JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2001 to 2010 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1750 €;

63 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	23 elements in 18 groups
Min. focus distance	1.40 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.17x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1570 g
Dimensions	86 x 197 mm
Buy
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Gabbo.apr

sent on January 05, 2025

Pros: Robust construction, tropicalization, internal zoom, 77mm filters, image quality, lightning-fast and precise auto focus, good focal range

Cons: Weight compared to younger sisters (justified), price despite age (not senseless though)

Opinion: Top of the range Canon lens as far as the medium length of the telephoto is concerned. The 2.8 aperture makes the lens ideal for any situation, very bright and fast like few others. even at TA at the 2 extremes of the focal lengths the photos do not come with too many distortions (chromatic aberration little and easily correctable in post, good sharpness and little loss of detail even at 200mm). The weight (compared to the other 70-200 that Canon produced) is quite a lot, but all justified by the presence of stabilization and the "crazy" aperture of 2.8. This leads to having to have the ring for the tripod so as not to strip the thread of the camera, thus adding more weight (which I honestly don't find too disabling). The robustness, materials and attention to detail that have been used to build this lens can be perceived, the tropicalization is the confirmation. If combined with a good camera body with a nice AF, the lens is lightning fast and precise even today. Too bad, however, for the price, which despite the 24 years it carries on its back, the project is still quite expensive (bought used with some small aesthetic defects for more than 600 euros). If this and the weight are not scary, well, in that case you have in front of you a lens with few errors, indeed none as far as I'm concerned! Recommended and in hindsight I would buy it again, even at the cost of spending a little more, because every time I shoot I can count every single penny spent. Absurd for a lens of this age, aged really well!

Photogio90

sent on August 21, 2024

Pros: Materials, image quality, internal zoom, handling. Still very good optics!

Cons: For me no cons

Opinion: I tried several 70 200 f2.8 also the RF series and I decided to buy the first stabilized series lens that has its years on its shoulders, so many told me that it was not the top that had gaps that the 2 series does not have etc etc ... The files are exceptional, faithful and bright colors, perfect sharpness, neither soft nor aggressive, very nice blur and an excellent three-dimensionality of the image! A perspective that can still be exploited to the great advantage today.

Andre-3-89

sent on January 04, 2023

Pros: Professional optics, not a toy slide, that says it all.

Cons: Hood clutch

Opinion: Optics that still knows how to return a lot of satisfaction, my copy is about 20 years old and still works very well (of course, things must be maintained with care and "love" if we want to carry them forward over time). At an optical level it has no problem solving the 20 Mpix of the 1DX2 with which I shoot but I'm sure that putting on a denser sensor would still have character to sell (obviously, we are not talking about a 100 L 2.8 Macro). The stabilizer is heard on video, but with an external directional microphone also attached above the camera, it is no longer heard. Stabilizer that allows you to use this lens outside of sports situations, for example you can take a portrait, or try a landscape a little more closed freehand. We are still talking about an old instrument, but professional, and it makes me laugh when I hear criticism from people who shoot with standard kit optics with outputs like "and but that lens you have is unusable" then inevitably you meet in the field and the difference you see, and how. As mentioned before, old but professional, consequently it brings with it characteristics that most do not even know how to evaluate because, in fact, they do not even know what we are talking about. That said, the great CON that I move is the lens hood graft, dancer because of the "screw" graft that wears over the years, problem solved with version 2.

Karl C

sent on November 13, 2018

Pros: A lot

Cons: Little

Opinion: I don't understand the criticisms of this excellent lens. The smooth is not even remotely comparable, let alone in low light conditions. There are also those who prefer the version F/4 and the thing, weight apart, amazes me. The F/4 never achieves its result. Version II is higher for AF speed. On the central sharpness are practically identical, on the edges it maintains more the II but nothing dramatic. The colors are a bit warmer on the version I but more contraended on the II. Compare the images in post to believe. The real problem is that Canon does not provide assistance on products no longer in production for seven years. Which also does not concern only this optics and which is not from Canon.

