|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rafx24x www.juzaphoto.com/p/Rafx24x  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 20mm f/1.4 PRO Pros: brightness, size, yield Cons: It is not a lens like many others, it has its own particular yield but it is not an edge-to-edge blade. Opinion: Taken to take with me on vacation coupled with m1 mark 3 and 12-100 f / 4, with the zoom I would have done everything and more during the day, I needed a fixed light for the evening but that eventually I could also use indoors with little space. Undecided between this, leica 25mm 1.4 II and sigma 30 1.4, the choice fell on 20mm because of its focal length that best suited my needs. Moving on to his surrender, looking at the photos taken in the evening in San Benedetto del Tronto, it is cmq promoted. At TA its yield is very honest in the center if the subject is half bust, if further away instead loses a bit of detail, at 1.8 instead improves the center and for my taste has done its duty. In fact I didn't care if at f/2.8-4 it was an edge-to-edge blade, so I would have always used it only ever at f/1.8. Having had the leica 25 1.4, the yield at TA is very similar, but then the leica is always sharper, at f/2.8 it is definitely sharp from edge to edge. This om-system is different, I can safely say that if I compare to f/4 the 20mm and the 12-100 pro, the zoom is sharper at the edges and identical at the center at the fixed, the leica instead outclassed the 12-40 pro at 25mm at f/2.8. But in my case, I'm happy with its yield and its focal length, in interiors between 40 and 50mm equivalent the difference can be seen. So small, bright and not too expensive (new 550 € about), if you need a fixed bright where in the center does its duty, is him. With 12-100 and 56 1.4 formed me a nice triad to keep in one bag. sent on July 20, 2023 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 II OIS Pros: Everything, sharp, compact, internal zoom Cons: Maybe double stabilization with g9 Opinion: My favorite optics, what can I say... sharp to TA , taken used at 500 € , often remains glued to my olympus m1 mark 3, impeccable yield and autofocus at all focal lengths even on the video side, disabled lens stabilization and use only ibis olympus. I open a parenthesis, with lumix g9 the dual is II with this lens created the shake with fast times, even at 1/500 for example or more, which is really annoying because I never liked to activate and have to disable the stabilizer depending on the shutter speed, but I do it only if I put the camera on a tripod. It's not due to a single g9 or 35-100 II, but I've tried 3 of both. Sometimes the image especially at 100mm was softer and I did not understand, until I did the same tests both with active stabilization and deactivated always freehand, example at 1/500 or 1/1000 without stabilization the image was super sharp, with dual is II decidedly softer. Too bad that with panasonic you can choose either dual is II or nothing, if you could decide to use only the ibis of the g9 was perfect. Changed the g9 with m1 mark 3 and I could not choose better, disabled lens stab and use only ibis and always perfect images. I consider it the essence of the m4/3, a 70-200 with this quality, and so compact... wow. 12-40 and 35-100 f/2.8 II = top combo. sent on April 20, 2023 |
 | Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: Video side, really remarkable. Cons: Photo side... it is also not related to 30 1.4 and 56 1.4 Opinion: Used with m4/3 I call it a big disappointment. Video side is remarkable and thanks to its wide aperture the iso always remain low and fast autofocus. But photo side is not remotely related to the 30mm f / 1.4 and 56mm f / 1.4 , this 16mm (and I took 2 specimens because it seemed impossible), a TA is unusable, in the center begins to be sharp as it should at f / 2.8, at the edges instead you have to close it at f / 5.6. Small example, the 12-40 pro, at 16mm is always sharper from edge to edge of this fixed. In the m4/3 especially you need light and then be able to use it with open apertures, obviously I do not recommend it, but not even for landscapes etc., there are even zooms that do better. I have seen various tests that confirm my opinion about it, I do not understand the reviews where they define this 16mm a blade ... Then comparing it to the 56mm is really unreadable. sent on December 20, 2022 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: Construction, sharpness, colors, focal range.... in short, everything Cons: I would say nothing Opinion: What can I say, after trying a thousand machines, aps-c sensors, FF... here I am instead to try the m4/3, and I went down in size just for him ... the 12-100 pro f / 4, taken in kit with the m1 mark 3 in promo allows me outdoors with good light to do everything, from the wide angle (starting from a 24mm equivalent is gold), to the tele... and it doesn't even have a focal length where it gets worse, and I'm very picky eh ! Sea, mountains, zoos, trips... he is the ideal travel companion, the various 18-135, 18-150 of any other brand never, never stand comparison. To him I combined 2 fixed lights and with 3 lenses are always in place. What can I say, does it cost? is it hail? does nothing... once you look at the photos taken without even too many pretensions are great. Not to mention the double stabilization, the high res shot with this lens is impressive. 1000% recommended But found the offer with lumix s5 + 24-105 f / 4 ,+ 2 fixed lights ... and I'm back in FF ! sent on June 24, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: - bright and stabilized - nice sharp - light, makes the Rp a compact Cons: - autofocus stm, it doesn't give me any problems but it's clear that nano usm is another thing. - oddities .... that is, that attached to the rp even when off if I move the selector af/mf, the lens moves back and forth ... to be turned off?! Opinion: Well I went from m50 to RP, this lens replaces 1000% the 22mm f/2 I had before, plus it is stabilized and also brighter... what more do you want? I also find it sharp at TA, of course at f/2.8 it is even more so but I have to say that even at the edges it satisfies me very well. It makes the Rp a compact FF, light, stabilized... well I gave him a nice 9! It is clear that it may seem plastic, fat compared to a 35 art, but I tried them both and x 3 reasons I sold immediately after trying the sigma and the canon I kept it. - the 35 art needs adapter and does not have corrections in the room, and at TA ugly vignette. - the 35 art is absolutely not sharper than the canon (I will provide evidence) - the 35 rf does not need an adapter, has corrections in the chamber, is sharper at the edges without a shadow of a doubt and is also stabilized. The art is wonderful and in your hand you can immediately notice why it is ART, but I am sorry , costing a lot more I believed it better as an image quality, definitely better, it will have that additional stop but I would not do anything about it, I recover it with the stabilizer of the rf. I must admit I couldn't update the fw of 35 art because I don't have the dock, but I don't know if it can affect its surrender on Canon rp or not. I took the 35mm rf used it for just over 300€ , and it was a crazy purchase. Next arrival? 85mm f/2 is stm, it won't be f/1.4 but if it takes from the little brother 35rf I have... will also be this top. sent on December 11, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM Pros: Sharpness to TA, compactness, sharpness I've already written?! Cons: Maybe only in the video the maf apart from the zzz of the engine stm, it is not very fast. Opinion: Well only 5 voted this beast and only 3 reviewed it??? eh no now in 6 and in 4 :) What to say, it's impressive the sharpness it already offers to f/1.4 both in the center and at the edges, at f/2.8 is indescribable! I use it with satisfaction with m50 although I don't really like the 32mm focal, having the 22mm f/2 and the 56mm f/1.4 , this is found in the middle.... my favorite remains the 56mm sigma but because I portray my little girl, but with the 32 is never wrong, at max I have to remember not to get too close so set or half bust is more than good, close-up no. it is compact, and its sharpness is indescribable because most of the bright targets, f/1.4 or f/1.8 , at TA are soft and always closes a stop for force of things... no this is not his case , clear that at f/1.4 the maf wants precise eh, but then you find yourself cabbage with excellent results, closing a hair the diaphragm improves even by offering a hair more contrast also... as 22mm and 32mm ef-m colors are identical and therefore excellent, the 56mm sigma is different from the 2 canons. To date it is the top with ef-m attack, undisputed leader... the price of the new is not low... but I took it at 285th used (with still 4-5 months of warranty remaining and as new), here at this price is a best buy, the sigma 30mm ef-m is not remotely comparable to the canon, 16 and 56mm instead are beasts so thank you sigma. Ducis in fundo maybe only video side sin definitely vs the 30mm f/1.4 C sigma, the latter has an autofocus similar to the usm canon, so lightning and silent, instead the stm canon is slower and you hear the engine buzz, but I never use it x video so x me no problem. sent on September 13, 2020 |
 | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM C Pros: Size of 18-55!!! , price, focal excursion, sharpness for a whole do, up to about 115mm is f/5.6 , for example the ef-m 18-150 to 60mm is already f/6.3. Cons: Faulty examples? The first 24 to 45mm was outrageous ... then replaced by amazon and this is top ! Opinion: I have a canon eos m50 and I needed a handyman for when we go to the zoo with the baby, holidays etc... and here I am, I use it with the canon adapter and it goes that's a wonder. Well meanwhile it's small to be a 18-200, quite silent even in the videos, I do not know how canon face to make them completely silent (e.g. 18-135 nano usm), I replaced just the usm to have more mm. Well the sharpness is good for an all do and I am satisfied for the outputs I have written before and it is very constant. The stabilizer is very effective, at 200mm I snapped at 1/25 freehand , however compared to the 18-135 usm as times we are there, but the canon had in the crosshairs just the still preview motionless... sigma no, but I don't care. I went to the zoo and overseas just with that. It's as big as an 18-55, it comes up to 200mm, paraluce included in the 330 degrees, well good sigma. at 18mm: definitely that good, identical to sigma 17-50 both to f/5.6 up to 24mm: ditto as at 18mm from 28 to 50mm : less good than at 18-24mm as sharpness but still ok "50 to 80mm" : good "80 to 135mm" : It's back to being definitely more than good at 200mm: and here the wonder... even sharper than at 135mm!!! Its center and edges consistency is really good, just close the diaphragm and the edges improve in an instant, for example I sold after 1 hour the 17-70 sigma C f/2.8-4 , at the edges not even at f/11 improved (then in the tests watched they said expressly that strangely the edges did not improve by closing the diaphragm to all the focal points, but if I saw them first with cabbage that I took it, but x luck I made the Amazonian return ). Overall it is promoted with flying colors, too bad the first specimen arrived me with problems especially at 35mm where the image was almost blurry, made rider and they replaced me the lens before I sent back the old x compare them at my request , top! Obviously an all-rounder should not be compared with the fixed, in fact I have 3 but I do not even compare them... but I had the 18-150 ef-m (native then x m50) and I didn't like it at all, vs the 18-200 that I now lose 3-0 as image quality. Instead the 18-135 is usm canon I exchanged it with this only x have extra mm, as IQ I think are on par and the canon is super mega hyper silent in the autofocus, the sigma ne noisy and silent, stands in the middle :) but it has a whopping 65mm and at the zoo and overseas they made me very comfortable! Ducis in fundo... before taking this 18-200 I had also rated the 18-300 always sigma C , but seeing the tests was definitely inferior to this so have mm but x be less than mediocre even no, I realized that they can not be perfect the handyman, so the 18-300 and 18-400 I would let them go (definitely better a smaller sensor and excellent optics example rx10 m3-4 or fz1000 II) , but the 18-135 and 18-200 are a godsend in those exits where you want to bring a lens only, in the outside is their world... x the interior and evening x luck invented the fixed lights :) sent on July 17, 2020 |
 | Sony A6400 Pros: Enviable detail, iso rendering, autofocus that doesn't miss a beat, 4k really good Cons: Digital viewfinder too small?! Sony menu to study... coming from canon and panasonic is a real trauma... (but then the image rendering makes you remember xke you took it :) ) Opinion: the a6400 is among the best ML that you can take this is little but safe , I sell it only because I wear glasses and the small evf does not make my life very easy. The image yield is much better at the m50. the 4k is spatial and also the autofocus that reads the eye farther than the other brands and NEVER loses it. The menu is the sore spot, but only because I came from canon :) But you get used to quiet. the iso yield is remarkable, not that there is no noise, but the detail in the jpeg is not blown away, the grain is seen but even at 3200 iso the details are read very well. sent on January 26, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: -All make light, stabilized, excellent sharpness for a whole do, imperceptible focus silent! -with dual pixel of the M50 goes to the big stra. Cons: Let me think.... Nobody! It is clear that it is f/3.5-5.6 But it is born not to be compared with the 17-55 f/2.8. Opinion: If I had been told that it was so I really would not even believe it, to date I have 3 objectives: 22mm F/2, 50mm f/1.8 and this. To date if you ask