JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 840 €;
188 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 184000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Zoom all-rounder cheap, versatile and unwieldy. Precise autofocus.
Cons:General quality quite low, but adjusted to the price. F4
Opinion:Versatile lens, focus pretty fast and precise. Its small limit is the vignette that if you can not do post production is obvious and turns off a lot of the images. Fixed F4 is a limit but with such a hike it is difficult to get better results. A product with these features but f 2.8 I think would cost too much. But I hope sooner or later it will come. On the used is located at very affordable prices and therefore accessible to everyone. Blurring is what it is. whoever buys it has to put it into account. Recommended as the best unpretentious lens and handyman on the market. Not recommended to those who already have 24 70 2.8 and want a replacement: it is not worthy.
Pros:Focal excursion from real all-rounder, good sharpness and blurry, AF at height for portrait and landscapes, if you use it to chase moving subjects you can run the risk of being out of focus in some shots since the AF is not a splinter. It does everything and discreetly well.
Cons:In the reviews of other users there is written distortion and vignette, with a click it solves everything, so for me it has no relevant defects.
Opinion:Taken in kit with the nikon D750, I took it to have an all-rounder to use for family and travel photos, without major illusions or hopes (since I came from D7100 and Had as handyman the 18-140mm, of which I regretted the poor quality of the photos that churned) I was pleasantly surprised and impressed, maybe I had zero expectations and seeing the files coming out I was shocked (in a positive way) to keep it attached to the D750 more than I imagined! Of course if you compare it with a 24 70 mm or super bright fixtures it is logical that it is qualitatively worse, but if you take it for what it is (ie an all-rounder in kit) you can not really complain, indeed!
Pros:Compactness, versatility and great autofocus and VR
Cons:Not very clear with a little distortion.
Opinion:I'd say great and versatile. I sometimes lack a bit of brightness in scenes where it is not enough to stretch the times (here the VR gives you a good hand) but where you have to be quick because the subject moves. It's slightly less contrasted from 85mm up but it's not a big deal. I find it to be sharp enough even for 36 Mpix of the d800. At f4 you can not separate the subject well unless you have it close enough and the background far enough away or the right type (which you already dough alone when just out of focus, you see small leaves ... The poles coming out of the head remain clearly visible! Overall, good especially if bought in import (I paid 500 euros a year and a half ago..) or today official. I also have the 28-300 (which is not bad ..) but to get to the quality of this at 4-5.6 you have to close it at least to 8 ... Simply put when there is light almost everything is fine even if this is already much better than the average consumer. In the middle is a blade! even better than many fixed optics. The distortion is annoying to the short focal points only if there are architectural lines that give you references ... at that point you have to correct it a little bit. I really consider myself at the beginning, I usually try in difficult light situations, and I shoot in Jpeg although End at 24 or 26 Mpix. I do not like to tinker with the PC , I use it already all day, and I like beautiful pictures. Sometimes, not always, certain shots make me do ohh for the sharpness and colors that produces the d800 24-120 pairing. Max.
Cons:Distortion and vignetting always present-softness over 100mm-price a bit high for performance
Opinion:This lens would be a great fine-handyman lens until it is measured with demanding and pixel-rich sensors. On the D700 gives off noteworthy shots and does not regret zooms less multiplied, but on the latest cameras complaint with more evidence the limits of the project than a 5x zoom. Too bad because colors, saturation and stabilization are very valid, the first shots conquer for these characteristics; As soon as the horsemanship on the D850 are revealed the above faults. On a DX body, even dense, can do better, taking advantage of the crop section, but not part more from 24mm.... So what...
Pros:Range from all to do, in the end the yield is there, but you have to pull it out a bit with the pincers (compared with 18-35 G, 24-85 VR D, and 28-105 D)
Cons:Weight, sometimes disappointing quality, AF not suitable for moving subjects, on FF makes a little regret the 18-105 on DX (in terms of ease of bringing something home)
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