Ferorake

sent on November 08, 2018

Pros: ----

Cons: It's not worth buying

Opinion: The price difference between this lens and the next version is lowering terribly. There are 70-200 is II to €1000 in perfect condition. What is the point of spending €200 less, for a perspective that is largely demonstrating its age? It is sharp if you use 12mpx machines, if you climb you see its objective limits. He weighs like a kid, and the stabilizer makes a tremendous noise. By the way if they also make them pay used because they are rare to find, and therefore there is risk that you find them even at €900. Absolutely not recommended in my opinion the purchase. Much better than the smooth version, also because shooting at 1 \ \ 60 and the like with a 70-200 I find it a bit... useless? If you are doing sport at 1 \ \ 60 The images are moved to you because the object moves, if you are doing stationary portraits where you can use 1 \ \ 60... Do not use the 70-200. I do not know, I repeat how personally I find the difference in cost with version II widely justifiable, even in the perspective of future resalability. I have yet to understand this obsession with the stabilizer, it seems that people do not live without, when for me is really useless. More expense, more weight and less quality only for the stabilizer?

There are 7 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

19:00

by Dino Torri
160 comments, 16332 views

Siren is born

by Motofoto
64 comments, 15519 views [editors pick]

Coffee Break

by Motofoto
74 comments, 18790 views

Wandering backlit

by Luigi Piccirillo
58 comments, 8661 views [editors pick]

Montserrat

by Zerba
64 comments, 32718 views [editors pick]

Speed

by Superbrod
54 comments, 5257 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The mad rush

by Luigi Piccirillo
51 comments, 10555 views [editors pick]

Cathal Carroll / Portrait Session

by Marco Arienti
86 comments, 7726 views [editors pick]

Playing in the Rain

by Filippo Rivetti
63 comments, 19143 views [editors pick]

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
48 comments, 8222 views

HI RES 21.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by Zerba
60 comments, 21372 views [editors pick]

The white race

by Luigi Piccirillo
61 comments, 6053 views

Senegal: Village IWOL; Bimba ethnic Bedick

by Sergio Pan
84 comments, 22264 views [editors pick]

Let there be light? (In the Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
105 comments, 8792 views

Wake up! which is late.

by Dino Torri
103 comments, 7704 views

The 'Dawn of the Lost World

by Memy
72 comments, 17895 views [editors pick]

Reflected in the lake ... ...

by Alexandro78
45 comments, 10996 views

HI RES 14.0 MP

The landing .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
109 comments, 5030 views

The carpets of Castelluccio

by Dino Torri
100 comments, 8176 views

Ripatransone fire horse 2015

by Roskox61
32 comments, 7932 views [editors pick]

HI RES 20.0 MP

Facing? (Val D'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
89 comments, 8426 views

Gerenuk

by Chui
46 comments, 7975 views [editors pick]

HI RES 5.4 MP

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
39 comments, 4944 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

Just ... get out of here!

by Dino Torri
100 comments, 12651 views

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
43 comments, 5227 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Golden in the dawn ... Yellowstone ... 01

by Gian Mario Zaino
90 comments, 6172 views

This side of the hill .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
85 comments, 4052 views

Bear in the mirror

by Memy
54 comments, 3349 views

A blanket Adda

by Gian Mario Zaino
38 comments, 4747 views

Walking through the colors

by Mauritac
50 comments, 2300 views

Nature, color, snow

by Spang
47 comments, 1658 views

The Scarecrow

by Dino Torri
84 comments, 4317 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

To all friends

by Emmegiu
83 comments, 2826 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Terrace sull'Orcia

by Dino Torri
83 comments, 5367 views

Untitled Photo

by Zerba
19 comments, 9160 views

Sunset with umbrella .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
92 comments, 4403 views

Lioness dawn

by Photoexplorer
37 comments, 7235 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM