RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD : Specifications and Opinions


Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012 to 2017 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1210 €;
127 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   70-200 mm
 Angle of view   34.4 - 12.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   23 elements in 17 groups
 Min. focus distance   1.30 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.12x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   1470 g
 Dimensions   86 x 188 mm

 Buy

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD, buy on Ebay Ebay

  JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on April 02, 2023

Pros: value for money, overall yield

Cons: Yield to f/2.8 can be improved

Opinion: Purchased at the end of 2015 more because I wanted a 70-200 than for actual necessity, it is a lens that I used very very little. Like the 24-70 it is superior to the Nikon of the time in practically everything, price included, even if on the 70-200 the yield at f / 2.8, especially at minimum focus distance is not particularly stellar (I would say more in terms of contrast than sharpness). If it is used it can be a valid choice even today on F mount, especially if it is a support lens and not the lens with which you intend to take most of the photos, otherwise it is worth investing in the G2 version or directly in the latest Nikon (which however has another price).

avatarjunior
sent on April 23, 2022

Pros: price used, sharpness

Cons: lack of tropicalization, hood perhaps too big

Opinion: Taken used a few days ago, I wanted a tele with a wide focal aperture for greater brightness and good blurry. The price is more than reasonable for this truly exceptional optics. I found a good, if not excellent sharpness already at 2.8, very bright and pleasant color rendering. For stabilization I did not encounter the delay that some users complain. Needless to say, it's a fairly heavy optics and would have been the top if it had been tropicalized.

avatarjunior
sent on August 01, 2019

Pros: Price quality, size and weight in order with the product

Cons: VC activates late, really sharp only at f4.0

Opinion: Bought a long time ago with the aim of taking some sports photos and taking some shots during a safari in South Africa. Very happy with the purchase because with a low price you take a very good optics. The lack of sliding elements on sight make it, even if it is not tropicalized, however resistant to dust and water in a moderate form. A sore note, in my opinion, is the activation of the VR: it takes even 2 seconds and therefore forces you, to make shots not posing, to always hold the camera button in half, thus leading to a quick discharge of energies. If you shoot at a sharp stop by pressing the shutter button the "violent" activation of the VR can even lead to more choppy shots than without the active stabilizer. To say is that once activated the stabilizer is really effective, as is a Nikon home VC system. The sharpness, at F2.8 sincerely does not excite me, as it is not exciting the blurry that is quite stylized and little "smeared". At f4.0 the sharpness becomes really good and it is usually to this diaphragm that I prefer to shoot. Of course you have to respect good lighting conditions that must be present otherwise, if you want to shoot at dawn or at dusk, I advise you to buy something else. I've never had any problems with focus, in fact the inner moped is really fast and hit the lens right away!

avatarjunior
sent on November 06, 2018

Pros: Sharpness already at 2.8, effective stabilizer, fast focus, quality/price

Cons: Reactivity stabilizer, tires, contrast

Opinion: I bought it more on a whim than my mother that for my need, despite this I am aware of its quality and versatility and worth all the money spent. It is already sharp at full aperture and at all focal lengths, the zoom and focus rings are sliding. What I appreciate most of this lens is the effectiveness of the stabilizer, I was surprised: at 200 mm I can shoot at 1/4 s despite my hands are very, very, very, flickers. On the other hand I do not digest the reactivity of the same stabilizer, because I find it slow to activate and sometimes it does with a sharp click visible from viewfinder or screen. Another point in disfavour are the tires of the nuts, which are consumed too quickly, are detached and come off even using them little and very carefully. Last point to disfavor is that this lens returns very contrasecond images to my liking. Compared to Canon 70-200 2.8 II I found the Tamron more compact and as a result to me it seems to be more balanced as weight when mounted on the camera.

avatarjunior
sent on August 07, 2018

Pros: Price sharpness Stabilization

Cons: AF in Liew view not Performane

Opinion: Use Guy'il lens on APS c I would say excellent even at f2.8 the only flaw in the AF in Liew view that sometimes crashes, I have to turn the machine on and off. Anyway I recommend to all the sharp purchase at full aperture af fast on the viewfinder weighs a bit but it's worth the cost of a 24 70 G2 you have everything you need for a good price given the optical quality it returns.




Photos taken with Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Foto
Waiting for the green ...
by Leopalm79
130 comments, 14373 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 6.2 MP

Foto
Scrum in a storm
by Gianca61
121 comments, 23573 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 5.9 MP

Foto
Comix Portrait 2
by Cosiminodegenerali
198 comments, 26487 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Sara, Sata
by Stefy Matalone
52 comments, 8779 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
On the beach
by Carlo Marras Photography
69 comments, 24495 views  
HI RES 35.4 MP

Foto
Nongmin
by Jacopo Della Valle
120 comments, 7272 views  
HI RES 5.0 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
A Sea of ??Fog
by Mirkopizzaballaphoto
54 comments, 9741 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
To move with the times.....................
by Jerry Vacchieri
267 comments, 19100 views
Foto
Group of adult ibexes
by Wild Bergas Photo
51 comments, 7018 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Beauty portrait HKC
by Cosiminodegenerali
109 comments, 16718 views
Foto
Noemi
by Daniel Maran
83 comments, 15685 views
Foto
Benedetta
by Wolfhask
48 comments, 8320 views  
HI RES 24.1 MP

Foto
A natural painting
by Francesco.Santullo
221 comments, 8486 views  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Bed
by PaulVega
32 comments, 9882 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The happy family
by Daniel Maran
39 comments, 16364 views
Foto
Greta
by Andrea_P_67
128 comments, 6844 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Benzhai People's
by Jacopo Della Valle
37 comments, 3417 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 5.0 MP

Foto
The wound
by Sguazzo
33 comments, 13648 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Greta in B&W
by Andrea_P_67
147 comments, 5601 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Beauty Portrait
by Cosiminodegenerali
63 comments, 12942 views  
HI RES 5.2 MP

Foto
Blocking traffic
by Nino 58
90 comments, 2972 views  
HI RES 19.5 MP

Foto
Looks
by Waltertrevisan
61 comments, 8334 views
Foto
Albumen
by Stefy Matalone
35 comments, 3351 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Sara
by Koda59
78 comments, 20920 views
Foto
Torrechiara Castle - Parma
by Roberto M Parma
71 comments, 8488 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Alexey
97 comments, 5690 views  
HI RES 16.2 MP

Foto
Reflected
by Claudio Carpinato
36 comments, 26094 views
Foto
Model
by Roberto M Parma
54 comments, 7444 views  
HI RES 6.0 MP

Foto
Unnamed beauty
by Carlo Marras Photography
46 comments, 9457 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
In a couple of minutes free...
by Alexey
79 comments, 4805 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Nicolalamanna
83 comments, 2505 views  
HI RES 36.2 MP

Foto
Giorgiomilone.com
by Giorgiomilone
27 comments, 7782 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Double catch
by Mattia1977
27 comments, 3800 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Ylenia
by Claudio Carpinato
21 comments, 16606 views
Foto
Beauty,
by Alan Zandonà
47 comments, 2247 views  
HI RES 19.9 MP

Foto
First time one
by Maria Adele
38 comments, 4717 views  
HI RES 6.9 MP

Foto
Laura
by Claudio Carpinato
34 comments, 6800 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me