|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Massimino65 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Massimino65  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF Pros: Well-built lens. Solid and reliable. Ghetto fluidity. Cons: Diaphragm ring jamming into 3 specimens that I had in my hands. For those who own it, could you tell me if it is just as much a factory defect as all the Nikon specimens? Opinion: Magnificent optics in every sense. Af reactive. Smooth and soft rings that move even with a single finger. Reliable and pleasant to use. A great reportage goal. With greater effort Nikon could make him return better sharpness to the edges at F2.8 and F4. That's a shame. Otherwise excellent optics. The excellent distortion correction at 20 mm is truly exemplary. sent on February 01, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS 1N RS Pros: Speed, AF module that does not miss a beat, practicality of controls, constructive and solid quality. Cons: Nothing relevant. Opinion: Describing a review of the technical aspect to describe the characteristics of a machine body is fine. But there's no point publishing images taken with film cameras. In this case it is the lens that draws the image. So what difference can there be between a blazoned chamber body and a mediocre film body? It all depends on the lens here. In digital it makes sense as in addition to the lens the sensor also contributes. sent on November 17, 2020 |
 | Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.8 (C/Y) Pros: All. Mechanical precision, solidity and construction. Light. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: Magnificent lens like the mythical 28 f2.8 nikkor AI-S which is very similar for rendering and optical quality. Also comparable to biogon 28 f2.8 Zeiss. Sharpened to all diaphragm openings from center to edge. No distortion. The optical yield is really remarkable. Very small vignetting. Lightweight use and mechanical reliability. The focus ring is fluid and precise. Very compact and pleasant to use. A classic old-fashioned tool to last. Timeless lens. Highly recommended. sent on June 19, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Image quality of raw images. Constructive quality, ergonomics, high ISO noise, viewfinder and LCD screen among the best. Made to last. Cons: Only one slot for the memory card but not dramatic what the compact flash are the pro memories par excellence. Opinion: Until now, a great car that does not slip away from the latest reflexes. Battle horse currently for ceremony, portrait, landscape, publicity, and much more. Reliable and robust. The central AF is reliable and fast, sidebars seem less sensitive but standard. Surely it is at the 5D MKIII level for picture file quality. Only it is not for the burst of about 4 frames per second. But on the other hand it is a reflex for everything except for sports where the scarcity is noticed. Whoever likes it, however, enjoys it. For the rest it is an excellent machine like the mark III that I find absolutely no difference except from 3200 ISO up compared to the next worthy queen. Excellent shadow recovery capability, even in heavily under-exposed areas. He often plays theater and concerts and the remarkably silent shooting has never disturbed or distracted anyone who is performing, watching. In hand is fine, all buttons are in place, practical and intuitive in the rich menu. sent on May 27, 2017 |
 | Nikon F4s Pros: Autofocus, solid appearance and construction, reliable, functionality and aesthetics, versatile, complete with automation but very simple in use. Cons: Weight, she gets very tired really. Some spare parts out of production. Opinion: The nikon F4 for features is a great camera, I own 2 and they work great after 27 years of hard work. Nikon brand tanks. Reliable, indestructible. One made a flight of over 20 meters high and landed with a few scratches recently and despite still working great. It has a pleasant appearance and boasts a solid and reliable construction. Functionality and aesthetics, versatile, complete with automation but very simple in use. Of course the technology is outdated and feels compared with the following SLRs. But of features similar to digital as many say I do not find any at all. Case the similarities to digital we find in the most modern F5, F100 etc. But I wouldn't say that. Pleasant in use and functionality. Now I turn to juzaPhoto technicians because I see that they often ignore different parameters and without offense, maybe they do not know well cameras and optics and write incorrectly. In the datasheet of the nikon f4 they wrote that it owns only the Exposure Mode M, S, A. Instead it also has the Programmed mode P and PH. PH or fast-paced program and P, program in normal times. sent on April 25, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Comfortable, practical, a whole do. Cons: It has significant defects and you have to recognize them. Opinion: A valid optician, worthy of herself. Great construction like all series L. Solid as a rock, fast, silent and accurate AF. The judgment is good but it does not shine for clarity. Boys do not write that this lens has all the pros and nothing to it. Defects have enough ..... Distorted pronounced, vignetting vivid, 85 mm up is not at all clear. In post production you can minimize the many defects it possesses. But to say that it has nothing against and that PRO does not have anything to do with it. I had 3 and only the last of 2015 is slightly better but nothing extraordinary. Accurate mechanics but tend to slide to the longest focal plane when it slides downwards; Nice thing for a series L. And they are all so even at the time of purchase. Sin!! It only pays off the lightness and practicality of a real everything that replaces half a kit. The only and only advantage of this lens. sent on March 23, 2017 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness in the center, excellent construction, af fast. Cons: Unclear edges at wide apertures from f5.6. Sin. Opinion: very sharp in the center but only optical diaphragm f8 or more closed. It 'a shame that matched the excellent construction and solidity would have made it a unique lens. But probably has sigma not able to optimize the edges where the yield is disappointing. Unclear with tests carried out on flat subjects such as frescoes on the walls, decorated furniture and subjects placed on the same footing. The objects at the sides of the frame are blurry from f5.6 and higher openings. Probably market laws or inability of the sigma in lens design. The result is a lens only suitable for reportage, street, etc. Not suitable for architectural subjects and landscapes. Such a pity. I sold a few months later after having also tried another copy of the same, but a few years before. Really a great disappointment .... Ah Ah Sigma. sent on October 16, 2016 |
 | Nikon 180mm f/2.8 ED Ai-S Pros: excellent optical quality, pleasing blurred, flawless mechanics. Cons: Nothing for her age. Opinion: What about a lens like that? Excellent as all nikon a time. Crisp thrilling. optical quality in all senses and mechanical precision. The ring of focus is soft and pleasant like all AI-S. For those accustomed to manual focus is a real satisfaction. I found it used to 250 euro in excellent condition from an amateur photographer who used it only for a few portraits. Did I steal away. Now some people do not appreciate more such lenses. Now there is autofocus and these lenses are no longer for certain individuals. I'll keep sretto for life. Highly recommended !! A real lust. sent on June 13, 2016 |
 | Leica Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH Pros: extreme sharpness. Vignetting very low. On the construction and mechanical precision there is no need to express themselves. Cons: The price of course. For the rest nothing. Opinion: excellent optics in every sense. Excellent sharpness of the whole plan. The mechanics are smooth and high precision, there are no inaccuracies in them on the aperture will focus on the ring. It has slight vignetting but nothing serious. The correction of the distortion is excellent given the particular typical optical design all symmetric lenses and not the back focus. (See for example Zaiss Biogon) On the construction there is no need to rule, a zenith for excellence as all Leica. sent on February 05, 2016 |
 | Leica Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 ASPH (2016) Pros: excellent sharpness. Vignetting very low. On the construction and mechanical precision there is no need to express themselves. Cons: The price of course. For the rest nothing. Opinion: excellent optics in every sense. Excellent sharpness of the whole plan. The mechanics are smooth and high precision, there are no inaccuracies in them on the aperture will focus on the ring. It has slight vignetting but nothing serious. The correction of the distortion is excellent given the particular typical optical design all symmetric lenses and not the back focus. (See for example Zaiss Biogon) On the construction there is no need to rule, a zenith for excellence as all Leica. sent on February 03, 2016 |
 | Zeiss ZM Distagon T* 18mm f/4 Pros: All. Mechanical precision of operation, image quality and fluidity of the ring focus. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: The Distagon T * 18mm f / 4 Carl Zeiss offers high picture quality in terms of performance. Reliability and precision of operation. Like all optical Zaiss is a far superior goal throughout. For example, you can have a highly sophisticated control of the stray light so you get brilliant photos and crisp. In addition, the distortion of 0 ensures absolute precision in the reproduction of geometric shapes especially useful when taking pictures of architecture and advertising products of geometric shape. Dramatic perspectives are not a problem with the ZEISS optics. Distortion would spoil the composition, because the straight lines that do not cross the center of the picture would become curved. This effect is annoying and ugly balanced optimally through optical schemes challenging with any focal distance and in particular with the scheme (Zaiss Biogon). The optics Zeiss are made of a metal construction and are designed to last for long periods of intensive use. THE'ring focus ring and aperture metal ensures better grip and ease of use, giving photographic experience exciting. All the lenses of the lens Carl Zeiss are provided with a coating multi-layer anti-reflection T * and an optical design that produces bright images even in unfavorable light conditions. The first anti-reflective coatings were used by Carl Zeiss back in the'30s. Possess means to feel a unique experience. I highly recommend! RnrnMassimo Guardì. sent on December 11, 2015 |
 | Nikon F100 Pros: All you have to own a SLR Pro. Construction Excellent, bright viewfinder and large even if you wear glasses. AF fast. Very reliable. Cons: The leather upholstery which becomes sticky after years of disuse. For the rest nothing. Opinion: Excellent professional SLR. It has everything you need to own a SLR Pro. Lightweight, reliable and accurate in focusing which also has lightning. Worthy of the Nikon brand. A real Queen with a capital R. rnUna clarification for chì writes comments on film cameras (it is absurd to publish pictures taken with film cameras because the image is engraved on the lenses of photographic film and not about the reflex so not having a sensor that captures images. It 's all about the lenses in this case. There is nothing to prove with the pictures published the photo will not affect the optical analog camera. sent on December 09, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Superlative Optics!! Sharp lens and excellent mechanical precision! Sturdy and solid construction. AF very fast and precise even with little light. Reliable. Cons: 17 mm Physiological distortion only if you tilt up or down. Opinion: As mentioned is a perspective that for its price has no rivals on the Full Frame. I took it used equal to the new still under warranty at 400 euros. At the image Center is a lens always sharp at all focal length and at all apertures. At the edges the sharpness decays a bit but only at F4 and F5, 6. But closing from F8 onwards the Edge Center quality is analogous. It has an excellent color rendition with a high saturation and micro contrast. Sturdy, solid and eccellentissima mechanical precision. Solid construction. The AF is very responsive and instantaneous, it is accurate and reliable even in low light situations, it is not easy to put it in crisis. Used for reportage, landscapes, architecture and weddings performs his work with excellence. For architecture work distorts a bit at the minimum focal length but only angle up or down, but if kept perfectly in the bubble is well corrected. I've got to use the F2 16-35, 8 and believe me it distorts and vignettes a lot more, but as it costs double comes into play the opinion that is better. Believe me, the Big Brother only if you need a bigger opening can come back more useful, but it is not better. Indeed this gem carries out its work with excellence. In a normal lens, medium tele or long tele aperture F2, 8 for sure is an advantage; But with a wide-angle lens specific for landscapes, reportage, architecture, group photos and much more, the F4 aperture is not a problem as we can elevate the ISO by considering the noise containment with the modern sensors. With a price of about 700 euros you have all the wide most used in one optical. Recommended!! sent on October 12, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Lens lofty. Even better than many fixed lenses. AF performance and precise. Cons: Dimensions and weight unfortunately. Opinion: Lens sharpness unreachable !! Even better than many fixed lenses. No coincidence that cost a fortune. I use it for about 20 years and has never missed a beat. He never had broken it whistles as they say. A mule kick. He has made my shots and never let me down. The AF is very fast and precise. Building excellent as usual Nikon few decades ago. Just a shame that a little tired for the significant weight but gives you some satisfaction exceptional ... Highly recommended !! sent on September 16, 2015 |
 | Canon EOS 1V Pros: Rugged, solid, mechanical reliability, precise AF performance, top performance. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: Reflex really solid performance throughout. Reliable and sturdy as a rock bears any kind of hard work and never give in. AF fast and accurate. It has a burst of 10 frames per second and is appropriate in action sports and naturalistic pictures of animals on the run. The maximum short you could wish for a film camera. For those who use the film it is one of the most efficient SLR. Queen of action shots. It has marked the history of sports photography, scientific nature and remains the best performing film camera ever built by Canon. Consigliatissma. sent on September 11, 2015 |
 | Nikon 105mm f/1.8 Ai-S Pros: All. From construction to excellent image performance. Cons: Nothing for optical type in question. Opinion: To say the least sublime sharpness. Blurry gradual fairytale with a unique creaminess and not replicable by other lenses. The mechanics of the very precise diaphragm as all manual focus. Focusing is smooth and soft as all manual lenses. People who like portraiture is worth trying at least once. Moreover, for the portrait does not need auto focus as it requires speed of action, and you can safely focus when focus with all the time you want. If you find it at a good price does not pass this one by. Highly recommended. sent on September 08, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D Pros: All you should have a professional viewpoint. And it did. Cons: Nothing. Perhaps the stabilizer. Opinion: Excellent throughout. Optical quality to solid construction. It has everything you should have a zoom PRO. Regarding the autofocus is still possible that many do not realize that some objectives af-d are more responsive to some af-s? I possess both of them and I am not that much difference in speed for the AF-S. But who said the nikon af-s are so fast? I repeat, some AF-D are more reactive to certain AF-S. I work with both systems canon and nikon. Not typhus it for the one nor to the other as both are very valid. But unfortunately the objectives Nikon AF-S Silent wave although ultrasound is not as quick as the canon EF ultrasonic. Mettetevelo that into your head. sent on September 04, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: Sharp at all apertures, compact, risolvenza also on digital, well corrected, distortion correction exemplary also on full frame. Af fast. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: Excellent !! Always clear at all apertures from the center to the edges. A distortion correction really accurate. Very little vignetting on full frame. I never had problems of flare but you have to use the lens hood. Excellent for landscapes and reportage. Versatile also on APS-C. The cost of the new is modest for the services can give without spending a fortune for version af-s F1.4. With a colleague of mine who owns the Nikon AF-S 24mm F1.4 doing tests on the same camera believe me, where is the difference? We were surprised, A must have !! sent on August 25, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Exemplary sharpness, lightweight, stabilized, tropicalized. A real gem. Cons: Stabilizer just a little noisy. Opinion: You are right Paolopi when you say Can it ever be a fault if I choose a petrol car and then mention the flaws that it is petrol? The example you bring is perfect;) But many people do not know what they say. But then if there is little light to have a f f2.8 lens or a f4 that changes? Just lift up the iso of a stop. Or maybe you want to insinuate that in a situation of poor lighting who has a f2.8 does the shooting and who has a f4 can not do it? I found myself photographed in the interior and the shooting difficulties there are for both the lenses both f4 and f2.8. Having a f2.8 does not solve the problem in low light situations, as if a f2.8 was the winning move. There is a lot of ignorance about the dear Paolopi .... for one stop of difference the one is worth the other. If they were 2 stops of difference then the advantage would be really substantial. sent on August 24, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Construction, Weight, Fast AF, bright colors, versatility and even on APSC. Excellent value for money. Cons: Sharpness drops to full-face edges on FF. But not dramatic. Opinion: Exceptional lens really !! Bright enough. The 28mm focal length is very versatile on both FF and APS-C. Almost everything is done. I bought a copy of the new one. Very clear specimen especially at the center of the image. On the edges there is a sharp decline but I do not find all this loss of quality as many say. The most open diaphragm is physiological loss of edge quality. Then I will repeat some 28 mm maybe less successful, mystery of canon. I would highly recommend !! Beautiful. sent on August 22, 2015 |
