JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM : Specifications and Opinions

Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM

The Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1996 to 2022 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1150 €;

199 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	135 mm
Angle of view	18.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.0
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	10 elements in 8 groups
Min. focus distance	0.90 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.19x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	750 g
Dimensions	83 x 112 mm
Buy
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Rednaxela

sent on August 08, 2015

Pros: excellent sharpness and contrast, very pleasing bokeh, solid construction, comparatively low price

Cons: no weather sealing, small AF switches

Opinion: This lens is one of the best Canon L prime lenses below 200mm. Image quality is excellent, with very high sharpness wide open and incredible sharpness from f2.5 onwads! Colors and contrast are also excellent and the rendered bokeh is one of the best and harmonic bokehs you will find in this focal range. AF is extremely fast and very accurate - it is one of my lenses with the best "in focus" hit rate! Construction is solid but with tiny AF switches, no weather sealing and a little outdated lenshood witch is a little hard to install (rough-running thread). Compared to its excellent image quality the price is comparatively low!

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Alessandro_Gennari

sent on December 02, 2024

Pros: Simply magical

Cons: Not having it

Opinion: Not being a portrait photographer, for some time I had been thinking about whether it was appropriate to trade it in to buy a lens more suitable for sports photography (although those few times I had taken it with me to a fencing or volleyball arena it gave me excellent results as well as in concert photography) but after being able to test it in its field of choice during a portrait workshop set in I no longer have any doubt that it will remain part of my kit. Used with Canon 1DX (but even with 5D III the discourse does not change), it is pure magic: blurred, colors, definition. sharpness even at high apertures. Of course it is not an easy focal length, also thanks to the fact that it is a fixed lens, but once "tamed" it can only give satisfaction and make you have a lot of fun. Absolutely and warmly recommended for those who do not have it yet, those who do have it instead keep it tight. I sold it to finance the R6 and as soon as I have the opportunity I will not fail to put it back in the kit.

Lorenzo902018

sent on November 13, 2024

Pros: Magic blur, fixed lens quality, construction

Cons: Maybe the absence of the stabilizer, but given the design date I don't think it can be considered a real con

Opinion: I had wanted this lens for a long time, I finally bought it and was not disappointed. The shots it gives are fantastic, the blur is superb and the colors are gorgeous. I'm not a portrait photographer but for me it's a must-have lens! The project is dated but it still defends itself greatly, especially on sensors that are not too dense like the one of my 6D Mark II

Riful

sent on July 26, 2023

Pros: Image quality, f2, L series, Built-in hood, Fixed lens.

Cons: Unstabilized, "high" fire distance.

Opinion: Lens purchased a few months ago after trying other telephoto lenses (70-200 f4, 70-300). I fell in love with it immediately. Lens "of other times". It makes you go back in time. Colors, for me superb, warm. Focal "strange" to understand. For me it was love at first sight. An advantage/disadvantage: it is a fixed lens. To take pictures you have to use your legs and look for the shot according to the landscape. The zoom is practical and versatile, definitely, but, for me, the unmistakable quality of fixed lenses always pays off. Lens that I recommend to fans "of the old" and as an investment. If you find it on 600 euros, I wouldn't think twice. it is appropriate to say: "Old but gold".

LoryM

sent on May 01, 2023

Pros: Incredible optics, becomes stabilized with the current Mirrorless

Cons: Management of a fixed 135

Opinion: Purchased in 2023, it is a lens that I have always craved and I have always waited to buy. I recently made the transition from Reflex to Mirrorless and I decided to make this purchase too. Obviously used. One of the most comfortable things about Mirrorless technology is the stabilization of the sensor, which gave me the opportunity to start seriously exploiting many fixed lenses by specifically choosing non-stabilized ones. I must say, that despite the project is from 1996, this perspective behaves very well even with modern machines (R6-R7), returning absolutely exceptional results. Precise focus, incredible sharpness, crazy colors, wonderful blur! From my point of view this perspective has no flaws, and what once could have been (lack of stabilization), with modern machines is solved beautifully. In fact, for those who use Mirrorless, you will obviously find a stabilized optics. The only real complication is the fact of being a fixed 135, not easy to manage in all situations, but this applies to any fixed lens. It must be said that we are faced with an optics intended for the portrait par excellence and, in my opinion, especially for half-length and close-up shots, even if in the whole figures it still manages to detach the subject from the background in an incredible way. The cleanliness of detail and the clarity of the images are really excellent, as well as the color rendering even in very difficult situations and with precise casts; The complexion is always very precise and the shades of color returned perfectly. Reading some other opinions around the web, some complained about the minimum focusing distance, but I find that 90 cm for a 135 mm is more than enough for the use for which it was built. In short, I was absolutely enthusiastic about the choice I finally managed to make, finding myself an incredible and moreover "stabilized" optics. Even on the R7 (32 megapixels on APS-C), it does not suffer at all from the density of the sensor (which for example the 24-105 L a little bit does) returning fantastic images! On the R6, instead, we are at poetry! As for the use for sports activities and action photography in general, I found the autofocus very fast, but its focal length makes it preferable for more indoor than outdoor use; If I had to photograph a volleyball game I would definitely choose it, for an 11-a-side football match I don't know. But in any case it is simply a matter of choosing the focal length, because for speed of focus and image rendering you go with your eyes closed.

There are 52 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM

Alone in the slums

by Alessandro Bergamini
364 comments, 85859 views [editors pick]

Dancer in Green

by Stefanotealdi
92 comments, 65503 views [editors pick]

Rome EUR - Palace of Civilization

by Angelo Adorisio
379 comments, 30336 views

Eternal love .. Ladakh, India

by Alessandro Bergamini
144 comments, 22928 views

My mom .. ethiopia

by Alessandro Bergamini
110 comments, 25128 views

Erika

by Donato Romagnuolo
63 comments, 62161 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Light

by Ste77
79 comments, 19395 views [editors pick]

Blue eyes?! found (india)

by Alessandro Bergamini
104 comments, 24782 views

Star

by Fabiodistefano72
69 comments, 19681 views [editors pick]

HI RES 18.6 MP

Manuela

by Stefanotealdi
62 comments, 14150 views [editors pick]

The bag!

by Scava 73
248 comments, 21469 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Erika

by Donato Romagnuolo
63 comments, 40217 views

Rouge

by Luca_S
73 comments, 21277 views

Erika

by Donato Romagnuolo
58 comments, 31731 views

Winter sport II

by Stanislav Marko
20 comments, 12934 views

Miss fano rossella

by Luca_S
36 comments, 21538 views

What a charm ...

by Alessandro Bergamini
74 comments, 6877 views

I love the 135 f2

by Luca_S
64 comments, 20218 views [editors pick]

First the mother and then the daughter ...

by Alessandro Bergamini
51 comments, 13460 views

Eyes Himalayan ..

by Alessandro Bergamini
75 comments, 7939 views

Nice evening

by Irina Pazhaeva
32 comments, 9695 views

Erika

by Donato Romagnuolo
54 comments, 31555 views

Diana

by Donagh
13 comments, 11514 views

Only eyes

by Enrico Finotti Re
77 comments, 8078 views

Green eyed woman, rajasthan 2014

by Alessandro Bergamini
50 comments, 13434 views

Untitled Photo

by Stefanotealdi
24 comments, 10750 views

Sweet Escape (Little Red Riding Hood)

by Geps
31 comments, 6481 views

HI RES 16.9 MP

Confused and happy

by Peppe Cancellieri
128 comments, 5025 views

HI RES 10.8 MP

The sky above Rome

by Antonia Cam
133 comments, 8465 views

HI RES 15.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Paco68
27 comments, 8213 views

Amanda

by Stefanotealdi
24 comments, 5844 views

Mary

by Muron
33 comments, 7988 views

Green

by Alessandro Bergamini
55 comments, 9414 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Photographer hermosa

by Peppe Cancellieri
157 comments, 18883 views

HI RES 8.9 MP

Nerd Girl

by Peppe Cancellieri
108 comments, 8223 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

Http://www.stefanotealdi.com/2015/smoking-ballerina

by Stefanotealdi
28 comments, 6038 views

Breathe...

by Alexrozzy
15 comments, 4516 views [editors pick]

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM