|
| sent on 02 Ottobre 2018
Pros: 1-inch sensor, 4k photo (a gem of Panasonic), built-in Nd, yield to very good ISO up to 1600 (for sensor that clearly has)
Cons: It's not tropicalized like the fz300 I had, the price from new maybe (I feel €1000 excessive, I took it used in fact). F 2.8 Only at 24mm, already 25mm we are at F 3.0 and so on.... and you arrive soon to the F 4.5.... So soon.
Opinion: Let's start from the fact that I had only Lumix in the last 15 years, (fz38, fz45, fz62, fz82, fz300 and fz1000), and that I make an amateur use, holidays, birthdays and photos in the family. I have always liked to have a bridge to have a nice zoom to use when you need it and outdoor I have always taken care of with beautiful photos, instead of evening or indoors ahi... The high ISO and the small sensor never go along.... then the fz300 amazed me x its 2 .8 constant that in the videos is fantastic because you do not see the image darken while zooming, and it creates a beautiful blur in the compromise foto.il in the fz300 is in the resolution, there are those who say it does not matter etc.... but it is not true in the sense that the details count and 10.5 mpx Shooting in 3:2 did not allow me to have that quality I wanted (ok in Photoshop I gave all the sharpness I wanted, but artificial...). Well now we come to the fz2000, well what about is another category, first because it costs twice as much as a fz300... then why finally with the 1-inch sensor shot photos decidedly better than before, first with all Lumix prior to 400 ISO you saw immediately noise , but also at 200.... Therefore the obligation was to shoot at 80-100 ISO always. Now I was amazed that up to 1600 ISO I can shoot quietly, clearly depends on the situation and I never mold over at 40x60. The 3200 still retains details and colors so I would say the max X the Web or small prints, besides I would not go, but for me it's fine. It has a myriad of professional functions that I may never use, but those who search for it are all right. Why did I take a fz2000 then? To make a leap of quality not indifferent in the photos and videos, and then I flash DMW-fl360 and the Tele 1.7 x DMW-lt55 Panasonic (here I open a parenthesis, is not among the accessories of fz1000 and 2000 the Tele , but through a ring from 67mm to 55mm of metal and by a few euros the game is made!!!! ) and then I was undecided until the last if I take a fz1000 or fz2000, but the touch screen now is a must and the improvements of the zoom etc have made me choose this x next thousand years:) By default as I read about English reviews, the image was calibrated on the soft but setting it on the custom on contrast + 1 sharpness + 3 NR-2 and Saturation + 1, now it goes much better. 4k photo is very useful, it churn out the incredible 8mpx, I would never have been able to capture with a burst of photos of the genre, not to mention the focus in the 4k photo (I use the "s. S" i.e. start and stop, and this way is like a normal 4k video (so also has and the audio but it does not play the camera (instead with burst and pre does not save the audio eh!!!, but the PC or TV is:)) and this way you can see each single frame x choose which photo to save! I think it's a great thing, in the day it churn out the 8mpx full of details. I do not know if I explained myself but if one makes a 4k video certain that the audio there is also from the camera in play, but instead in mode 4k photo only saves the audio in S. s mode, but does not reproduce it, but if you watch it from the PC or other device there is) the autofocus is very good , the Panasonic DFD allows you to easily detach the subject from the background. I repeat has 1000 professional functions, and that I can not review but for the use that I do, the sensor 1-inch + Leica has changed me for the better photos! As a last thing the raw that is processed by the cameras allows you to modify many things (brightness, contrast, tone, balance white, shadows, intelligent resolution, noise reduction, sharpness etc.) so if the JPEG came out does not meet then from the camera You can make the raw to your liking. The only flaw is just this lens + soft than that of the fz1000, I had it for little but to today remains the fz1000 x the photos The best bridge, really really sharp. |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
