Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D

The Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1998 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1012 €; 85 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   80-200 mm
 Angle of view   30.3 - 12.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   16 elements in 11 groups
 Min. focus distance   1.5 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.14x

 Features
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   In-camera AF motor
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   No

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Built-in
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   1340 g
 Dimensions   87 x 195 mm
Buy Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 178000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on July 29, 2019

Pros: Materials, sharpness, colors, ring for tripods, weight

Cons: Yield at 200mm 2.8, front/back focus, dancer lampshade

Opinion: I bought this lens for 490euro used guaranteed. It is a great lens, in my opinion to always take with you especially for travel. The weight I do not feel, being accustomed to the 150-600 sigma sport that weighs more than 3 kg. Not excelled at TA, gives the best closing the diaphragm at least of a stop. Fabulous starting at f8. At 80mm just an f4 for a fantastic detail, at 200mm, from tests made at home, for a detail equal to 80mm, I had to close to f11. They are defects, if you can call them that are visible only by zooming the photo to 100% and are very solvable in post production. He suffers greatly in the backlight, creating conspicuous chromatic aberrations. The Af is quite responsive on d7100, great on d500: it's fine, in my opinion, also for naturalistic/sports. My lens was back focus, then adjusted in the room I solved.... from the other reviews read, it seems to be a frequent problem for this lens. The lack of stabilizer is not felt, because it is very usable freehand, with times no higher than 1/100 I am satisfied with the purchase and recommend it to anyone who wants a great lens without spending a fortune

avatarjunior
sent on June 26, 2019

Pros: Unparalleled construction and robustness. Zoom all in. Warm chromatic yield. Gorgeous Bokeh. Open shadows.

Cons: only and exclusively the weight

Opinion: I love vintage lenses and this is the best canvas ever tried and definitely the most solid built to date by any manufacturer. It's certainly not a super-modern-hyperfast-multicoated but it gives away exciting images. Blurred by chills, warm tones, perfect sunstars... its only problem, alas, is weight, an inevitable counterpoint to its solidity. I did not put between the cons the absence of VR because with that it would come to weigh about 2 kg...

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2018

Pros: Nice lens if found at the right price

Cons: Possible molds Lurking

Opinion: A very interesting lens. Compact to be a 70-200 (10mm do not feel), definitely brandable freehand and the absence of the VR is not felt. I'il be the big one, but it really seemed like a feather. The yield is interesting, the coldest colors of the bestial VR II, but the sharpness is completely satisfactory. Unfortunately the technology is felt, and if for the optical rendering the difference is not so marked, for everything else yes. Not having an internal AF motor, it exploits the engine machine, and albeit fast it is very noisy. I would not recommend it for weddings, but for sports where the quietness is superfluous yes. Also because the VR in sport I find it quite unnecessary, however, having to use very fast times to freeze the image. Only huge downside is the use of glue for the lenses. The molds are lurking. Beware when you buy it used, because the sellers are very clever (I happened one today), and certainly will forget to tell you. To be sure open the diaphragm to TA, aim the inverted lens (as if it were macro) towards a light source very weak or close (if the direct bet you blind and see nothing), and make sure it is clean. Don't panic about some speck of dust, but mold yes. It can be dangerous even for the other lenses you have. It's not worth the risk. Don't worry because the molds are recognizable. Looks like cobwebs. In case there is some speck of dust, just avoid keeping it in damp places where it might arise. Once a lens is attacked by molds, it is better to throw it. 9 times out of 10 repairs are not carried out as required, and you will risk throwing hundreds and hundreds of euros in photorators who will answer "eh but you can not do more".

avatarjunior
sent on October 03, 2018

Pros: Great build Quality

Cons: Weight, footprint and price when you buy it again

Opinion: I had this lens for a couple of years if I remember well in the period 2000/2002 after using for some time the Monolock (which was fine anyway), and sometimes I regretted having sold it, after all (in my opinion) both the monoring and the Bighiera were zoom to To say the least excellent, by the undersigned replaced with the most modern (and expensive) 70-200 F/2.8

avatarjunior
sent on September 10, 2018

Pros: Image quality and build quality.

Cons: Nobody.

Opinion: I was looking for a bright telephoto within a certain budget, in the end I opted for the Bighiera and I do not regret. The image quality is at the top, the mechanical robustness also. I preferred the Bighiera to version 80 200 AFS just for the fragility of autofocus while this is a tank. The autofocus will not have the performance of AFS but is much faster than how I describe it, loses in fast pursuit. The lens hood isn't beautiful, but it does its job. Fluid ring nuts and level mechanics without uncertainty. The weight is shown as against, actually data to the hand weighs 100 grams less than 80 200 AFS and all versions 7Every time at 2.8 It amazes me how the subject stands out with the front and rear F0 200 vr. For my use I do not hear VR lack. Great Bokeh. After a few months of use I can confirm the goodness of the optics (mine has an imperceptible back focus correct in the car), gives me satisfactory photos.




Photos taken with Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D

Foto
Magic Sound
by Stefano Campo
135 comments, 17470 views  [editors pick]
Foto
In the woods
by Stefano Campo
129 comments, 34512 views  [editors pick]
Foto
I am ...
by Alessandro Carosi
107 comments, 16578 views
Foto
Spring
by Alessandro Pollastrini
83 comments, 7474 views
Foto
Adda
by 1niko
136 comments, 8473 views
Foto
Eared owl
by Francesco Abbate
131 comments, 7864 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
WRC Rallye de Montecarlo 2019-Neuville/Gilsoul
by Turbolumaca
57 comments, 3705 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Jay flying
by Francesco Abbate
88 comments, 8885 views
Foto
Sunset Baccoleno
by Luca160
138 comments, 3148 views  
HI RES 3.7 MP

Foto
Julienne's eyes
by Ivano Tsunami
66 comments, 6811 views
Foto
Conductor
by Matteo78vi
27 comments, 14823 views  
HI RES 11.7 MP

Foto
Adda
by 1niko
82 comments, 5093 views
Foto
To tutt'ala
by Francesco Abbate
66 comments, 4717 views
Foto
It's done!
by Redento Trento
77 comments, 8463 views
Foto
Jay with acorn
by Francesco Abbate
66 comments, 5021 views
Foto
Morgana
by Raffaele Franco
30 comments, 6430 views
Foto
This gondola quaaaa you put laaaaa ....
by Maxange
126 comments, 4689 views  
HI RES 11.4 MP

Foto
Among the golden fields
by Andrea Musina
68 comments, 5237 views
Foto
Focus on Prata
by Manrico Chiti
28 comments, 4727 views
Foto
Old Bridge
by Luca160
107 comments, 2738 views
Foto
The Carretto Lino
by Zillao65
70 comments, 2659 views  
HI RES 8.4 MP

Foto
Stellar Florence
by Luca160
68 comments, 2053 views
Foto
Western Burca
by Redento Trento
55 comments, 5558 views
Foto
Divine Light
by Massimo-lanteri
41 comments, 4332 views  
HI RES 36.2 MP

Foto
Black and white
by Matteo78vi
28 comments, 7110 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Last rays in Baccoleno
by Luca160
74 comments, 1164 views
Foto
Contrasts in Val D'Orcia ......
by Maxange
103 comments, 5097 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Down sahari ...
by Redento Trento
57 comments, 4430 views
Foto
Tricolor arrows 1
by Aringhe Blu
65 comments, 2337 views  
HI RES 17.4 MP

Foto
Jay on the fly
by Francesco Abbate
56 comments, 4338 views
Foto
Country
by Stefano Campo
13 comments, 10508 views
Foto
Beauty Sicily
by Ivano Tsunami
24 comments, 4404 views  
HI RES 3.9 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by 1niko
89 comments, 4066 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Fox in the dark
by Francesco Abbate
50 comments, 4139 views  
HI RES 5.4 MP

Foto
Giulia ...
by Momophoto
19 comments, 5603 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Larches - Julian Alps
by Roberto Degli Uomini
35 comments, 2951 views
Foto
Sciliar dress autumn
by Enzonic
35 comments, 3734 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me