JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2015 to 2023 (discontinued). The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 324 €;

22 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.

Specifications
Focal lenght	15-45 mm
Angle of view	83.1 - 32.9° (equivalent to a 24-73mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	APS-C
Max. aperture	f/3.5-6.3
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	10 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.25 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.25x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	49 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	130 g
Dimensions	61 x 45 mm
Buy
Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Reg.77

sent on March 25, 2023

Pros: Everything for the ridiculously low price paid, was included with the camera body

Cons: None for its price

Opinion: What can I say, I have the series M 11-22, the 22, the 28 and the 55 200. This objective based on its cost, that is included in the price with the machine body has the best value for money... And it has a stabilizer... It has its limits but it is built really well compact a battle objective, I use it for example at the sea on holiday with the family when I take it to the beach ... In daylight it is always clear. Much better than the smartphone to give an idea

Mauryg11

sent on August 15, 2020

Pros: Essential optics in an M set

Cons: 15 mm distortion

Opinion: ... for 2 years with the body m6 Old, it had to remain the only native optics, since the aim was to flank the reflex system aps-h or be the alternative to a compact quality in "light" outputs - to date it joins 11/22 - 22 - 28 macro - Kamlan 1.1 - - - - the focal and'.... perfect x a generalist use, not luminous but consistent with the M philosophy that favors a modern construction and weight/footprint to a minimum - very useful unlocking (now does not bother me) and the stabilizer - unique mole, the distortion at 15 mm and the yield on detail (my specimen is not a "blade", in the sense that it does not reach the detail of 22 but not even 11/22, but it is not even as mediocre as many describe it) - tried in macro with extension tubes... amazed me with really decent results -- with a ridiculous cost and a minimal footprint of the set of pipes, further expands the range of use of this optics - note: I did not do specific tests but in macro I used closed diaphragms (and this would confirm the previous reviews on the criticality to TA) and the distortion is very marked compared to 11/22 (which however is the best non L wide angle in Canon) - ultimately: remained stationary x almost 2 years, gold if I have to go out light, stay mounted in the car side by side with the Kamlan f 1.1 and tubes...

ToMato

sent on July 04, 2020

Pros: Compactness, weight, colors, stabilization, focal equivalent to 24-70, cost.

Cons: None, bearing in mind the market share to which it is addressed. Maybe the ring of manual focus very narrow, but you get used to it.

Opinion: Taken in kit with the m50 I initially set it aside to make room for the Sigma 30mm F1.4 because I preferred its greater sharpness and brightness. In the meantime for the wider focal points I used on loan a 17-50 L f4 but when returning it, which unfortunately always comes, I had fond of the wide-angle side and so I reassembled it on the machine and automatically re-evaluated it (or maybe evaluated really for the first time). First of all, the weight, just over 100g (!) and the compactness, fit perfectly to the size of the m50 (unlike any fantastic lens of the L series). It seems to be going around with a compact when you actually have a 24 mp apsc and a 24-70 equivalent, and the real 24mm on apsc are not bad at all. To make street is perfect, the whole thing is in a pocket and you go virtually unnoticed while hanging it around your neck: I imposed the remote shot from the mobile phone and I shoot on the street pretending to be lobotomized from the phone, which is easy since I really am. On the sharpness has already been said all in the excellent review of Simone that precedes this, I could not say better. As for the colors the yield is excellent, right from Canon, and in this one looks a lot like the beautiful 22 and the 32 (but they are not stabilized and what you earn in the opening you lose it in time...). The Sigma achieves impressive sharpness but the colors are much cooler, there is no comparison in the slightest. It's amazing how goals affect the rendering of colors with the same body machine, I always wonder... As I wrote in the cons, it is clear that it is an economic kit objective but contextualizing it in the market segment to which it draws, newbies or little more, it is in my opinion an excellent object, small, light and with an optical yield more than dignified. I'll take a 16-35 L f4 is soon but I won't give it away anyway given the huge comfort that is unparalleled.

Simone O.

sent on July 15, 2019

Pros: Compact and light, pleasant to carry (cluttered little more than a pancake when it is pictured). Sharp in the middle, good sharpness at half-distance. Distortion reduced to all LF (amazing for such a small lens). AF very fast and usually accurate. 24 (25) mm equivalents available in a kit lens (rare fact!)

Cons: Severe decay of sharpness at the edges, whether used at full opening or just under. Important violet color aberration.

