|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pier Franco www.juzaphoto.com/p/PierFranco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: build once, lightweight, good opening, incorporated hood, excellent optics with outstanding blurred. Cons: I do not know! Opinion: Using this perspective of d700 and fuji s5 pro. On the latter it becomes a 270mm 2.8 it is not male.Comunque born to portraits and it is them that since the optical meglio.rnUn which I think should not be missing in an even serio.Utilizzo 85mm kit 1.8 afd find good also this perspective, that combined with 180 covers all the needs of the average teleobiettivi.Trovata used in good condition paid € 300, well spesi.Chi money is looking for an optical tele, can not do a pernsiero on this, even in the face prezzo.Ottica of value that it will always remain in my kit. sent on October 23, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 35mm f/2 D Pros: light, crisp, good quality / price ratio, minimum focusing excellent Cons: for me nothing Opinion: focus that is also covered by my Nikon 20-35 f2.8, but I wanted to try, found used with metal hood at 190 €, held as nuovo.rnMi am fine light, very incisive an all fare.Su D700 is an optical truly versatile lends the portrait set to paesaggio.rnLa series d is very well chosen, use the 35-70 and 80-200 f2.8 de I am benissimo.In effects this 35 is a perspective that I think is a must in a corredo.Consiglio purchase to all those looking for a 35, good quality and spending ridotta.Non looks good next to my Nikon fixed 15-24-50-105 and 180, makes his figure with a very cost contenuto.rnSe used on 5.6 to its maximum as incisiveness, 2 is slightly soft, but from 2.8 grows. sent on December 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: small, compact, money outstanding Cons: nothing Opinion: purchased used model not D, made fantastic paid just under € 150 worth much più.Normalmente in ff with D700 use 20-35 2.8 I feel good, but with envi fixed when you have the time to frame it calmly another cosa.rnConsiglio all nikonisti looking for a 24 to make us a thought, even the new version AFD worth all the money that costa.Poi if you're lucky enough to find a used affixed, meglio.E 'light goes everywhere. sent on September 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF Pros: excellent construction, sturdy, nice range of focal Cons: af than once, high maf Opinion: about a week for my purchase, in poco.Utilizzo effects of d700 for now I love it, I concluded the royal tern nikon the years 1990-2000, as also used 35-70 and 80-200 f.2,8.Tre optical fabulous for my taste, are not blades wide open, become influential closing, but have a vintage feel, for me insuperabile.Il 20-35 replaces my 12-24 f4, used on large optical d300, but the old affascina.rn if you can find it under 450-500 € try it worth pena.rn sent on April 09, 2015 |
 | Nikon 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro Pros: optical light, good and pure medium telephoto macro, good construction Cons: for the cost I have not found Opinion: I state that I have used in the 90 relative ais.Questo model af I bought used a few weeks fa.rnSono satisfied good as a whole used in aps-c 150mm micro.Discreta good sharpness at wide apertures, good for ritratti.Incisivo above f.11.Nel Overall a good buy, I'm about to buy a body ff we will see how va.Se found below 300 € is an optical to buy, above better to wait and contact VR.rnN.B. March 19, 2015, bought D700 body and tried, excellent as of aps-c, optical for my taste perfect for portrait (105mm) as I said in dx 150mm better for the macro. sent on March 02, 2015 |
 | Sigma AF 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC IF Pros: lightweight, good value for money, good hiking Cons: a little tough zoom ring Opinion: Use this as a zoom lens on a handyman fuji s2pro.La machine is always with me when I do not want to take me all the equipment (3 bodies D300 objectives dal12 to 200mm f2.8 and 400mm.) RnAcquistato used, kept very well despite problems of plastic cover that have the sigma.Questo exemplary suffers poco.rnConsigliabile as an alternative to zoom with opening 3.5 / 4.5 original, this is a 2.8 on the entire excursion of the focali.rnCerto's better but other costs. sent on January 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: cost, good materials, versatile Cons: a bit of noise, but tolerable, I do not find another Opinion: Use three bodies d300 with optical brightness f2.8 starting from 14-200 all Nikon.Avendo modulated bodies on the specific objectives, work to find meraviglia.Mi really well, they are about two years that use d300, come from D90 and a few years ago by F4.rnHo started with Nikkormat, then ..... RNLA machine is excellent, some sensor no longer young, but you have prices that is located on second, held up well, even from huge soddisfazioni.rnSe you change the jump is FF . sent on December 24, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm S2 Pro Pros: Beautiful, sturdy, economical Cons: Antiquated, does not have what it takes you tutto.ma Opinion: A workhorse, I have three cameras, d300 and 800mA with a 50/40 a few times and 1.8 micro shutter having fun. Every now and then I use a 400 / 5.6 x stalking with birdlife. Fine. Used very little paid. Great soddisfazioni.è definitely surpassed by machines today, but not in raw has good results, wedding photographers such as exceptional. To use every day sent on October 11, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4 G ED Pros: excellent sharpness, little distortion, light, fast autofocus Cons: currently not found Opinion: bought used recently, before I used Tamron 10-24 mm lens discreet, this is another cosa.Utilizzo on a D90, sometimes on a D300.Mi am wonderfully well, it gives me a lens that all fare.l'obiettivo I carry when I go out without equipment, gets a bit of tutto.Veramente ottimo.Consiglio purchase good quality / price ratio, used of course, the figure on the back is, in my opinion, a bit high. sent on August 12, 2014 |
 | Sigma 1.4x EX DG Pros: quality / price great, keeps all the automatic Cons: not yet found Opinion: use with 70/200 2.8 sigma in aps-c fabulous, also tried on Tamron 200-400 f 5.6 saves you seen the Focal which arriva.Sono satisfied lightweight, inexpensive and tantissimo.Ottimo I might compromise a long focal length with limited spending, certainly does not have the quality of 400 mm nikon, but with saving money I'm on vacation and fotografo.Consiglio purchase sent on August 12, 2014 |
 | Tamron 200-400mm f/5.6 AF LD IF Pros: exceptional value for money, very aesthetically pleasing, functional and sturdy tripod mount Cons: a bit slow af, Purple fringing present. Opinion: found used, complete packaging etc, taking benissimo.Fa his duty, I use it on nikon d300.Certo can not compare with other lenses in my kit, all nikon 12-200 f.2, 8.Ma for spending and the desire of some shots with long focal length is wonderfully perfetto.Fà his duty to use very amateurish and sporadic, not the 200-400 from sports photos on the go or optical professionale.In conclusion if you want some shots with super-telephoto (in aps-c you get to 600mm) is the right shopping. sent on August 07, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: exceptional clarity, one major focus, light, versatile, quality / price fabulous Cons: not yet torovato Opinion: a lens that must not be missed in the bag, looks good in front of any corredo.Ho tried version f1, 4 is D G I do not see the differences, if not in the whole prezzo.A opening game has a focus on closing a fabulous pair baffles, the sharpness and the separation between the foreground and the rest is vede.A diaphragm is a average sharpness sconcertante.rnSu fx is the timeless "fifty" suitable for almost anything; on the right is a 75mm by urlo.rnper what it costs you hold in life sent on June 07, 2014 |
 | Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF (1987 version) Pros: quality / price ratio, excellent blurred; tough; excellent mechanical; excellent lens; weight Cons: Autofocus is not comparable to the younger generation; not stabilized; Opinion: I once used the model ED monoghiera analog, F3 and F4; now I have discovered the optics of D300 and D90, finding AND D model, which is better than the first model citato.rnLe differences with the True union are not worth the difference price on second quest'ultimo.rnConcludo of counseling, for those on a budget figures affordable and have a 80-200.f.2,8, buying this ottica.rnI new 70-200 VR are other things, but this will give you great monoghiera soddisfazioni.Per use on stand on a robust machine as the D300 is not as big problems, otherwise it makes up for with a bracket, available on the market but it is not very difficult to use the DIY! My model, which is one of the last built, is fine with a 1.4 teleconverter Sigma, keeping all the automatic, have a 420mm on DX f.4 not male.Ho purchased a d700, proven optical, also excellent in FF. sent on May 18, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: lightweight lens, focal length good, handy, great value / price especially if you buy used Cons: a little dark. Opinion: good hike, a full canvas, comes to 420mm on the right, have fun, needs a good luce.Buon auofucus, silenzioso.Stabilizzatore great, at least in the model I tried, you see the difference between him and added that no.Ottica I changed just because the past nikonj 70-200 f.2, 8, otherwise I have always had a great time, you see the difference, but not worth all the difference in euro. sent on March 16, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 40mm f/2.8 G Micro Pros: right balance for money, especially on used, good sharpness is versatile and macro optics do everything, 55mm on APSC. Cons: fragilino if you use professionally, but there are other optics if you want to do real macro. Opinion: the whole good optics, entered fully into my kit for some close-up shots and for those occasions where you want to move leggerissimo.Va a little better by closing the diaphragm, the rest is micro.Non looks good with the other lenses in my kit much more challenging (24-200 all f.2, 8) if you want some serious macro I turn to 105, which costs four times tanto.Consiglio optics to all those who want to get closer to the macro picture and those who are thinking of an optical Fixed all do, alternatively 1.8 to 35, gains in versatility. sent on January 31, 2014 |
 | Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Pros: objective robust, good sharpness, used by quality / great price, great ring to stand, hsm favoloso.vale all about the money Cons: coating loses color with use, the lens hood leggerino, Opinion: I feel good, with adequate time does not feel the lack of VR, Nikon compared to 2.8, I've got to try, I think the price on quality games in favor of sigma.Mi gave and I hope to continue, the excellent soddisfazioni.Solo 2.8 does not convince me, but otherwise everything ok.Mi would recommend the lens, which I use on the D300 body, certainly the purists might turn up their noses, but with a little care has not nothing to envy to the most renowned optics. sent on January 28, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Pros: excellent quality / price ratio, good construction, good saturation Cons: better to use 13mm. up, after distortion. Opinion: I bought the lens used, but in codizioni like new, I feel good for the wide range of focal lengths, use of D90.rnper the use that I find it an interesting optical abbordabile.Se price you want quality at any cost rather go elsewhere, perhaps on optical fisse.Concludendo, offers a lot for what it costs and can give good satisfaction sent on January 28, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 Pros: optics that despite the years is still very valid, I personally use with the D300 and D90, have a yield on colors for my taste ottimale.Costruzione massive Nikon volta.Ottimo in a fuzzy Cons: autofocus slow compared to the new generations, as zoom pump all the problems connesse.Una good review does not cost much and does it well. Opinion: using it in DX I have a 52-105 lens, which combined with the 10-24 on another body, allows me to spazziare the focal for me the most utilizzo.rnHo used this lens in the 90 F3 and F4, then venduto.Ritrovato has lately really ottimo.rnSe found in used to figure affordable (150/200 € for review if 300/350 €), if revised, better if the D version, it is definitely a purchase you will not regret. sent on January 28, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
