|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Chewbecca98 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Chewbecca98  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7 IV Pros: New sensor and related color science, improved construction and ergonomics, even more perfect AF, improved display/viewfinder quality, protective curtain on the sensor, usual total customization of the camera, usual eternal battery, infinite lens park Cons: Lower ISO tightness than the previous series, operating speed can be improved, display/viewfinder can be improved Opinion: I bought this A7IV coming from A7iii, A7R iii and other systems (Canon R and fuji X-H2/X-T5) seeing it as the definitive and evolved middle ground between all these mentioned: small, fairly light, quality to sell and infinite range of lenses. Actually in many respects it is like this: the operating speed (power-on, touch response, shutter button response, etc.) has improved a lot since the third series (however much slower than the old Eos R), the autofocus has improved further, useful but not so fundamental being already brilliant that of the previous series, the menu is now more intuitive (but none is impossible to use). On the other hand, the ergonomics and build quality have been significantly improved compared to the 3 series: more pronounced keys, less spongy rings, increased grip, wider and more comfortable joystick, more robust and larger gaskets, apparently more solid paint, more versatile articulated screen and above all foldable for protection. Video quality further improved and FINALLY implemented touch tracking (present on the Canon R since 2019 and never on sony), it has now become so advanced in the video field that to take advantage of all its functions you have to do it by trade! WHAT DID I LIKE? The new sensor brings with it, in addition to resolution, a splendid color science, much more precise and with a new, more vintage profile well done. Display and viewfinder are finally good/decent quality! The 3 series ones were really indecent, slightly better on the R version but still indecent. Now it's much less straining on your eyes and you can even tell when a shot is in focus :-). The new slot is also very much appreciated, which despite being CF makes the standard SD insertable, a considerable saving of money for those like me who do not use burst and manage 4k safely with fast SD. The sacrosanct protective curtain as on the Canon is finally present here too! WHAT DID I DISLIKE? The resolute sensor unfortunately brought with it an ISO seal that I find rather sad, from the first 6 thousand shots I consider it worse than both A7iii, but also A7Riii (with 42mpx). We're still at a high level, but it doesn't give me the feeling of omnipotence-ISO that the A7iii gave me, really a shame. Much can be improved in terms of switching on and switching between viewfinder and display. sent on March 03, 2024 |
 | Fujifilm X-T5 Pros: Detail and colors of the new sensor, amazing autofocus, amazing video quality, no overheating, improved grip, viewfinder/display quality and customization of the related displayed data, Cons: Very very easy microblur, previews of compressed RAW files not visible on MacOS, usual X-Trans anti-Lightroom constraint, removable screen dancing already after 6 thousand shots, very delicate silver paint Opinion: Bought instead of my x-h2, with which I didn't find either the fuji feeling or the usability of the other brands, I was impressed! The lower-quality viewfinder is unnoticeable even when using them side by side. Having had T1 and T4 I consider this camera a great innovation: I find the new sensor to provide richer and more precise files as colors, the 40mp did not give me any disadvantage up to 6400 on a par with the T4 and the greater detail in the photos, even without magnification, makes you regret the crunchiness of the FF files A LITTLE LESS. Autofocus is a DRASTIC change. The camera is now hyper responsive and can't really be considered a brake for photographers. Both EYE-AF and tracking are finally precise and accurate. On a par with Sony or Canon? NO. Is it necessary? Probably not. Compared to T4, the grip also changes, which becomes better and fuller even with large hands. The machine has also matured a lot in the video field, between the new formats and the reliable Continuous AF, it churns out amazing videos! Detriments? The motion blur is deadly, it takes very little to get it and you have to shoot with the same times as a camera without IBIS. Does it make sense to have it at this point? Compressed RAW previews are not yet visible on MacOS and managing files like this in the workplace becomes a real ordeal, since standard RAW have a disproportionate weight and no improvement over compressed. Even with the new sensor, the files are not "compatible" with Lightroom, having a destruction of any detail. If you work with the Adobe suite on a daily basis, it will be a nightmare and an hour/work cost to integrate Capture One into it... Because of these last two reasons, I lost so much time at work that I opted to change brands, with a lot of regret. Think carefully if you are in a similar situation! sent on December 01, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR Pros: D-E-F-I-N-I-T-I-V-O Perfect optical rendering, full fujifilm look, instant autofocus, tropicalization, dimensions Cons: Cost (?) Opinion: I had all the 23mm available for FUJIFILM system, f2 Fuji, f1.4 Fuji MK1 and 2x 1.4 viltrox (due to poor quality control) and now I've come to this. It has nothing to do with any other of the aforementioned 23mm. It's just perfect: absolute sharpness at any aperture, no signs of chromatic aberrations, instant focus, perfectly resistant rings. I was afraid of losing that very particular look of the 1.4 Fujifilm MK1, but in reality I had to change my mind, it kept much of that charm, but improved everything else. Tested on my X-T5 and X-H2 it makes its best, but I guess it's a pleasure even on older systems. If you like the equivalent 35mm, this is the lens to have without ifs and buts. Personally I think it is worth the investment compared to the MK1 even just for tropicalization, beyond the optical yield, which allows you to always use it without thoughts. sent on July 09, 2023 |
 | Sony A7r III Pros: Image quality likely to be at the top even in 2023, incredible dynamic range, construction and EVF compared to A7III, battery Cons: Menu, disastrous operational slowness and fairly uncertain AF with little light and/or contrast Opinion: I bought the Riii coming from two smooth A7iii. I was disgusted by the poor quality of viewfinder and display of the smooth version and I looked for improvements in this one. I had it especially EVF side, while the display reaches a "discreet" level but certainly not great. Compared to the smooth version, however, you immediately notice a much better construction, more metal, more insulation, more pronounced keys and more precise rings in the shots. It was a really good step forward. Image quality side the speech is the same. The sensor of the R churns out incredible files, with a crazy dynamic range and a much less "digital" detail than the A7iii. ISO hold for me is identical or even better in the R, scaling to 24mpx up to 3200/5000. Beyond I do not go and even the A7 at 6400 was K.O. without mixing the images with noise reduction. Where I noticed worsening was the Autofocus. It is slower than smooth, hooks less quickly especially with low light and / or contrast. But still advanced to the point that if you can not bring home a result, excluding the photo hunt, probably the problem lies behind the camera. Operating speed between ignition, menu and shooting? As ridiculous as the A7iii, compared to any other camera brand. To give you an idea, any of these timelines are 2 times slower than a 2012 Canon 6D and almost 3 times slower than the Eos R, Fuji X-T4, XH-2. In conclusion, if the experience of using Sony does not disturb you, for me it remains an absolute best buy in 2023 compared to the A7iii and considering that you take it home from 1500 euros down. Try to do better in equal numbers. ;) sent on January 24, 2023 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Pros: Build quality, tropicalization, programmable key, minimum AF distance, image quality Cons: Barrel extension decidedly noisy and not very reassuring, price, "ring" diaphragms Opinion: I bought this Tamron 28-75 G2 after trying the first version, looking for better build quality, decent hand feedback and some optical improvements (which never hurts). Construction side is definitely better, looks more solid and the barrel with different shapes improves the feedback and does not look like a Chinese Pringles tube. Too bad instead for the extension of the barrel during the zoom, which makes a tremendous noise of friction and reduced tolerances. It is hard to shoot, noisy in the video field and from a wrong impression on 900 euros of optics. His is the same as a barrel with grains of sand inside, but already from new. Moreover, if it already has such reduced tolerances when new, the time you get stuck a few grains of dust what will happen? The programmable button also, among the various functions, offers one that seemed phenomenal to me: the focus ring can be transformed into a diaphragm ring! Too bad that then it is not so functional, since it does not change value in a regular way and without clicks it does not return feedback. On the optical quality nothing to say, so much stuff. Sharp, lightning fast AF always, pleasant blur, focus even closer than before. Much faster, more reliable and more accurate than the first version You really do everything. I am not convinced that it is worth spending 900 euros for this instead of 500 for the first version used guaranteed, considering that it still has some diffettuccio .. EDIT: About the last sentence, in the end I returned it in favor of the first version at half price. A few more sacrifices, but nothing dramatic compared to the economic difference. sent on March 23, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Pros: Optical quality with capital Q, granite construction, great sharpness, 77mm filters, tropicalization, autofocus Cons: Dimensions, WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT. Opinion: The best Fujinon lens I've had in stock: excellent optical quality, no intrusive flare, no AC, distortion and vignetting completely solvable. Silent and fast autofocus. Convenient filter size 77mm, common to the 24-70/24-105 f4 to which it is attributable, granite construction with very precise diaphragm ring and effective tropicalization. Compared to my fujinon 23 1.4 and 56 1.2, it is sharper and crisper at any aperture so, given this premise, I do not consider the cost a defect. Defect instead the weight and dimensions almost from Full Frame. They are already felt on X-T4 so imagine on all the other smaller bodies ... A professional perspective in all respects that brings home any job, but that in my opinion has little to do with the philosophy of use Fujifilm and the idea of aps-c. sent on January 19, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-T4 Pros: Colorimetry, impressive value for money, user experience, construction (for materials and tropicalization), immediacy in use, EVF and sharp and faithful displays, battery. Cons: Not so bright autofocus, Eye-AF unstable, Tiny joystick, lack of a rear bezel instead of the d-pad, APS-C sensor still limited, fragile painting, weights and dimensions ALMOST from FF, RAF file previews not visible on MacOs Opinion: A crazy colorimetry, beautiful simulations for jpg and integrated profiles already perfect for raw. A unique user experience, immediate and easy. Super battery, super data sheet both in photos and videos. EVF and display with excellent quality and color fidelity. The grip is non-existent compared to other brands, but the ergonomics of the machine requires a completely different type of grip and therefore does not make it weigh. I literally fell in love with it for these aspects. It was hated instead for many others: improved autofocus but not so bright and reliable, eye-af stability light years away from sony and canon, biblical card writing times after long exposures, paint peeled in several places without shocks, menus still confusing, Joystick really too small, touchscreen only partial. APS-C vs. FF? For dynamic range I did not hear leaks, for ISO seal not even since the noise is pleasant and pertinent to the Fuji "philosophy" (although the difference is obvious and evident already from 400 ISO). Instead, I noticed big differences on the detail of the photos, reduced by the small sensor, reduced again by many old optics in the Fuji ecosystem and reduced even more if you do not use Capture One as an editor. Photographing landscapes with vegetation and probably birdlife without using C1 is still impossible due to artifacts, much less problems for portraiture and "street". It must be tried! sent on January 19, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Light and compact, stabilized, macro, handyman par excellence Cons: NO TROPICALIZATION, slow AF after barrel extension, AF noise, sharpness not at the top, nondescript bokeh Opinion: I bought this 35 RF for my Eos R with no little distrust in trying to reduce its size, long undecided between Tamron and sigma art. In the end I fell in love with it to the point of leaving all the other most prestigious optics at home. I knew I was going to have a noisy and slow AF. But then, while for the first defect I could not do anything but confirm it, for the AF speed I noticed that it slows down only after having the barrel extended in macro mode (1 meter, about??), otherwise it works great. The sharpness at 1.8 is not tears in the eyes, but it is also not something unusable or undeful. The stabilization guarantees him an even more combative all-rounder spirit, useful even on video or with little light. No A.C. or flares worthy of note found. The two most important defects that I found are: the lack of tropicalization, a blow to the heart for such an all-rounder optics and the "character" of the blurry: very hard, anonymous, very little poetic (similar to the various 50 1.8 Canon) I recommend trying it, because on R system it continues to cost / weigh / clutter at least half of any other 35mm adapted and because it does everything that is basically needed. It may surprise you! sent on August 04, 2021 |
 | Samyang AF 85mm f/1.4 FE/RF Pros: Everything: Sharpness, bokeh, color rendering, no A.C., AF speed, ergonomics, aesthetics, tropicalization Cons: Don't have it Opinion: RF version: AMAZING optics. For me the ultimate portrait lens, which I would prefer to the Sony GM or Canon L even if only trivially for the value for money. Sharp to scare already at 1.4, nice soft and pasty bokeh, warm beautiful colors in pure Samyang style, lightning AF even in pursuit and video. The filter diameter 77 is very common so versatile, the dimensions are honest in relation to the opening and the same speech for the weight. Tropicalization works and allows you to bring it into adverse conditions and shoot without fear. In a nutshell, for 500/600 euros it is the perfect optics. It works well and no frills, guarantees everything that an advanced professional/amateur can and will ever REALLY need. PS: Having first owned the Samyang 85 EF, I confirm that this version is actually new and different. It has NOTHING to do with the previous one, MUCH less sharp, super invasive chromatic aberrations and slower AF. sent on August 04, 2021 |
 | Canon Adattatore Canon EF/Canon RF Pros: Almost total compatibility, tropicalization, construction Cons: Almost total compatibility, extension and therefore imbalance of optics, price Opinion: I received this kit adapter with both the RP and the R. Noteworthy is the fact that it allows you to maintain tropicalization and use all Canon EF/EFS lenses. Unfortunately, however, not all third-party objectives are compatible (e.g. the very common Tamron 70-300) and even more unfortunately, it significantly stretches and unbalances the optics. (for example, 16-35 and 24-70 become exaggerated cannons) The price? well, that's ridiculous like any original accessory like that... The fact that it saves on the total change of optics does not seem to me to be a valid reason to profit on an empty metal/plastic tube sent on July 05, 2021 |
 | Sony A7 III Pros: value for money, image quality, ISO seal, video compartment, battery life, key customization Cons: user experience, OBSCENE EVF, equally obscene display, uncomfortable joypad, chewy and very unseat rings, crazy menus, ridiculous reaction times (lighting, zooming in photos in the gallery) Opinion: Thoroughly tested in the field for a thousand shots and then resold as fast as possible. Bought to decide whether to replace another machine or not, having high expectations. The machine churns out very good files: photo side excellent dynamic range, excellent iso seal, excellent 4k video side without crop. the face is lightning fast and very reliable, never misses a shot ... But. BUT this sony did not prove to be the miracle I expected from a practical point of view and from the point of view of usability/user experience. The EVF viewfinder is obscene, very undefined, very noisy and with colors that are not at all reliable. After two hours I found my eyes very very fatigued and tired, with hints of tearing (I have no problem with sight). Same speech for the display, very limited in movements and with the same problems. Out of 700 shots, weights and EVF never showed me a balance of white and real colors. The file then comes out perfect, but if you like to shoot like this, glad you! Then we move on to OPERATIONAL SLOWNESS, the machine takes quite a while to turn on, enlarging the photos in the gallery takes a time never seen on a camera. ERGONOMICS SIDE: I thought the grip was small, but with large hands and long fingers this A7III still holds very well, the keys are many and very customizable. Too bad they give bad feedback: the joystick is too small and uncomfortable/inaccurate to use, the rings are super spongy and do not rotate precisely. FINAL CONCLUSIONS: for me this A7III turned out to be a machine that churns out excellent files, excellent videos, which has every technical feature that a professional wants, but has not in the least taken care of the user experience, having turned out to be really un pleasant / intuitive to use, very robotic and tiring in the long run. It's up to you to choose what you prefer, but now any brand comes to similar merits... sent on March 01, 2021 |
 | Manfrotto BeFree Advanced (Twist) Pros: Weight in carbon version, STOP. Cons: Stability, construction quality of the head in kit, extendable column. Opinion: [CARBON VERSION] I bought this tripod in a 1.25kg carbon version, believing I was making an investment compared to the Chinese 50 heuri tripod I came from. After only one day of testing I immediately returned this to return to my cinesone. I found a tease. I loaded an Eos R + RF 24-105, 1.3kg in total and it didn't give the slightest impression of stability, either extended column or retracted. The materials of the head are shameful, on the tightening levers there were various plastic burrs and the levers themselves look very fragile. I did not find the unlocking of the legs particularly comfortable, having to tighten them and keep it clicked in order to move them. The column is not firm in its place and trembles even without mounted machine body. the 300 euros worst spent ever sent on February 15, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: cost, weight and size, stabilization, maximum aperture, autofocus Cons: Are there really any? Maybe the optics that do not retract completely setting to 28mm but halfway through the stroke. Opinion: But do you really think this lens is so horrible? I bought it in kit with the A7III although almost totally convinced to resell it shortly afterwards. I totally believed it. GIVEN the PRICE at which it is located/sold, I think it is an excellent optics: STABILIZED, bright at 24mm, sharpness not bad at TA especially in close-ups. I believe that for the price it has, it is worth buying and keeping it in the backpack both as a backup and for the exits without obligation, given the weight and the zero dimensions. Even for autofocus I found myself well: he chased a subject fast approaching through the trees without missing a single shot. Absurdly enough for most of the work on commission and especially for an amateur who can't even set sony menus, going to criticize a 150 euro lens is simply R-I-D-I-C-O-L-O. sent on February 02, 2021 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX II Pros: Nothing? Maybe the price? Cons: Very soft at TA, sharpness in sharp drop at the edges, flares everywhere, exaggerated AC, resistance to external agents NOTHING Opinion: I hope for the other buyers that I had a sliced version on my hands, but my experience with this perspective was tremendous. Very soft at TA, sharpness in sharp drop at the edges, flares everywhere, exaggerated AC, resistance to external agents NOTHING: without even taking water, it filled with mushrooms and I had to throw it away. If I can avoid Tokina in the future, I will! sent on February 02, 2021 |
