|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ulysseita www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ulysseita  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Voigtlander Apo-Lanthar 50mm f/2 Aspherical Pros: All Cons: I don't know. Opinion: Perfection. I use it on the M10r, and I've tested it from family portraits to photos with polar temperatures at night to landscapes. Unattainable (only the 8k monster comes close to it sold by Leica but the mtf and age put it a little behind; the new GM for Sony 1.4 beats it in the center but not at the edges), no AC, excellent starry, blurred free of aberrations and very clean, bright color transmission, small and sharp from f2 onwards in the same way. Super flat fire plane and it shows in the landscapes. Thanks to the already TA rendering, it allows with bigmpx resolutions and microcontrast that do not suffer from evident diffraction, making the photos look like they came out of higher formats. Together with the 28, 21, 35 and 90 it fills the family of Voigtlander's excellent lenses. sent on January 15, 2024 |
 | Voigtlander E 21mm f/1.4 Nokton Pros: Sharpness, build quality, starry, ac, microcontrast, brightness. Cons: Weight in the M version, not quite known and few will love it Opinion: Taken for a super offer in the grey market for my Leica in mount version M. Stratospheric lens, probably the best 21mm for any mount on 35mm format. It has an embarrassing resolution and already at f2 it manages to make perfect images without any AC from edge to edge and with remarkable stars. It manages to detach at 1.4 with a medium format effect for the reduced pdc and if compared with sacred monsters of both Leica and Zeiss it excels for optical quality (super elmar, distagon in Loxia and Milvus) The biggest flaw is the weight and gargantuan dimensions for the M system (as big as a Noctilux). Update after a few months. It's the best glass I've ever used; I have never seen a similar performance from TA onwards except in specialized lenses with much longer focal lengths (such as the 105 art to be clear). sent on January 15, 2024 |
 | Leica M10-R Pros: Image rendering, construction quality, highlights recovery, viewfinder, long exposures up to 16min, resolution, grain, value hold, very soft and silent shutter. Cons: Cost, possibility of "sensor bifurcation" on some specimens, bad electronic viewfinder 020, cost of batteries. Opinion: Bought at a great price also considering the possibility of testing the files so as to eliminate the variability of sesnori that Leica unfortunately has not controlled in the m10r and m10m (and m11). Tested and almost absent the problem I began to enjoy it on a broad spectrum. Unfortunately it is the obligatory body if you are psychological slaves of the spectacular Lenses Leica M, Voigt M, Zeiss zM. Yes, those lenses go divinely and with some of those glasses, the APO or the precious slightly closed we are close to the yields of higher formats. Needless to talk about the advantages of the rangefinder and the body itself, if you want you know why. Here compared to the sister m10 you have resolution, recoveries in spades, soft shutter and touch screen. Compared to the m240 you have a much slimmer body, excellent viewfinder and a much more functional menu system with obvious advantages of resolution and recoveries. Compared to the m9.. well... it's like comparing an m3 of 1985 against one of 2020... neither more nor less even if it must be said that at ISO base if you do not print in large sizes or look at 100% monitors there is not this great detachment. For? those above, and I repeat.. ONLY solution if we exclude the new m11 to have serious resolution to squeeze the exceptional lenses that you can mount here and that only make the most here. Compared to the m11 we have the latest version with removable caseback, sensor that is not always exposed, which still maintains an advantage in mechanical shooting in speed and silence. Against? ridiculous or too expensive evf viewfinder in the version for M11.. battery cost (140 pounds for a Leica rebranded VARTA, we are ridiculous even considering the bad capacity and the competition), possibility of the electronic problem of the bifurcation of the sensor that divides the frame with a line from top to half as soon as the contrast with clear skies moves in some specimens, not really a serious CQ ... Sublime body, seriously. Using it makes you smile and is addictive. sent on August 21, 2022 |
 | Voigtlander VM 28 mm f/2.0 Ultron II Pros: Compactness, sharpness already at TA, detachment, flare resistance, aberrations, starry. Cons: Optional hood,sometimes blurred hard.vignetting,not having it, Opinion: This is a gem. Taken on confidence following the indications of the major forums at its exit, I gave in the mister POP 25 zm of Zeiss to have the framing on the rangefinder and the extra half stop and also a new lens since the 25 had a lopsided side. Frightful. Rendered against the light like the emblazoned Zeiss with T treatment, similar starry, halved dimensions, instant MAF with very short stroke and embarrassing sharpness even with M10r from side to side already at TA. He is considered an APO seed for his resistance to chromatic aberrations already halfway through the closing stop and offers a blurry at times angry in comparison with his colleague Cosina. The vignetting is also present for the Lilliputian dimensions but it never bothers me. Probably, removed the DIO Leica 1.4, the best 28 currently available on the market being able to from various tests conducted a little everywhere excel even on the Summicron Leica f2 where it "loses" only in the vignetting. If you like the focal length there is no reason to avoid it, other focal lengths do not have such obvious and clear samples offering valid alternatives for different palates; here is so, do you want a 28 f2 M? Do you want an excellent 28 without taking into account DIO 28 Lux for costs, dimensions, commitment? Just buy this one. PS. on Sony it smarmella at the edges up f8 (on M a TA it goes better than f8 on Sony) and the blur is almost always hard. sent on July 01, 2022 |
 | Samyang AF 85mm f/1.4 FE/RF Pros: Sharpness, AC, price, AF. Cons: Yellow dominant. Opinion: Specialized lenses, those that are rarely used unless you work in the field of expertise. Well, an 85 1.4 is a specialized lens and this is better than you can expect for anyone not specialized in the field of use, or wedding, portraiture. Even in that field we are on very high levels. I come from a 105 1.4 sold because ' precisely, it's fine the sharpness and brightness' , but carrying a large 105mm when a super tele 500mm precisely a specialty' not mine did not make sense. Never regret the gearbox, where the Samyang plays the part of the compact, always performing, for yield and autofocus. It often surprises me for the detachment, for the quality of the blurred and the absence of aberrations; probably the GM has that little extra in the blurred where he excels. EXCELLENT. sent on May 26, 2022 |
 | Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Pros: Compactness, yield at 500, cost in the grey market, construction, AF, general sharpness. Cons: Weight (but it's a supertele... there is), does not multiply. Opinion: I needed a supertele that I would carry around... and in the market they only make 2 , the Canon 100 500 and this. The others are huge in comparison or the 100 400 DO NOT GO like this if you exclude the Sony that costs almost 3 times... It impressed me positively, I expected sharp but not so "clean". No AC, in the landscape if the sky is clear it is embarrassing already at TA at 500mm on 42mpx. Pesa yes, but it's already fine on the slow a7r3 as AF and I dare not imagine on A9ii or A1 ... it does not multiply but chissene, for that there is the white and long brother of Sony. The thing that shocked me is to see that in fact it is a fixed 500 that drops to 150mm with the yield at TA better at 500 than at 150 ... Tamron is doing REALLY, REALLY GREAT stuff. ps taken in GREY FROM THE UK at £850 with 3 years warranty. sent on May 16, 2022 |
 | Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD Pros: Embarrassing esccursion, yield on bigmpx, relatively high brightness, size, cost. Cons: Isn't it 1.2? a few too many AC that you remove easy, does not have the starry of the best Voigtlander or legendary Canon. Opinion: A lens that in my experience enhances the Sony E system (Tamron has at least 4 that make it unique). For months I doubted the pace but in the end I did it and I am very happy; mindful of the superzoom of the previous generation but also of the various 24 105 that have always been quite painful even if closed, I thought I would find yet another plastic. But here there is something different, this is a plastic made for 61mpx that does not start from 24 but from 28 and that difference is worth a world, for the better for the compromises avoided on the quality side. Yes, it solves 61 mpx and on 42 it is embarrassing for how it goes as soon as you close a stop; if you shoot trees, woods and foliage it makes an impression for how much crisp stuff you get on the frame. Use fixed of value and among those closed and this does not change the sharpness, but the lack of AC and the resistance flare .. STOP. Fast Af, excellent eye focus, tropicalized, light, sharp more than any other wish and so much so that it is worth a kit together with a bright / wide fixed ... Believe me... makes you smile after years looking for the fixed that solves the big mpx ... being in your hand a zoom, a superzoom... so resolving. sent on May 16, 2022 |
 | Leica Elmarit-M 90mm f/2.8 Pros: Compactness, construction, sharpness, detachment, separation of fire planes, built-in hood. Cons: Don't have it, flare resistance. Opinion: Taken very obvious with a few lines in the barrel but optically perfect. Superb lens both on Sony where it works very well with techart and on M where it still has that small margin on the quality of the soft fire. On Sony it is able if bigmpx will replace a 135 by cropping and maintaining an exemplary sharpness with laughable dimensions. On Leica m it is sometimes difficult to focus but the detachment of the subjects at medium distance seems to be higher than the opening seen on the barrel, probably it is true what you read around about the fact that it is the last of the pre asph at 90m. for ... magic. Sharp from 2.8 and excelling at F4 even on 42mpx. Beautiful also the starry f from 4 onwards, the only problem is the flare resistance that if it is composed with the front sun invades part of the frame. sent on December 20, 2021 |
