|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franc91 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franc91  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r II Pros: Sensor - File Quality - Price - Dynamic Range - Recoveries Light/Shadow - Weight - Dimensions - USB Charging - APS-C Mode - Steadyshot Cons: Autonomy - Autofocus sometimes uncertain - Ergonomics - Single memory slot - Buffer - Slow operation Opinion: Owned for just over 2 years and about 8000 shots, in my case point of "Entry" in the Mirrorless system migrated from Nikon D810, at the beginning I had many doubts but a few outputs were enough not to regret the old kit where I had twice the weight to take for a walk, the sensor allows so much, in fact even at the time of the debut of superior there was very little or almost, Overall really a great body but still immature from some points of view, accustomed to the old Nikon I had to get at least 3 original batteries + 1 third as a backup to keep up with what I did on Nikon with 2 batteries, the autofocus in situations with little light sometimes uncertain, ditto in face detection, ergonomics can be improved especially in the grip area (too thin and angular), using bracketing for landscapes you feel the weight of the file on buffering that becomes very slow, but the biggest flaw is the single SD slot that in case of anomaly sends all your photos up in smoke. Overall, however, I would buy it again, with subsequent models have solved all the "gaps", still today as a quality / price ratio is a machine that still has a lot to offer, I found myself very well with the steadyshot on the sensor, very convenient charging via USB and APS-C mode that does the crop directly in the room, I recently replaced it with the R IV. sent on September 14, 2023 |
 | DJI Osmo Action Pros: File Quality - Stabilizer - Reliability - Autonomy Cons: For me no one Opinion: I have owned this Action Cam for 2 and a half years, now it has become a forklift or Double Cam combined with the new Insta360 One X3, I took it to the pool, to the sea, adventure parks, via ferrata, trekking, without ever batting an eyelid, the quality of the files is really good, even the audio quality is good, the display has excellent quality and backlighting, also excellent responsiveness of the Touch, I think I will bring it to the end of life, because it has never disappointed me until today, even the autonomy is exceptional, with a single battery I can record about 65-70 minutes of video 4K30fps stabilized, Defects? for me none! If I think that I had taken it on offer on Amazon at € 299 the combo kit with 3 batteries and charger ... sent on November 17, 2022 |
 | TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Sharpness - Construction - Colors - Yield Cons: Weight (Justified by Good Construction) Opinion: Optics Owned for About 1 year and then resold for Poor use, Very Sharp already at TA, Completely in Metal, Very Fluid the rings, Flare and Aberrations content, used mainly for particular shots very studied, honestly never used in landscapes because for my tastes too much field of view available, I saw it more as an "action cam" style use but with Sony Fullframe quality, However overall lens that I really liked, as already said by other reviewers the cap is easily scratched, for the absence of autofocus I never posed the problem, I always worked from f4 to f8 in hyperfocal almost always, I would have kept it in the kit even if used rarely, but I had to monetize for the Sony 12-24 ... sent on November 17, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS Pros: Construction - Autofocus - Stabilizer - Weight Cons: Sharpness - Yield Opinion: Used for about 1 year and a half on A7rII, I would not buy it again, it was the only Telephoto lens to disappoint me as a general rendering, I owned Canon's white on 6D and 5DsR (70-200 F4 L IS USM) and the 70-200 F4 G ED VR on Nikon D810, the Sony? the worst of all, sharpness just acceptable to TA, improved a bit at f5.6 and f8, aberrations evident in many shots, general flat rendering, in my greater range of use (70-100mm) the loss of sharpness at the edges was very evident at TA, really a shame because taking it in hand I perceived an excellent build quality, exceptional autofocus, stabilizer ditto! and despite everything also the weight quite normal, not using the longer focal lengths 135-200mm has just been replaced with the 24-105 F4 G. sent on November 15, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness - Autofocus - Construction - Price Cons: Blurred - Flat Made Opinion: I owned this lens for about 1 year, used on A7rII, Sharpness already Excellent at TA, in the range f2.8 > f5.6 I would say perfect from center to extreme edges, excellent build quality, heavy the right, fast autofocus precise and silent, as already pointed out in other reviews the bokeh has never convinced me 100% and in some conditions on TA shots I found the general yield flat, little contrasted but solvable with a good post production, but overall I think I would choose it again, the price gap with the G Master is really high ... sent on November 15, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Construction - Autofocus - Weight - Color rendering - Stabilizer - Price - Filters 72mm Cons: Loss of sharpness 35mm Opinion: The most used lens in my kit on A7rII, sold a few days ago for the 12-24 F4 G, From 16mm up to 28mm Exceptional sharpness already at TA, perfection is reached at 5.6, while at 35mm there is a noticeable loss on the edges that improves closing at