Opinion: Great lens kit, offers much more than it costs. As the days went by to try it on my M100, I thought about him again. At first I was crushed by the kneading of the edges, and I immediately thought to discard it. Over time, however, I realized its many merits. The edges are scarce at all LF (especially around 15 mm) but only at full opening or little more. Closed by about 1 stop becomes acceptable even at the edges, and almost excessively sharp in the center. To get a uniform image from the center to the periphery, you need to close more (but I must note that the Digital Goal Optimizer feature of the Canon DPP software does its dirty work in compensating for sharpness at the edges, great). On the edges of the objects there are strong violet bands in strong light situations, as is typical of all kit lenses, but the correction in the camera or in RAW is great, removes them entirely. The flaws end here! The construction is good although made of plastic (right the cap is big and low quality). The fact that it has to be stretched (unlocked) in order to use it even at 15 mm I do not see it as a defect, the movement takes only 1 second and you gain a lot in transportability. I was impressed by the reduced distortion at all focal lengths (which is always barrel and drops from 15 to 45 mm): by comparison the excellent Nikon 24-120 f4, for example, is horrible. I don't feel the need to fix it in software. In backlight situations I seem to resist well the flare, even without lampshade (optional). The AF is fast and reliable thanks to Canon's Dual Pixel mechanism, if it makes a mistake it does so little (it's not foolproof, but you can forgive it for this range of optics). The stabilizer is good, not impressive, for example by holding the car still you can shoot without the slightest move at 31 mm (eq. 50 mm) at 1/4", recovering 3.5 stops as stated in the datasheet (and this is a HUGE advantage in night photos or with little light , compared to the "best" 22 mm pancake not stabilized, which should be opened from f5.6 to f1.8 to shoot with the same ISO!). Finally, it should be noted that the equivalent LF of 24 mm (for comparison, it seems more like a 25 mm) is usually available only in pro or fixed lenses, so it is an honorable mention (the 15 mm should be used NOT at full opening). In conclusion, a kit lens with very interesting characteristics, and that even an experienced amateur like me is brought to maintain, instead of replacing it with a pair of fixed optics (as I did instead on the Olympus PEN for the 14-42mm II R, which at the same price does not hold comparison on nothing). Vote 9, since it is a good optics but practically given along with the machine body (otherwise I would give 8). I would be curious to try the older EF-M 18-55 to see if it is sharper at the edges, but from different reviews on the net I read that they are virtually identical, and at this point, although very dark from 35 to 45, I think to hold the 15-45. However, many American reviews have shown a wide variability in the performance of both obese kits (1/2 of "bad" copies and 1/2 of "good"); I was afraid at first that mine was "bad", but canon assistance does not seem to detect anomalies from the photos I sent them, and on the European market are not reported faulty copies (kit bought new in physical store).

Rafx24x

sent on November 25, 2018

Pros: As a lens in kits I would say very good, light and stabilized and especially closed a pelino is clear all right.

Cons: The X button unlocking it I find it uncomfortable but I'll get used to it, clearly dark but it is normal like many others.

Opinion: I want to break a spear on this lens that I took in the kit with the M50 (only body cost me more... why??), and that I left Incelopanato until last week as I had the 18-150, 22 and 50. Well on the 18-150 I never had much feeling but for the little sharpness that from. Well I was astounded when I did the same photos, at 18mm (F/4) and at 35 (f/5.6) and at 45mm (F. 8) and what about the 15-45 is a lot sharper than the 18-150, it is clear that it should be closed a bit but also the 18-150, but at the same focal and aperture there is no comparison , and think that I tried to sell it on 15-45 and in a month I have not sold... well I have made many tests, and I sold the 18-150 in 2 days, OK I no longer have a mini tele, but at Max when I need the 55-200 is always at very little , but x the photos I do lately I do not need. I do not talk about construction etc, but only of sharpness, the 22mm f/2 is sharper clearly but not stabilized, with the 15-45 shooting at 1/8 second and is perfect... with the 22.... Well...... let it be... as a kit lens I think it's really good. Now I'm aiming the Canon 17-55 F/2.8 and the Tamron 35mm F/1.8VC, then I'll reevaluate the whole thing.

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Landscapes of the Marche

by Fragarbo
130 comments, 6890 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Saring light in Montefeltro

by Fragarbo
111 comments, 5538 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Magical sunset at old Pieve

by Fragarbo
86 comments, 3832 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Last rays in Fermignano..........

by Fragarbo
76 comments, 6176 views

HI RES 4.1 MP

Chiara's first three thousand

by Gast1
62 comments, 5645 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

Marche landscape....

by Fragarbo
67 comments, 2914 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sunsets of Montefeltro

by Fragarbo
70 comments, 2921 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Kaleidoscope

by Coradocon
136 comments, 4489 views

HI RES 20.3 MP

Dunes

by Gast1
55 comments, 3477 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Autumn

by Coradocon
102 comments, 2862 views

HI RES 8.0 MP

A sunset in my own way

by Coradocon
104 comments, 1898 views

HI RES 21.0 MP

Autumn coming soon

by Axel72
62 comments, 5311 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Autumn Red...

by Fragarbo
46 comments, 909 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The fog in the bridge - Fermignano

by Fragarbo
91 comments, 2832 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The snow and the Fermignano waterfall

by Fragarbo
59 comments, 2116 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Montefeltresco Landscape.........

by Fragarbo
47 comments, 1050 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Impressionism

by Coradocon
125 comments, 3093 views

HI RES 19.5 MP

My Square

by Coradocon
130 comments, 2138 views

HI RES 17.5 MP

Sunset in white....

by Fragarbo
42 comments, 1723 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Montefeltro Sunset

by Fragarbo
45 comments, 1565 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The rolling hills of the Marche...

by Fragarbo
39 comments, 1119 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Fermignano, sunset of 13/02/2021

by Fragarbo
46 comments, 1524 views

White desert

by Gast1
47 comments, 973 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

A day at the seaside!

by Coradocon
87 comments, 3571 views

HI RES 22.4 MP

You jump first.

by Vincenzo Sciumè
24 comments, 3130 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Above cotton

by Gast1
30 comments, 2380 views

HI RES 5.2 MP

The colors of winter

by Coradocon
75 comments, 1375 views

HI RES 18.8 MP

White tips at Mount Catria

by Fragarbo
40 comments, 1787 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Walking in the snow.....

by Fragarbo
46 comments, 1697 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Reflection with the mute goose

by Fragarbo
46 comments, 1758 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

A small poplar

by Coradocon
98 comments, 1552 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

The color of what life should look like

by Federico_28
63 comments, 1643 views

HI RES 16.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Vernal Sasso

by Gast1
36 comments, 1976 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Grain pops up while and the mountains are white

by Fragarbo
37 comments, 993 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Admiring the end of a day....

by Fragarbo
48 comments, 1010 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

In yellow

by Coradocon
70 comments, 1355 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

A sunrise in Lomellina

by Coradocon
92 comments, 1029 views

HI RES 21.7 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM