had never seen in any other wide angle, solid metal construction, perhaps the only flaw is the quality of the front cap they could do better , but let's move on to the sore notes, the weight and the footprint compared to a classic 16-35 make themselves felt, in conditions of frontal light you have to know how to handle the flares because they are very pronounced and then lastly the inconvenience of not being able to mount screw filters, then in the mountains another 250-300g of weight to carry holders and slab filters , for the rest I think that in Nikon there is nothing more valid to make landscape, optical quality is comparable to fixed objectives.
Opinion:Great lens used for many months even on the go. Sharpness on par with a first, excellent image quality, distortion virtually absent. Only two flaws are the weight (1.1kg On Reflex tired after a while) and the combated front element that does not allow the assembly of threaded filters. Sold for a slightly less superb but lighter lens.
Opinion:Great lens, after years loved and sold waiting for the z-mount series. Sharpness distinguishes it, an optics loved by all fans. Bulky, front lens does not allow you to insert screw filters, and being protruding there is a danger that during the service you may run into involuntary shocks... Waiting for the 14-24 2.8 z-mount I use the 16-35 f4 optics more comfortable 77mm caps with excursion up to 35mm, but not comparable for sharpness and distortion to the king 14-24 f2.8 f-mount. good research
Pros:Edge sharpness, incredible colors, focal range
Cons:Very pronounced flare, fixed lampshade, protruding front lens
Opinion:It is a very high-level lens, but at the moment, since they do it on less interesting lenses, it would require a makeover. I have never appreciated its fixed lampshade and its front lens, too exposed to scratches and weather conditions. Excellent in sharpness, it also has a low distortion, but I was always disappointed by the flares that in difficult conditions are seen and not little. More photos required heavy interventions with Photoshop and not always with positive results. I believe that when you learn to use it well, it will return images comparable only to the fixed (few). Overall, taking into account that it is an extreme zoom, which has incredible autofocus skills, which has high-level optical features, in my opinion it is time to take a step forward (although now everyone is pointing the headlights on the mirrorless). Nikon unfortunately struggles to update some products but this is the only one of the triad that has not yet been modernized (some consider it the holy grail). I am not asking for the vr which I consider useless, but rather a tweak to its nei. Undoubtedly a lens that has made its contribution to the history of digital photography. Cost of the new, in my opinion a little excessive. Weight appropriate to nikon standards.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