least at f8, Excellent Color Rendering, Fluid Rings, Silent and Fast autofocus, very good stabilization, light and versatile in my mountain outings, as for the delicacy of the paint I personally did not encounter this problem because I have a lot of attention and I keep all my lenses in the cases during transport, beautiful to handle being all metal, 72mm screw filter attachment, For the Price Range and Focal I think I would buy it again. sent on November 15, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness - Lightness - Cost - Soft Blur Cons: Autofocus - Construction Opinion: I owned the Sony 50ino for 1 year and a half, taken Used at About 140 €, used with my A7rII to cover the hole from 16-35 to 70-200 in my landscape photos and also used for some portrait / close-up, Sharpness already excellent at TA, Pleasant Blurred, Super Light, in this Focal I think it is the best lens as a quality / price ratio in Sony, if we really want to find some fault, Autofocus sometimes uncertain while on a constructive level you feel that it is a plasticotto but still to the touch is not so bad, as mentioned above difficult to find better in this price range. sent on November 15, 2022 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Handyman - Stabilizer - Autofocus - Price (used) Cons: Distortion - Sharpness - Weight - Vignetting Opinion: Used on D810 for 1 year, what about? if you are looking for versatility is an excellent lens, I used it for undesigned shots or for quiet Sunday outings without having to carry with me so much weight and lenses, the autofocus is fast, from the best of itself to intermediate focals 35-50-70, at 24 it has so much distortion at 120 the image is rather soft especially at TA, evident vignetting , on the sensor of the "BIG" all these defects obviously can be noticed more, but overall this lens will pay you back with the focal excursion that will allow you to take home the classic "stolen" shot sent on July 01, 2021 |
 | Tamron SP 85mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness - Stabilization - Blurry - Autofocus - Construction Quality - Tropicalization Cons: price Opinion: Used for 1 year on D810, Amazing Lens, Very High Sharpness, Very nice blurry, great stabilizer even if I have never exploited it properly, autofocus very fast only a noisy wire, I shot some landscape to diaphragms 5,6 and 8 and I have to say that the whole frame has an impressive sharpness, zero distortion, aberrations almost non-existent, and the construction quality is excellent , you can hear it right away, the only sore note is the price, the weight not even so much, sold only because I migrated to Sony from Nikon otherwise this is a lens that is to be kept fixed in a kit. sent on June 30, 2021 |
 | Tamron SP 45mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness - Cost - Construction Quality - Tropicalization - Stabilizer Cons: Autofocus Uncertain at Times Opinion: Used for 1 year on a D810, Very High Sharpness already at TA, used for many landscapes and from the center to the edges no loss, really an excellent lens both optically and as a construction quality, you feel it immediately because of its weight, I also used it as a handyman, some aberration but only in backlight, well done tropicalization , the only problem I encountered is that sometimes autofocus lost shots in conditions with little contrast or light, but forgivable for all its "Pros" and for its competitive price. sent on June 30, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Sharpness - Colors - Build Quality - Three-Dimensionality Images Cons: Weight - Flare - No Screw Filters Opinion: Used for almost 2 years on a D810, Lens Cara si but really Imposing, Very Sharp, Minimal distortion and well manageable during shooting, then in many scenes manages to give a three-dimensionality to the image that I had never seen in any other wide angle, solid metal construction, perhaps the only flaw is the quality of the front cap they could do better , but let's move on to the sore notes, the weight and the footprint compared to a classic 16-35 make themselves felt, in conditions of frontal light you have to know how to handle the flares because they are very pronounced and then lastly the inconvenience of not being able to mount screw filters, then in the mountains another 250-300g of weight to carry holders and slab filters , for the rest I think that in Nikon there is nothing more valid to make landscape, optical quality is comparable to fixed objectives. sent on June 30, 2021 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: File Quality - Dynamic Range - Build Quality - Autonomy - Ergonomics - Control And Ghiere Preparation - Double Slot Cons: I would have liked more definition on Live View Opinion: Owned for almost 2 years, I came to Canon (5DsR) what to say? The Best Reflex ever owned, has distorted the way of photographing, infinite dynamic range, recovery margins also, combined with high-level optics the quality of the image and colors is exceptional, holding the body you immediately perceive the true touch of professionalism and robustness, preparation of controls and rings comfortable and intuitive, excellent viewfinder and well readable information , the autonomy with the original batteries seems never to end, I would have liked only a more defined live view, otherwise I would buy it back today, even the very reliable tropicalization, I made days in the rain without blinking, Sold only for switch to Sony, I had to lighten my backpack for high-altitude outings ... sent on June 29, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness - Construction - Lightness - Stabilizer - SPEED AF - Tropicalization Cons: I couldn't find any... Opinion: The perfect telephoto lens for the landscaper, f/4 therefore much lighter than the big brother f/2.8, maximum sharpness already at full opening, in the hand is very solid and immediately makes you understand its robustness, the ghieres are very fluid and pleasant to the touch, the stabilizer is Awesome! I managed to take home a 200mm shot with 1/30 perfectly sharp time! The autofocus combined with my D810 doesn't miss a beat! the tropicalization seems good, in fact my specimen has no traces of dust inside, at full opening the blur is very pretty ditto the bokeh with the 9-blade diaphragm, if you use it on easel in particular situations I recommend the ring original to optimize the balance of the system, it is real cost but nothing to compare with the 10-dollar cines! Overall I can say that this lens meets my expectations 100% and after months of use I can not find them a defect... sent on November 08, 2019 |
 | Canon 5Ds R Pros: File Clarity - Ergonomics and Command Predisposition - Autofocus - Tropicalization - Double Memories Slots - High Light Recoveries Cons: ISO Estate Over 1600 - Shadow Recoveries - Dynamic Range - Autonomy - Slow in Post-Shooting - Sensitive to Diffraction Opinion: Bought and sold after about 2 months after owning 1000D > 60D > 6D, Grand Machine on the construction side and predisposition of controls, basically it is a 5D Mark III with a 50mpx sensor, in fact it is just nice to hold, the autofocus if set properly does not disappoint never, but the real effect "Wow" is the sharpness of the Files that churns out as long as you mount lenses worthy of the Sensor, even the recoveries of the High lights are very good, but let's move on to the sore notes: if you do landscape and often use the live view you need at least 2/3 batteries , while if you use almost only the mirror the autonomy is not bad, you get about 500-600 shots with the original batteries LP-E6N, but this in the end is a subjective problem, above f5.6 you already perceive diffraction, but the drop that made the vase overflow are the recovering shadows and dynamic range, nothing better than the respective 6D and 5DIII released 3 years before, a real disappointment given the price of the body, in fact before buying the 5DsR I had the 6D and in the recoveries of 2-3 stop the background noise is almost identical , and the 6D with the same ISO was slightly cleaner, for those who say it is a "study" machine I agree only partly for the dynamic range, in fact it was enough to spend a weekend with a D800E to go to the other side and buy a D810, which despite being out 1 year or before in cleaning files are light years away.... Really a shame for Canon, and this confirms the difficulty in reselling it, in fact I had to change it... sent on July 19, 2019 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Price, Handiness, Construction. Cons: What it costs to None. Opinion: Apparently seems not very solid, but it goes far beyond the declared weights, I loaded my 6D and the 70-200 f / 2.8 without batting an eyelid, some precision is not that of a ball head bigger though me left-handed, of course, must rest on a straight plane, however overall I would buy back with my eyes closed, I always keep in my backpack as weight and dimensions .... sent on November 27, 2015 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: High Yield Iso - Central Point Autofocus - Cleaning Del File - Ergonomics - Weight - Autonomy - GPS - Microadjustment Af Cons: Underexpose - Burst Slow - AF points Side inaccurate in low light - No second slot Memory Opinion: I came from a 60D, the body as ergonomics and preparation of commands I find it perfect, you to me like the joystick zero, in fact I have not experienced trauma in exchange for the body, and I noticed that the ergonomics of the handle that the fluidity of the nuts is better than on the 60D, hand expresses a feeling of lightness, making many trips to the mountains I do not mind at all, the battery life with GPS and wifi off is really good, using the mirror with LV off thus reaching 1000 shots while with the two mentioned above and the use of LV halving autonomy, although I avoid to keep them turned on both the wifi at least in my use does little or nothing, while I found very useful GPS to review the precise locations of my shots and also the altitude, we talk about the auto focus, the central point guarantee, I shoot in low light with moving subjects and I have never stoner clicks, while the side I can say the exact opposite, misbehave as soon as the light becomes short, even on static subjectsBut by 80% to the landscape is not a problem too, made amends with the quality of the files that churns obviously combined with slow to height, as ISO you can go quietly to 3200 to 6400, the detachment from the old 60D is 3 stops clean, and even the possibility of recovery are exceptional, the vertical banding is a bad memory, it remains only the problem of under-exposure, ranging from 3/4 to 1 stop clean, I would have liked a second SD / CF and a flurry of 6fps least, the preparation of the menu instead I find it perfect, convenient menu "customizable" and the presence of micro and another thing to start shooting sminuivo very quiet, is very useful in the presence of animals very close or in situations of general embarrassment, summing up all my choice today would fall increasingly on 6D, to fill the defect of the lateral