JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro is a superzoom lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (Stepper Motor), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1043 €;
36 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 186000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:That's the best! Materials, tropicalization, stabilization, distance and speed of focus, size, sharpness, constant f 4 light,
Cons:Nobody!
Opinion:L I used with a m 10 mark ii, which I wanted to sell, since I tried this I totally changed my mind. A fantastic lens, versatile and sturdy, sharp, with a long hike and precise fast focus! Sharpness from 12 to 100 mm. Good bokeh. Perfect x who wants to travel and x who wants to have a lens all do of excellent quality! I recommend it to anyone who has a 4 m 3 car.
Opinion:I had the 12th 40s 2.8 I wanted to try this fantastic goal, as yield I have to say that we are there ,maybe the 12th 40s at the maximum opening in the edges , which does not make the 12th 100 f4. It is true that you lose a diaphragm and that weighs more, but little, in my opinion is a wonderful all-rounder. Using it with double stabilization which I have can't do nice stuff with slow times. In conclusion I recommend it to those who want to go long excursions and not have to always change optics , if you own the 12th 40 2.8 it is difficult to decide to give it for the 12th 100 I keep them both are pro optics, but I have to choose to monetize. I chose to keep the 12th 100, for the above reasons. I'll finish, for now I need the 12th 100 then maybe more ' the' I'd match a light optic type 17mm f1.2 pro. In conclusion I tried to take a few photos with an em10/3 not really suitable because it is small, but I have to say that I really like this optics. I found that dual stabilization is possible with the EM10/3 just turn on both the optical button and in the car . You can make unthinkable shots with times that even with easel I could not do? joke but it's great , I arrived almost a second freehand.
Pros:Construction quality, minimum focus distance, stabilization, sharpness, color rendering.
Cons:For me, no one.
Opinion:I think it is the perfect lens for the country, for which a high depth of field is required and there is no need for focused openings. Top build quality, solid and tropicalized, even better than the Oly 12-40: it's really a pleasure to handle it. Sharp already at full opening, it has the ability to bring out the colors, and then it is tropicalized. The stabilization combined in combo with that of the OMD-M1 II leaves me speechless, allowed me freehand shots with a recovery of up to 8 stops. I find it very funny, it has a really small focus distance, which allows "macro" shots, and a focal length that allows portraits with a good blur in the background. heavy? I would say no, since with this zoom you can leave everyone else at home, and also the tripod considering the excellent stabilization ... do you.
Cons:It's an f4 but I don't see it as a real con since even 2.8 zooms often have to be closed to this diaphragm.
Opinion:I love it, the real everything do quality. I also have the 14-150II but there is an abyss for the final quality, and giving up those 100mm extra equivalentis is worth the candle. Weight and footprint are not a problem with the m1 II, with the m5 II or the younger sisters the weight is unbalanced forward and makes the shot uncomfortable. For those who take photos of landscapes is a boon double stabilization. For the interior f4 can go well knowing to expose properly and you can safely pull the shot under exposing by 1 stop and then recover it in post reducing the shooting time without exaggerating with the iso. I recommend it, if you then pair the Sigma 56 1.8 as a fixed for portraits and a 17 1.8 for darker interiors also travel light and ready for anything.
Opinion:I was very hesitant about the weight and size important to the mft system. Once I tried it on the field I was thrilled. The versatility of a wide focal extension is added the ability to make incredible closeups with incredible sharpness, very beautiful colors. In my opinion it lacks a bit of microcontrast but it resolves to pp. Ephestation to f4 towards the longer focals makes it better at f5.6. On my recent trip I never regretted the pair lumix 12-35 f2.8th 35-100 f2.8. If weight and footprint are not an insurmountable obstacle this lens is practically perfect. I'm recommended.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
