RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D

The Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1998 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1012 €;
97 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   80-200 mm
 Angle of view   30.3 - 12.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   1.5 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.14x

 Features
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   In-camera AF motor
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Built-in
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   1340 g
 Dimensions   87 x 195 mm

 Buy

Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D, buy on Ebay Ebay



Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 226000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2021

Pros: This lens has a fantastic yield. It's also a nice object.

Cons: I don't know. Not stabilized, but you know. Not motorized, but that's also known. Maybe not a 2.8 blade but still very, very sharp.

Opinion: It's my main lens. At 80 mm diaphragm a wire has excellent detail even for panoramas. Nice blurry, nice colors. The backlight doesn't suffer much. Possible problems are the non-practical autofocus/manual switch ring and a little delicate. Tires over the years become lasche. Another problem, there's a lot of metal. If you take a winter hike before returning to a warm environment, put it in an airtight bag... Or it will produce condensation for hours. Paid 350 euros, to know, I would have done it sooner!

user87191
avatarsenior
sent on July 29, 2019

Pros: Materials, sharpness, colors, ring for tripods, weight

Cons: Yield at 200mm 2.8, front/back focus, dancer lampshade

Opinion: I bought this lens for 490euro used guaranteed. It is a great lens, in my opinion to always take with you especially for travel. The weight I do not feel, being accustomed to the 150-600 sigma sport that weighs more than 3 kg. Not excelled at TA, gives the best closing the diaphragm at least of a stop. Fabulous starting at f8. At 80mm just an f4 for a fantastic detail, at 200mm, from tests made at home, for a detail equal to 80mm, I had to close to f11. They are defects, if you can call them that are visible only by zooming the photo to 100% and are very solvable in post production. He suffers greatly in the backlight, creating conspicuous chromatic aberrations. The Af is quite responsive on d7100, great on d500: it's fine, in my opinion, also for naturalistic/sports. My lens was back focus, then adjusted in the room I solved.... from the other reviews read, it seems to be a frequent problem for this lens. The lack of stabilizer is not felt, because it is very usable freehand, with times no higher than 1/100 I am satisfied with the purchase and recommend it to anyone who wants a great lens without spending a fortune

avatarjunior
sent on June 26, 2019

Pros: Unparalleled construction and robustness. Zoom all in. Warm chromatic yield. Gorgeous Bokeh. Open shadows.

Cons: only and exclusively the weight

Opinion: I love vintage lenses and this is the best canvas ever tried and definitely the most solid built to date by any manufacturer. It's certainly not a super-modern-hyperfast-multicoated but it gives away exciting images. Blurred by chills, warm tones, perfect sunstars... its only problem, alas, is weight, an inevitable counterpoint to its solidity. I did not put between the cons the absence of VR because with that it would come to weigh about 2 kg...

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2018

Pros: Nice lens if found at the right price

Cons: Possible molds Lurking

Opinion: A very interesting lens. Compact to be a 70-200 (10mm do not feel), definitely brandable freehand and the absence of the VR is not felt. I'il be the big one, but it really seemed like a feather. The yield is interesting, the coldest colors of the bestial VR II, but the sharpness is completely satisfactory. Unfortunately the technology is felt, and if for the optical rendering the difference is not so marked, for everything else yes. Not having an internal AF motor, it exploits the engine machine, and albeit fast it is very noisy. I would not recommend it for weddings, but for sports where the quietness is superfluous yes. Also because the VR in sport I find it quite unnecessary, however, having to use very fast times to freeze the image. Only huge downside is the use of glue for the lenses. The molds are lurking. Beware when you buy it used, because the sellers are very clever (I happened one today), and certainly will forget to tell you. To be sure open the diaphragm to TA, aim the inverted lens (as if it were macro) towards a light source very weak or close (if the direct bet you blind and see nothing), and make sure it is clean. Don't panic about some speck of dust, but mold yes. It can be dangerous even for the other lenses you have. It's not worth the risk. Don't worry because the molds are recognizable. Looks like cobwebs. In case there is some speck of dust, just avoid keeping it in damp places where it might arise. Once a lens is attacked by molds, it is better to throw it. 9 times out of 10 repairs are not carried out as required, and you will risk throwing hundreds and hundreds of euros in photorators who will answer "eh but you can not do more".

avatarjunior
sent on October 03, 2018

Pros: Great build quality

Cons: Weight, footprint and price when I buy it again

Opinion: I had this lens for a couple of years if I remember well in the period 2000/2002 after using the monoghiera for some time, which was still fine. I regret to have sold it, after all (in my opinion) both the monoghiera and the bigot were zoom to say the least excellent, by the undersigned stupidamete with the more modern 70-200 F/2.8




Photos taken with Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D

Foto
Magic Sound
by Stefano Campo
135 comments, 23902 views  [editors pick]
Foto
In the woods
by Stefano Campo
129 comments, 41182 views  [editors pick]
Foto
I am ...
by Alessandro Carosi
112 comments, 23784 views
Foto
Spring
by Alessandro Pollastrini
107 comments, 11548 views
Foto
Adda
by 1niko
166 comments, 11769 views
Foto
WRC Rallye de Montecarlo 2019-Neuville/Gilsoul
by Turbolumaca
61 comments, 7105 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Jay flying
by Francesco Abbate
90 comments, 11606 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Sunset Baccoleno
by Luca160
142 comments, 5394 views  
HI RES 3.7 MP

Foto
Julienne's eyes
by Ivano Tsunami
66 comments, 9735 views
Foto
Conductor
by Matteo78vi
27 comments, 18840 views  
HI RES 11.7 MP

Foto
Adda
by 1niko
86 comments, 6724 views
Foto
It's done!
by Redento Trento
77 comments, 10750 views
Foto
Morgana
by Raffaele Franco
32 comments, 8627 views
Foto
To tutt'ala
by Francesco Abbate
66 comments, 6498 views
Foto
Jay with acorn
by Francesco Abbate
66 comments, 6363 views
Foto
Old Bridge
by Luca160
108 comments, 4279 views
Foto
Harmony
by Luca Lavezzo
73 comments, 1574 views
Foto
Focus on Prata
by Manrico Chiti
29 comments, 6432 views
Foto
Among the golden fields
by Andrea Musina
72 comments, 6932 views
Foto
This gondola quaaaa you put laaaaa ....
by Maxange
128 comments, 6536 views  
HI RES 11.4 MP

Foto
Tricolor arrows 1
by Aringhe Blu
69 comments, 3808 views  
HI RES 17.4 MP

Foto
Western Burca
by Redento Trento
57 comments, 8958 views
Foto
Stellar Florence
by Luca160
69 comments, 4496 views
Foto
The Carretto Lino
by Zillao65
70 comments, 3692 views  
HI RES 8.4 MP

Foto
Barcolana 51
by Redento Trento
44 comments, 1520 views
Foto
Divine Light
by Massimo-lanteri
41 comments, 5360 views  
HI RES 36.2 MP

Foto
Country
by Stefano Campo
13 comments, 13081 views
Foto
Last rays in Baccoleno
by Luca160
78 comments, 2221 views
Foto
Black and white
by Matteo78vi
28 comments, 8699 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Larches - Julian Alps
by Roberto Degli Uomini
37 comments, 4351 views
Foto
Down sahari ...
by Redento Trento
57 comments, 6294 views
Foto
Chrete, New
by Vawapud
41 comments, 1631 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Contrasts in Val D'Orcia ......
by Maxange
105 comments, 6440 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Waiting for sowing
by Luca160
85 comments, 2332 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Beauty Sicily
by Ivano Tsunami
24 comments, 6580 views  
HI RES 3.9 MP

Foto
Glory
by Dylan
172 comments, 3158 views  
HI RES 41.1 MP

Foto
Sciliar dress autumn
by Enzonic
35 comments, 4807 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me