 | Canon RF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: SHARPNESS, AF speed, ring, tropicalization, size Cons: Switches for AF and IS too little marked to the touch, noise during transport (or IS module or barrel probably) Opinion: I purchased this RF 7 months ago together with Eos R, coming from RP + 24-105L first series. I took them everywhere: Norwegian fjords in the rain, stormy sea, windy beaches.. I did all kinds of photography: landscape, portraiture, sports, product, astrography, disco events and parties. After this long test I consider him the all-rounder par excellence. I start by saying that it has absolutely nothing to do with the old 24-105, neither first nor second series (200) and it is totally worth the change. It is EXTREMELY SHARP on a sensor like that of the R at any focal point and already from f/4, autofocus significantly faster and quieter and very effective stabilizer (I arrived at 0.5 to 35mm seconds without micromosso). I have no idea how he behaves for vignetting and AC, as working with RAW active the correction and they both disappear totally, I no longer find it sensible as a problem in 2020. The flare is very small and in terms of tropicalization, although it does not look like a tank to the touch, I consider it perfect. I worked on it in the rain, salt water and sand and it didn't have the slightest infiltration or hesitation. The only two criticisms I would like to make to this lens are the IS and AF switches on the barrel, which are too little marked to the touch and I often happen to confuse them in the dark or without looking directly at them and a noise that happens by shaking or carrying the lens, probably due to the IS module or the barrel, which however I would have preferred not to hear on an L series. sent on October 28, 2020 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Picture quality, dynamic range, fabulous EVF and screen, ergonomics, battery life, tropicalization Cons: Double slot, TIMELAPSE RAW, 4k crop and no 60fps, lens park TOO TOO expensive and reduced, lack of awkward focus bracketing Opinion: I bought this Eos R in March 2020 when for the price it became a best buy in the Canon house, discarding both Sony A7iii and 5D4. I waited 7 months to try it well before reviewing it (maybe everyone did). The file produced by this camera is splendid: the AWB rarely misses a beat, raw malleable in post, beautiful sharp and clean image with great dynamic range (compared to RP/6D/6D2 the difference is immediate). Compared to the models mentioned a moment ago, on which I always seemed almost to see an opaque "veil" on the sensor, I find the R file much more "crunchy" and sharper.. I cannot explain it, but the difference is very tangible. The ergonomics are great, it would have been nice to have the joystick but using the touch to move the AF point is not a problem at all, the controls are positioned where they should and falls into your hand very very well. In recent months I have brought it in the rain on the Norwegian fjords, on the north sea in gales and on the sand of the Greek beaches, never any problem and never any trace of dirt on the sensor (the curtain is brilliant) so tropicalization also works as god commands. Using the EVF and screen, among the best on the market for resolution, really make it a pleasure to use this R and do not make it feel too "distant" from the old school. The battery is a leap ahead of the mirrorless I've tried, I've never taken less than 1000 shots, third-party batteries included, so it takes that thought out of my mind as well. The AF is another gem of this chamber that made me discard the 5D4: always very fast focus, precise and fast EyeAF, reliable Servo pursuit. What would I miss? Double slots for added security, timelapse in RAW, 4k 60 or no-crop on video, the embarrassing lack of focus bracketing that is present on the lower-end Eos RP and above all a much less expensive RF lens park than the current one, is it possible that third-party manufacturers are not interested? Would I switch to R6 or R5? Honestly not: R6 with 10mpx less I consider it a step back from THAT point of view, R5 with 15mpx more and the very expensive CF would require extra storage and better hardware not needed for most uses.. Would I buy Eos R back? absolutely yes, I worked on it 7 months learning how to make the most of it and I will work on it again! I consider it even more of a best buy with the new releases. sent on October 27, 2020 |
 | Canon EOS RP Pros: Size and ergonomics, controls, tropicalization, price, rf lens system quality. Cons: EVF VIEWFINDER, dynamic range, slot memory card together with the battery, price if over 1100, on/of switch on the left side, partial incompatibility of third-party batteries and cost of the originals, cost rf lens system. Opinion: EDIT NOVEMBER 2020: Quite disappointed by this RP, sold after 3 months to switch to R: far from it. Good ergonomics, falls into the hands well and the controls are well studied, slightly too low perhaps, the little finger does not always find a place. Quality and detail of the images in my opinion poor, compared to other cameras, it seems that it has a kind of soft "veiling" on photographs. Good but not mind-blowing ISO seal. I consider images usable, with reduction removes, up to 3200 ISO. First flaw: dynamic range, already at first glance sins compared to other FF, allows very little in post production at the level of recoveries and drastically worsens by raising the ISO Second flaw: THE EVF VIEWFINDER. Hateful. It has the same viewfinder as the M50, enlarged with a lens positioned in front, well when you look at it perfectly centered, as soon as the eye moves slightly, it creates a nuisance never experienced on a camera. The battery for amateur use does its duty, I have come to take an average of 300/500 shots on a single charge, however the original Canon have exaggerated costs for the lens of this machine and the third-party ones do not report the level of charge. As for the burst, which in AF Servo drops to 4fps but with ILLLIMITATO RAW buffer, I have taken and sold with satisfaction the full-day service to a motocross race, so I do not consider it unusable at all. Who do I recommend it to? Above 800 euros at the end of 2020 really a few people. The Eos R has overestimated, and with the price of the new and the used, I would make a little extra effort and buy that, the difference is felt in every area: construction, sensor, viewfinder and screen, battery life.. sent on January 12, 2020 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori Pros: Everything: price, robustness in relation to cost, excellent organization of spaces. Cons: Nothing.. Maybe the tripod laces too short Opinion: I find some really ridiculous bad reviews of a backpack that is on sale for 25 euros. How can you criticize a product at a similar price? The spaces are divided very intelligently, many internal separators, safety straps to prevent lenses or other objects from moving, double external front pocket of which a very deep and full of pockets and pockets. Inside front with two waterproof pockets. Good quality hinges. The only downside: the laces on the side to tie the stand maybe are a little too short, I can not fasten mine but I will replace them with those of an old backpack. Of course, it is not a 300 euro Manfrotto backpack but it is instead the cheapest photo backpack on the market and I wonder: how can you complain? sent on November 06, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness up 200mm, new and used price, stabilizer, precise AF Cons: noisy, weight, lampshade too bulky Opinion: I tested this tamron on 550D and M50 for both portraits and birdlife, bought new low price good sharpness up to 200mm, very good bokeh in portraits. AF quite accurate. Unfortunately the lens is quite heavy which pushes to leave it at home very often if not certain of its use, it also helps the lampshade that is very bulky and that if mounted in reverse, makes it impossible to use the lens with access to the dial. The stabilizer works well but is very noisy. Good for quality/price and to start with the canvases, but to date, at its price from new or little more are found on the used L canon series, I would probably orient myself on them sacrificing the stabilizer but having the certainty of quality. sent on September 01, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Quality/price, size and weight, sharpness, silent AF, no AC and little distortion Cons: As light as it is, it doesn't give the impression of solidity (but as much as it costs..), AF not always accurate Opinion: I bought this 50mm to get a cheap portrait lens for my Canon M50. Tested with classic adapter (80mm equivalent) and speedbooster (56mm effective and f 1.2 MAX). Impressive sharpness for the price it has, new and used. Ridiculous size and weight, it occupies the same space as a lampshade in the bag. STM engine very quiet but unfortunately in several shots I noticed an AF not very precise (several front and back focus) and on mirrorless should be even more precise no (?). Opening 1.8 which makes it very bright and suitable even for shots with little light. Also tested with f1.2 speedboosters, starting with excellent original sharpness, at f 1.2 gets a super bokeh, lots of incoming light and a sharpness still acceptable for web use. Recommended for portraits, although in hindsight, I might have opted for the 40mm 2.8 STM, to have a wider field of view. Both at 80mm and 56mm actual I find it a bit too tight to be used in any other context. sent on September 01, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: f.4 constant, L-series construction, excellent color rendering, non-existent AC, very quiet AF, used price Cons: sharpness, stretching of the barrel Opinion: This lens is a tank, that's its strength. It does not excel at anything, but it still allows/allowed professionals to take home probably most of the jobs. It is located for little money used, has a decent sharpness, excellent color rendering and non-existent aberrations, is stabilized, tropicalized and is built to last. Quick and very quiet focus. THE ONLY annoying mole, the elongation of the barrel tilting the lens. Without a filter it does not happen to me, but already with a UV unfortunately it happens. I also tested it with speedbooster on the M50, where it becomes almost 24-105mm effective and f.2.8 constant, versatility doubles and image quality and sharpness still remain very good PS: Now I switched to his brother RF 24-105L and it has nothing to do with this, light years later in every area, if you have a mirrorless do not hesitate even a second to invest in the latest version! sent on August 17, 2019 |
 | Canon EOS M50 Pros: New and used price, compactness (up to a point), low weight, quality of photos and videos, high iso hold (for an apsc) and dynamic range, Raffica, WIFI, EVF. Cons: ERGONOMIA!, battery life (yes and no), price and availability of EF-M optics, lack of another control dial Opinion: Despite being sold as a mirrorless entry level, I decided to gamble and buy it. I immediately paired it with EF optics (24-105L, 50, 70-300) via Meike adapter and Viltrox speedbooster as I do not see longevity and convenience (as far as resale then) of the EF-M system. With this pairing, I am convinced that I have obtained in my hands and in many respects an APS-C semi pro, with high performance photos and videos (only 1080p, NO 4K) thanks to the technology it encloses. The Digic 8 processor combined with a relatively new sensor guarantees a great quality of image and detail, good dynamic range and great recovery of shadows (iso 100) and also an excellent iso seal: I set ISO MAX to 6400 and I can get shots satisfying and recoverable by almost always shooting freehand. Canon's AF Dual Pixel system speaks for its own, fabulous video side and incredible photo side: very fast, so many points that can be selected via touch and continuous eye-tracking for portraits. CHICCA RECORD: By mounting the speedbooster, you get the FF field of view, a stop in less diaphragm (from 4 to 2.8/ from 1.8 to 1.2) losing a lot of clarity and gaining a lot in practicality. Which you can't do a sLR. LET'S COME AGAINST IT. The battery life is subjective, I have two originalones, but for a daily outing and both on holiday stressed a lot I managed to make a full day or a little less, using only the viewfinder and keeping the screen off (facing inwards). In such a small body you can not claim to have the battery of a computer and, considering the ridiculous cost, lightness/size of the batteries and the little time to replace them, it is up to you to decide whether to classify it as an absolute defect or not. Good ergonomics with a 50mm 1.8, and so I assume even with EF-M lenses being lightweight. INSUFFICENT ADOLON instead if you mount big and heavy lenses (24-105, 70-300), but I solved it with a 3D printed external grip and now I have a salner grip. Unfortunately, at least one additional dial is missing to adjust a few parameters, after a few months I got into the habit of using touch and almost all customizable keys, but I still consider it a flaw. CONCLUSION Let's talk about a 500 euro body used, if you are willing to make compromises for the "cons", the "pros" instead of this M50 make it perfect as a travel machine, second body or any scope. In short, we are talking about a 500 euro body used, only half of these pros should convince you to have it already in your kit! EDIT: That said, if interested is for sale or looking for exchange with Canon 6D or 6D MKii for need of an FF sent on June 10, 2019 |
 | Cosina 100mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: NITIDEZZA, materials and construction, bokeh, diaphragms' diaphragms ring and distance indication, amazing macro with the 1:1 lens Cons: For the price at which it is located, no defects to reportrp Opinion: I start with the premise that all the pros listed are based on the value for money to which this lens is located and are not an absolute value. With a ridiculous price tag, you can find this lens (quite rare in reality) that is good enough for portraits (long distance) and especially for the macro with dedicated lens. It offers excellent quality and sharpness of the image. You might report some AC and poor flare resistance. but is it really to be considered a flaw on a lens under 100 euros? Great to start with macros and have fun experimenting. (Used with adapter on Canon Eos 50D and currently in use on Eos M50) sent on May 26, 2019 |
 | Canon 50D Pros: Construction, ergonomics, reliability used price Cons: Weight, high ISO seal, few AF points Opinion: I bought this 50d coming from a 550d and wanting to look for a more durable, professional and therefore more advanced machine, at a ridiculously cheap price in the used market. Holding it in your hand you immediately notice a great robustness that, while being ergonomic, translates into a fairly important weight.. Considering the age it has, I presume that flaws such as few AF points, low shadows and half-lights and poor dynamic range and very poor tightness at high ISO are normal.. However I am considering selling it again to move on to something newer.. Conclusion, good as a school ship, sturdy solid and very reliable, at the price to which it is used is still difficult to find a new with the same characteristics, but has its limits dictated by age. sent on May 19, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
