JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF (1987 version) is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1987 to 1992 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 400 €;
21 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 222000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Good contrast, useful focal range, constant aperture f2.8, good sharpness. Bulilt like a tank.
Cons: Slow and noisy AF, bokeh could be little bit better. Quite heavy.
Opinion: In general, very good lens indeed. Especially, right now it can be bought for a solid money. Good contrast, useful focal range, constant aperture f2.8 is very welcome, good sharpness. Built like a tank. I bought this lens more than 20 years old, but in excellent condition. Slow and noisy AF, bokeh could be little bit better. Lens is also quite heavy.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:autofocus a bit slow compared to current performance
Opinion:That it was a good lens, for me it was a fact already when I used it over 20 years ago on manual machines. The slowness of the focus - according to the current criteria - was not a problem, I was hand-sealing with an F3 and without stabilization and AF the rate of perfect images was very high. I decided to write this review because just these days I digitized some of the 1997 dias, on which I had to intervene to eliminate the damage caused by time. This forced me to work on the image at very high magnifications 300/400% and I was able to re-discover its extraordinary yield. Although on an Ektachrome 100 film, which did not shine for the fineness of the grain, the richness of the smallest details is extraordinary, widely satisfying and even superior to the 45 mpix sensor of the D850 with which I reproduced the image (for duplication I employed a specialist Zuiko 80mm f4 macro 1:1). If you then intervene with modern noise reduction software, the detail obtainable becomes extraordinary even for a film. Therefore: my voice is added to the chorus of those who sing the praises of this lens. Given the price of used goods, it is a widely recommended choice, but I recommend not to buy it in a closed box, because I recently ran tests on a model that was not in place. On the other hand, it has been around for at least 30 years and although the manufacture is very robust, some ailves can be there. In my gallery I will publish the duplicate PWC97 image from slide. The 9.5 vote was fully deserved then as it is today.
Cons:Weight, uncertain autofocus and lack of tripod attack
Opinion:I read the various opinions and found that more than photographers you are a computer. Eye point out the difference between the 3 models of the 80-200 that also have the same pattern of lenses Companies that make comparisons with sophisticated equipment can not be so precise. I think you all agree that in all 3 versions anyway is a great goal, too bad that in the first one misses the attack for the treppiede.co I still prefer it to pump without moving the hand I can zoom and focus. I'm the usual polemic. Good light to all :)
Opinion:I Have been holding this lens for more than a year now and I have to say that every time I am surprised by optical quality and sharpness. Squeezed properly in some situations it has proved even so slow, as it seems sometimes, perhaps because of the noise it makes when it goes back and forth looking for the focus. In any case also saw the price to which you find recommend!
Opinion:I had found it online for 390 euros two years ago. It is an ancient lens, even if slow, but professional and reliable. Although it was born in other times it is built with superb glass. The weight is the main peculiarity that determines a pleasant and reassuring feeling of metal between the hands, which can also be used to avoid blur. Evaluation, framing, relaxation, exhalation and away! Also grafted onto a D 50 and with only 6 megapixels, and especially in the portrait, can prove to be able to make real masterpieces. With the D3, then, once again provoking the provocative young of the past.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