me what goals would you recommend x APSC canon? The 18-135 is USM is the first on the list, an all make that was my biggest surprise (paid on the new €259 Bay with 4 year warranty!!!!!!) I did not have high expectations, but cabbage in outer I will hardly use another goal! I use it with the M50 + adapter, it is less cumbersome d than you can think and it is also very light! I'll give you a simple example, I got the EF-M 18-150, well I think it's bad in comparison, at the outrageous sides and the central sharpness gets to F/8. This on the sides is really really good, and a f/5.6 does its duty!!! It is clear to Ta do not ask too much, but in external will be my first lens to 100%. Effective stabilizer, and autofocus is the quietest ever heard. I will use it at 100% also for videos in the pool, recite and skating. Rating? As everything do to APSC I do not know if there is any better, for what is designed so do not compare it to the 17-55 f/2.8 eh (this is for little light), I give 9 definitely. sent on May 09, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: AF USM, constant brightness, professional appearance:) Cons: I would say the weight (but x a similar optics there), and the price (if taken used in excellent condition you save a 30-40%) Opinion: After a thousand ideas and tests (Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 15-85 (really sharp), 18-135 STM, USM etc.), here I am finally reviewing the lens that I will keep to 99% on my EOS M50 with EF adapter (except the sea that I will use the 15-45, you never know:)) Well what about I finally found the lens that is for me, it will be cumbersome for a body of the M50, but I find it very well, indeed much better as a grip than with the 15-45 EF-M. Well now everyone knows this goal, has a constant brightness and sharpness from 20mm to 55mm decidedly good even at f/2.8 and more stabilized, as soon as you close a hair is really very sharp. I open a small parenthesis, I also had the Sigma 17-50 F/2.8 And there is no comparison logically with the canon, the canon also costs 3 times as much:(, the autofocus noise is disturbing and unusable x video (and do not want to make video with a constant f/2.8???), and less sharp de The canon both at the edges and at the center, I would say at least one stop. I thought I had found the perfect all do x me in 15-85, which I think is really good and sharp, has nothing to do with the 18-135 (as sharpness is like seeing with and without glasses), but then as soon as I arrived and tried the 17-55 I gave up having that length I n more than focal, but it was love at first sight. This lens is clear that you can not call it handyman vista its short excursion, but paired with a fixed luminous and a tele and you are in place x always! sent on February 11, 2019 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: The price definitely... faithful colors and sharpness in the center really high Cons: loud autofocus, for videos is unusable. Opinion: Bought to use it with adapter on my eos m50, well I was disappointed only by the noise of the autofocus... tttt... T.. tttrttt... unusable x video, too bad. As sharpness in the center already in TA is definitely good, at 35 and 50mm from the best, obviously wide-angle side closed to f/5.6-8 is perfect. Bought used as new at 200 degrees I would say they were spent very well, x the canon takes twice as much. I must say that it also offers a nice contrast, long ago I happened a copy not of the best maybe, this one instead I keep it stretra. Another defect perhaps that during the focus the dial rotates and every now and then I touch it with the left hand, made the habit I keep it further back. I can say that I have replaced 22mm and 50 stm with a single goal, which is no small feat. sent on January 20, 2019 |
 | Canon Speedlite 270EX II Pros: Small, articulated upward and the comparison with the integrated flash of the EOS M50...!!! Cons: I would say no for its price and size. Opinion: Taken to pair with my EOS M50, and is spectacular, small, sufficently powerful and articulated upwards, I coupled it to an omni bounce diffuser and makes a beautiful light in the portraits, the comparison with the M50 mini Flash is like day and night. Lho taken used by a girl and is practically new (€70), zero scratches and I am completely satisfied, small and powerful articulated for a mirrorless like the M50. Rated 10. sent on November 27, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: As a lens in kits I would say very good, light and stabilized and especially closed a pelino is clear all right. Cons: The X button unlocking it I find it uncomfortable but I'll get used to it, clearly dark but it is normal