JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2006 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1140 €;

280 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	20 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	1.20 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.21x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	67 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	760 g
Dimensions	76 x 172 mm
Buy
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 235000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Frengod

sent on August 12, 2023

Pros: Bokeh, weight, size, manufacture (I used to write "everything" before:) )

Cons: I would have preferred it black, noisy stabilizer when used on RP

Opinion: Optics had for 11 years. Sold to finance the purchase of the 3 corresponding fixeds: Viltrox 85mm F1.8 RF, EF135mm F2.0, EF200mm F2.8. I think that after this perspective there are two ways out: either the fixed or the stabilized biancone. I opted for the former. Until the advent of the fixed, the best optics possessed. Used on 50D, 6D, RP. Wonderful blur, with the current sw there is no problem for the sharpness to TA at all focal lengths. For me, it remains the best buy (used) for those who need versatility for focal ones. Returns warm, soft portraits both outdoors and indoors. On the RP I shot at 1/30" at 70mm and at 1/40" without shake. The stabilizer made "cash" on the RP, rather noisy, much more than on the 6D. For comparison: I had the EF F/4.0 L IS triad (16-35mm, 24-70mm, 70-200mm) for 4 years; well, the other two optics did not come anywhere close to the performance of 70-200 in terms of IQ.

Giacomoguzz

sent on March 24, 2023

Pros: Sharpness, solid construction, AF speed, IS stabilizer, tropicalized

Cons: For an amateur like me: none

Opinion: Coming from a Canon 55-250mm IS STM I found myself with this "sacred monster" in my hand and it made me understand immediately that there is a lot of substance. After a couple of test outings I can say that unplugging it from the car is often a disappointment; at the racetrack he immediately demonstrated his strengths: lightning-fast AF, stabilizer and a sharpness to which I was not even remotely ready, absolutely a pleasure to use. The only drawback (but it is a personal factor) is the focal ring that I would have preferred a little harder / frictioned, for the rest I would buy it again tomorrow.

Riccardo Arena Trazzi

sent on October 21, 2022

Pros: AF, build quality, stabilizer, blurred

Cons: Dimensions

Opinion: Switching from plastic lenses to my first telephoto lens in metal structure gives palpable satisfaction. It has a remarkable build quality that is also reflected in its optoelectronic performance. AF is fast and accurate. The stabilizer does its job, it's a bit noisy but it works as a scare. The blur at 70mm is not particularly noticeable but at 200mm f/4 it returns incredible images. The weight of less than 800g is not bad at all and overall it is balanced. The hood is part of the lens kit. The only negative note for me are the dimensions: 20cm in the backpack are uncomfortable if you want to do a session with a small and compact bag or backpack for a relatively "short" telephoto lens of only 200mm

Stefano Marangon

sent on May 03, 2022

Pros: Construction,Robustness,F4 constant, sharpness,weight

Cons: Nothing if you are an amateur like me

Opinion: It is useless to talk about the construction as I am not competent enough to make technical judgments. It is an L series, tropicalized, constant F4 aperture, stabilized. This would be enough but then the colors it returns and the excellent sharpness already at full aperture. I use it on a 6d old and I managed to take several photos of basketball in arenas and on an eos m50 where it is a bit unbalanced for weight reasons but the results are the same. I think it's the perfect telephoto lens when you consider the size.

user218602

sent on May 10, 2021

Pros: L series; Ergonomics; Sealed; Stabilized; Solid; Well built; bright.

Cons: It is addictive; If he had been black, it would have been nicer.

Opinion: I use it with the stabilizer off, but the stabilizer-free version isn't tropicalized, which is why I took this. F4 opening I think is right. I recently mounted a Canon 1.4X III multiplier to him, bringing it to 98-280 f5.6, but I don't notice the difference, in the sense that I don't find it dark. It's not super bright, but very bright metrics don't use them because my favorite openings oscillate between f5.6 and f.16, so here we go.

There are 73 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM

New Year's Eve in Venice

by Ted
178 comments, 39387 views [editors pick]

Cascade of Light on the Piano Grande

by 66tonycar
135 comments, 30837 views [editors pick]

St. Coloman - Bavaria

by Luisa60
181 comments, 18015 views

All roads lead to home .....

by Simona Loredana
185 comments, 21809 views

Egrets

by Anto55
112 comments, 7549 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Omar Alberti
134 comments, 34523 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Untitled Photo

by Albertom
85 comments, 28729 views [editors pick]

HI RES 18.9 MP

The Barcarolo

by Donna
180 comments, 14680 views

Bliss

by Giani Scarpa
212 comments, 25429 views [editors pick]

I never find the lighter!

by Jooferr
121 comments, 11999 views

Quiet Autumn

by Kyagi
120 comments, 11805 views

Fighting the storm

by Vincenzo Mazza
88 comments, 8281 views [editors pick]

The gold of the evening

by Claudio Cozzani
553 comments, 28269 views

Winter geometries

by Massimo Panzavolta
60 comments, 4046 views [editors pick]

HI RES 11.3 MP

Claudia

by Giani Scarpa
153 comments, 24291 views

Lencois maranhenses

by Agroberto
136 comments, 7752 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

In a ray of sunshine

by Jooferr
140 comments, 9602 views

The Magic of Colors

by Alberto Sobrero
85 comments, 4881 views [editors pick]

HI RES 20.5 MP

Greta

by Vale75
68 comments, 12690 views [editors pick]

HI RES 14.3 MP

Passing on traditions

by Marco Misuri
65 comments, 4312 views [editors pick]

Escaping from

by Jooferr
110 comments, 7888 views

Magic Arpy

by Omar Alberti
115 comments, 15250 views

Kimi

by Casirarsky
65 comments, 17658 views [editors pick]

HI RES 20.0 MP

Oriental beauty

by Jooferr
90 comments, 8612 views

Bootstrap

by Barone
68 comments, 22806 views [editors pick]

Vinic podzim

by Vasile Gori
209 comments, 6038 views

Red Season

by Jeronim
93 comments, 14687 views

HI RES 26.2 MP

Teak U Bein Bridge

by Agroberto
120 comments, 5587 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Mission Impossible

by Jooferr
124 comments, 6378 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Quiet

by Gtabbi
109 comments, 17730 views

The baby, the dog, the gull

by Jooferr
105 comments, 6877 views

Ready for Grand Gala

by Gtabbi
110 comments, 28689 views [editors pick]

Finishing Touches

by Luciano Caturegli
59 comments, 7114 views

Wild Autumn

by Fabbry
34 comments, 4299 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Between The Arches

by Marco Misuri
58 comments, 4747 views [editors pick]

The Dark Hedges

by Francesco Zecca
110 comments, 4206 views

The boulevard at sea ?.. on the other side

by Claudio Cozzani
244 comments, 8767 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM