JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 179000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Construction quality, minimum focus distance, stabilization, sharpness, color rendering.
Cons:For me, no one.
Opinion:I think it is the perfect lens for the country, for which a high depth of field is required and there is no need for focused openings. Top build quality, solid and tropicalized, even better than the Oly 12-40: it's really a pleasure to handle it. Sharp already at full opening, it has the ability to bring out the colors, and then it is tropicalized. The stabilization combined in combo with that of the OMD-M1 II leaves me speechless, allowed me freehand shots with a recovery of up to 8 stops. I find it very funny, it has a really small focus distance, which allows "macro" shots, and a focal length that allows portraits with a good blur in the background. heavy? I would say no, since with this zoom you can leave everyone else at home, and also the tripod considering the excellent stabilization ... do you.
Cons:It's an f4 but I don't see it as a real con since even 2.8 zooms often have to be closed to this diaphragm.
Opinion:I love it, the real everything do quality. I also have the 14-150II but there is an abyss for the final quality, and giving up those 100mm extra equivalentis is worth the candle. Weight and footprint are not a problem with the m1 II, with the m5 II or the younger sisters the weight is unbalanced forward and makes the shot uncomfortable. For those who take photos of landscapes is a boon double stabilization. For the interior f4 can go well knowing to expose properly and you can safely pull the shot under exposing by 1 stop and then recover it in post reducing the shooting time without exaggerating with the iso. I recommend it, if you then pair the Sigma 56 1.8 as a fixed for portraits and a 17 1.8 for darker interiors also travel light and ready for anything.
Opinion:I was very hesitant about the weight and size important to the mft system. Once I tried it on the field I was thrilled. The versatility of a wide focal extension is added the ability to make incredible closeups with incredible sharpness, very beautiful colors. In my opinion it lacks a bit of microcontrast but it resolves to pp. Ephestation to f4 towards the longer focals makes it better at f5.6. On my recent trip I never regretted the pair lumix 12-35 f2.8th 35-100 f2.8. If weight and footprint are not an insurmountable obstacle this lens is practically perfect. I'm recommended.
Pros:Versatility, stabilization, image quality and construction, tropicalization
Cons:Vignetting at 12 mm
Opinion:All-purpose lens of extraordinary build quality. For the trip is unbeatable, I pair it to 8 mm 3.5, 17 mm 1.8 and 45 mm 1.8. Excellent image quality even at full aperture, vignetting at 12 mm, very impressive stabilization. Surely the weight is felt on the micro 4/3 bodies but on the WCO em1 is well balanced
Opinion:I'm an amateur, so my needs are pretty limited. I needed a fast, portable machine that did not give too much in the eye and at the same time ensured a high quality; For this I switched to the MFT, buying an Olympus OM D1 MII, Equipped with the 12-100, taken as a lens all to do. Tested at Carnival I was thrilled with the quality of the images and the overall color rendition. That Said I realized that the extensible part of the zoom has a slight game. I contacted Olympus and was told that it is normal, having the lens to endure any climatic changes, even critical. But who has this optic has encountered the same problem? Or if it is not a problem, feature? Thanks for any answers, Hello Old (John)
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