like many others. Opinion: I want to break a spear on this lens that I took in the kit with the M50 (only body cost me more... why??), and that I left Incelopanato until last week as I had the 18-150, 22 and 50. Well on the 18-150 I never had much feeling but for the little sharpness that from. Well I was astounded when I did the same photos, at 18mm (F/4) and at 35 (f/5.6) and at 45mm (F. 8) and what about the 15-45 is a lot sharper than the 18-150, it is clear that it should be closed a bit but also the 18-150, but at the same focal and aperture there is no comparison , and think that I tried to sell it on 15-45 and in a month I have not sold... well I have made many tests, and I sold the 18-150 in 2 days, OK I no longer have a mini tele, but at Max when I need the 55-200 is always at very little , but x the photos I do lately I do not need. I do not talk about construction etc, but only of sharpness, the 22mm f/2 is sharper clearly but not stabilized, with the 15-45 shooting at 1/8 second and is perfect... with the 22.... Well...... let it be... as a kit lens I think it's really good. Now I'm aiming the Canon 17-55 F/2.8 and the Tamron 35mm F/1.8VC, then I'll reevaluate the whole thing. sent on November 25, 2018 |
 | Canon EOS M50 Pros: - lightness, size, many functions and aps-c 24mpx sensor, ability to use ef optics (this is a !!!!!!!!!!!!!! value). - dual pixels - a lot of stuff! - fully articulated display, I would say fundamental in 2020 - jpeg canon (once custom picture styles , I would not abandon more canon (I had a parenthesis with a6400 sony, great but what color has in jpeg?!) Raw processing in the !!!!! room Cons: The 4k.... because of the prehistoric focus... no dual pixel... no party :( - drums... not so much the duration... but that goes from complete... 2 notches out of three and after very little, and trust very little... to CHANGE THE BATTERY! - lack of internal stabilization x photos but it would have cost a lot more. Opinion: So, I come from a fz2000( fz1000 and many other bridges), three times as big, 1-inch sensor but stabilized. First I have to say that it is really tiny, almost funny if you compare it with a reflex ! yet it offers the same identical functions, and it improves several by adding more. The aps-c canon sensor is already known, plus there is the new digic 8 processor and staying low on the iso and with the right optics you have great shots. The jpeg canon I like a lot also as colors and in fact I always shoot raw - jpeg but I explain after the xke, I put the noise reduction on off always so leaves as many details as possible, then I customized 3 picture style depending on whether I shoot a portrait, or landscape or if I use the 18-200 (with this I pumped a little sharpness and .1 the contrast). Raw processing in the room, great thing that I already used with panasonic bridges( here's xke snap raw-jpeg), if after the shot you realize that the white balance is wrong, distortions, brightness, colors, sharpness and shadows well you can do everything with a touch and you're good to!!! As a video, the 1080p at 50 or 60 frames/sec, is great , thanks to the dual pixel does not miss a beat... il4k instead uses the contrast focus a little dated and therefore unreliable except for timelaps etc (using manual focus instead everything resolves, but you know how it is.... ) The wifi for transferring photos to your smartphone is simple, fast and reliable. Do I recommend it? Of course you, after 1 1/2 years certainly, the wide variety in addition to the native ef-m opens up a world and at the moment I have: ef-m 22mm f/2 , ef-m 32mm f/1.4 (a real razor), and sigma 56mm f/1.4 (can you call it spatial?!) and the sigma 18-200 Contemporary that I use with canon adapter (as everything do I consider the best I tried). I would have liked to try fuji x its jpeg (better than canons?!) and film simulation, but meanwhile an x-t30 does not have the articulatable display like m50 and then remember that on Fuji you only mount fuji optics (not as with canon that with adapter uses all efs, canons, sigma tamron etc...) ... so take a hit to get my respective goals that I have now... I think I would have spent twice as much definitely. sent on November 09, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: it's a whole do, unique value not to change lens in trips etc ... Cons: Well... 3.5-6.3 18-150.... but at 55mm it's already at 6.3!!!!! Opinion: ok on the outside and with good light.... but as soon as the light drops, and at 55mm you are already at 6.3.... well already this says it all... As rendered nothing special as we expect, at the level of 18-135. Maybe in a set with a couple of fixtures you can feel good about it, in the end I have the 22mm f/2 and sigma 56mm f/1.4 great, but without this at the zoo and leolandia I certainly could not have changed goals a thousand times with a 5-year-old girl now and I would not have photographed almost anything, and so it is comfortable we would miss, in the photos that really count use the 2 fixed sharp, x all the rest is fine. sent on November 09, 2018 |