 | Leica M9 / M9-P Pros: Ease of use, beauty, m glass yield, user experience, construction, grain quality Cons: display, (machissene), slowness, addictive Opinion: I have been prevaricating for years, I have lost years of guduria because I read on the forums of the negatives such as iso rendering, seniority of the project, display, slowness etc. well... I'm not interested in making birds, sports or anything like that. I'm not interested in shooting in the dark at night without tripod. I have a Big Mpx Sony ff with its lenses... I don't need to cover all genres. Grip, put in hand and at the shot seems to blow despite the noise, it is brass and feels, how stabilizes the shutter and DOES NOT close the vision not being the eye where the curtain goes down... you seem to be looking at the scene that shoots, ready and operational by looking much more and predicting what happens if you follow certain situations or if you want to compose differently. The manual maf, you learn immediately and, I am serious, I do not get more than 2 or 3 for every 100 shooting with a 40 1.2... Technological limitations I don't see.. indeed if I place some photos on highly rated forums abroad I receive as a comment that "the M9 still splits" or highly rated characters who after taking it, want to try it and declare "I have M9, M10R and A7R IV but keep reaching for the former! There is something about its files and camera simplicity that speaks to me. All capable of great images." It is not clear if it is the ccd, the type of ccd, or what else.. but despite having 10 years of serious digital behind me, I always prefer these images to everything else up to 800 iso.. and very often at 2500 ISO GODO for the random grain typical of ccd. ONLY what comes out of the Merrill does differently and makes you enjoy the same but we know the other limits. Optical chapter? A 28mm like the Voigtlander ultron mkii at TA smashes even at equal quality mpx (m10r) against a closed 24gm on Sony.. What do you mean? That this medium is also the richest platform in my opinion to enjoy the best lenses ever made, whether they are Leica or Cosina... the blurry quality for the very thin sensor stack and microleaches is embarrassing. If I mount a biogon I have a 3d side rendering that I dream of anywhere else. I mean, needless to say. I just regret having hesitated so much and today I am much happier with a revised M9 than I would have been of an m240 or m10.... precisely because if I look at those numbers that the new ones improve, I would be wrong having something else like Sony by my side. sent on July 02, 2021 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, blurry, micro-contrast,colors, AF (FE x sony), CA control exaggerated Cons: Clutter, blurred hardness away from TA., af with little uncertain light. Opinion: Taken and returned to base. EXASURED lens, not for weight since we are not girls, but for gargantuan clutter that require special bags and often to leave other glass at home. The collar comes to the aid to handle it compared to the little brothers 135 and 85. Last-generation sigma sharpness (40.35 1.2, 28) that has , not only low and medium frequencies but an exaggerated impact even in high ones. Never tried a sharper lens and in fact at 1.4, on the edges you have more sharpness here than at 2.8 on a normal 70 200 in the center. This sharpness, ideal for those who are especially looking for this in a modern portrait with a model with perfect and blurry iris almost out of the world, collides with the quality of the bokeh: at 1.4 everything disappears even in a messed-up room, but as soon as you close a moment, maybe to have two eyes in focus if you do not have the look in axis, here comes a set of details and contrast from the same blurring that appears heavy and blurred. Af in the FE version that I tried very responsive and almost a safety except that the speed is not high for large optical groups. When you have this glass for your hands, objectively comes to think. is it worth having these clutter for all this macro detail on such a small level of fire? That's why I came back. The sure thing is optical perfection in TA... almost unforgettable and probably, even just to enjoy the click 100% I will miss knowing that anything in focus from my 42 mpx was NITIDA as on a medium format. detail not strained but almost sharp and soft at the same time. Here's my comparison test with the 100 canon. https://giuseppetorre.co.uk/2020/02/28/100mm-comparison-sigma-art-vs-canon/ Absurd Lens, but almost like having a Pagani Huayra and walking in ztl... unless you always have in your hand portrait sessions with VIP , and then it also makes as a business card the clutter and the ability to work with absurd details even in the dark thanks to the 1.4 and the endless possibility of crop on bigmpx. Only big doubt. in marriage and reportage with little light the Af has some hesitation too long to medium-short distances. sent on March 05, 2020 |
 | Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 Pros: weight, clutter, color yield, microcontrast, sharpness to the awkward center, rendered to open diaphragms. Cons: field curvature, non-homogeneous rendering at the edges, exaggerated impact of diffraction. Opinion: Extreme lens... I would recommend to those looking for a high-performance wide to go on Tamron or the canon adapted if they want to use filters. or directly on 16 35 2.8 sony/12 24. I took it to have the top even at the edges and alternative solutions , the wider they start to have big compromises. let's say 18 is the last call to have an excellent frame on large pixels like a7r3 or a7r4. Over.. you go down! This glass is bought for minimal dimensions as a complementary lens to a 24 70/24 105... and its use destination is not the landscape but the reportage where it giants on any competitor on Full frame... In the center, just see the mtf of Cicala (lensrental) to see that if you use it with a big mpx in fact you can use crop that make the lens an 18/24 quality. embarrassing sharpness and quality of contrast, there is no better than already said. Problems arise at the edges, not for lack of quality but for a curvature of the field that if you use glass for landscapes requires fire on the edges to have an all-sharp frame. Another unfavorable point even if it arises from a huge pro is the yield to TA and up to 5.6 with sensors without resolute AA filter... IMPRESSIONANTE as in the minimum diffraction zones come out minimal details, subtle but perfectly reproduced not as do other glass (sigma on all) super-contrasted and almost passed by the black marker. but drawn with a pencil even 100% thin. all this disappears violently passed f8 and begins a veil, confroting the major openings, all over the frame (diffraction). Average and stable flare resistance lower than Canon competitors (15 35 f4 outstanding. 16 35 iii 2.8 INCREDIBILE) against which I tried the glass and against which everyone knelt out of respect :D Once you buy it you can say... 18 are settled. I can avoid thinking about it for life! :D Excellent lens that must be tamed and that you have to know how to use especially in the pesteristic ... sent on January 11, 2020 |
 | Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton Pros: Unique lens. Sharpness, colors, detachment, construction, compactness, price quality, multifacetedness. Cons: Some variables in the E mount specimens. Opinion: I come from years of Canon with 35L and 50 1.2 deputies to magic in comparable focal points, I have gone from 50 art and other valuable manuals. This wipes everyone out. Superb sharpness at 1.2 in the center, rendered on all the excellent diaphragm from 2.8 onwards. Basically you have a lens that at 1.2 or 1.4 has the MAGIC button but not clouded like some of its peers (nokton 1.1, canon 1.2 , nocti 1.1), but ringing. Soft fire passages with a modern rendering on colors and sharpness with small defects released specifically to inactivate the tired user of perfect lenses such as the various ART or OTUS. There is and is remarkable the phenomenon of the annihilation of the central blurring at 1.2 and also 1.4. means that despite being 40mm, at 1.2 if there is a wall or detail behind the subject even just half a meter, at the end the wall seems further away. I could choose between version E or with mount Vm... I chose the Leica version, probably a lower wire of the E but only at the edges for the different stack. but it suffers from great variability among the specimens and is considerably larger and heavier. I use it with the techart pro with latest firmware on sony a7r3.. Perfect AF in afc.... with af... I CAN'T GET IT OFF. here some sample: https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=3196774 https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=3186467 I'm honest, if you don't want to get sick so much that you can't go back with huge glass and flat... don't look! Ps.. 40mm is ideal to trade off between 35 and 50. you do everything and really, probably with this glass you could only use a lens 90% of the time. sent on May 29, 2019 |
 | Voigtlander VM Nokton 40mm f/1.4 SC Pros: Weight, personality, micro-contrast when standing on 2.8, off-plan even if closed. 1 or 2 stops, cost, versatility, size. Cons: Build quality, edges up to 2.8, blurred quality for some looking softness. Opinion: Taken to really.. 2 lire.. Before I blasphed for a ridiculous rendition on my a7r3.. It went from mighty to crappy on very simple shots. Then I.. Got the Voigtlander adapter.. Close up and.. Screwed in front and rear lens (if I was moving I felt TAC TAC). He's been a surgeon ever since. A. 1.4 is soft. At 1.6 The center becomes good and the edges seem less nervous. At 2.8 it becomes sharp and very micro-contrasty in the center maintaining a remarkable detachment at medium distance... Uqasi good edges on 42mpx se to infinity. At F4 it pulls off almost like 2.8.. And it's sharp. Much and 3d. At 5.6 It becomes an infinity blade. A F8 on tripod at night moves for surrender and Stellati. I'm just saying I had the 50 art.. Excelled. But flat. Obviously it went 2 times better but in the portraits at 2.8 this detached and so much more. I sold the 50 art for the surrender of this united to the weight.. And I wait for the TechArt... Focal length from 40 mm that if you get used to it is over.. That little shorter than 50 for reportage.. That little bit longer than 35 to make less deformed portraits.. Recommended and remember.. To be used only on Leica and Sony with BSI that have no problems at the edges. sent on May 01, 2019 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, price, yield to TA Cons: Weight, AF variability in Canon pre 5diii. Opinion: Taken to use it on the 5ds, once calibrated with the dock I am a sniper. Frightening the difference with any other bright 50mm tried before at TA.. You can put the subject in focus in an extreme corner having it clear and without aberrations. The perfect lens if one wants to use in toto the large opening, also for particular landscaping as well as uncommon compositions. For the rest.. I use it now with Sony and Mc11.. And the eye AF runs fast and accurately. From F2 onwards it is stratospheric for sharpness, a reference. Bought used for less than 400 cards, I would say for the FF is a mandatory glass to have if you love the 50mm focal. Against? Weight.. But if you want these optical qualities the cons must be put in the count. sent on December 08, 2018 |
 | Canon 5Ds Pros: Robustness, controls, compatibility with Canon home lenses, AF, exposure meter, file rendering if well exposed, silent and silent shutter. Cons: Huge files, slower than new machine guns, af to calibrate for good, micromoney lurking, safety times to keep at 50mpx. Opinion: What if it is used without taking care of the intrinsic weight of data behind each photo it is likely to throw it out of the hill and return to the markings because it is lighter and more similar. RnrnIt is used to today, mid November 2017, in Canon and in some respects throughout the market, there are no rivals on the 24x35 format. The well-exposed file returns impressive details and, in this version with the filter, I personally find a better thread about it microdetails that require more sharpening but never become almost as excessive as those of 5dsr; I obviously look at 100 or 200% of the file.rnPermette crop INDICABLE, sharpen the lenses as if they were sponges, but at the same time, the sharpest ones can make the final click out. rnThe 5dmkiii has a silent shutter, a better metering meter, a self-worthy self-worthy, and if you open the shadows you will never see banding; we are at the 6d but on 50mpx! rnspect the 5dmkiv? rnLent, a lower af for avifauna (i would say more for the limitation of f8 solor on the board more than anything else), but a file that slaps unresponsively with the newest sister, however, allows more exaggerated recoveries and is accompanied by a lesser Canon contrast contrast. Mostly taken under the 3200 iso not there are currently other Canon cameras you might want.rnrn Thanks to me I converted to Capture One that allows me to edit without waiting for so long at every zoom as happens with adobe; the file is clearly more alive.rnrnOcchio to the micromosus from snap without care and .. if the iso go up, just go to mraw (28mpx) or sraw (12mpx) and it also gets serene even at 12800 iso.rnrnThe main body that, anyone I know between 5ds and 5dsr, has elected primary even having the newest or the most expensive ones in your house, in your opinion, why? sent on November 14, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: practicality, construction, af speed, brightness, sharpness to ta Cons: stellate af closed, flare possibilities Opinion: Juice in two weeks after the purchase of a test system m43 pro..rnrnho always hated light standard zoom on both aps that of ff .. huge, heavy and if used professionally in my view be replaced by two bodies with two fixed lenses performance superiori.rnrnin this system rather think they have found the panacea nell'usarne one .. big so relative to the average size of m43 .. but always combined mini..rnQuel 2.8 to 5 axes stab scares and allows sharp pictures from side to side even at night-time unthinkable to 40mm..rnDirei an ideal lens trip that if it came out a fixed wide worthy, would be ideal on the stock exchange with 40 150 2.8 and possible fixed uwa to photograph everything well ovunque.rnrnavendo this i do not see the sense to try a fixed in the same range having no ambition to greater openness in the mini system i'm componendo.rnrnDa avere..rnpreferito to 12,100 that with the stop and the weight lost interest and lost the two big points favor of this lente.rnrnunici defects .. Starry af closed in LExp .. 7 14 2.8 does much better ... and a good propensity to flare. sent on March 09, 2017 |
 | Sigma DP1 Merrill Pros: Compactness, quality 'extreme image, black and white at the top today. Cons: difficulty 'to use for novices but also those who practice for years photography, high / iso average yield, slowness, difficulty' raw development, to ta slow performance, battery autonomy. Opinion: Let's start off by saying .. with a battery up to 100 photos and 'fortuna.rnrnFare a photo well exposed, and' from operating professionisti.rnrnLentezza also to write a single file .. 5 7 secondi.rnrnlente not at the top as dp2 sister never sell '.. and so the edges do not excellent as the center except by f4 in poi.rnrnA aside .. and the obvious use to max iSO 640, and' like having an average inca..ta formed in the black box ready to be scary if properly used and will seem 'not bad online publishing photos at full resolution or not print them in maximum size .. we talk about quality' extreme even crop as 300 or 400% .. things that current ff you dream excluded some but never above the maximum pari.rnrnBianco and black .. well what to say, tHE bLACK aND wHITE ammenicoli no filters or other various things, just as it does the leica M but with ossibility 'to choose which filter layer use. .rnrnPost .. well enjoy the online guides' cause NEED to have the famous file! rnrnSiete ready to fight for photos, when they can, stratospheric? comprateveone of them, IF YOU FIND! : Drnrn rn sent on February 28, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: unique, maf surgical .. color blur .. .. .. 3d up 2.8 build quality. Cons: between 8 years no more canon assistance. Opinion: I come from 35 art .. crisp, beautiful but with a maf always approximate, when I remember the feeling I experienced seeing a photographer at a wedding abroad using 35l..rnuna lens that creates paintings, paintings with 3D on the subject from the magnificent colors .rnrnal that i try and i always immaculate with mounted filters and focus ring consumed at the same price fel sigma nuovo.rnrnla take it, change the tire .. and now is when the uso..che when the riding school that when i look at the files in monitor .. the grin on my face is huge ..rnrnUnica.rnrnda 1.4 to 1.8 you are dreaming sometimes with exuberant sharpness to centro..piu brother 50l.rnrnda 2 to 2.8 sharpness becomes blade throughout the frame while maintaining the pop up extreme of the subject with the background still disconnected esageratente.rnrnda 3.2 onwards .. as a 35 rasoio.rnrncolori top .. really unreachable except by going on German giants to find the same character and the same quality in a single lens . sent on February 18, 2017 |
 | Sony RX100 Pros: Compactness, speed 'operational, quality' images, personalization. Cons: brightness' in the tele side Opinion: A little beast, which allows you to always have with you a quality 'elevata.rnIn good hands leaves walk amateur reflex and optical behind, his B are magnificent if well handled, very good combination 1.8 to 28 mm with the yield at average iso..rnPurtroppo when night falls the lens on the side canvases and 'too buia.rnOttimo the flash with your finger becomes bounch.rnComprata to EUR 200 used, THANK sony to release an update a year so' to bring down so ' so the price of this gem UNICO.rnrnOnestamente one could travel the world and take with you only if you had no ambition to be the end for anyone art.rnIdeale always want with it a quality 'high pocket, really from pOCKET. sent on December 28, 2016 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Small, well-made, precise, economical Cons: no vertical shot. Opinion: Bought Black Friday really little, I did not imagine it was so 'well-made and solid with such a' good head for class prezzo.rnViaggia always with me if I bring a little as RX100 or sigma Merrill .. and has always done his work in a manner also egregia.rnProvato with 6d + 16 35 .. and ... REGGE.rnrnUnico precisely .. but basically there and 'a true fact, it would be great to tiltare head for vertical compositions. sent on December 28, 2016 |
 | Yashica ML 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Weight, size, optical quality, color, three-dimensional. Cons: Use full manual Opinion: Lens excellent .. used x years of nex and 50d now use with pleasure in your spare time with 1ds mkii, 1ds MKIII and 6d and 5d..rnSaldata almost on 5d, ride with this lightweight and 100f2 doing everything and enjoying the quality (all with slide for the focus mounted) .rnrnColori sharpness to the top, I do not love the stars ... but I can not ask for more for the pleasure it gives me in its use .. ALWAYS preferred to the various 35 f2 that I had on hand ... rnrnQua below you will find a picture of me with THE 1ds on the old bridge, and you'll understand what I mean by .. MAGNIFICENT! sent on December 02, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: sharpness, color, bokeh, light weight, price. Cons: only 1.8? : D Opinion: a lens avere.rnrnPer me, always around with fixed 24-50-100 with puntatine sometimes to 14mm and 200mm ... is essential to have a good 50, small and little ingombrante.rnrnCanon heard me, af finally all 'height, construction and ... ditto sharpness and color really good in line with its latest uscite.rnHo also did some testing at parity with the opening 1.2 and brother .. looks good at all ... sent on October 08, 2015 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Yield color .. Purchase price today .. It forces to work as before and is an excellent gym. Cons: Sensor that is dirty .. No more. Opinion: Used several times over the years .. The I purchased 360 euro in almost perfect condition and with reinforcement mirror already effettuato.rnrnL intention was to have a second security body for the work less expensive but semrpe ff.rnrnLa yield leaves on foot modern aps .. It is becoming day after day my life partner with optical outputs held welded durant .. type the 50stm or yashica 28ml .rnSoddisfattissimo of what can still give years later with its iso 1000 and lenses bright like a great car iso:) rnrnLa answer if you find one not too used to any picture taking level (with a 35 low cost 500 Euros revenue in the format ff and started taking it seriously with airiness and detachment typical) sent on October 01, 2015 |
 | LG G3 Pros: Camera, display, battery charger, battery removable, UI, interface, photo editor of the series. Cons: ..we Would like a battery 6000 for how many things you can do. Opinion: After months of doubt Hamlet, I abandoned my trusty Nexus 4 (superfast would say with its operating system aggiornatissimo) for battery too small and not on the sostituibiule fly.rnrnHo took the monster (display-af flash, perfect camera) from 3gbyte of 32 ram and memory, and I quickly lost three hours to update all of Android 5.rnrnA equal speed with the nexus, using google now, basically the same logic I use more various additions from lg of that beloved in Nexus .rnHo removable battery, a battery charger that recharges in less than one hour, a camera SHOUT day with future possibilities to shoot in Raw, an af fast and finally, even if only on jpeg, after shots I can edit with a like Snapseed integrated lg that works very bene.rnPer the rest 2000 accessories, IR remote control with release by tapping should, excellent reception, very high build quality, display absurd for quality and colors (I guess even consumption) and ... rnrn..Si. .. yes, addictive and you risk to stay all day to "azzeggiare" .rnrnpreferito competition trusting in LG after the two had success with google Nexus 4 and 5..Ho been right, for me there was overtaking on Samsung and Sony.rnStraconsigliata the cover Ringke Fusion already tested for four months on the nexus. .. excellent and very durable. sent on February 16, 2015 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: sharpness, field of view, micro-contrast, brightness, PRICE, use with hyperfocal Cons: Require correction of lens profile to be used in my opinion ... nothing ... requires jpeg.rnFiltri those 165, you have to work in stop down, no exif. Opinion: Things to buy with their eyes closed, in my tests left foot 14 2.8 L, the various 17-40, 16-35 ... spectacular sharpness, difficult to use, requires practice, eye and experience, the field of view is huge and just tilt a wire and the prospect becomes estrema.rnGrazie Samyang, a focal length that I love and I have not had to spend € 2000 to be able to enjoy rides at f8 and hyperfocal really the detail becomes affilato.rnIl speech that does not have af, exif, distortion solved or circumvented all ... when you see the final results ..;) rnrnMUST HAVE sent on September 19, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto BeFree Pros: Solid and professional despite the size really minimal, typical finish Manfrotto, ability to change the head with other more serious all'occorrenza.Splendida the chance to close it and turn it into the MINI. Cons: Is not very high and requires you to carry around the key tool if you plan on doing a great use of stesso.Meglio avoid opening it all in case of windy weather! The head is very simple but always solid. Opinion: At the price we paid (115 all'offertona thanks peck) a BUY, I finally made a solid even with 6d + 70-300 (tested with exposures of 30 seconds at the click of ritrado 10 sec and everything is perfect), I would not have always me stand if I had to take the brother maggiore..rnUsato often with 6d + 24-105 and filter nd1000, shots and 5 more minutes ... perfect. Highly recommended! sent on August 11, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm Finepix X20 Pros: Lightness, flash sync up to 1/4000, silence, wb quality, lens quality, film-quality filters, JPEG Mighty, detail end of the day if you open RAW with c1 or Photoninja, AF Cons: Battery .. makes you leave the camera and its optical expensive .. at home! Opinion: An excellent machine that I would recommend to everyone, from the beginner who wants to learn the pro who wants always with you .. rnrnPuoi shoot in jpeg and live happy with the sound that comes out slowly from 800 ISO and colors irreplicabili pp in the ... wb works quite excellent (no canon, not even the number 1 that I used had such accuracy) .. rnrnPuoi shoot in RAW and convert if you have a good day detail than many aps .. rnrnSilenziosa, light, with a very slow good, accurate and fast f ... what to say more, except I can not see battery defects but only qualities and really, who wants to learn how to take the courses has beginner, intermediate and advanced all on a tiny body! rnrnPer everyone who criticize the starting of the engine required to access photos ..... with the machine off, press and hold the play button and you'll get the picture without turning the lens! sent on July 13, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Pros: Optical performance, "focal point ', lightness, AF Cons: Hood Opinion: Having used after months of research, but in exemplary conditions to try to staunch the hunger of 135 f2 .. rnrnRisultato ... superb lens, Af lightning, performance TA dream (and I know that both brothers down in high) and focus almost sewn on my needs, a step back to 85, 1 and a half before the 135 ... rnrnLa thing that makes this point, however excellent in my opinion is its light weight and portability, making it almost invisible in the crowd if you shoot with care being able to leave the house .. along with the 100 and the short, 35 ... lightweight and ready for anything with really high quality! rnrnIl hood ... well, the Canon at that time probably took drugs, but I've also seen worse ... sent on June 18, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Weight, size, versatility, airiness of FF, price, vignetting (who likes) Cons: F noise, vignetting (who does not like) Opinion: Taking less than 200 euro used but almost new with hood .. rnrnPer who has a ff and still doubts is a MUST HAVE .. REAL rnAriosità impossible to have on aps, creative possibilities, easy