 | Mamiya 7II Pros: Quality images. Construction Cons: For the kind of use anything. Opinion: Meanwhile precise The Mamiya 7II not a reflex as described above, but a car like rangefinder leica M contax G1 or G2 etc. He has the Galilean viewfinder. Sorry technicians by Google that they put this on wrong information. Excellent in all its kind. It produces an 'excellent image quality of medium format film. The frame size is 6 cm by 7 cm. Enlargements of high quality. Not suitable for photo dynamic but unique as portraits, landscapes, reporting, still life etc ... sent on April 21, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Quality construction; price; three-dimensional effect; bokeh !! Sharpness at f2, Price, Yield unique! Cons: Nothing !! Opinion: Optical quality in all senses. Image quality really superb! Out of focus of the plans outstanding. It has a three-dimensional effect incomparable! The subjects in the foreground seem to come out of the scene. Light and handy! Yield formidable! I had the 135 mm Zeiss 135 and this canon is like, maybe even better than Zeiss! Once mounted would not want to remove from the body machine. Optical unique. sent on April 18, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Velcoità Af, stabilizer silent, engraving and image quality, blurred delicate and smooth. Cons: Weight only. Opinion: Optics Eccelsa in every sense. There is a zoom lens built so high and so sharp. We are at the highest levels. Sharpness of fixed focal length. Even better, I would say. Superb! The best zoom 70-200 f2.8 never existed until now, both as construction and as image quality. Backlight is unmatched! Resistance to Flare. A true gem !! Kudos to Canon !! Rated 10 and Praise! sent on April 18, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Robust, impeccable construction, weather sealed, stabilizer great, bright. Cons: Weight, not very crisp compared to the first series and the series II. Opinion: I had it in the test and I used it on canon 5d mark II. For what it costs, unfortunately, is not as sharp as the other two before and after this. Mysteries of canon. Prefer the model without stabilized but with a high sharpness as the Series II. Too bad, however, because of high construction as ever for the series L. disfigures really than 2 brothers including the version f4 less bright. I am sorry but it is not bigotry. I would not even given. Regarding the sharpness is not only up to the other. Excuse me also Canon .... sent on April 18, 2015 |
 | Nikon D3x Pros: Exceptional image quality. Impeccable construction, viewfinder and autofocus excellent and reliable, low noise for use in ISO 1600 and beyond. rn Cons: High price although well built. Opinion: Reflex very valuable despite the years of hard time competing with the most modern; better use for portraiture, studio work, landscape photography and everything you want to do, even for sports photo where you do not require a burst over 5 frames per second. The sharpness of the images is impressive as well with color and contrast optical adequate. Ease in obtaining good images than the D800. From 100 to 1600 ISO clarity of files it is unmatched !! Hotel is certainly one of the best FF SLR ever produced. SLR photographers for real, is to have in your kit. Highly recommended. sent on April 11, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4 D Pros: excellent construction, lens quality, focus, color rendering. Cons: I could not find. Only too soft at f1.4. Opinion: Lens magnificent. Excellent sharpness from f2.8 onwards. Intermediate diaphragms reaches high peaks of sharpness but it is a soft and gentle sharpness, saccharine. Sharpness portrait. I used it on Nikon D3X and I compared it with the new AF-S 85 f 1.4 for digital. The most recent brother seems to be sharper due to a higher contrast, but is an apparent sharpness, zooming in fact has the more rounded contours observing the details of the same subject taken at equal aperture. The 85 AF-D at the center of the image has much to teach the newcomer 85 AF-S. The edges instead is better the new AF-S 85 1.4. As for the AF speed the new one is more ready and quiet, but it is not so much a difference as many would have you believe. I have a Nikon optical assorted park between AF-D and AF-S and AF-S not all are quick. If anything, the contrary some AF D series are also more reactive than many AF-S with professional Nikon bodies. sent on April 04, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Exceptional optical quality. Bright enough. Beautiful blurred. Cons: Construction disappointing, ridiculous to be a nikon. Plasticky and maf manual at all smooth. Opinion: I tried this lens and I was amazed by the excellent sharpness. Unfortunately I was disappointed in the physical structure, plasticky and poor. Manual focus is not fluid. Af accurate but slower than the old AF even. disappointing the speed to be an AF with ultrasonic motor. The AF-D in my possession are much more reactive. sent on April 02, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