 | Panasonic FZ2000 / FZ2500 Pros: 1-inch sensor, 4k photo (a gem of Panasonic), built-in Nd, yield to very good ISO up to 1600 (for sensor that clearly has) Cons: It's not tropicalized like the fz300 I had, the price from new maybe (I feel €1000 excessive, I took it used in fact). F 2.8 Only at 24mm, already 25mm we are at F 3.0 and so on.... and you arrive soon to the F 4.5.... So soon. Opinion: Let's start from the fact that I had only Lumix in the last 15 years, (fz38, fz45, fz62, fz82, fz300 and fz1000), and that I make an amateur use, holidays, birthdays and photos in the family. I have always liked to have a bridge to have a nice zoom to use when you need it and outdoor I have always taken care of with beautiful photos, instead of evening or indoors ahi... The high ISO and the small sensor never go along.... then the fz300 amazed me x its 2 .8 constant that in the videos is fantastic because you do not see the image darken while zooming, and it creates a beautiful blur in the compromise foto.il in the fz300 is in the resolution, there are those who say it does not matter etc.... but it is not true in the sense that the details count and 10.5 mpx Shooting in 3:2 did not allow me to have that quality I wanted (ok in Photoshop I gave all the sharpness I wanted, but artificial...). Well now we come to the fz2000, well what about is another category, first because it costs twice as much as a fz300... then why finally with the 1-inch sensor shot photos decidedly better than before, first with all Lumix prior to 400 ISO you saw immediately noise , but also at 200.... Therefore the obligation was to shoot at 80-100 ISO always. Now I was amazed that up to 1600 ISO I can shoot quietly, clearly depends on the situation and I never mold over at 40x60. The 3200 still retains details and colors so I would say the max X the Web or small prints, besides I would not go, but for me it's fine. It has a myriad of professional functions that I may never use, but those who search for it are all right. Why did I take a fz2000 then? To make a leap of quality not indifferent in the photos and videos, and then I flash DMW-fl360 and the Tele 1.7 x DMW-lt55 Panasonic (here I open a parenthesis, is not among the accessories of fz1000 and 2000 the Tele , but through a ring from 67mm to 55mm of metal and by a few euros the game is made!!!! ) and then I was undecided until the last if I take a fz1000 or fz2000, but the touch screen now is a must and the improvements of the zoom etc have made me choose this x next thousand years:) By default as I read about English reviews, the image was calibrated on the soft but setting it on the custom on contrast + 1 sharpness + 3 NR-2 and Saturation + 1, now it goes much better. 4k photo is very useful, it churn out the incredible 8mpx, I would never have been able to capture with a burst of photos of the genre, not to mention the focus in the 4k photo (I use the "s. S" i.e. start and stop, and this way is like a normal 4k video (so also has and the audio but it does not play the camera (instead with burst and pre does not save the audio eh!!!, but the PC or TV is:)) and this way you can see each single frame x choose which photo to save! I think it's a great thing, in the day it churn out the 8mpx full of details. I do not know if I explained myself but if one makes a 4k video certain that the audio there is also from the camera in play, but instead in mode 4k photo only saves the audio in S. s mode, but does not reproduce it, but if you watch it from the PC or other device there is) the autofocus is very good , the Panasonic DFD allows you to easily detach the subject from the background. I repeat has 1000 professional functions, and that I can not review but for the use that I do, the sensor 1-inch + Leica has changed me for the better photos! As a last thing the raw that is processed by the cameras allows you to modify many things (brightness, contrast, tone, balance white, shadows, intelligent resolution, noise reduction, sharpness etc.) so if the JPEG came out does not meet then from the camera You can make the raw to your liking. The only flaw is just this lens + soft than that of the fz1000, I had it for little but to today remains the fz1000 x the photos The best bridge, really really sharp. sent on October 02, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Lumix FZ300 Pros: Clearly the constant 2.8, the 4k and 4k photo 30p and Full HD video 60p (both unlocked, Standard has 25p in 4k and 50p in FHD), quick focus touch, is a bridge therefore very versatile, even in macro with manual MAF with a special side nut. Cons: Clearly the tiny sensor and the only 10.5 mpx shooting in 3:2, I also have to admit that the EVF does not seem to be sharp, even adjusted well by anyway bother a little to the eyes. The JPEG churched out by the fz300 applies excessive automatic noise reduction, eats several details, fortunately you can customize it. Opinion: Then I have to partially recreate on this fz300 bought used in excellent condition at €260, it takes a bit of familiarity to bring out the best. Now I explain better, I come from a fz62 used maybe 6-7 years and myriad of shots and videos, and a fz82 that instead I sold after little because I did not convince me full (ok the improvements of the 4k photo that is very convenient, and the zoom lunar 60x , but at the maximum focal length required times not very fast and were not fermissime photos except with tripod), so the first thing in negative that I noticed was pass with the same sensor, in 3:2, from 16mpx to 10, 5mpx, the difference in the details you notice All right. But then working in custom with sharpness in positive and negative NR-3 I rediscovered details that before the camera automatically took off trying to remove noise. The constant 2.8 was a surprise... it is bright outside from start to finish, and also creates a nice blur but you have to focus the subject for good because if not sometimes it makes a mess, I have always snapped in P, but lately I'm grating in a for certain scatt I and I see how I helping the camera gets all better. The 4k photo is very convenient, instead of shooting in burst, focuses initially and then you choose the shot you want to 8mpx (say a few but is worked with a different algorithm I would say because I do not know big differences from the classic shot indeed). The post focus in my case is useless, but someone will serve. The focus in the videos is definitely improved by my fz62, and the swivel display is really comfortable. I have to update the review saying that the raw is a whole other thing x luck, the JPEG of the fz300 above 200-400iso applies an automatic reduction by eating so many details, the raw instead has everything you need and with the software that from Panasonic, the Sylkipix come out Out JPEG's that are finally really good, and large double the ones on the camera almost:) and then forgot, I took the extra tele DMW-lt55 which has 1, 7x conversion and is really good, creates an unexpected blur thanks to 2.8!! I have to remember that this bridge remains a compromise, so it does not have the quality shot of a mirrorless or SLR with certain optics, but it can give you satisfaction cmq. sent on August 23, 2018 |
 | Panasonic FZ80 / FZ82 Pros: 60x Zoom by day incredible, with Intellizoom 120x (lunar photo with tripod not to be believed), possibility to shoot in manual, many scenes mode in automatic, WiFi. Cons: Obviously with this sensor you have to shoot at minimum ISO otherwise indoors the noise is very high. In The interior is almost a must flash. 4k Video.... that is Comodo only x get some shots in 4k photo mode. Opinion: I had x years the fz62 and this fz82 I find it improved albeit with its usual limits, I was undecided whether to take the fz300 used but we'll see if you try it. I tell the truth I use only the JPEG and with a bit of Photoshop with outdoor photos I have always found more than good. It's not made x go over the ISO 800. On the post focus... Boh I do not need for now. On the 4k photo is very comfortable x extrapolate beautiful photos to 8mpx from the videos, but I use it only x this reason (example the girl who plays in the sea water etc., so then I can see which frame to keep) but for video use only the Full HD. Very nice the time laps (I did from sunset to sunrise, superb) because you say, I do not have a 4k TV, but still a very good 47 "LG Full HD 400hz that I do not mean to change.... and so my TV does not read 4k videos... and not even the laptop because the videos go jerky or Little fluid with all the programs I've tried. The advice to anyone who uses it sporadically as in my case, with less than €300 (paid €268) you have a super zoom and many modes as scenes, I always use in P so I can set the max ISO that can use, but for those who intend to use it especially X photos inside know that will use the Flash 99% to get photos with little noise. sent on July 25, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