to carry around, compact, lightweight, perfect as a single lens to be disposed of in very light outputs .. rnrnAf VERY accurate and sharpness exactly how much I love her ... in the middle, the sides a little less in TA, with that slight vignetting that highlights the subject centrale.rnRumorosa but .. . peggio.rnrnPresa thought and never sell it even buying the Sigma 35 1.4 or Canon being the small REALLY small in viaggio.rnrnAggiungo for those who like to use zoom expensive and heavy ... OLD rnPreferisco this series of drives to the new 24-70 of any brand .. ;) sent on May 13, 2013 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Body solidity, quality files, made iso, noise, size, point af central autoiso. Cons: Lateral points fire, af tracking, sd, no joy Opinion: A small dedicated to events, portraits, paesaggi.rnrnResa iso star is coming from the latest aps (for yield and detail) is coming from the previous series ff (d700, 5d mkII) where at least 1.5 stops of guadagno.rnCorpo hard, made good shot and really soft and silent; excellent file to be processed (head and shoulders above the mkII). rnrnImpressionante the central point af ... now I really do not swear more when I have more light Focusing, first I envied the auxiliary light competition now. no longer needed ..! rnrnAutoiso finally programmed as competition and smart enough, comfortable developing raw onboard wifi and gps I was missing after the sony a55.rnrnIl body to have if you love the three kinds mentioned without fainting. sent on February 21, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Focal range, stabilizer, clarity, strength, lightness. Cons: F4 .....? Opinion: Caught in a kit with the 6d ... that direrninnanzi all I've tried to see this famous weakness on the flare and probably being one of the last series, resists better than my old tammy 17-50 ... rnrnAf ipersilenzioso, very fast, almost at the level stabilizer of the 70-300 tamron, excellent focal range (allows you to run with a small 50 emergency all day in the report) and excellent sharpness already at room temperature .. rnrnDa take absolutely kit if you can, I can not understand why his brother more new 24-70 f4 cost so much in piu.rnrnPS: For those who pass by aps to ff is a godsend and does not regret the slow 2.8 (17-50,17-55 etc.); focal stabilization and more, f4 to blur more than any sfochi to 2.8 lens on canon and, extremely, with the strength of the new canon iso stop less does not feel at all. sent on February 19, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: clarity, cost, resistance to flare, containing ac Cons: af noisy, plasticky Opinion: ThaT is, if you have a camera aps, is a must-buy Used x do night shots on a tripod with a focal length anywhere from 8 to 14 ... A BLADE, impressive. Excellent as always keep standard lens attached, useless in my opinion the stabilized version that loses a little in performance, but if you get used to this lens, the possible transition to acting will be a drama, you will have to shell out to have similar performance 6, 7 times the cost of tammino x have a top nikon, canon, sony .. Defect af ... inaccurate with low light situations, the lens hood mounting plastic. sent on September 24, 2012 |
 | Sony SLT A55 Pros: portability, stability, speed af, raw quality, general usability with Minolta lenses, speed maf in lv, Gun Street. Cons: slow flash, usability in sports photos, dimensions when used with canvases, p mode is not adjustable Opinion: It looks like a SLR but it is not ... exceptional for use with Minolta lenses, which seems to give a couple overstated in af motor, made at high iso exciting (sensor d7000 k5 though filtered through the film) used with a minolta 50 1.7, with the LV, is the impressive quality and accuracy of the maf keeping low among people, ARMA sniper x does not get noticed .. I took in places where it was strictly forbidden without frame holding his neck ... no words .. Defects enormous: Flash shutter lag embarrassing in bursts frame is a chimera doing a replay effect in the viewfinder af precise but not adjustable, Auto ISO limited to 100-1600 P mode put there for no reason, no possible adjustment. First experiment of sony in the field, seems to shoot with a compact, but the yield is another level ... his heir a57 never experienced in the field has improved all quality losing gps (very useful and excellent). sent on September 24, 2012 |
 | Sony NEX 5 Pros: Construction, made high ISO, slow adaptability, ease use, portability, MAF peaking, ideal grip Cons: lack external wheel mode, hot shoe owner, lack viewfinder. Opinion: X crazy almost bought, used on holiday with satisfaction, but become invaluable as a light body to take with itself and with vintage lenses attached and adjusted, and the increasing use a rikenon 50 f2, with a Yashica ml28 with a pentax to 80 200 (I enjoy the sea, her, and her paintings pentax flash f20s x fill) .... since they put on peaking for the maf gives me enormous satisfaction, much to think about to take off her .. 18 55 . I only needed a viewfinder and I seriously think that if sony came out a nex ff, with viewfinder also simple, and wheel mode, kill the market back the urge to take and, if used in the cockpit, no one in the street you note. sent on September 24, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
