JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

The Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2006 to 2009 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 900 €;

23 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	17 elements in 14 groups
Min. focus distance	1.8 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.13x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal AF	Yes
Full Time MF	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	1270 g
Dimensions	86 x 184 mm
Buy
Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 220000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

user215205

sent on January 20, 2021

Pros: Construction, optical quality, fixed opening, diaphragm ring in the Nikon version.

Cons: Delicate coating.

Opinion: I'm not one to do fleas every single pixel of the images, apart from the "peeling" of the coating, I have no complaints about this optics, precise and fast focus, at least for my needs, optically very good, the flare, although present in certain situations, is quite contained, not higher than that of other similar optics, but with the most famous brand, even if the wording APO is a little exaggerated, the chromatic aberrations are quite contained. I used it, and I still use it, in the most disparate situations, and it never betrayed me. The iris ring, in my version for Nikon, makes it usable on all cameras in this house, including analog. Compared to the Nikon 80-200 F/2.8 pump, which I used for a long time, optically does not disfigure at all, on the contrary, and the maf is much faster and quieter.

Matteo N.

sent on April 12, 2017

Pros: Construction, sharpness, starry at night, value for money, absent chromatic aberrations.

Cons: Use multiplied to the limit, loss of typical coating of sigma, af valid, but not very fast.

Opinion: is an excellent 70-200 cheap, my copy I took it semi destroyed to 240 euros, but still optically very efficient. The sharpness is good although of course at 2.8 does not break the hair (as it is honest), but closing is really defending very well and the diaphragm with 9 blades you see everything in the night and in the blurred, now is the best starry I've ever found in a lens. The construction is great, by tank, if the copy I had found I still went is a virtually immortal lens. It Has several limits in the multiplied use, considering its 2x up to 300mm is more or less acceptable closing, besides it becomes aberrant even closing a lot, to do something remotely acceptable you have to close to F11-F13. The AF is already ultrasonic, but it is not in step with the times, for more with time the clutches of the full time MF are kneading and can be dragged behind the outer ring together with the elements of the lens. It Can be a very valid alternative to a 70-300 paying no more than 300-350 euros for a specimen kept well, besides so much worth taking the OS version

Bm75

sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: 2.8 aperture, zoom and internal mf, very solid construction, fluid ferrules, good excursion of mf ring, sharpness, color tone, it is FF, speed and accuracy AF good.

Cons: unserviceable at minimum focus distance and 2.8 ingombroe weight (which is also considered 2.8 remains a beast), unusable with direct sun in the frame, even diaphragmed.

Opinion: Used only on the right coupled with Nikon d300. It 'a good deal because it has a good cost-performance ratio. My copy has the defects that I describe above, I do not know if it's common problems. Unlike what I read in other reviews mine has no problem back focus. Its advantage is the price: it costs as a Nikon 80-200 first original series but is more modern and HSM.

Iziomio75

sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: HSM Autofocus, aesthetics

Cons: Everything, zero contrast weight of stabilizer tropicalizzatornAssenza

Opinion: I had this zoom for two months, sold out of desperation, suffering from back focus weighs very heavy, although these lenses is normal, the sore point of this now optical dated and exceeded the quality of the mediocre, slow, often having the lenses untreated sufferers magenta casts, under the 125 second if you do not use a monopod is often risks camera shake, under daylight conditions works decently, although much advice Nikon rende.rnOttica coast sconsigliornrnVoto 5

Stefanod91

sent on April 04, 2015

Pros: f2.8 throughout the zoom range, price, speed AF.

Cons: Heavy (but with this type of optics is obvious), the coating loses color, heavy problems of back-focus, rings that rotate with respect to the contrary nikon but there becomes a habit.

Opinion: I had this light for a period of about 4 months and then I resold for a simple reason ... unsolvable problem of back-focus. At the time I had a Nikon D5100 so I could adjust the autofocus as I would now with the D7000. But despite the assistance has resulted in the problem I was not solved. Unfortunately, we must admit that as optical start to feel the years, in fact ensue type 3/4 new versions even if there is to admit that in fact aging technology is much slower than for example the SLR. Minimum distance of focusing too high (1.8 meter are very many and not realize it since the first shots). Undoubtedly low price now that with 300 euro you take home. Obviously to buy only if you are in "monetary shortage" and you have a DSLR where you can correct the problem of back-focus because from what I understand almost 70% of the models suffers. Needless to say, the absence of the stabilizer is felt but for the amount that it is insane to demand it. Vote7 for the ultrasonic motor and the price calculated for the fact that it is a fixed f2.8 (the Nikon motorized version is twice what af-s and if you're lucky three times). If I had another chance to buy it do not know if it wouldnt, right now I aim to nikon 80-200 or if its just the Tamron.

There are 2 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

Child of the village

by Massimo Bruno
61 comments, 3828 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Flamingo

by Federico_28
130 comments, 5256 views

HI RES 9.2 MP

A jump into the past

by Fabrelio
34 comments, 2035 views

HI RES 15.2 MP

Untitled Photo

by Stefano67
12 comments, 1832 views

Retone

by Galskap
22 comments, 887 views

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
23 comments, 3184 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Peasant grandmother

by Massimo Bruno
39 comments, 2879 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

One night in Flam

by Miketm
19 comments, 1543 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Slide the end of 80 years

by Federico_28
58 comments, 3438 views

HI RES 18.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
8 comments, 1429 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo 1986
60 comments, 1814 views

HI RES 16.1 MP

Deer Mesola

by Finco
9 comments, 2148 views

People of Gubbio

by Mmmarci69
13 comments, 1990 views

Maristella

by Mmmarci69
28 comments, 2388 views

Deer Mesola

by Finco
6 comments, 1714 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

The Corsa dei Ceri

by Mmmarci69
19 comments, 1045 views

Blue

by Vincenzo 1986
37 comments, 1983 views

HI RES 14.9 MP

Heron

by Federico_28
41 comments, 1925 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Desia

by Massimo Bruno
9 comments, 1540 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Race of the past

by Fabrelio
17 comments, 910 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

Girls today ...

by Mmmarci69
17 comments, 1424 views

Sunset on Brahmaputra

by Massimo Bruno
26 comments, 1320 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

The deer Mesola

by Finco
6 comments, 1690 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
2 comments, 1032 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

A "rellistic" Autumn

by LoriCava
34 comments, 1288 views

HI RES 20.7 MP

Docking

by Federico_28
18 comments, 1204 views

HI RES 7.9 MP

First variant in Monza

by Luca87
10 comments, 1292 views

Child of the village

by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 1729 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 1087 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Isabell 1

by Stefano67
8 comments, 932 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

Combat 2

by Massimo Bruno
5 comments, 1289 views

HI RES 11.9 MP

Ophelia

by Stefano67
3 comments, 1346 views

Pelican

by Federico_28
25 comments, 1286 views

HI RES 8.9 MP

Grey Heron

by Federico_28
47 comments, 2300 views

HI RES 4.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Outlet of Light

by Federico_28
9 comments, 932 views

HI RES 12.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo 1986
22 comments, 1576 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

Bonda

by Massimo Bruno
12 comments, 1107 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM