JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 266 €;
140 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 221000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:For those who want to get original perspectives, this lens is for them. The distortion on the sides of the frame can be a defect, personally I find it a gimmick to pull out shots different from the usual. Also in this case, the lightness of the material, the stabilization and the sharpness (not excellent) play in favor of this lens while the aperture not really generous and the inaccuracy of the autofocus limit the overall quality. This last problem, already encountered in the 18-55 IS-STM forces me to use only and exclusively manual focus to avoid finding myself with a portion of the frame more or less out of focus regardless of the aperture of the aperture.
Cons:Loss of sharpness on the sides of the image - Flare
Opinion:Comfortable and light upright on the camera, it returns good images especially in the center of the frame while at the edges it accuses a bit of loss of sharpness. Unfortunately during my test outing I also had flare problems but they are most likely solvable with a hood (not included in the package but that I proceeded to buy in a few wedges). The cheapness of the lens is at the same time cross (impression of construction not very solid) and delight (little expense "so much" yield) of the lens but in the canon house on aps-c I do not see many other alternatives. Would I buy it again? Without thinking twice, for what it costs...
Opinion:I had this lens for a year and I got to test it on various trips, it was my first real wide angle and its focus gave me the opportunity to experiment with new camera angles. It has an excellent stabilization, at 10 mm I managed to shoot even at 1/2 of a second in some cases, it is very light, it resists well to the flare (with lampshade mounted) and has a great value for money. It's a plastic, but at 250 degrees what can you expect? The thing that made me turn my nose up is that to start it will also be fine, but when you start to develop a RAW file and maybe you are going to make a 100% magnification you notice all the optical defects of this lens: distortion (even if just one click to corr "It's a very bad thing to do," he said.
Opinion:The Canon 10-18 STM is a great lens that saved me in various situations where the 17mm was not enough for me. Around the city allows you to photograph anything thanks to its 10mm, it has a good sharpness and thanks to its plastic construction is also very light (but also a bit weak). He's got a few flare problems but it's common to a lot of wide-anglers and given the economics of the lens there is. In my opinion it is the ideal wide-angle to learn to master this type of lenses.
Pros:quiet, and within certain limits sharp even at F4.5 (see cons), optical stabilizer L series , with eos 60d and 7D matched very well
Cons:plastic construction that at one point created problems even of decentralization lenses , dust that you found everywhere and unfortunately (unfortunately ) also in the rear lens
Opinion:I loved it literally , with the 7D accomplice the double processor in live view looked like a compact. a lot of fun walking around the village, with the 60d the live view was obviously slower. he was in the room service because the autofocus was on and it was dirty with dust inside after a few months of the new purchase. the problem I started to hate was the construction speech, at one point he started out of the blue to decentralise some lenses without even bumping into him or anything like that. (I am a technician who repairs them and disassembles them for years now on his own), so one side of the photo was useless if not printing it in 10x15. and not even ... then I realized that he had the bad habit of attracting dust especially in the rear lens and at that point I said stop , after a send to the service room I resold it . A positive note to the stabilizer... It was something phenomenal... believe me on the word. I would take pictures in the evening at 1/5 of a second with the 60d and they were trestle photos. if only they had taken better care of the construction ... too bad for real.......... If you pay 50 -70 euros you risk as well ... otherwise buy it again, for what it costs...!!! I just got out I paid him 240 euros on ollo store. and I'm talking about 2014. now they should give it away or almost seeing the quality XXXX with which it is built. here is one of the many photos taken together with 60D with this toy https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1970107&l=it
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.