points and underexposure would take at least another 1000 € for a body that 5dIII as final quality of the file è nothing more than 6D and if you studied landscape and still shots you've answered it yourself ... :) sent on November 04, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness - Speed ??Autofocus - Stabilization - Weight - Function Macrorn Cons: None For the Moment Opinion: And my handyman lens, the use of 6d, already crystal clear at room temperature and constant at all focal lengths, my copy at least in my use does not present the possible problem of "focus shift", the autofocus is very impressive, I have lots of shots night perfect! do not miss a beat, even the stabilizer performs very well, the ultimate in sharpness to the edges is obtained from f5.6 up, nice macro function although very little use, I preferred to 24-105 as I considered not essential focal 105, also the little weight and size less are felt in the portability, the f2.8 not I miss it, overall the buy back with my eyes closed .... rn sent on October 31, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Constructive quality - Sharpness - Colour - Stabilization - Weight - Autofocus - Tropicalisation Cons: Nobody Opinion: Purchased just before switching to Full Frame, hardly detachment this lens from my 6D, mainly do landscapes and cars, almost always use with diaphragms ranging from 5.6 to 8 and 11, never seen a lens so sharp from the center to the edges extreme, the purchase price is a bit higher end, but it does pay off in time, every shot for me is a joy, color and sharpness even stabilization, and which the very beginning underestimated tropicalization, note that for exploit 100% is always better fit before a UV filter / protective, in fact I found myself in many situations such as wet waterfalls very close together, the objective is flawless, so far I have not managed to find fault, the rings is Zoom to fire are very fluid, very well finished hood and housing included with the bundle, such as lens from landscape to me today on Zoom canon no better, the buy back again with your eyes closed ... sent on October 29, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Constructive quality - price - Sharpness - Autofocus - Weight - Bokeh Cons: Manual Focusing only machine on (The ring is motorized) Opinion: I own this lens for several months, being small and compact is almost always in my backpack along with the 16-35L, when in fact there are not enough 35 he covers my shoulders with those 15mm more without having scarrozza 24 -70L, 1.8 is usabilissimo, but starts to give the best from 2.8 up, bokeh very pretty with the new 7-blade diaphragm, the build quality light years ahead of its predecessor, especially the bayonet metal and fluidity focus ring, and also the mode of engagement of the hood has been revised, we pass by the screw to the quick release with the release button, the autufocus works very well both in AI FOCUS that AI SERVO precise and quiet, as written in the "against" the only flaw is precisely the system that controls the motorized focus in manual mode, for example, if you leave the barrel all exposed and have already switched off your reflex to get it back all in because you have to turn and focuse & eacute; in fact the system is no longer mechanical but electrical, personally I've got used to it and do not bother me, but the first few times it can happen, overall I am very satisfied with this lens, for me should be in each kit all canonists :-) sent on October 29, 2015 |
 | GoPro Hero3+ Black Pros: Weight - Handiness - Portability - Quality Video / Photos - Tenuta High ISO - Standard Box containing - Wifi Cons: Autonomy - Price Opinion: I have since the GoPro HD HERO, the 3+ Black Edition I can not talk about it very well, is second only to my SLR, I find it a must-have item for fans of photos / videos, very convenient in situations where the camera can not be worn or in extreme outputs, also used at sea during the holidays and in environments over 40c ° and winter at -10c °, apart from the duration of the abnormal battery I had no anomaly in the operation, if you know how to manage the infinite settings video, with a good post-production will pull out of the movies really very valid, type in the onboard car essential the meter set to "spot" or to shoot from the drone essenzionali 60fps at 1080p to have a fluidity and lack of vibration of any Typically, obvious that a DSLR is much better, but if you think the size of the sensor is the size of the lens all in just 73 grams! I consider myself a great thing! in my kit a gopro will never fail! sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: Constructive quality - Ergonomics - Collars and Hotkeys - Upper Display - Display Adjustable - Autonomy - Precision Autofocus - Video Quality - Quality Photo Cons: Tenuta High ISO (Over 2000) - Lack Microadjustment AF - Points of Focus Opinion: I own the 60D for almost a year, before I had a 1000D and the passage above in ergonomics and practicality of the controls is abysmal, just wield feels that it is not an entry-level body, holds up well the ISO up to 1600, after the quality the picture becomes very, very precise autofocus is a viewfinder that liveview! provided that your optics are correctly calibrated from the house, I would have liked the micro-adjustment af, but until now I have not felt the need, and I wanted more points of focus, not tropical conditions, but I traveled both in conditions of extreme heat or cold, and I have never had a malfunction, very useful the upper display that also has the timer of seconds in the poses in BULB, spectacular autonomy, even with liveview active, always overcome the 1000 shots per charge cycle, and in my sessions and outputs do not pass ever such numbers, so I'll save the weight and the purchase of a battery grip and 2nd battery, very practical also customizable controls, and also the Balanceent of white in CAR is very good, the same with regard to the video function and the main screen adjustable, very convenient for macro photography or in awkward positions where it would be tiring to keep your eye fixed on the screen, to exploit to the full the sensor requires the optics a bit more "valid" of the classic 18-55, overall I am very satisfied and I think I still hold it for 3-4 years .... sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: Price - Weight - Stabilizer - Sharpness Cons: Chromatic aberrations - Autofocus Loud - Constructive Quality Opinion: Received in Bundle with my 1000D in Kit, we've spent together 5 years! before abandoning it in the closet, and I must say that I got a lot of satisfaction especially at the beginning, where you do not have special needs, many underestimate it because overall it was "the training ship" of all canonists, true that after a while we get tired and you look for new sources of inspiration, but I must say that I also had the opportunity to compare the various Tamron 17-50, and the yield of the finished image was equal or nearly so before storing it in the closet I would open some good book of photography and I would try to exploit properly the "plasticotto" and then maybe you think with what to replace, but suffers from chromatic aberration is all recoverable PP, autofocus is not, however, with both ultrasonic liveview viewfinder that did not give me never accuracy problems, while it is a bit noisy, the focus ring is unwieldy and has no distance scale, the stabilizer performs well both in video than in the pictures, overall I would recommend this tonte to those who want to bring the world of photography with a body entry level without fainting economically. sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Price - Sharpness - Autofocus - Quality Constructive - Collars - Stabilizer - Bundle (Hood and Ring Tripod) Cons: Weight - No Dedicated Case Opinion: Purchased about 6 Months Ago, I made several outputs mounted on my 60D, the stabilizer is truly exceptional, despite not had much practice with panning shots I brought home very beautiful, loses a little something to 200mm in TA, but we see only in crop 100%, the rest has a truly exceptional optical performance, beautiful and even the blurry bokeh, focus USD is not on par with that of USM bianconi, but not the third to none! and especially in AI SERVO works really well, very welcome the bundle of the pack with its hood and tripod ring of high quality, in line with the build quality of the optics, also the rings are very fluid and did not play, if you have doubt there are many reviews around the web, on the whole is just behind the 70-200 f2.8 mk2 is usm .... so even if you are not professionals but still want a telephoto very good in my opinion is a great alternative toed the canon! Whereas much is a 30-40% lower despite the final yield of the photo is very similar sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price - Sharpness - Brightness - Blur / Bokeh - Weight Cons: Fire ring - Quality Constructive - Focus Noisy EA Times Imprecise Opinion: I own the fifty from almost 1 year, initially used on 1000D and currently on 60D I must say that I brought home many beautiful shots, most of the shots for use in "study" and "lightbox" is my favorite because small and lightweight compact, with the best from the diaphragms from f2.8 up, but I also pretty good shots at f1.8, the bokeh is something wonderful, especially TA, the focus ring is a bit too vague, sometimes I struggle a lot in liveview with zoom x10 to focuse, at the slightest movement happens that moves even only half a millimeter making you lose precisely the focus on the subject while in autofocus with liveview behaves very well, with the viewfinder sometimes errs, however, in Overall I can not complain since the price, for those who want to use it as an optical study or even novices in search of new inspiration recommend it with my eyes closed! sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price - Focus - Sharpness - Weight - locknuts Fluide - Constructive Quality Cons: Maybe a little Dark - No Hood in Bundle - At Direct sunlight suffers a little Flare Opinion: I bought this lens almost to debut, although a little "doubtful" for the lack of reviews and extensive testing, I went to my dealer, I conceded the evidence on my body (60D) I was immediately surprised by the speed and above quietness focus STM, we thought about it a few days, and then I bought it, the return from holiday in Puglia can only say that I was very impressed by the quality of this lens, compared to its price! I've also combined some ND filter and polarizer, to 10mm cartoon a little but all recoverable PP, also excellent stabilizer in many contexts where the F4.5 I was under time security has saved me a bit of both ISO and shake-even in video stabilizer behaves very well, if you have a steady enough hand to 10mm there seems to be supported as the image is fixed! overall it's become my favorite optics, especially in landscape! so if you have a 60D and want a superwide as quality / price there isbetter! sent on February 11, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
