JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2001 to 2010 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1750 €;

55 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	23 elements in 18 groups
Min. focus distance	1.40 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.17x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal AF	Yes
Full Time MF	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1570 g
Dimensions	86 x 197 mm
Buy
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM, buy on Ebay

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 220000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Karl C

sent on November 13, 2018

Pros: A lot

Cons: Little

Opinion: I don't understand the criticisms of this excellent lens. The smooth is not even remotely comparable, let alone in low light conditions. There are also those who prefer the version F/4 and the thing, weight apart, amazes me. The F/4 never achieves its result. Version II is higher for AF speed. On the central sharpness are practically identical, on the edges it maintains more the II but nothing dramatic. The colors are a bit warmer on the version I but more contraended on the II. Compare the images in post to believe. The real problem is that Canon does not provide assistance on products no longer in production for seven years. Which also does not concern only this optics and which is not from Canon.

Ferorake

sent on November 08, 2018

Pros: ----

Cons: It's not worth buying

Opinion: The price difference between this lens and the next version is lowering terribly. There are 70-200 is II to €1000 in perfect condition. What is the point of spending €200 less, for a perspective that is largely demonstrating its age? It is sharp if you use 12mpx machines, if you climb you see its objective limits. He weighs like a kid, and the stabilizer makes a tremendous noise. By the way if they also make them pay used because they are rare to find, and therefore there is risk that you find them even at €900. Absolutely not recommended in my opinion the purchase. Much better than the smooth version, also because shooting at 1 \ \ 60 and the like with a 70-200 I find it a bit... useless? If you are doing sport at 1 \ \ 60 The images are moved to you because the object moves, if you are doing stationary portraits where you can use 1 \ \ 60... Do not use the 70-200. I do not know, I repeat how personally I find the difference in cost with version II widely justifiable, even in the perspective of future resalability. I have yet to understand this obsession with the stabilizer, it seems that people do not live without, when for me is really useless. More expense, more weight and less quality only for the stabilizer?

CesareCallisto

sent on November 07, 2018

Pros: Sharp, stabilized, robust, does not extend zooming, colors, AF

Cons: Weight, kidney to be given away to have it

Opinion: I had the smooth, excellent version, given away to some fixed including the 100l and went back to the 70-200 2.8... Is gentlemen this is the lens, the one you need to have in outfit without any doubt! I read that it is not as sharp as the smooth, but I find them really equivalent and both to the height of the 100 L macro is, which makes me suspect of variability of specimens, I want to point out that I bought them both in the center canon and both I did do AF calibration, to get snipers. Sharpness at the top apart from giving unique colors, warm, deep, vibrant, excellent out of the planes, fast AF, tropicalization, certainty of the result every time you shoot... Its qualitative stamp is always present, at all focal lengths, you will always take the shot at home. Only cons is the weight... 1.5 kg of glass are many, I decided that I prefer to bring those kg rather than lose a photo, the is on this lens is indispensable, I shoot at 1/60 freehand to 200, all clear without micro-blur, I would say evidence widely exceeded! Sooner or later I'll switch to the is II version, for simple upgrade, but this is already a really high level.

Kantiano

sent on August 04, 2017

Pros: Tropicalization, quality, stabilizer, bright, blurred, robust

Cons: Weight, not sharp (but nothing dramatic), old-fashioned stabilizer

Opinion: It was the first "pro" optic of my dear friend, spending a fortune at the time when I used the rare occasions that lent him to me and my love was immediately; Subsequently also because of the many criticisms of the forums and with the release of the series II he sold it. After a few years I have just had the opportunity to buy it at a price drastically compared to the average value of the sales here on the forums (taken at the price of a stabilized whitewash used), which say to me like, handsome, very colors Thick cake, not the best of the sharpness that is, especially when compared to the new version but nothing catastrophic this I tend to say !. The stabilizer is not the maximum covers up to two maximum stops; It's heavy on the right, but at the end of the fair the files are beautiful.rn honest, if I did not find the opportunity at a higher price I would not have taken it, under the conditions for how I bought it I can say I'm very satisfied ! rn

Max1985

sent on November 25, 2016

Pros: tropicalization, quality ', stabilizer, bright, beautiful blurred, robust

Cons: high price, heavy but the quality 'pay

Opinion: I bought it around 2005, overused and I continue to use it professionally, from fashion to the outdoor theater where the stabilizer and 'fundamental, it has not disappointed me so much that I never even felt the need to try the series despite 2 all men speak well. rnHa "character", and on my own this and 'the most' important thing in a obiettivo.rnFa part of my basic kit and do not think to change it. rn

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

19:00

by Dino Torri
160 comments, 14670 views

Siren is born

by Motofoto
64 comments, 12253 views [editors pick]

Coffee Break

by Motofoto
70 comments, 15091 views

Wandering backlit

by Luigi Piccirillo
58 comments, 7346 views [editors pick]

Montserrat

by Zerba
63 comments, 29852 views [editors pick]

The mad rush

by Luigi Piccirillo
51 comments, 9058 views [editors pick]

Cathal Carroll / Portrait Session

by Marco Arienti
85 comments, 6313 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Playing in the Rain

by Filippo Rivetti
63 comments, 17223 views [editors pick]

The white race

by Luigi Piccirillo
61 comments, 4801 views

Untitled Photo

by Zerba
60 comments, 19470 views [editors pick]

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
48 comments, 5902 views

HI RES 21.5 MP

Senegal: Village IWOL; Bimba ethnic Bedick

by Sergio Pan
84 comments, 20346 views [editors pick]

Let there be light? (In the Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
105 comments, 7410 views

Wake up! which is late.

by Dino Torri
103 comments, 6446 views

The 'Dawn of the Lost World

by Memy
72 comments, 16751 views [editors pick]

Reflected in the lake ... ...

by Alexandro78
45 comments, 9896 views

HI RES 14.0 MP

The landing .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
109 comments, 3873 views

The carpets of Castelluccio

by Dino Torri
100 comments, 7332 views

Facing? (Val D'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
89 comments, 7244 views

Ripatransone fire horse 2015

by Roskox61
32 comments, 6502 views [editors pick]

HI RES 20.0 MP

Gerenuk

by Chui
46 comments, 6598 views [editors pick]

HI RES 5.4 MP

Just ... get out of here!

by Dino Torri
100 comments, 10281 views

Golden in the dawn ... Yellowstone ... 01

by Gian Mario Zaino
90 comments, 5406 views

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
39 comments, 3628 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

This side of the hill .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
85 comments, 3384 views

Beatrice

by Wolfhask
43 comments, 3535 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Bear in the mirror

by Memy
54 comments, 2527 views

A blanket Adda

by Gian Mario Zaino
38 comments, 4049 views

Walking through the colors

by Mauritac
50 comments, 1394 views

The Scarecrow

by Dino Torri
84 comments, 3578 views

To all friends

by Emmegiu
83 comments, 1924 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Terrace sull'Orcia

by Dino Torri
83 comments, 4477 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Nature, color, snow

by Spang
47 comments, 1003 views

Sunset with umbrella .. (in Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
92 comments, 3640 views

Lioness dawn

by Photoexplorer
37 comments, 6412 views

Castelluccio

by Dino Torri
59 comments, 1778 views

A sunset wet? (In the Val d'Orcia)

by Dino Torri
79 comments, 3629 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM